Treatment Differences in Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Between Sociodemographic Groups

Disparities in prescriptions among Danish heart failure patients: a national longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have a Class I indication in the European Society of Cardiology's guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure due to benefits in symptom management, rehospitalization rates, and mortality in heart failure. The aim of this study was to investigate demographic, geographic and socioeconomic disparities in prescriptions for ARNi and SGLT2i for heart failure patients in a universal healthcare system.

METHODS

We used national registers to identify all Danish heart failure patients who were diagnosed on or after the updated clinical guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology (14 July 2016 for ARNi and 27 August 2021 for SGLT2i). Patients were followed until redemption of prescription, emigration, death or censoring on 30 June 2022, whichever came first. The Aalen-Johansen estimator and Cox proportional hazard models were used for individual analysis of ARNi (n=43 625) and SGLT2i (n=2819).

RESULTS

The following factors were associated with lack of prescriptions for ARNi and SGLT2i: being women, older age, living alone and being non-native Danish or descendant. HRs ranged from 0.31 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.36) to 0.86 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93) for ARNi and 0.49 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.58) to 0.93 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.20) for SGLT2i. Prescriptions for both ARNi and SGLT2i showed a social gradient, with the gradient for ARNi being statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial disparity was found in prescriptions for the potentially life-saving medications, with lack of prescriptions being associated with lower education, lower income and several demographic characteristics.

Temporal trends in heart failure and acute kidney injury-related mortality in the U.S.: a 21-year retrospective analysis of the CDC WONDER database

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) and acute kidney injury (AKI) are leading contributors to morbidity and mortality in the United States, often coexisting as part of the cardiorenal syndrome. Understanding long-term mortality trends is crucial for guiding healthcare policies and interventions. This study analyses national trends in HF- and AKI-related mortality from 1999 to 2020, with a focus on age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) and disparities across gender, race/ethnicity, urbanization, and geographic regions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using the CDC WONDER database, extracting mortality data for adults aged 25-85 years. HF- and AKI-related deaths were identified using ICD-10 codes. Temporal trends in AAMR were evaluated using Joinpoint regression, and subgroup analyses were performed to assess disparities.

RESULTS

A total of 219,243 HF- and AKI-related deaths were recorded. The overall AAMR increased from 3.56 per 100,000 in 1999 to 5.30 in 2020 (AAPC: 1.52%; p < 0.001). Males had a higher AAMR than females (5.80 vs. 3.84). NH Black individuals exhibited the steepest rise in mortality, whereas NH White and Asian populations showed stabilization. Nonmetropolitan areas had higher AAMRs compared to metropolitan regions. State-level disparities revealed that North Dakota and West Virginia had the highest mortality rates, whereas Florida and Arizona had the lowest.

CONCLUSION

HF- and AKI-related mortality has risen significantly over the past two decades, with pronounced disparities across demographic and geographic subgroups. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address healthcare inequities and improve outcomes in high-risk populations.

Outpatient worsening heart failure: innovative decongestion strategies and health equity implications

Worsening heart failure (WHF) is a major clinical and economic challenge, contributing to high rates of hospitalization and significant healthcare costs. While WHF has traditionally been managed through hospitalization, recent approaches are shifting toward outpatient care to maximize patient time spent at home and optimize allocation of hospital resources. Emerging treatments like subcutaneous furosemide and intranasal bumetanide offer promising alternatives for safe, well-tolerated, and effective diuresis outside the hospital. However, these novel strategies face several challenges, including the need for clinician/staff training, patient education, logistical difficulties, and a lack of evidence in diverse populations. To ensure equitable management, it is also essential to address healthcare disparities, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged and rural populations. While these new treatments have the potential to improve care delivery, additional research is necessary to assess their comparative effectiveness and overcome current limitations fully.

Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Fewer than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receive all 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Understanding disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy.

METHODS

Utilizing the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry, we examined associations between race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health (insurance type and documented social need [any barrier to accessing health care]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized between July 1, 2021, and September 30, 2023, with complete medication data at discharge. We calculated adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the discharge QTO score (range, 0%-100%) reflecting the proportion of eligible use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and compared across demographic and adverse social determinants of health groups.

RESULTS

Among 82 637 patients (median age, 66 years; 32.5% female; 57.0% non-Hispanic White; 76.4% prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (SD, 25.5). After adjustment, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, Black (AMD, 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.16-2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD, 0.71 percentage points [95% CI, 0.11-1.31]) had higher QTO scores. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD, 1.94 percentage points [95% CI, 1.58-2.31]). Patients with no insurance (AMD, -4.90 percentage points [-5.62 to -4.17]), Medicaid (AMD, -0.45 percentage points [-0.89 to -0.01]), and Medicare (AMD, -1.64 percentage points [-2.10 to -1.18]) had lower QTO scores versus private insurance. Those with an identified social need (n=24 651) had lower QTO scores than those without (AMD, -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10 to -2.71]).

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in QTO were most evident for patients with no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or potentially an identified social need. Future efforts should focus on reducing gaps to improve equitable guideline-directed medical therapy use.

Equity in Heart Failure Care: A Get With the Guidelines Analysis of Between- and Within-Hospital Differences in Care by Sex, Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance

BACKGROUND

Disparities in guideline-based quality measures likely contribute to differences in heart failure (HF) outcomes. We evaluated between- and within-hospital differences in the quality of care across sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance for patients hospitalized for HF.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients hospitalized for HF across 596 hospitals in the Get With the Guidelines-HF registry between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated performance across 7 measures stratified by patient sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. We evaluated differences in performance with and without adjustment for the treating hospital. We also measured variation in hospital-specific disparities.

RESULTS

Among 685 227 patients, the median patient age was 72 (interquartile range, 61-82) and 47.2% were women. Measure performance was significantly lower (worse) for women compared with men for all 7 measures before adjustment. For 4 of 7 measures, there were no significant sex-related differences after patient-level adjustment. For 20 of 25 other comparisons, racial and ethnic minorities and Medicaid/uninsured patients had similar or higher (better) adjusted measure performance compared with White and Medicare/privately insured patients, respectively. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor measure performance was significantly lower for Asian, Hispanic, and Medicaid/uninsured patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription was lower among women and Black patients after hospital adjustment, indicating within-hospital differences. There was hospital-level variation in these differences. For cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription, 278 hospitals (46.6%) had ≥2% lower implant/prescription for Black versus White patients compared with 109 hospitals (18.3%) with the same or higher cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription for Black patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HF quality measure performance was equitable for most measures. There were within-hospital differences in angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription for historically marginalized groups. The magnitude of hospital-specific disparities varied across hospitals.

Determinants of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Implementation During Heart Failure Hospitalization

Background

Despite evidence that guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), implementation remains suboptimal.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to measure GDMT implementation during acute HFrEF hospitalization, evaluate the association between socioeconomic factors and GDMT implementation, and assess the association of GDMT utilization with subsequent clinical events.

Methods

Retrospective determination of GDMT utilization using a modified optimal medical therapy (mOMT) score (which accounts for specific contraindications to drugs) during unplanned HF hospitalization of consecutive adult patients with new-onset or previously diagnosed HFrEF from 2017 to 2018. Outcomes included discharge mOMT score, association between socioeconomic factors and GDMT implementation (assessed using both the Mann-Whitney U test for binary variables and the Kruskall-Wallace for nonbinary variables), composite outcome 1-year all-cause mortality and 1-year HF readmission, and each component as a function of discharge mOMT score (assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models).

Results

Of 391 patients fulfilling entry criteria (of which 152 [38.9%] had new-onset HFrEF), only 49 (12.5%) had a perfect or near-perfect discharge mOMT score. Black patients and those experiencing homelessness had significantly lower discharge mOMT scores. Higher discharge mOMT score is associated with a lower rate of composite endpoint events, particularly in patients with new-onset HFrEF. Overall, a 0.1-increase in the mOMT score resulted in a 9.2% reduction in the composite endpoint.

Conclusions

Suboptimal implementation of GDMT during HF hospitalization is widespread and is associated with a worse outcome. Black patients and patients experiencing homelessness were less likely to have GDMT optimized.

Sex Differences in Cardiac and Clinical Phenotypes and Their Relation to Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure

Biological sex is one of the major factors characterizing the heart failure (HF) patient phenotype. Understanding sex-related differences in HF is crucial to implement personalized care for HF patients with various phenotypes. There are sex differences in left ventricular (LV) remodeling patterns in the HF setting, namely, more likely concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in women and eccentric remodeling and systolic dysfunction in men. Recently supra-normal EF (snLVEF) has been recognized as a risk of worse outcome. This pathology might be more relevant in female patients. The possible mechanism may be through coronary microvascular dysfunction and sympathetic nerve overactivation from the findings of previous studies. Further, estrogen deficit might play a significant role in this pathophysiology. The sex difference in body composition may also be related to the difference in LV remodeling and outcome. Lower implementation in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in female HFrEF patients might also be one of the factors related to sex differences in relation to outcomes. In this review, we will discuss the sex differences in cardiac and clinical phenotypes and their relation to outcomes in HF patients and further discuss how to provide appropriate treatment strategies for female patients.

Trends and site-level variation of novel cardiovascular medication utilization among patients admitted for heart failure or coronary artery disease in the US Veterans Affairs System: 2017-2021

BACKGROUND

We assessed trends in novel cardiovascular medication utilization in US Veterans Affairs (VA) for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified cohorts from 114 VA hospitals with admission for prevalent 1) systolic heart failure (HF, N = 82,375) or 2) coronary artery disease and diabetes (CAD+T2D, N = 74,209). Site-level data for prevalent filled prescriptions were assessed at hospital admission, discharge, or within 6 months of discharge. Variability among sites was estimated with median odds ratios (mOR), and within-site Pearson correlations of utilization of each medication class were calculated. Site- and patient-level characteristics were compared by high-, mixed-, and low-utilizing sites.

RESULTS

ARNI and SGTL2i use for HF increased from <5% to 20% and 21%, respectively, while SGTL2i or GLP-1 RA use for CAD+T2D increased from <5% to 30% from 2017 to 2021. Adjusted mOR and 95% confidence intervals for ARNI, SGTL2i for HF, and SGTL2i or GLP-1 RA for CAD+T2D were 1.73 (1.64-1.91), 1.72 (1.59-1.81), and 1.53 (1.45-1.62), respectively. Utilization of each medication class correlated poorly with use of other novel classes (Pearson <0.38 for all). Higher patient volume, number of beds, and hospital complexity correlated with high-utilizing sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of novel medications has increased over time but remains suboptimal for US Veterans with HF and CAD+T2D, with substantial site-level heterogeneity despite a universal medication formulary and low out-of-pocket costs for patients. Future work should include further characterization of hospital- and clinician-level practice patterns to serve as targets to increase implementation.

Eliminating Health Disparities in Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Dyslipidemia: A Path Toward Achieving Pharmacoequity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pharmacoequity refers to the goal of ensuring that all patients have access to high-quality medications, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or other characteristics. The goal of this article is to review current evidence on disparities in access to cardiovascular drug therapies across sociodemographic subgroups, with a focus on heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and dyslipidemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Considerable and consistent disparities to life-prolonging heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and dyslipidemia medications exist in clinical trial representation, access to specialist care, prescription of guideline-based therapy, drug affordability, and pharmacy accessibility across racial, ethnic, gender, and other sociodemographic subgroups. Researchers, health systems, and policy makers can take steps to improve pharmacoequity by diversifying clinical trial enrollment, increasing access to inpatient and outpatient cardiology care, nudging clinicians to increase prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy, and pursuing system-level reforms to improve drug access and affordability.