Quality of resection margin with patient specific instrument for bone tumor resection

Ultrasound-based 3D bone modelling in computer assisted orthopedic surgery - a review and future challenges

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery requires precise representations of bone surfaces. To date, computed tomography constitutes the gold standard, but comes with a number of limitations, including costs, radiation and availability. Ultrasound has potential to become an alternative to computed tomography, yet suffers from low image quality and limited field-of-view. These shortcomings may be addressed by a fully automatic segmentation and model-based completion of 3D bone surfaces from ultrasound images. This survey summarizes the state-of-the-art in this field by introducing employed algorithms, and determining challenges and trends. For segmentation, a clear trend toward machine learning-based algorithms can be observed. For 3D bone model completion however, none of the published methods involve machine learning. Furthermore, data sets and metrics are identified as weak spots in current research, preventing development and evaluation of models that generalize well.

Fluoroscopically calibrated 3D-printed patient-specific instruments improve the accuracy of osteotomy during bone tumor resection adjacent to joints

BACKGROUND

Inadequate surface matching, variation in the guide design, and soft tissue on the skeletal surface may make it difficult to accurately place the 3D-printed patient-specific instrument (PSI) exactly to the designated site, leading to decreased accuracy, or even errors. Consequently, we developed a novel 3D-printed PSI with fluoroscopy-guided positioning markers to enhance the accuracy of osteotomies in joint-preserving surgery. The current study was to compare whether the fluoroscopically calibrated PSI (FCPSI) can achieve better accuracy compared with freehand resection and conventional PSI (CPSI) resection.

METHODS

Simulated joint-preserving surgery was conducted using nine synthetic left knee bone models. Osteotomies adjacent to the knee joint were designed to evaluate the accuracy at the epiphysis side. The experiment was divided into three groups: free-hand, conventional PSI (CPSI), and fluoroscopically Calibrated PSI (FCPSI). Post-resection CT scans were quantitatively analyzed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used.

RESULT

FCPSI improved the resection accuracy significantly. The mean location accuracy is 2.66 mm for FCPSI compared to 6.36 mm (P < 0.001) for freehand resection and 4.58 mm (P = 0.012) for CPSI. The mean average distance is 1.27 mm compared to 2.99 mm (p < 0.001) and 2.11 mm (p = 0.049). The mean absolute angle is 2.16° compared to 8.50° (p < 0.001) and 5.54° (p = 0.021). The mean depth angle is 1.41° compared to 8.10° (p < 0.001) and 5.32° (p = 0.012). However, there were no significant differences in the front angle compared to the freehand resection group (P = 0.055) and CPSI (P = 0.599) group. The location accuracy observed with FCPSI was maintained at 4 mm, while CPSI and freehand resection exhibited a maximum deviation of 8 mm.

CONCLUSION

The fluoroscopically calibrated 3D-printed patient-specific instruments improve the accuracy of osteotomy during bone tumor resection adjacent to joint joints compared to conventional PSI and freehand resection. In conclusion, this novel 3D-printed PSI offers significant accuracy improvement in joint preserving surgery with a minimal increase in time and design costs.

Surgical Margins in Musculoskeletal Sarcoma

» Negative margin resection of musculoskeletal sarcomas is associated with reduced risk of local recurrence.» There is limited evidence to support an absolute margin width of soft tissue or bone that correlates with reduced risk of local recurrence.» Factors intrinsic to the tumor, including histologic subtype, grade, growth pattern and neurovascular involvement impact margin status and local recurrence, and should be considered when evaluating a patient's individual risk after positive margins.» Appropriate use of adjuvant therapy, critical analysis of preoperative advanced cross-sectional imaging, and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team are essential to obtain negative margins when resecting sarcomas.

What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: a systematic review

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) and intraoperative surgical navigation (SN) can significantly help in achieving wide oncological margins while sparing bone stock in bone tumour resections. This is a systematic review aimed to compare the two techniques on oncological and functional results, preoperative time for surgical planning, surgical intraoperative time, intraoperative technical complications and learning curve. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023422065). 1613 papers were identified and 81 matched criteria for PRISMA inclusion and eligibility. PSI and SN showed similar results in margins (0-19% positive margins rate), bone cut accuracy (0.3-4 mm of error from the planned), local recurrence and functional reconstruction scores (MSTS 81-97%) for both long bones and pelvis, achieving better results compared to free hand resections. A planned bone margin from tumour of at least 5 mm was safe for bone resections, but soft tissue margin couldn't be planned when the tumour invaded soft tissues. Moreover, long osteotomies, homogenous bone topology and restricted working spaces reduced accuracy of both techniques, but SN can provide a second check. In urgent cases, SN is more indicated to avoid PSI planning and production time (2-4 weeks), while PSI has the advantage of less intraoperative using time (1-5 min vs 15-65 min). Finally, they deemed similar technical intraoperative complications rate and demanding learning curve. Overall, both techniques present advantages and drawbacks. They must be considered for the optimal choice based on the specific case. In the future, robotic-assisted resections and augmented reality might solve the downsides of PSI and SN becoming the main actors of bone tumour surgery.

Current Concepts in the Resection of Bone Tumors Using a Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printed Cutting Guide

Orthopedic oncology has begun to use three-dimensional-printing technology, which is expected to improve the accuracy of osteotomies, ensure a safe margin, and facilitate precise surgery. However, several difficulties should be considered. Cadaver and clinical studies have reported more accurate osteotomies for bone-tumor resection using patient-specific cutting guides, especially in challenging areas such as the sacrum and pelvis, compared to manual osteotomies. Patient-specific cutting guides can help surgeons achieve resection with negative margins and reduce blood loss and operating time. Furthermore, this patient-specific cutting guide could be combined with more precise reconstruction using patient-specific implants or massive bone allografts. This review provides an overview of the basic technologies used in the production of patient-specific cutting guides and discusses their current status, advantages, and limitations. Moreover, we summarize cadaveric and clinical studies on the use of these guides in orthopedic oncology.