1
|
Freites-Nuñez D, Leon L, Toledano E, Candelas G, Martinez C, Rodriguez-Laguna M, Rubio D, Fernandez-Gutierrez B, Abasolo L. Switching related to inefficacy in biologics and targeted synthetic therapies for psoriatic arthritis: a comparative real-life study. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2024; 16:1759720X241273083. [PMID: 39219744 PMCID: PMC11366104 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x241273083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Switching between therapies is a recommended strategy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients who experience treatment failure; however, studies including real-life data are scarce. Objectives To assess the incidence rate (IR) of switching between biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) due to inefficacy in PsA, and to compare the risk of switching due to inefficacy across different b/tsDMARDs groups. Design A longitudinal retrospective study, spanning from 2007 to 2022, was conducted on patients with PsA treated with b/tsDMARDs at an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Methods The primary outcome was switching between b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy. The independent variable was the exposure to b/tsDMARDs during follow-up. As covariates, clinical, treatment-related, and sociodemographic variables were considered. Survival techniques were run to estimate the IR of switching due to inefficacy per 100 patients*year and confidence interval at 95% (95% CI). Cox multivariate regression analyses were run to assess the risk of b/tsDMARDs switching due to inefficacy, expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Results In all, 141 patients were included, with 893.09 patients*year follow-ups. 52.48% of them were females in their fifties. In total, 262 courses of treatment were recorded. During the study period, 56 patients presented 121 switches and 103 related to inefficacy (IR: 11.53 (9.51-13.98)). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) showed the lowest IR. In the bivariate analysis, all b/tsDMARDs had more risk of switching compared to TNFi (HR: anti-lL-17 vs TNFi: 2.26 (1.17-4.36); others vs TNFi: 3.21 (1.59-6.45)); however, this statistical significance was no longer present in the multivariate analysis once adjustments were made for the covariates. Still, the final model achieved statistical significance in the following variables: gender, clinical symptoms, prescription year, therapy courses, glucocorticoids, and sulfasalazine. Conclusion In this study, we did not find differences in the rate of switching due to inefficacy among different groups of b/tsDMARDs. Other concomitant treatments, sociodemographic, and clinical variables were identified as risk factors for switching due to inefficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leticia Leon
- Leon Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Rheumatology Department, IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Health Sciences - HM Hospitals, University Camilo José Cela, Calle Martín Lagos, s/n. Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Esther Toledano
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Candelas
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martinez
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Rubio
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Rheumatology Department, IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lydia Abasolo
- Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Rheumatology Department, IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reena K, Mittal S, Faizan M, Jahan I, Rahman Y, Khan R, Singh L, Alhalmi A, Noman OM, Alahdab A. Enhancement of Curcumin's Anti-Psoriatic Efficacy via Formulation into Tea Tree Oil-Based Emulgel. Gels 2023; 9:973. [PMID: 38131959 PMCID: PMC10743130 DOI: 10.3390/gels9120973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the hyperproliferation and aberrant differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes. It is a debilitating condition that can cause significant physical and emotional distress. Natural anti-psoriatic agents have been investigated as alternatives to conventional allopathic medications, as they have notable limitations and drawbacks. Curcumin and tea tree oil are cost-efficient and effective anti-inflammatory medicines with less adverse effects compared to synthetic psoriasis medications. Our research endeavors to harness the therapeutic potential of these natural compounds by developing an herbal anti-psoriatic topical drug delivery system. This novel method uses curcumin and tea tree oil to create a bi-phasic emulgel drug delivery system. Formulations F1 (gel) and F2 (emulgel) have high drug content percentages of 84.2% and 96.7%, respectively. The emulgel showed better spreadability for cutaneous applications, with a viscosity of 92,200 ± 943 cp compared to the gel's 56,200 ± 1725 cp. The emulgel released 94.48% of the drugs, compared to 87.58% for the gel. These formulations conform to the zero-order and Higuchi models, and their stability over a three-month period is crucial. In vivo, the emulgel healed psoriasis symptoms faster than the usual gel. The gathered results confirmed the emulgel's potential as a drug delivery method, emphasizing the complementary benefits of tea tree oil and curcumin as an effective new therapy for psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Km Reena
- Department of Pharmacy, Invertis University, Bareilly 243123, India;
| | - Saurabh Mittal
- Center of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Noida 201303, India;
| | - Mohammad Faizan
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India;
| | - Iram Jahan
- Department of Physiology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India;
| | - Yasir Rahman
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India; (Y.R.); (R.K.); (A.A.)
| | - Rahmuddin Khan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India; (Y.R.); (R.K.); (A.A.)
| | - Lalit Singh
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Future Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly 243202, India
| | - Abdulsalam Alhalmi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India; (Y.R.); (R.K.); (A.A.)
| | - Omar M. Noman
- Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad Alahdab
- Institute of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Str. 17, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paccou J, Bavière W, Sornay-Rendu E, Szulc P, Ramdane N, Cortet B, Chapurlat R, Flipo RM. Body composition in patients with psoriatic arthritis and changes during interleukin 12/23 inhibition. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021; 74:1608-1613. [PMID: 33973385 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about body composition in patients with PsA. We compared body composition parameters in PsA patients and healthy controls, and then investigated the effects of ustekinumab (UST) on body composition in patients with PsA. METHODS At baseline, 30 PsA patients were compared cross-sectionnally with 60 non-PsA healthy controls matched for age, sex, menopausal status and body mass index. Thirty active PsA patients treated with UST were included in a 6-month open follow-up study. Body composition parameters were measured at baseline and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS Body composition parameters were different in PsA patients compared to healthy controls: in PsA patients, total and appendicular lean mass were lower (p=0.013 and p=0.010 respectively), whereas total fat mass was higher (p<0.001). In 30% of the PsA patients, skeletal muscle mass was below the cut-off for low muscle quantity (men 7.26 kg/m2, women 5.5 kg/m2), whereas no such change was observed in the control group. After 6 months of treatment with UST, there was no significant change in BMI in 18 of the PsA patients. Total lean mass decreased slightly (p=0.046), whereas fat mass tended to increase, but not significantly. No significant changes in appendicular lean mass and skeletal muscle mass index were observed. CONCLUSION In this study, we found that PsA patients had higher fat mass and lower lean mass than healthy controls. At 6-months of treatment, total lean mass decreased slightly, whereas fat mass tended to increase, but not significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Paccou
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABlab ULR 4490, Department of Rheumatology, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Wallis Bavière
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Rheumatology, 59000, Lille, France
| | | | - Pawel Szulc
- INSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Nassima Ramdane
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Bernard Cortet
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABlab ULR 4490, Department of Rheumatology, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Roland Chapurlat
- INSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - René-Marc Flipo
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Rheumatology, 59000, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Skin-penetrating polymeric nanoparticles incorporated in silk fibroin hydrogel for topical delivery of curcumin to improve its therapeutic effect on psoriasis mouse model. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2017; 160:704-714. [PMID: 29035818 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 10/07/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
A poor percutaneous penetration capability for most topical anti-inflammatory drugs is one of the main causes compromising their therapeutic effects on psoriatic skin. Even though curcumin has shown a remarkable efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis, its effective penetration through the stratum corneum is still a major challenge during transdermal delivery. The aim of our study was to design skin-permeating nanoparticles (NPs) to facilitate delivery of curcumin to the deeper layers of the skin. A novel amphiphilic polymer, RRR-α-tocopheryl succinate-grafted-ε-polylysine conjugate (VES-g-ε-PLL) was synthesized and self-assembled into polymeric nanoparticles. The nanoparticles of VES-g-ε-PLL exhibiting an ultra-small hydrodynamic diameter (24.4nm) and a positive Zeta potential (19.6mV) provided a strong skin-penetrating ability in vivo. Moreover, curcumin could effectively be encapsulated in the polymeric nanoparticles with a drug loading capacity of 3.49% and an encapsulating efficiency of 78.45%. In order to prolong the retention time of the ultra-small curcumin-loaded nanoparticles (CUR-NPs) in the skin, silk fibroin was used as a hydrogel-based matrix to further facilitate topical delivery of the model drug. In vitro studies showed that CUR-NPs incorporated in silk fibroin hydrogel (CUR-NPs-gel) exhibited a slower release profile of curcumin than the plain CUR-gel, without compromising the skin penetration ability of CUR-NPs. In vivo studies on miquimod-induced psoriatic mice showed that CUR-NPs-gel exhibited a higher therapeutic effect than CUR-NPs as the former demonstrated a more powerful skin-permeating capability and a more effective anti-keratinization process. CUR-NPs-gel was therefore able to inhibit the expression of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, NF-κB and IL-6) to a greater extent. In conclusion, the permeable nanoparticle-gel system may be a potential carrier for the topical delivery of lipophilic anti-psoriatic drugs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Merola JF, Lockshin B, Mody EA. Switching biologics in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017; 47:29-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Revised: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
6
|
Sala M, Elaissari A, Fessi H. Advances in psoriasis physiopathology and treatments: Up to date of mechanistic insights and perspectives of novel therapies based on innovative skin drug delivery systems (ISDDS). J Control Release 2016; 239:182-202. [PMID: 27381248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting mainly the skin but which can be complicated by psoriatic arthritis (PsA).This autoimmune skin disorder concerns 2-5% of the world population. To date, the physiopathology of psoriasis is not still completely elucidated but many researches are ongoing which have led for example to the discovery of the Th17/Th22 pathway. The conventional therapeutic approaches (local or systemic route) appeal to various classes of drugs with complex mechanisms of action and non-negligible side effects. Although there is no therapy capable to cure psoriasis, the current goal is to relieve symptoms as longer as possible with a good benefit/risk ratio. That is one of the principal limits of conventional antipsoriatic drugs. New formulations based on nanoencapsulation are a promising opportunity to answer to this limit by offering an optimization of the conventional antipsoriatic drug use (higher activity, lower side effects and frequency of application, etc.). Herein, we tried to put in perspective the mechanistic insights (histological and immunological views) proposed into scientific literature these last years in order to have a better comprehension of psoriasis physiopathology resulting in skin lesions and PsA. The therapeutic armamentarium and the different strategies in the management of psoriasis are discussed in greater details. To finish, the field of encapsulation in nanoparticles is broached in order to put forward recent advances in innovative skin drug delivery systems (ISDDSs) of antipsoriatic active agents for a better efficacy, safety and compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sala
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire d'Automatique et de Génie des Procédés, CNRS, UMR 5007, LAGEP-CPE-308G, 43 bd. du 11 Nov.1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France; Pharmacie centrale, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 57, Rue Francisque Darcieux, 69563 Saint Genis Laval, France
| | - A Elaissari
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire d'Automatique et de Génie des Procédés, CNRS, UMR 5007, LAGEP-CPE-308G, 43 bd. du 11 Nov.1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - H Fessi
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire d'Automatique et de Génie des Procédés, CNRS, UMR 5007, LAGEP-CPE-308G, 43 bd. du 11 Nov.1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prati C, Claudepierre P, Goupille P, Pham T, Wendling D. TNFα antagonist therapy in axial spondyloarthritis: Can we do better? Joint Bone Spine 2016; 83:247-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
8
|
Gossec L, Smolen JS, Ramiro S, de Wit M, Cutolo M, Dougados M, Emery P, Landewé R, Oliver S, Aletaha D, Betteridge N, Braun J, Burmester G, Cañete JD, Damjanov N, FitzGerald O, Haglund E, Helliwell P, Kvien TK, Lories R, Luger T, Maccarone M, Marzo-Ortega H, McGonagle D, McInnes IB, Olivieri I, Pavelka K, Schett G, Sieper J, van den Bosch F, Veale DJ, Wollenhaupt J, Zink A, van der Heijde D. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:499-510. [PMID: 26644232 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 628] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2012, new evidence and new therapeutic agents have emerged. The objective was to update these recommendations. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed regarding pharmacological treatment in PsA. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and the expert opinion of the 34 Task Force members. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were allocated. RESULTS The updated recommendations comprise 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations, covering pharmacological therapies for PsA from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, whatever their mode of action, taking articular and extra-articular manifestations of PsA into account, but focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. The overarching principles address the need for shared decision-making and treatment objectives. The recommendations address csDMARDs as an initial therapy after failure of NSAIDs and local therapy for active disease, followed, if necessary, by a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD). The first bDMARD would usually be a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)12/23 (ustekinumab) or IL-17 pathways (secukinumab) may be used in patients for whom TNF inhibitors are inappropriate and a tsDMARD such as a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor (apremilast) if bDMARDs are inappropriate. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD may be used. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of PsA and strategies to reach optimal outcomes in PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Gossec
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS), Paris, France Department of rheumatology, AP-HP, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - J S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Second Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M de Wit
- EULAR, representing People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), London, UK
| | - M Cutolo
- Research Laboratory and Clinical Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto, Italy
| | - M Dougados
- Medicine Faculty, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France Rheumatology B Department, APHP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P Emery
- Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT, Leeds, UK Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R Landewé
- Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - D Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Betteridge
- EULAR, representing People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), London, UK
| | - J Braun
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne and Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - G Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - J D Cañete
- Arthritis Unit, Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N Damjanov
- Belgrade University School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - O FitzGerald
- Department of Rheumatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital and Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E Haglund
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Sweden and School of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - P Helliwell
- Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - R Lories
- Laboratory of Tissue Homeostasis and Disease, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Belgium Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Luger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - M Maccarone
- A.DI.PSO. (Associazione per la Difesa degli Psoriasici)-PE.Pso.POF (Pan European Psoriasis Patients' Organization Forum), Rome, Italy
| | - H Marzo-Ortega
- Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT, Leeds, UK Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D McGonagle
- Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT, Leeds, UK Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - I B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - I Olivieri
- Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza, Italy
| | - K Pavelka
- Institute and Clinic of Rheumatology Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
| | - G Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Sieper
- Department of Rheumatology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - D J Veale
- Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease, Dublin Academic Medical Centre, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Wollenhaupt
- Schoen Klinik Hamburg, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Zink
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - D van der Heijde
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|