Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor improves chronic rhinosinusitis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in children with cystic fibrosis on long-term therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2024

The year 2024 marks a pivotal moment in the field of cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment, characterised by significant advancements in clinical care and an expanding body of literature on CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. These CFTR therapies have transformed the landscape of CF management, offered systemic benefits, and established new guidelines for assessing clinical manifestations and therapies. Additionally, progress has been made in newborn screening (NBS), diagnosis, and understanding outcomes for individuals with CF-related metabolic syndrome or inconclusive diagnostic results. However, amidst these clinical milestones, disparities in global access to CFTR modulators (CFTRm) persist, threatening to exacerbate existing inequities in CF care. This review provides a focused overview of the most impactful articles from 2024, highlighting both the clinical advancements and the pressing global accessibility challenges that define this transformative era in CF research and treatment.

Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor CFTR modulator therapy on rates of endoscopic sinus surgery in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), a combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR) modulator, has demonstrated improved pulmonary outcomes in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, ETI's impact on functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) remains unclear.

METHODS

The TriNetX Analytics Research Network, consisting of 120 million global de-identified electronic medical records, was queried from 2012 to 2023 for subjects with CF who underwent sinus surgery.1 Patients on ETI prior to FESS (n = 6,056) were propensity score matched to control individuals with CF not on CFTR modulators (n = 37,906) and those on other FDA-approved CFTR modulators (tezacaftor/ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, and ivacaftor) (n = 2437) based on relevant factors. The primary outcome was the absolute risk reduction (ARR) of undergoing FESS. Secondary outcomes included ARR of CF-related pulmonary exacerbations and hospital admission from 0 to 6, 6 to 12, and 12 to 24 months following FESS.

RESULTS

ETI use demonstrated a significant ARR for FESS when compared to CF patients not on CFTR modulators (2.12%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.75; p-value < 0.0001) and those on other CFTR modulators (4.7%; 95% CI 3.54-5.85; p-value < 0.0001). No significant differences occurred in secondary outcomes between ETI and non-CFTR modulator groups, except for reduced CF-related pulmonary exacerbations from 0 to 6 months post-FESS. Additionally, a significant reduction in pulmonary exacerbations was observed at all time points and hospital admissions within 6 months following FESS compared to those using other CFTR modulators.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large dataset, CF patients on ETI demonstrated significantly reduced risk of FESS, pulmonary exacerbations, and hospital admission compared to patients not on CFTR modulators or those on other CFTR modulators, suggesting improved sinonasal disease and overall health status in CF.

Update on advances in cystic fibrosis towards a cure and implications for primary care clinicians

During the past quarter century, the diagnosis and treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) have been transformed by molecular sciences that initiated a new era with discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The knowledge gained from that breakthrough has had dramatic clinical impact. Although once a diagnostic dilemma with long delays, preventable deaths, and irreversible pathology, CF can now be routinely diagnosed shortly after birth through newborn screening programs. This strategy of pre-symptomatic identification has eliminated the common diagnostic "odyssey" that was a failure of the healthcare delivery system causing psychologically traumatic experiences for parents. Therapeutic advances of many kinds have culminated in CFTR modulator treatment that can reduce the effects of or even correct the molecular defect in the chloride channel -the basic cause of CF. This astonishing advance has transformed CF care as described fully herein. Despite this impressive progress, there are challenges and controversies in the delivery of care. Issues include how best to achieve high sensitivity newborn screening with acceptable specificity; what course of action is appropriate for children who are identified through the unavoidable incidental findings of screening tests (CFSPID/CRMS cases and heterozygote carriers); how best to ensure genetic counseling; when to initiate the very expensive but life-saving CFTR modulator drugs; how to identify new CFTR modulator drugs for patients with non-responsive CFTR variants; how to adjust other therapeutic modalities; and how to best partner with primary care clinicians. Progress always brings new challenges, and this has been evident worldwide for CF. Consequently, this article summarizes the major advances of recent years along with controversies and describes their implications with an international perspective.