Analgesia of percutaneous thermal ablation plus cementoplasty for cancer bone metastases

Advancements in Surgical Management of Periacetabular Metastases: Emphasizing Minimally Invasive Techniques

This review aims to summarize the evolution of surgical techniques for periacetabular metastatic cancer, assess their strengths and limitations, and clarify the corresponding indications. We conducted a comprehensive literature review on periacetabular metastatic cancer, summarizing surgical techniques involving both open and minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we evaluated the indications for different minimally invasive techniques and proposed potential combinations of these techniques. Our review underscores the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, including reduced surgical trauma, improved patient mobility, lower complication rates, and expedited recovery times, facilitating earlier initiation of systemic cancer therapies. These techniques show substantial potential for broader application in the future. Despite the historical reliance on open surgery as the standard treatment, minimally invasive approaches are emerging as a promising alternative, particularly for managing osteolytic metastases around the acetabulum. This review provides insights into the optimal integration of these techniques, aiming to support evidence-based clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Progression of Femoral Osteolytic Metastases after Intramedullary Nailing and Subsequent Salvage Techniques

Intramedullary nailing insertion from the proximal-to-distal femur is frequently performed for impending and complete pathological femur fractures due to osteolytic metastases. After nailing through cancer-laden bone, residual chemotherapy- and/or radiation-resistant tumor may progress. Progression of osteolysis risks future nail failure or pathological fractures. This study assesses the incidence of cancer progression following intramedullary nailing in a femur-only cohort and describes a percutaneous rod-retaining salvage technique. A single-institution, retrospective study was conducted to identify adult patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for femoral osteolytic lesions for complete or impending nail failure from 2016 to 2023. Progression was defined as enlargement of the pre-existing lesion and/or appearance of new lesions on radiographs. Surgical outcomes were assessed with a combined pain and functional score. A total of 113 patients (median age 66.8 years (IQR = 16.4); median follow-up 6.0 months (IQR = 14.5)) underwent intramedullary nailing. Sixteen patients (14.2%) exhibited post-nailing cancer progression. Pre- and postoperative radiation and chemotherapy did not decrease the odds of cancer progression. Three patients underwent initial open surgical salvage consisting of proximal femur replacement arthroplasty, and six patients did not receive salvage due to poor surgical candidacy or patient choice. Seven patients (median follow-up 10.7 months (IQR = 12.9)) received percutaneous salvage. In this group, pain and functional scores improved by 4.0 points (p = 0.0078) at two-week postoperative follow-up and 2.0 points (p = 0.0312) at the most recent follow-up (mean follow-up 13.0 ± 9.4 months). All three nonambulatory patients became ambulatory, and six patients were able to ambulate independently without walking aids. No major complications were reported 30 days postoperatively. Progression of femoral osteolytic metastases may occur following intramedullary nailing. Continued monitoring of the entire femur is needed to maintain improved functional status and to prevent catastrophic progression of pre-existing lesions or appearance of new lesions. In patients with more proximal metastases only, the customary practice of bringing a long nail from the proximal femur to distal metaphysis should be reconsidered. Furthermore, there is concern of mechanical transport of cancer cells during guide wire insertion, reaming, and rod insertion through cancer laden bone to cancer free distal bone.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of percutaneous thermal ablation plus cementoplasty for painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) plus percutaneous cementoplasty (PCP) (PTA + PCP) for painful bone metastases.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase for articles published up to October 2022. Outcomes were a 10-point pain scale, morphine equivalents daily dose (MEDD) and complications. A subgroup confined to spinal bone metastases was analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were selected for the analysis. The 21 selected articles involved a total of 661 cases. The pooled pain scales at pre-PTA + PCP, 1 day, 1 week and 1-, 3-, and 6 months post-PTA + PCP were 7.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.26-7.95, I2 = 89%), 3.30 (95% CI, 2.25-4.82, I2 = 98%), 2.58 (95% CI, 1.99-3.35, I2 = 94%), 2.02 (95% CI, 1.50-2.71, I2 = 93%), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.26-2.53, I2 = 95%), and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.14-2.31, I2 = 88%), and in the subgroup, 7.97 (95% CI, 7.45-8.52, I2 = 86%), 3.01 (95% CI, 1.43-6.33, I2 = 98%), 2.95 (95% CI, 1.93-4.51, I2 = 95%), 2.34 (95% CI, 1.82-3.01, I2 = 68%), 2.18 (95% CI, 1.57-3.03, I2 = 78%), and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.16-3.48, I2 = 86%). Mean MEDD decreased up to 3 months post-PTA + PCP in 4 articles. The overall pooled major complication rate was 4% (95% CI, 2-6%, I2 = 2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The updated systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that PTA + PCP for painful bone metastases is safe, and can lead to rapid and sustained pain reduction.

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process

•

Evidence is emerging for new paradigms in the management of non-spine bone metastases.

•

Consensus was feasible amongst physicians in both academic and community-based practice settings.

•

Topics deemed of highest importance for consensus included referral for surgical stabilization and approach to peri-operative radiation, preferred radiation fractionation and appropriate use of stereotactic techniques, and clinical scenarios classified as potentially “complex” warranting multidisciplinary discussion.

Purpose

Methods and Materials

Results

Conclusions

What's new in the management of metastatic bone disease

Metastatic bone disease is a common complication of malignant tumours. As cancer treatment improves the overall survival of patients, the number of patients with bone metastases is expected to increase. The treatments for bone metastases include surgery, radiotherapy, and bone-modifying agents, with patients with a short expected prognosis requiring less invasive treatment. Patients with metastatic bone disease show greatly varying primary tumour histology, metastases sites and numbers, and comorbidities. Therefore, randomised clinical trials are indispensable to compare treatments for these patients. This editorial reviews recent findings on the diagnosis and prognosis prediction and discusses the current treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease.

Percutaneous management of bone metastases: State of the art

Interventional radiology is playing an increasingly important role in the local treatment of bone metastases; this treatment is usually done with palliative intent, although in selected patients it can be done with curative intent. Two main groups of techniques are available. The first group, centered on bone consolidation, includes osteoplasty/vertebroplasty, in which polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is injected to reinforce the bone and relieve pain, and percutaneous osteosynthesis, in which fractures with nondisplaced or minimally bone fragments are fixed in place with screws. The second group centers on tumor ablation. tumor ablation refers to the destruction of tumor tissue by the instillation of alcohol or by other means. Thermoablation is the preferred technique in musculoskeletal tumors because it allows for greater control of ablation. Thermoablation can be done with radiofrequency, in which the application of a high frequency (450 Hz-600 Hz) alternating wave to the tumor-bone interface achieves high temperatures, resulting in coagulative necrosis. Another thermoablation technique uses microwaves, applying electromagnetic waves in an approximate range of 900 MHz-2450 MHz through an antenna that is placed directly in the core of the tumor, stimulating the movement of molecules to generate heat and thus resulting in coagulative necrosis. Cryoablation destroys tumor tissue by applying extreme cold. A more recent, noninvasive technique, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS), focuses an ultrasound beam from a transducer placed on the patient's skin on the target lesion, where the waves' mechanical energy is converted into thermal energy (65 °C-85 °C). Treatment should be planned by a multidisciplinary team. Treatment can be done with curative or palliative intent. Once the patient is selected, a preprocedural workup should be done to determine the most appropriate technique based on a series of factors. During the procedure, protective measures must be taken and the patient must be closely monitored. After the procedure, patients must be followed up.

Percutaneous management of bone metastases: state of the art

Interventional radiology is playing an increasingly important role in the local treatment of bone metastases; this treatment is usually done with palliative intent, although in selected patients it can be done with curative intent. Two main groups of techniques are available. The first group, centered on bone consolidation, includes osteoplasty / vertebroplasty, in which polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is injected to reinforce the bone and relieve pain, and percutaneous osteosynthesis, in which fractures with nondisplaced or minimally bone fragments are fixed in place with screws. The second group centers on tumor ablation. Tumor ablation refers to the destruction of tumor tissue by the instillation of alcohol or by other means. Thermoablation is the preferred technique in musculoskeletal tumors because it allows for greater control of ablation. Thermoablation can be done with radiofrequency, in which the application of a high frequency (450 Hz-600Hz) alternating wave to the tumor-bone interface achieves high temperatures, resulting in coagulative necrosis. Another thermoablation technique uses microwaves, applying electromagnetic waves in an approximate range of 900MHz to 2450MHz through an antenna that is placed directly in the core of the tumor, stimulating the movement of molecules to generate heat and thus resulting in coagulative necrosis. Cryoablation destroys tumor tissue by applying extreme cold. A more recent, noninvasive technique, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS), focuses an ultrasound beam from a transducer placed on the patient's skin on the target lesion, where the waves' mechanical energy is converted into thermal energy (65°C-85°C). Treatment should be planned by a multidisciplinary team. Treatment can be done with curative or palliative intent. Once the patient is selected, a preprocedural workup should be done to determine the most appropriate technique based on a series of factors. During the procedure, protective measures must be taken and the patient must be closely monitored. After the procedure, patients must be followed up.