A Prospective Study of Prevalence and Predictors of Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy and Its Role in Development of Hepatorenal Syndrome

Addition of a Loop Diuretic to Norepinephrine During Treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome Type 1

Introduction

Diuretics are commonly discontinued in patients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) because they are presumed to trigger hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1). We hypothesized that if HRS-1 is adequately treated with a vasoconstrictor (mean arterial pressure [MAP] effectively increased), diuretics are safe and effective.

Methods

Records of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis who received i.v. furosemide while receiving i.v. norepinephrine as a vasoconstrictor to treat HRS-1 were examined. We assessed change in urine output (UOP), trajectory of serum creatinine (sCr), and impact of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPHTN) on the therapeutic response.

Results

Twenty-six patients with HRS-1 received i.v. furosemide (median: 2 days, 160 mg boluses every 6-24 hours) added to i.v. norepinephrine. Median age was 51 years; 91% were of White race, 36% were women, and median model for end-stage liver disease score was 32. The median initial sCr was 4.0 mg/dl. Before treatment, median UOP was 358 ml/d. Norepinephrine alone led to a median increase in UOP to 850 ml/d. Addition of furosemide to norepinephrine induced a subsequent increase in median UOP to 2072 ml/d (P < 0.0001), which was not observed in a control group (n = 22) who did not receive furosemide. Nineteen patients (73%) treated with norepinephrine plus furosemide (median MAP increase, 16 mm Hg) either maintained or improved their sCr trajectory. The magnitude of norepinephrine-induced increase in MAP correlated with the norepinephrine plus furosemide-induced UOP (r = 0.67, P = 0.0002), and the correlation coefficient was numerically stronger among those with PoPHTN.

Conclusion

In patients with HRS-1 who are adequately treated with norepinephrine and achieved an optimal MAP increment, addition of i.v. furosemide enhances diuresis without negatively affecting renal recovery.

Association Between Sleep Quality and Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Objective

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the changes in sleep quality among patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM).

Methods

The study included liver cirrhosis patients aged 18-75 from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University and collected their clinical examination results to assess the clinical characteristics and related risk factors of patients with CCM.

Results

The study found that the onset of CCM was not related to the etiology of inducing cirrhosis. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score (odds ratio (OR) = 13.476, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.514-119.923, P = 0.020), absolute GLS (OR = 0.328, 95% CI = 0.210-0.510, P < 0.001), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR = 1.050, 95% CI = 1.025-1.076, P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for inducing CCM.

Conclusion

In patients with CCM, a decrease in sleep quality often occurs. When cirrhotic patients also have poor sleep quality, along with a decrease in absolute Global Left Ventricular Strain (GLS) levels and an increase in NT-proBNP levels, these factors may pose a higher risk for CCM development. However, further validation of these research findings is required in larger sample sizes.

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: Pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

Cardiac dysfunction among cirrhotic patients has long been recognized in the medical community. While it was originally believed to be a direct result of alcohol toxicity, in the last 30 years cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) has been described as a syndrome characterized by chronic cardiac dysfunction in cirrhotic patients in the absence of known cardiac disease, regardless of the etiology of cirrhosis. CCM occurs in about 60% of patients with cirrhosis and plays a critical role in disease progression and treatment outcomes. Due to its predominantly asymptomatic course, diagnosing CCM is challenging and requires a high index of suspicion and a multiparametric approach. Patients with CCM usually present with the following triad: impaired myocardial contractile response to exercise, inadequate ventricular relaxation, and electrophysiological abnormalities (notably prolonged QT interval). In recent years, research in this area has grown expeditiously and a new set of diagnostic criteria has been developed by the Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium, to properly identify patients with CCM. Nevertheless, CCM is still largely unknown among clinicians, and a major part of its pathophysiology and treatment is yet to be understood. In the present work, we aim to compile and summarize the available data on the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of CCM.

Comparison of the 2005 Montreal Criteria and the 2019 Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium Criteria for the Diagnosis of Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy

The comparison between the diagnostic criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) first proposed in 2005 (2005 Montreal criteria), and those redefined in the 2019 Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium (2019 CCC criteria) has generated significant controversy. Importantly, the predictive value of these criteria in cirrhotic patients (CPs) remains unclear to this date. Thus, the present study aims to compare the 2 sets of criteria and investigate their predictive value in CPs. Between April 2021 and April 2023, a total of 104 CPs with an average age of 46.4 ± 8.9 years, who had no history of other cardiac diseases or malignancies were enrolled in this prospective single-center observational cohort study, conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Various echocardiographic indicators were measured and assessed for their prognostic value and association with clinical outcomes. The prevalence of CCM was found to be comparable when evaluated using both the 2019 CCC and 2005 Montreal criteria (54.8% vs 44.2%, p = 0.161). However, the diagnosis of systolic dysfunction was significantly different between the 2 criteria (52.9% vs 1.0%, p <0.001). Among patients with systolic dysfunction, 27.9% had reduced left ventricular global longitudinal strain, while 25% had increased left ventricular global longitudinal strain. Moreover, fewer patients were diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction (DD) using the 2019 CCC criteria (4.8% vs 44.2%, p <0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that CPs who had encephalopathy, a high model for end-stage liver disease score, and DD diagnosed using the 2019 CCC criteria exhibited a poorer prognosis. In conclusion, although the prevalence of CCM according to both criteria is similar, the consistency is poor, indicating that they are not the same group of patients. Importantly, CPs with DD diagnosed according to the 2019 CCC criteria might be associated with increased adverse events.

Pathophysiology and management of liver cirrhosis: from portal hypertension to acute-on-chronic liver failure

Cirrhosis transcends various progressive stages from compensation to decompensation driven by the severity of portal hypertension. The downstream effect of increasing portal hypertension severity leads to various pathophysiological pathways, which result in the cardinal complications of cirrhosis, including ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy. Additionally, the severity of portal hypertension is the central driver for further advanced complications of hyperdynamic circulation, hepatorenal syndrome, and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. The management of these individual complications has specific nuances which have undergone significant developments. In contrast to the classical natural history of cirrhosis and its complications which follows an insidious trajectory, acute-on-chronic failure (ACLF) leads to a rapidly downhill course with high short-term mortality unless intervened at the early stages. The management of ACLF involves specific interventions, which have quickly evolved in recent years. In this review, we focus on complications of portal hypertension and delve into an approach toward ACLF.