1
|
Obeidat M, Teutsch B, Floria DE, Veres DS, Hegyi P, Erőss B. Early nutrition is safe and does not increase complications after upper gastrointestinal bleeding-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10725. [PMID: 38730079 PMCID: PMC11087503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61543-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite a lack of evidence, patients are often not fed for 48-96 h after upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB); however, many trials have demonstrated the benefits of early nutrition (EN). We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs) to evaluate the outcomes of EN compared to delayed nutrition (DN) after UGIB. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022372306). PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched on the 27th of April 2024 to identify eligible RCTs. The primary outcomes were early (within 7 days) and late (within 30-42 days) mortality and rebleeding. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 10 trials with 1051 patients were included in the analysis. Early mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.20, CI 0.85-1.71, I2 = 0%), whereas late mortality was reduced to a clinically relevant extent in the EN group (RR 0.61, CI 0.35-1.06, I2 = 0%). When comparing the two groups, we found no significant difference in terms of early and late rebleeding (RR 1.04, CI 0.66-1.63, I2 = 0% and RR 1.16, CI 0.63-2.13, I2 = 0%, respectively). Our analysis also showed that the length of hospital stay was reduced in the EN group compared to the DN group (MD -1.22 days, CI: -2.43 to -0.01, I2 = 94%). In conclusion, compared with DN, EN (within 24 h) appears to be a safe intervention and could reduce the length of hospital stay without increasing the risk of complications after UGIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Obeidat
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| | - Brigitta Teutsch
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| | - Diana-Elena Floria
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
- Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115, Iași, Romania
| | - Dániel Sándor Veres
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
- Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, 7623, Hungary
- Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1083, Hungary
| | - Bálint Erőss
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, 7623, Hungary.
- Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qasim Agha O, Alsayid M, Reynolds J. Nasoenteric Tube Placement in Patients with Esophageal Varices: A Review of the Current Evidence and Society Guidelines. Avicenna J Med 2023; 13:193-198. [PMID: 38144911 PMCID: PMC10736187 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal varices are a common complication of portal hypertension and variceal bleeding can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis might require nasoenteric tube (NET) placement, commonly for nutritional support and/or medication administration. However, the fear of causing massive variceal bleeding among clinicians might lead to hesitancy or complete avoidance of NET placement in patients who either have a known history of esophageal varices or are at risk to have them. Several experts and society guidelines addressed this concern with variable recommendations and degrees of evidence. In this article, we present an extensive review of the literature and latest society guidelines that address the safety of NET placement in patients with esophageal varices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Qasim Agha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Muhammad Alsayid
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Justin Reynolds
- Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
- Center for Liver and Hepatobiliary Disease, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| |
Collapse
|