Pelvic reconstruction following resection of tumour involving the whole ilium and acetabulum

3D-Printed Prosthesis with an Articular Interface for Anatomical Acetabular Reconstruction After Type I + II (+ III) Internal Hemipelvectomy: Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pelvic reconstruction after type I + II (or type I + II + III) internal hemipelvectomy with extensive ilium removal is a great challenge. In an attempt to anatomically reconstruct the hip rotation center (HRC) and achieve a low mechanical failure rate, a custom-made, 3D-printed prosthesis with a porous articular interface was developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this prosthesis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 28 patients with type I + II (+ III) internal hemipelvectomy through the articular interface of the sacroiliac joint and managed with a prosthesis at a single center between August 2016 and August 2021. Complications and oncological outcomes were analyzed. The position of the reconstructed HRC was assessed and lower-limb function was evaluated. Biomechanical analyses of different fixation modes of the prosthesis were conducted using finite element analysis.

RESULTS

The displacement distance of the HRC from preoperatively to postoperatively was a mean (and standard deviation) of 14.12 ± 8.75 mm. The rate of implant-related complications was 14.3% (4 of 28) for prosthetic breakage, 14.3% (4 of 28) for aseptic loosening, 7.1% (2 of 28) for dislocation, and 7.1% (2 of 28) for deep infection. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)-93 score was 18.2. The aseptic loosening rate was significantly greater for prostheses fixed with 3 sacral screws (4 of 10, 40.0%) than for those fixed with 4 (0 of 10, 0%) or 5 screws (0 of 8, 0%) (p = 0.024). The prosthetic breakage rate was lower in patients who underwent lumbosacral fixation (0 of 13, 0%) than in those who did not (4 of 15, 26.7%), although the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.102). Biomechanical analyses suggested that the addition of lumbosacral fixation or increasing the number of sacral screws from 3 to 4 or 5 visibly reduced the peak stress of the sacral screws.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a 3D-printed prosthesis with an articular interface for pelvic reconstruction demonstrated stable prosthetic fixation, anatomical acetabular reconstruction, and acceptable early functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does adding sacroiliac (type IV) resection to periacetabular (type II) resection increase complications or provide worse clinical outcomes? An institutional experience and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Internal hemipelvectomy is a limb sparing procedure most commonly indicated for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors of the pelvis. Partial resection and pelvic reconstruction may be challenging for orthopedic oncologists due to late presentation, high tumor burden, and complex anatomy. Specifically, wide resection of tumors involving the periacetabular and sacroiliac (SI) regions may compromise adjacent vital neurovascular structures, impair wound healing, or limit functional recovery. We aimed to present a series of patients treated at our institution who underwent periacetabular internal hemipelvectomy (Type II) with or without sacral extension (Type IV) in combination with a systematic review to investigate postoperative complications, functional outcomes, and implant and patient survival following pelvic tumor resection via Type II hemipelvectomy with or without Type IV resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A surgical registry of consecutive patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy for primary or secondary pelvic bone tumors at our institution since 1994 was retrospectively reviewed. All type II resection patients were stratified into two separate cohorts, based on whether or not periacetabular resection was extended beyond the SI joint to include the sacrum (Type IV), as per the Enneking and Dunham classification. Patient demographics, operative parameters, complications, and oncological outcomes were collected. Categorical and continuous variables were compared with Pearson's chi square or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Literature review according to PRISMA guidelines queried studies pertaining to patient outcomes following periacetabular internal hemipelvectomy. The search strategy included combinations of the key words "internal hemipelvectomy", "pelvic reconstruction", "pelvic tumor", and "limb salvage". Pooled data was compared using Pearson's chi square. Statistical significance was established as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were treated at our institution with internal hemipelvectomy for pelvic tumor resection, of whom 21 had periacetabular resection. Fifteen patients underwent Type II resection without Type IV involvement, whereas six patients had combined Type II/IV resection. There were no significant differences between groups in operative time, blood loss, complications, local recurrence, postoperative metastasis, or disease mortality. Systematic review yielded 69 studies comprising 929 patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy with acetabular resection. Of these, 906 (97.5 %) had only Type II resection while 23 (2.5 %) had concomitant Type II/IV resection. While overall complication rates were comparable, Type II resection alone produced significantly fewer neurological complications when compared to Type II resection with sacral extension (3.9 % vs. 17.4 %, p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between rates of wound complications, infections, or construct failures. Local recurrence, postoperative metastasis, and survival outcomes were similar. Type II internal hemipelvectomy without Type IV resection on average produced higher postoperative MSTS functional scores than with Type IV resection.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the two groups exhibited no differences. From the systematic review, operative parameters, local recurrence or systemic metastasis, implant survival, and disease mortality were comparable in patients undergoing Type II internal hemipelvectomy alone compared to patients undergoing some combination of Type II/IV resection. However, compound resections increased the risk of neurological complications and experienced poorer MSTS functional scores.

Novel positioning guiders accurately assist in situ acetabular reconstruction for patients undergoing pelvic bone tumor resection

PURPOSE

Acetabular reconstruction in situ after extensive pelvic resection is technically challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of positioning guiders for acetabular reconstruction following pelvic tumor resection and the clinical benefit brought by the approach.

METHODS

The study included patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis. In the guider-assisted group (n = 14), guiders were designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 18), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the guiders. The displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery was calculated. The complications and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society-93 scores were documented.

RESULTS

The overall displacement of the hip rotation center was significantly reduced in the guider-assisted group compared with the traditional operation group (13.83 ± 4.06 vs. 22.95 ± 9.18 mm in P = 0.000, 95%CI 3.90-12.96), especially in the anteroposterior axis (3.77 ± 3.03 versus 13.51 ± 9.43 mm in P = 0.000, 95%CI 3.45-13.09). Guider-assisted acetabular reconstruction reduced the risk of prosthesis dislocation compared with the traditional operation (dislocation risks: 1/14, 7.1% vs. 4/18, 22.2%).

CONCLUSION

Positioning guiders can effectively and conveniently help place the modular hemipelvic prosthesis at the native position, which might potentially reduce the risk of prosthesis dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Combination of frozen autograft produced with liquid nitrogen and total hip replacement as a bone recycle reconstruction in pelvic osteosarcoma resection type 2: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic osteosarcoma remains a challenge for orthopedic surgeons to manage. However, recent advances giving various options to get a more effective reconstruction method. We present bone recycle reconstruction using a combination of frozen autograft and total hip replacement (THR) following extraarticular resection type II of pelvic osteosarcoma.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 31-year-old female presented with pain in sitting and standing positions with no lump noted in the right hip joint for 11 months. Physical examination showed a palpable mass with indistinct margin in the inner groin area, with a limited range of motion. Histopathological examination confirmed small-cell osteosarcomaa. Extraarticular pelvic resection type 2 was performed followed by cryo-procedure using liquid nitrogen to produce frozen autograft. The graft was implanted and fixated with 3 reconstruction plates and screws, followed by THR. Postoperative plain radiographs showed the graft and implants were well-placed and fixated. There was no postoperative complication, local recurrence, or metastasis observed. The patient started to sit in the wheelchair without pain and walk using crutches.

DISCUSSION

Following resection of the hemi pelvic, various alternative reconstruction procedures such as pseudoarthrosis, arthrodesis, mega prostheses, massive allograft, and cryosurgery were attempted, but still dissatisfying which results in numerous complications. Expensive cost reconstruction makes it difficult to be performed in developing country like Indonesia.

CONCLUSION

A combination of frozen autograft and THR following pelvic resection achieve a cost-effective and desirable outcome which gives a good result in short-term follow-up. It could be a promising option for managing oncology cases.

Risk factor investigation for hip dislocation after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction via thin-slice CT-based 3D model

AIMS

Dislocation of the hip remains a major complication after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The position of the acetabular component is an important modifiable factor for surgeons in determining the risk of postoperative dislocation. We investigated the significance of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal displacement of the hip centre of rotation (COR) on postoperative dislocation using a CT-based 3D model, as well as other potential risk factors for dislocation.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients who underwent reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumour between January 2011 and January 2020 were studied. The risk factors for dislocation were investigated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables.

RESULTS

The dislocation rate was 13.9% (n = 17). The hip COR was found to be significantly shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in most patients in the dislocation group compared with the non-dislocation group. Three independent risk factors were found to be related to dislocation: resection of gluteus medius (odds ratio (OR) 3.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 19.70); p = 0.039), vertical shift of COR > 18 mm (OR 24.8 (95% CI 6.23 to 128.00); p = 0.001), and sagittal shift of COR > 20 mm (OR 6.22 (95% CI 1.33 to 32.2); p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Among the 17 patients who dislocated, 70.3% (n = 12) were anterior dislocations. Three independent risk factors were identified, suggesting the importance of proper restoration of the COR and the role of the gluteus medius in maintaining hip joint stability.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1180-1188.

Reconstruction of Type I-II Internal Hemipelvectomy in a Patient With Pelvic Myxoid Chondrosarcoma: A Case Report

Pelvic chondrosarcomas are a major clinical challenge since the only therapeutic approach available is surgical resection. Reconstruction after partial resection of the pelvis including the acetabulum or the hip joint is a laborious and rigorous surgical procedure. Numerous complications are associated with different reparative methods. Moreover, due to the anatomical complexities of the area, adequate surgical margins are difficult to achieve in many cases, which are closely related to the advent of local recurrence of the tumor. Several techniques for hip function restoration and skeletal reconstruction have been reported. The purpose of this report is to describe a novel pelvic reconstruction technique for PI-II resection that required a custom-designed implant. We present the case of a 61-year-old female patient with chronic pain in the gluteal region. The pelvis’s magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an osteolytic tumor in the right iliac wing that compromises the acetabular roof. The diagnosis was a grade 2 central chondrosarcoma. Surgery included the reconstruction of the acetabulum by inserting two Schanz pins coated with hydroxyapatite, one in the iliopubic corridor and the other in the ischium. A supporting “pyramid” was built, unitizing both Schanz with cement, onto which an acetabular cage was inserted. The procedure was completed with a conventional total hip prosthesis. The patient presented an acute prosthesis infection, which positively responded to prompt surgical lavage and antibiotic treatment. After 10 months of follow-up, the patient remains free of infection, with weight-bearing as tolerated, without pain, and with excellent hip motion. No tumor recurrence has occurred. Medialization of the construct has occurred as expected, with no evidence of implant loosening. The technique used in this patient is novel, could be considered cost-effective, and has allowed the reconstruction of a functional hip. For resections of the acetabular area and preservation of the ischium and pelvic zones, this technique may be an acceptable option.

A novel limb-salvage reconstruction strategy with a custom hemipelvic endoprosthesis and preserved femoral head following the resection of periacetabular tumors: A preliminary study

The treatment of periacetabular malignancy frequently challenges surgeons. To simplify the surgical procedure, we performed a novel reconstruction strategy preserving the femoral head for patients with periacetabular malignancies. We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients who underwent total en bloc resection of a periacetabular tumor and reconstruction of the hip joint with an individualized hemipelvic endoprosthesis and remaining femoral head from July 2015 to January 2019 at our center. Regions of pelvic resection: region II-4 (28.6%), region I + II-5 (35.7%), region II + III-2 (14.3%) and region I + II + III-3 (21.4%). The oncological outcomes were that 13 patients survived without disease and one patient survived with lung metastasis. None of the patients experienced local recurrence (range: 20-62 months; mean: 32 months). The incidence of postoperative complications was 35.7%, including delayed wound healing and deep venous thrombosis. No prosthesis-related complications occurred until the last follow-up in this study (range: 20-62 months; mean: 32 months). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional outcome score was 23.2. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score of the patients was 75.7 points, with a mean limb discrepancy of 1.51 cm (range: 0.5-3.2 cm). Reconstruction with preservation of the femoral head showed acceptable early functional and oncological outcomes, and it had an acceptable complication rate.

New adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis replacement with 3D-print osteotomy guide plate used in periacetabular malignant tumors: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular malignant tumor seriously endangers the life and health of patients. Hemipelvic replacement provides a good method for patients who want complete resection of the tumor while retaining or restoring the function of the affected limb.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance and clinical application of the new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis and to compare the effects of three kinds of hemipelvic prosthesis.

METHODS

In this study, 23 patients, with an average age of 44.6 years (21-75 years), were collected, who received hemipelvic replacement with new adjustable, modular, and screw-rod system hemipelvic prosthesis. Preoperative preparation was conducted on them, and operative complications were recorded. Postoperative functional follow-up was performed regularly.

RESULTS

The average operation time was 319 min (170-480 min), and the average blood loss was 2813 ml (1000 mL-8000 ml). The incidence of complications was 47.8%, and type A (wound-related complications) had the highest incidence (34.8%). Postoperative dislocation occurred in 3 cases (13.0%), and no dislocation occurred in the new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis group. The average MSTS score of the patients was 18.6 (10-23), and the average Harris score was 73.7 (53-87).

CONCLUSIONS

The new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis has the feasibility of reconstruction and good functional outcome, making it ideal for periacetabular tumors. Furthermore, preoperative tumor-feeding artery embolization and abdominal aortic balloon implantation may be an effective choice to reduce intraoperative blood loss and facilitate the operation of tumor resection.

3D-Printed Titanium Custom-Made Prostheses in Reconstruction after Pelvic Tumor Resection: Indications and Results in a Series of 14 Patients at 42 Months of Average Follow-Up

Wide resection is currently considered the mainstay treatment for primary bone tumors. When the tumor is located in anatomically complex segments, 3D-Printed Titanium Custom-Made Prostheses (3DPTCMP) are possible reconstructive solutions. The aim of the present paper is to analyze indications, results and complications of a series of 14 patients who underwent pelvis reconstruction with 3DPTCMP after tumor removal from January 2015 to December 2019. Chondrosarcoma was the main histology; indications were tumors located in the acetabular area without enough residual bone to support a cup with an iliac stem, and tumors located near the sacrum-iliac joint. The margins were wide in 12 cases, and marginal and intralesional in one case each. In three cases, resection also included the sacrum-iliac joint, so a spine stabilization was performed and linked to the pelvic prosthesis; The average MSTS score was 46.3%; the 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 85.7%. Wound dehiscences were the main complication, resolved with multiple debridements; nevertheless, prosthesis removal was necessary in one case. Currently, the 3DPTCMP is an effective resource for reconstruction after resection of tumors located in the pelvis. Further studies are necessary to value long-term results; more strategies are necessary to try to reduce the infection rate and improve osteointegration.

Acetabular reconstruction in oncological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of implant survivorship and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the hip for peri-acetabular oncological disease remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to summarize the evidence and identify techniques utilized for primary and metastatic tumors of the acetabulum and hemipelvis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases identified relevant articles. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was registered on PROSPERO.

RESULTS

53 papers were included, 16 were suitable for meta-analysis. 909 patients had primary and 1140 metastatic disease. 1094 patients underwent reconstruction with conventional total hip arthroplasty (with or without cup-cage or cement augmentation) or modifications of the Harrington procedure, collectively termed 'non-complex'. 928 patients underwent 'complex' reconstructions with either a modular hemipelvic, saddle, reverse snow-cone, custom-made or 3D-printed endoprosthesis. The most common complication was deep infection (11%) followed by dislocation (5%). Mean MSTS scores were 61.9% for 'non-complex' versus 63.2% for 'complex' reconstruction. Meta-analysis suggested increased mortality for primary (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.15-8.54) and trends toward reduced mortality for metastatic disease (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.26-3.29) following 'complex' versus 'non-complex' reconstruction. Reoperation rates were higher following 'complex' reconstruction for metastatic disease (OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.66-5.46) and similar for primary disease (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.45-2.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-acetabular tumors are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Decisions regarding implant selection are multi-factorial with recent increase in the use of custom-made and 3D-printing technologies. Multiple factors contribute to the oncological outcome and patient function. Further research is required in order to guide optimal practice.

Risk factors for early dislocation of the hip after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis

AIMS

There is an increased risk of dislocation of the hip after the resection of a periacetabular tumour and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the defect in the hemipelvis. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and timing of dislocation and to identify its risk factors.

METHODS

To determine the dislocation rate, we conducted a retrospective single-institution study of 441 patients with a periacetabular tumour who had undergone a standard modular hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction between 2003 and 2019. After excluding ineligible patients, 420 patients were enrolled. Patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables were studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The dislocation rate was 9.3% (n = 41). Dislocation was most likely to occur in the first three months after surgery. Four independent risk factors were found, one of which was older age at operation (p = 0.039). The odds ratios (ORs) of those aged ≥ 60 years and 30 to 60 years were 8.50 and 4.64, respectively, compared with those aged < 30 years. The other three risk factors were resection of gluteus maximus (p = 0.010, OR = 5.8), vertical shift of the centre of rotation (COR) of the hip by ≥ 20 mm (p = 0.008, OR = 3.60), and a type I+II+III pelvic resection (p = 0.014, OR = 3.04).

CONCLUSION

Hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a periacetabular tumour has a dislocation rate of 9.3% (n = 41). Patients are most likely to dislocate in the first three months after surgery. The risk is increased for older patients (especially those aged > 60 years) and for those with gluteus maximus resection, vertical shift of the COR ≥ 20 mm, and a type I+II+III pelvic resection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):382-390.