Assessment of myocardial fibrosis using T1-mapping and extracellular volume measurement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of radiation-induced cardiomyopathy

Quantitative assessment of radiotherapy-induced myocardial damage using MRI: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based metrics to quantify myocardial toxicity following radiotherapy (RT) in human subjects through review of current literature.

METHODS

Twenty-one MRI studies published between 2011-2022 were identified from available databases. Patients received chest irradiation with/without other treatments for various malignancies including breast, lung, esophageal cancer, Hodgkin's, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In 11 longitudinal studies, the sample size, mean heart dose, and follow-up times ranged from 10-81 patients, 2.0-13.9 Gy, and 0-24 months after RT (in addition to a pre-RT assessment), respectively. In 10 cross-sectional studies, the sample size, mean heart dose, and follow-up times ranged from 5-80 patients, 2.1-22.9 Gy, and 2-24 years from RT completion, respectively. Global metrics of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass/dimensions of cardiac chambers were recorded, along with global/regional values of T1/T2 signal, extracellular volume (ECV), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and circumferential/radial/longitudinal strain.

RESULTS

LVEF tended to decline at >20 years follow-up and in patients treated with older RT techniques. Changes in global strain were observed after shorter follow-up (13±2 months) for concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In concurrent treatments with longer follow-up (8.3 years), increases in left ventricle (LV) mass index were correlated with LV mean dose. In pediatric patients, increases in LV diastolic volume were correlated with heart/LV dose at 2 years post-RT. Regional changes were observed earlier post-RT. Dose-dependent responses were reported for several parameters, including: increased T1 signal in high-dose regions, a 0.136% increase of ECV per Gy, progressive increase of LGE with increasing dose at regions receiving >30 Gy, and correlation between increases in LV scarring volume and LV mean/V10/V25 Gy dose.

CONCLUSION

Global metrics only detected changes over longer follow-up, in older RT techniques, in concurrent treatments, and in pediatric patients. In contrast, regional measurements detected myocardial damage at shorter follow-up and in RT treatments without concurrent treatment and had greater potential for dose-dependent response. The early detection of regional changes suggests the importance of regional quantification of RT-induced myocardial toxicity at early stages, before damage becomes irreversible. Further works with homogeneous cohorts are required to examine this matter.

Case report: Early acute myocarditis after radiation therapy for breast cancer: A case presentation and review of literature

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide, and with the increased survival of patients by novel treatments, the frequency of complications of cancer treatments rises. Radiotherapy, especially on the chest wall, can damage different cardiac structures. Radiotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy mainly occurs over 10 years after breast cancer treatment; however, there is a gap in the literature on acute myocarditis following radiotherapy. Here, we present a 54-year-old woman who developed acute myocarditis shortly after 25 sessions of radiotherapy with 50 Gy of radiation, successfully diagnosed with the use of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and responded to the medical treatment with relative clinical improvement until the final follow-up. This case suggests the necessity of detailed examination of patients after radiotherapy, not only for chronic occurrence of cardiomyopathy but also for acute myocarditis. Although STE and CMR resulted in accurate diagnosis, in this case, further studies are required to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these two imaging methods compared with other imaging modalities in such patients and investigate the best diagnostic tool and therapeutic approach for these patients.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patterns in Rare Cardiovascular Diseases

Rare cardiovascular diseases (RCDs) have low incidence but major clinical impact. RCDs' classification includes Class I-systemic circulation, Class II-pulmonary circulation, Class III-cardiomyopathies, Class IV-congenital cardiovascular diseases (CVD), Class V-cardiac tumors and CVD in malignancy, Class VI-cardiac arrhythmogenic disorders, Class VII-CVD in pregnancy, Class VIII-unclassified rare CVD. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is useful in the diagnosis/management of RCDs, as it performs angiography, function, perfusion, and tissue characterization in the same examination. Edema expressed as a high signal in STIRT2 or increased T2 mapping is common in acute/active inflammatory states. Diffuse subendocardial fibrosis, expressed as diffuse late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), is characteristic of microvascular disease as in systemic sclerosis, small vessel vasculitis, cardiac amyloidosis, and metabolic disorders. Replacement fibrosis, expressed as LGE, in the inferolateral wall of the left ventricle (LV) is typical of neuromuscular disorders. Patchy LGE with concurrent edema is typical of myocarditis, irrespective of the cause. Cardiac hypertrophy is characteristic in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and Anderson-Fabry Disease (AFD), but LGE is located in the IVS, subendocardium and lateral wall in HCM, CA and AFD, respectively. Native T1 mapping is increased in HCM and CA and reduced in AFD. Magnetic resonance angiography provides information on aortopathies, such as Marfan, Turner syndrome and Takayasu vasculitis. LGE in the right ventricle is the typical finding of ARVC, but it may involve LV, leading to the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Tissue changes in RCDs may be detected only through parametric imaging indices.

Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities: An Imaging Primer

The Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant delays in the delivery of cancer treatments in Canada. As cancer treatment and imaging volumes return to normal, radiologists will encounter more cases of chemotherapy-induced toxicities. These toxicities have varied appearances on imaging, and can affect multiple organ systems. The purpose of this review is to offer a unified resource for general radiologists regarding the imaging appearances of chemotherapy-induced toxicities.

Severe Cardiac Toxicity Induced by Cancer Therapies Requiring Intensive Care Unit Admission

A steadying increase of cancer survivors has been observed as a consequence of more effective therapies. However, chemotherapy regimens are often associated with significant toxicity, and cardiac damage emerges as a prominent clinical issue. Many mechanisms sustain chemotherapy-induced cardiac toxicity: direct myocyte damage, arrhythmia induction, coronary vasospasm, and accelerated atherosclerosis. Anthracyclines are the most studied cardiotoxic drugs and represent a clinical model for cardiac damage induced by chemotherapy. In patients suffering from advanced heart failure (HF) because of chemotherapy-related cardiomyopathy, when refractory to optimal medical therapy, mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation represents an effective treatment. Here, the main mechanisms of cardiac toxicity induced by cancer therapies are analyzed, with a focus on patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission during the course of the disease because of acute cardiac toxicity, takotsubo syndrome, and acute-on-chronic HF in patients suffering from chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. In a subset of patients, cardiac toxicity can be acute and life-threatening, leading to overt cardiogenic shock. The management of critically ill cancer patients poses a unique challenge and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Moreover, no etiologic therapy is available, and only supportive measures can be implemented.

The 4D B-spline method of calculating left ventricular functional parameters of cardiac MRI to evaluate myocardial injury of the apical segment in patients with myocarditis: a case-controlled observational study

Background

Myocarditis does not have typical clinical manifestations and thus is difficult to accurately diagnose by virtue of infection history, and electrocardiogram (EKG) and peripheral blood abnormalities. Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of myocarditis, but is invasive, high risk, and has an observational blind area. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is multiparameter and multidirectional with high spatial resolution and high contrast of soft tissue. However, the optimal method of calculating left ventricular (LV) function in patients with apical-segment-injured myocarditis is unresolved. We compared and analyzed the differences between two different methods (Simpson and 4D B-spline surface model (known as the 4D method)) of measuring LV function by CMRI in patients with myocarditis in the 17th segment of the left ventricle.

Methods

The basic clinical data of two groups (myocarditis and non-myocarditis) were statistically analyzed, and differences in the LV function parameters by the two imaging methods were compared in the myocarditis group. Receiver-operating characteristic curves of single parameters and combined parameters based on the Simpson and 4D methods were drawn and the area under the curve, diagnostic threshold, maximum sensitivity interval, and maximum specificity interval were calculated.

Results

In the myocarditis and non-myocarditis groups the respective number of patients was 22 and 17, the percentage of males was 54.55% and 47.06%, and the average age was 32.20±11.59 and 43.06±11.62 years. The difference in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (P=0.033) and LV end systolic volume (LVESV) (P=0.030) in the myocarditis group was statistically significant. The respective AUCs based on the Simpson and 4D methods were LVEF 0.602 vs. 0.778, LVESV 0.556 vs. 0.751, LVEF-and-LVESV 0.634 vs. 0.775. Based on the 4D method, the diagnostic thresholds of LVEF and LVESV were 34.965 (sensitivity 0.882, specificity 0.591) and 69.090 (sensitivity 0.727, specificity 0.706), the maximum sensitivity intervals of LVEF and LVESV were (24.610, 27.450) and (35.355, 37.200), and the maximum specificity intervals of LVEF and LVESV were (60.530, 65.625) and (91.625, 95.835), respectively.

Conclusions

Compared with the Simpson method, the 4D method might be more effective for CMRI diagnosis of apical-segment-injured myocarditis. When the Simpson method is used, LVEF combined with LVESV is recommended for comprehensive evaluation to improve diagnostic efficiency. When the 4D method is used, LVEF might be the preferred parameter for evaluation of LV function.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in restrictive cardiomyopathies

The restrictive cardiomyopathies constitute a heterogeneous group of myocardial diseases with a different pathogenesis and overlapping clinical presentations. Diagnosing them frequently poses a challenge. Echocardiography, electrocardiograms and laboratory tests may show non-specific changes. In this context, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may play a crucial role in defining the diagnosis and guiding treatments, by offering a robust myocardial characterization based on the inherent magnetic properties of abnormal tissues, thus limiting the use of endomyocardial biopsy. In this review article, we explore the role of CMR in the assessment of a wide range of myocardial diseases causing restrictive patterns, from iron overload to cardiac amyloidosis, endomyocardial fibrosis or radiation-induced heart disease. Here, we emphasize the incremental value of novel relaxometric techniques such as T1 and T2 mapping, which may recognize different storage diseases based on the intrinsic magnetic properties of the accumulating metabolites, with or without the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents. We illustrate the importance of these CMR techniques and their great support when contrast media administration is contraindicated. Finally, we describe the useful role of cardiac computed tomography for diagnosis and management of restrictive cardiomyopathies when CMR is contraindicated.

Cardiac MRI utilizing late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1 mapping in the detection of radiation induced heart disease

Background and purpose

Radiotherapy has been associated with late dose-dependent cardiovascular toxicity. In this cross-sectional pilot study, radiation dose distributions were correlated with areas of localized and diffuse myocardial fibrosis as measured by novel cardiac MRI (CMR) sequences including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1 mapping with the goal to identify early markers of myocardial damage.

Materials and methods

Twenty-eight patients with chest tumors including lung, breast, esophagus, and lymphoma underwent CMR per study protocol on average 46.4 months (range 1.7–344.5) after radiotherapy. Patients without pretreatment cardiac history were included if the volume of heart receiving 5 Gy or more was at least 10% (V5Gy ≥ 10%). The association of LGE with cardiac dosimetric factors, clinical factors (e.g., tumor type, smoking history, BMI), and T1 values was analyzed.

Results

Cardiac maximum (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) equivalent to doses delivered in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) were on average 50.9 Gy (range 6.2–108.0) and 8.2 Gy (range 1.0–35.7), respectively, compared to 60.8 Gy (40.8–108.0) and 6.8 Gy (1.8–21.8) among the 9 patients with LGE. Doses were not different between patients with and without LGE (p = 0.16 and 0.56, respectively). The average T1 value of the left ventricle myocardium was 1009 ms (range 933–1117). No significant correlation was seen for heart Dmax and Dmean and T1 values (p = 0.14 and 0.58, respectively). In addition, no significant association between clinical factors and the development of LGE was identified.

Conclusions

No relation between cardiac doses, the presence of LGE or T1 values was observed. Further study is needed to determine the benefit of CMR for detecting radiotherapy-related myocardial fibrosis.

MRI in cardio-oncology: A review of cardiac complications in oncologic care

From detailed characterization of cardiac abnormalities to the assessment of cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction, cardiac MRI is playing a growing role in the evaluation of cardiac pathology in oncology patients. Current guidelines are now incorporating the use of MRI for the comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to cancer management, and innovative applications of MRI in research are expanding its potential to provide a powerful noninvasive tool in the arsenal against cancer. This review focuses on the application of cardiac MRI to diagnose and manage cardiovascular complications related to cancer and its treatment. Following an introduction to current cardiac MRI methods and principles, this review is divided into two sections: functional cardiovascular analysis and anatomical or tissue characterization related to cancer and cancer therapeutics. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1349-1366.

The Value of T1 Mapping Techniques in the Assessment of Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis

Cardiac fibrosis, characterized by net accumulation of extracellular matrix in the myocardium, is a common final pathway of heart failure. This myocardial fibrosis (MF) is not necessarily the primary cause of dysfunction; it often results from a reparative process activated in response to cardiomyocyte injury. In light of currently available treatments, late-identified MF could be definitive or irreversible, associated with worsening ventricular systolic function, abnormal cardiac remodeling, and increased ventricular stiffness and arrhythmia. T1 mapping should be used to detect incipient changes leading to myocardial damage in several clinical conditions and also in subclinical disease. This article reviews available techniques for MF detection, focusing on noninvasive quantification of diffuse fibrosis and clinical applications.