Salvage Balloon Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Variceal Bleed in Cirrhotic Patients With Endoscopic Failure to Control Bleed/Very Early Rebleed: Long-term Outcomes

Emergency Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Active Bleeding from Ruptured Gastric Varices

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of emergency plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) for active bleeding from ruptured gastric varices (GVs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with active bleeding from ruptured GVs were included in this retrospective study. Ten patients (47.6%) showed life-threatening hemorrhage (systolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg) just before emergency PARTO. All patients underwent emergency PARTO after initial ineffective endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (n = 9) or because endoscopic injection was not possible (n = 12).

RESULTS

Emergency PARTO was technically successful in all 21 patients. Mean fluoroscopic time was 30.8 minutes (range, 10-62 minutes). There were no procedure-related adverse events. Hemostasis was obtained in 20 (95.2%) of 21 patients immediately after PARTO. In 16 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT), complete thrombosis or obliteration of GVs and portosystemic shunt was observed. With the exception of 1 patient who underwent external transfer, 15 patients died within a mean of 196 days (range, 1-1,111 days), whereas 5 remained alive for a mean of 38.9 months (range, 17.1-74.2 months). Seven died within 30 days due to ischemia-related multiorgan failure (n = 5), hypovolemic shock (n = 1), or rapid progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 1). The causes of death in the remaining 9 patients were bleeding from esophageal varices (n = 2), liver failure (n = 2), and rapid progression of HCC (n = 5). The median patient survival time was 47 days (95% confidence interval, 0‒124 days). There was no case of rebleeding or recurrence of GVs.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency PARTO appears to be a fast, safe, and effective treatment option to stop active bleeding from ruptured GVs; however, survival in this population is modest because of comorbidities and complications of shock.

Is salvage Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (PARTO) safe and effective for bleeding gastric varices ?- A preliminary single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) obliterates the gastric varices and portosystemic shunt, thus resulting in a lower rebleeding rate than endoscopic glue/sclerotherapy.

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PARTO as salvage therapy in liver cirrhosis with gastric variceal bleed (GVB) after failed endotherapy. We assessed the clinical success rate and changes in liver function at 6- months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent salvage PARTO after failed endotherapy for GVB (between December 2021 and November 2022) were searched and analyzed from the hospital database. Clinical success rate and rebleed rate were obtained at six months. Child-Pugh score (CTP) and Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were calculated and compared between baseline and 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (n = 14, Child-Pugh class A/B) underwent salvage PARTO. Nine had GOV-2, and five had IGV-1 varices. The mean shunt diameter was 11.6 ± 1.6 mm. The clinical success rate of PARTO was 100% (no recurrent gastric variceal hemorrhage within six months). No significant deterioration in CTP (6.79 ± 0.98 vs. 6.21 ± 1.52; p = 0.12) and MELD scores (11.5 ± 4.05 vs. 10.21 ± 3.19; p = 0.36) was noted at 6 months. All patients were alive at 6 months. One patient (n = 1, 7.1%) bled from esophageal varices after three days of PARTO and was managed with variceal banding. 21.4% (3/14) patients had progression of esophageal varices at 6 months requiring prophylactic band ligation. Three patients (21.4%) had new onset or worsening ascites and responded to low-dose diuretics therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PARTO is a safe and effective procedure for bleeding gastric varices without any deterioration in liver function even after six months. Patient selection is critical to prevent complications. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are required to validate our findings.

Role of Interventional Radiology (IR) in vascular emergencies among cirrhotic patients

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis. Mostly, these patients bleed from the gastroesophageal varices. However, nonvariceal bleeding is also more likely to occur in these patients. Because of frequent co-existing coagulopathy, cirrhotics are more prone to bleed from a minor vascular injury while performing percutaneous interventions. Ultrasound-guided bedside vascular access is an essential procedure in liver critical care units. Transjugular portosystemic shunts (TIPS) with/without variceal embolization is a life-saving measure in patients with refractory variceal bleeding. Whenever feasible, balloon-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is an alternative to TIPS in managing gastric variceal bleeding, but without a risk of hepatic encephalopathy. In cases of failed or unfeasible endotherapy, transarterial embolization using various embolic agents remains the cornerstone therapy in patients with nonvariceal bleeding such as ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, and procedure-related hemorrhagic complications. Among various embolic agents, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) enables better vascular occlusion in cirrhotics, even in coagulopathy, making it a more suitable embolic agent in an expert hand. This article briefly entails the different interventional radiological procedures in vascular emergencies among patients with liver cirrhosis.

[Trends in endovascular treatment and prevention of portal bleeding]

Bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices is a major factor of mortality in patients with portal hypertension. The gold standard for diagnosis of portal hypertension is hepatic venous pressure gradient determining the treatment algorithms and risk of recurrent bleeding. Combination of endoscopic methods and therapy is limited by varix localization and not always effective. In these cases, endovascular bypass and decoupling techniques are preferred. Early endovascular treatment of portal bleeding is effective for hemostasis and higher transplantation-free survival of patients. Early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic bypass should be associated with 8-mm covered stents of controlled dilation. Combination of endovascular techniques reduces the complications of each technique and potentiates their positive effect. Endovascular treatment and prevention of portal bleeding should be determined by anatomical features of portal venous system.

Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Evidence-Based Guidelines for Interventions in Portal Hypertension and Its Complications

Portal hypertension is a complication of chronic liver disease. Various radiological interventions are being done to aid in the diagnosis of portal hypertension; further, an interventional radiologist can offer various treatments for the complications of portal hypertension. Diagnosis of portal hypertension in its early stage may require hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. Measurement of gradient also guides in diagnosing the type of portal hypertension, measuring response to treatment and prognostication. This article attempts to provide evidence-based guidelines on the management of portal hypertension and treatment of its complications.

RK, K. MRP. Review of Applied Anatomy, Hemodynamics, and Endovascular Management of Ectopic Varices

Portal hypertension leads to the opening up of collateral pathways to bypass the occlusion or resistance in the portal system. Ectopic varices are formed by such collaterals at many various sites along the gastrointestinal tract other than the usual location, that is, gastroesophageal region. Early diagnosis of ectopic varices needs strong clinical suspicion and contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan as endoscopy may often fail to pinpoint a source. In contrast to gastric varices where the understanding of the disease, as well as endovascular management, is widely studied and documented, the same is not true for ectopic varices due to low incidence. Understanding the applied anatomy and hemodynamic classification is important to decide the most suitable therapy. Interventional radiological procedures are aimed at either decompressing the varices or obliterating them and depend on the patency of the portal system, underlying etiology, and local expertise.