Optimization of the table speed of lower extremity CT angiography protocols in different patient age groups

Radiation dose and image quality with new protocol in lower extremity computed tomography angiography

PURPOSE

To compare radiation dose and image quality of lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) between cranio-caudal acquisition with single-source CT (SSCT) and flash caudo-cranial acquisition with dual-source CT (DSCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 60 patients were randomly assigned to Group A (control) or Group B (experimental) to undergo lower extremity CTA for peripheral obliterative arterial disease. Group A received protocol 1 (P1) with SSCT cranio-caudal acquisition. Group B received protocol (P2) with DSCT flash caudo-cranial acquisition. Intravascular attenuation (IVA), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image noise were compared. Two radiologists assessed the image quality. Computed tomography volume dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose-length product (DLP) were also compared.

RESULTS

IVA with P2 was higher than with P1 (586.8 ± 140.3 vs. 496.1 ± 129.3 HU, p = 0.011), as was SNR (33.0 ± 11.3 vs. 27.4 ± 12.3; p = 0.042), CNR (30.1 ± 13.3 vs. 24.2 ± 10.3; p = 0.029) and image quality score of small arteries below the knee (3.8 ± 0.2 vs. 3.1 ± 0.2; p = 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly lower in P2 than in P1 with CTDI_vol reduction of 40.9% (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 mGy; p = 0.006) and DLP reduction of 42.8% (148.7 ± 21.9 vs 260.2 ± 59.1 mGy * cm; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity CTA with DSCT flash caudo-cranial acquisition allows lower radiation dose with higher IVA, SNR, CNR and better image quality for small arteries below the knee than SSCT cranio-caudal acquisition.

[Study of CT Automatic Exposure Control System (CT-AEC) Optimization in CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Artery by Considering Contrast-to-Noise Ratio]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality and effect of radiation dose reduction by setting for computed tomography automatic exposure control system (CT-AEC) in computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of lower extremity artery.

METHODS

Two methods of setting were compared for CT-AEC [conventional and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) methods]. Conventional method was set noise index (NI): 14and tube current threshold: 10-750 mA. CNR method was set NI: 18, minimum tube current: (X+Y)/2 mA (X, Y: maximum X (Y)-axis tube current value of leg in NI: 14), and maximum tube current: 750 mA. The image quality was evaluated by CNR, and radiation dose reduction was evaluated by dose-length-product (DLP).

RESULTS

In conventional method, mean CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg were 19.9±4.8, 20.4±5.4, and 16.2±4.3, respectively. There was a significant difference between the CNRs of pelvis and leg (P<0.001), and between femur and leg (P<0.001). In CNR method, mean CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg were 15.2±3.3, 15.3±3.2, and 15.3±3.1, respectively; no significant difference between pelvis, femur, and leg (P=0.973) in CNR method was observed. Mean DLPs were 1457±434 mGy⋅cm in conventional method, and 1049±434 mGy·cm in CNR method. There was a significant difference in the DLPs of conventional method and CNR method (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CNR method gave equal CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg, and was beneficial for radiation dose reduction in CTA of lower extremity artery.

Can Radiation Dose Be Reduced and Image Quality Improved With 80-kV and Dual-Phase Scanning of the Lower Extremities With 64-Slice Computed Tomography Angiography?

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare the new computed tomographic angiography (CTA) protocol (NCP) using 80-kV and dual-phase scanning with the routine CTA protocol (RCP) using 120-kV and single-phase scanning in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients were randomized to undergo the NCP (30 patients) or RCP (30 patients) scan. We compared the arterial attenuation values, overriding of the contrast bolus, signal-to-noise ratio, and radiation dose between 2 groups.

RESULTS

The occurrence rate of contrast bolus overriding was not statistically significant (P = 0.69). The average arterial attenuation value in the NCP group was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that in the RCP group. The radiation dose in the RCP group was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that in the NCP group. The mean signal-to-noise ratio in the NCP group was significantly lower (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-four-slice CTA with the NCP can significantly reduce the radiation dose and improve the arterial enhancement and calf arteries imaging.

Diagnostic confidence of run-off CT-angiography as the primary diagnostic imaging modality in patients presenting with acute or chronic peripheral arterial disease

Objectives

To investigate the reliability of CT-angiography of the lower extremities (run-off CTA) to derive a treatment decision in patients with acute and chronic peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Materials and Methods

314 patients referred for run-off CTA were includ-ed in this retrospective study. First, diagnostic confidence of run-off CTA to derive a treat-ment decision was assessed in an interdisciplinary vascular conference using a 2 point scale (sufficient or not sufficient diagnostic confidence) and compared with the image quality eval-uated by two readers in consensus in four different levels (abdominopelvic, thigh, calf, foot arteries). Second, reliability of treatment decision was verified in all patients undergoing re-vascularization therapy.

Results

Diagnostic confidence of run-off CTA to derive a treatment deci-sion was sufficient in all patients with acute and in 97% of patients (215/221) with chronic PAD, whereas the rate of run-off CTA with non-diagnostic image quality was considerably higher in the calf and foot level (acute vs. chronic; calf: 28% vs.17%; foot: 52% vs. 20%). Reliability of treatment decision was superior for patients with chronic (123/133 = 92%) than for patients with acute PAD (64/78 = 82%, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Run-off CTA is a reliable imaging modality for primary diag-nostic work-up of patients with acute and chronic PAD.

Low contrast volume run-off CT angiography with optimized scan time based on double-level test bolus technique--feasibility study

PURPOSE

To verify the technical feasibility of low contrast volume (40 mL) run-off CT angiography (run-off CTA) with the individual scan time optimization based on double-level test bolus technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 92 consecutive patients who underwent run-off CTA performed with 40 mL of contrast medium (injection rate of 6 mL/s) and optimized scan times on a second generation of dual-source CT. Individual optimized scan times were calculated from aortopopliteal transit times obtained on the basis of double-level test bolus technique--the single injection of 10 mL test bolus and dynamic acquisitions in two levels (abdominal aorta and popliteal arteries). Intraluminal attenuation (HU) was measured in 6 levels (aorta, iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, middle and distal lower-legs) and subjective quality (3-point score) was assessed. Relations of image quality, test bolus parameters and arterial circulation involvement were analyzed.

RESULTS

High mean attenuation (HU) values (468; 437; 442; 440; 342; 274) and quality score in all monitored levels was achieved. In 91 patients (0.99) the sufficient diagnostic quality (score 1-2) in aorta, iliac and femoral arteries was determined. A total of 6 patients (0.07) were not evaluable in distal lower-legs. Only the weak indirect correlation of image quality and test-bolus parameters was proved in iliac, femoral and popliteal levels (r values: -0.263, -0.298 and -0.254). The statistically significant difference of the test-bolus parameters and image quality was proved in patients with occlusive and aneurysmal disease.

CONCLUSION

We proved the technical feasibility and sufficient quality of run-off CTA with low volume of contrast medium and optimized scan time according to aortopopliteal transit time calculated from double-level test bolus.