Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions

In Silico Evaluation of In Vivo Degradation Kinetics of Poly(Lactic Acid) Vascular Stent Devices

Biodegradable vascular stents (BVS) are deemed as great potential alternatives for overcoming the inherent limitations of permanent metallic stents in the treatment of coronary artery diseases. The current study aimed to comprehensively compare the mechanical behaviors of four poly(lactic acid) (PLA) BVS designs with varying geometries via numerical methods and to clarify the optimal BVS selection. Four PLA BVS (i.e., Absorb, DESolve, Igaki-Tamai, and Fantom) were first constructed. A degradation model was refined by simply including the fatigue effect induced by pulsatile blood pressures, and an explicit solver was employed to simulate the crimping and degradation behaviors of the four PLA BVS. The degradation dynamics here were characterized by four indices. The results indicated that the stent designs affected crimping and degradation behaviors. Compared to the other three stents, the DESolve stent had the greatest radial stiffness in the crimping simulation and the best diameter maintenance ability despite its faster degradation; moreover, the stent was considered to perform better according to a pilot scoring system. The current work provides a theoretical method for studying and understanding the degradation dynamics of the PLA BVS, and it could be helpful for the design of next-generation BVS.

Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Frontiers: A Dive Into Cutting-Edge Innovations in Coronary Stent Technology

Plain balloon angioplasty was the initial method used to enlarge the intracoronary lumen size. However, it was linked to acute coronary closure due to early vessel recoil. This led to the invention of coronary stents, which offer mechanical support to open and maintain the vascular lumen. Nevertheless, the metallic scaffold introduced other issues, such as thrombosis and restenosis caused by neointimal proliferation. To address these concerns, polymers were employed to cover the scaffold, acting as drug reservoirs and regulators for controlled drug release. The use of polymers prevents direct contact between blood and metallic scaffolds. Drugs within the stent were incorporated to inhibit proliferation and expedite endothelialization in the healing process. Despite these advancements, adverse effects still arise due to the inflammatory reaction caused by the polymer material. Consequently, resorbable polymers and scaffolds were later discovered, but they have limitations and are not universally applicable. Various scaffold designs, thicknesses, materials, polymer components, and drugs have their own advantages and complications. Each stent generation has been designed to address the shortcomings of the preceding generation, yet new challenges continue to emerge. Conflicting data regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of coronary stents, especially in the extended follow-up, further complicates the assessment.

Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery stenosis: Rationale, design and methodology of the OPTIMIS study

Introduction

Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) provide the vessel support for a limited period allowing the vessel to restore normal vasomotion after degradation of the BRS, opposed to treatment with drug-eluting stents where the metal persist in the vessel wall. Late lumen loss and reduction in lumen area after implantation have been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether intense pre-dilatation before BRS implantation resulted in less reduction of minimal lumen area at 6- and 12-month follow-up after implantation of a Magmaris BRS (MgBRS). Coronary imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was assessed to track changes in lumen and vessel dimensions.

Methods

The prospective Optimal lesion PreparaTion before Implantation of the Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold In patients with coronary artery Stenosis (OPTIMIS) study randomly assigned eighty-two patients with chronic coronary syndrome to two pre-dilatation treatment strategies. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to pre-dilatation with either a non-compliant scoring balloon or a standard non-compliant balloon prior to implantation of a MgBRS. The treated segment was evaluated with OCT and IVUS at baseline, after 6 and 12 months to assess changes in lumen and vessel dimensions. The hypothesis was that more intense pre-dilatation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before MgBRS implantation can reduce the risk of late lumen reduction compared to standard pre-dilatation. The power calculation used expected MLA after 6 months (6.22 mm2 for the scoring balloon and 5.01 mm2 for the standard non-compliant balloon), power of 80 %, significance level of 0.05 and expected drop-out rate of 15 %, requiring 82 patients to be enrolled.

Results

Eighty-two patients were included in the study. Enrollment was from December 2020 to September 2023.

Conclusion

The hypothesis was that more intense pre-dilatation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before MgBRS implantation can reduce the risk of late lumen reduction compared to standard pre-dilatation.

Hybrid interpenetrating network of polyester coronary stent with tunable biodegradation and mechanical properties

Poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) is an important candidate raw material of the next-generation biodegradable stent for percutaneous coronary intervention, yet how to make a polyester stent with sufficient mechanical strength and relatively fast biodegradation gets to be a dilemma. Herein, we put forward a hybrid interpenetrating network (H-IPN) strategy to resolve this dilemma. As such, we synthesize a multi-functional biodegradable macromer of star-like poly(d,l-lactide-co-ɛ-caprolactone) with six acrylate end groups, and photoinitiate it, after mixing with linear PLLA homopolymer, to trigger the free radical polymerization. The resultant crosslinked polymer blend is different from the classic semi-interpenetrating network, and partial chemical crosslinking occurs between the linear polymer and the macromer network. Combined with the tube blow molding and the postprocessing laser cutting, we fabricate a semi-crosslinked-polyester biodegradable coronary stent composed of H-IPN, which includes a physical network of polyester spherulites and a chemical crosslinking network of copolyester macromers and a part of homopolymers. Compared with the currently main-stream PLLA stent in research, this H-IPN stent realizes a higher and more appropriate biodegradation rate while maintaining sufficient radial strength. A series of polymer chemistry, polymer physics, polymer processing, and in vitro and in vivo biological assessments of medical devices have been made to examine the H-IPN material. The interventional implanting of the H-IPN stent into aorta abdominalis of rabbits and the follow-ups to 12 months have confirmed the safety and effectiveness.

Safety and efficacy of new-generation coronary bioresorbable scaffolds

INTRODUCTION

The concept of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) was born with the aim to reduce the rate of late and very late cardiac events related to drug-eluting stents. However, first-generation BRS failed to prove their short-term safety and efficacy. Based on data derived from early investigations, new-generation BRS have been developed and tested in preliminary studies. The present review's focus was to summarize the mechanical characteristics of these new scaffolds and the clinical evidence of their safety and efficacy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Biomed central databases were analyzed. Only papers published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were selected to summarize current evidence about new generation BRS, with CE mark approval. Overall, 23 studies were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data obtained from selected studies assessing the safety and efficacy of new generation BRS are encouraging. This is thanks to the progressive development of scaffolds with a different backbone structure and struts thickness that guarantee higher radial strength, flexibility, and resistance to fracture. These characteristics led to low rates of major adverse cardiac events and device-oriented composite endpoint at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

New-generation BRS have a good safety profile in stable patients with simple lesions, supported by a meticulous implantation technique. The first studies were performed on a small population with short-term follow-up, therefore new randomized clinical trials and registries are needed to expand the preliminary findings.

Drug loaded implantable devices to treat cardiovascular disease

INTRODUCTION

It is widely acknowledged that cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be the leading cause of death globally. Furthermore, CVDs are the leading cause of diminished quality of life for patients, frequently as a result of their progressive deterioration. Medical implants that release drugs into the body are active implants that do more than just provide mechanical support; they also have a therapeutic role. Primarily, this is achieved through the controlled release of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) at the implementation site.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discuss drug-eluting stents, drug-eluting vascular grafts, and drug-eluting cardiac patches with the aim of providing a broad overview of the three most common types of cardiac implant.

EXPERT OPINION

Drug eluting implants are an ideal alternative to traditional drug delivery because they allow for accurate drug release, local drug delivery to the target tissue, and minimise the adverse side effects associated with systemic administration. Despite the fact that there are still challenges that need to be addressed, the ever-evolving new technologies are making the fabrication of drug eluting implants a rewarding therapeutic endeavour with the possibility for even greater advances.

Advances in the development of biodegradable coronary stents: A translational perspective

Implantation of cardiovascular stents is an important therapeutic method to treat coronary artery diseases. Bare-metal and drug-eluting stents show promising clinical outcomes, however, their permanent presence may create complications. In recent years, numerous preclinical and clinical trials have evaluated the properties of bioresorbable stents, including polymer and magnesium-based stents. Three-dimensional (3D) printed-shape-memory polymeric materials enable the self-deployment of stents and provide a novel approach for individualized treatment. Novel bioresorbable metallic stents such as iron- and zinc-based stents have also been investigated and refined. However, the development of novel bioresorbable stents accompanied by clinical translation remains time-consuming and challenging. This review comprehensively summarizes the development of bioresorbable stents based on their preclinical/clinical trials and highlights translational research as well as novel technologies for stents (e.g., bioresorbable electronic stents integrated with biosensors). These findings are expected to inspire the design of novel stents and optimization approaches to improve the efficacy of treatments for cardiovascular diseases.

•

Bioresorbable stents can overcome the limitations of non-degradable stents.

•

3D printing of shape-memory polymeric stents can lead to better clinical outcomes.

•

Advances in Mg-, Fe- and Zn-based stents from a translational perspective.

•

Electronic stents integrated with biosensors can covey stent status in real time.

•

Development in the assessment of stent performance in vivo.

Development of Biodegradable Polymeric Stents for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular disease has become the leading cause of death. A vascular stent is an effective means for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In recent years, biodegradable polymeric vascular stents have been widely investigated by researchers because of its degradability and clinical application potential for cardiovascular disease treatment. Compared to non-biodegradable stents, these stents are designed to degrade after vascular healing, leaving regenerated healthy arteries. This article reviews and summarizes the recent advanced methods for fabricating biodegradable polymeric stents, including injection molding, weaving, 3D printing, and laser cutting. Besides, the functional modification of biodegradable polymeric stents is also introduced, including visualization, anti-thrombus, endothelialization, and anti-inflammation. In the end, the challenges and future perspectives of biodegradable polymeric stents were discussed.

Long-term results of long segment coronary artery lesions overlapped with novolimus-eluting DESolve scaffold: Disappointment or futuristic?

OBJECTIVE

The data on using novolimus-eluting DESolve bioresorbable scaffolds (BVS) for long-segment coronary artery lesions remains insufficient. In this study, our main objective was to assess the long-term effects of the overlapping applications of both DESolve-DESolve and the drug-eluting stent (DES)-DESolve.

METHODS

A single-centered study of 103 patients scheduled for DESolve placement for long-segment lesions (>28 mm) was conducted (October 2013 to November 2016). A DESolve-DESolve overlap was used on 43 patients and a DES-DESolve overlap on 60 patients. Acute procedural success and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (stent thrombosis, targeted vessel revascularization, targeted lesion revascularization, and cardiac death) were evaluated. The patients were followed up for 48 months.

RESULTS

Revascularization was performed on 4 (6.7%) patients in the DES-DESolve group and 5 (11.6%) patients in the DESolve-DESolve group for target lesion revascularization. Among the study population, 10 (9.7%) patients had MACE, including 5 (8.3%) patients in the DES-DESolve group and 5 (11.6%) patients in the DESolve-DESolve group.

CONCLUSION

The positive results of our study concerning the use of DESolve for the treatment of long coronary lesions demonstrate that BVS will emerge with new platforms and become non-inferior to the DES.

Imaging and 2-year clinical outcomes of thin strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: The MeRes-1 extend trial

OBJECTIVES

This study explores the safety and efficacy of thin strut MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.

BACKGROUND

In interventional cardiology, the emergence of BRS technology is catalyzing the next paradigm shift.

METHODS

The MeRes-1 Extend was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, open-label study enrolling 64 patients in Spain, Macedonia, Brazil, South Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The imaging efficacy endpoint was mean in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 69 target lesions were identified in 64 enrolled patients (mean age 58.30 ± 9.02 years). Of the treated lesions, 49 (71.01%) lesions were of type B2/C. Procedural and device success was achieved in 64 and 62 patients, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, MACE was reported in one patient (1.61%) in the form of ID-TLR. There was no case of MI, cardiac death or scaffold thrombosis through 2-year. In a subset of 32 patients, paired QCA showed mean in-scaffold LLL of 0.18 ± 0.31 mm at 6-month follow-up. In a subset of 21 patients, OCT revealed 97.95 ± 3.69% strut coverage with mean scaffold area of 7.56 ± 1.79 mm² and no evidence of strut malapposition.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and imaging outcomes of MeRes-1 Extend trial demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting BRS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.

Development of a polycaprolactone/poly(p-dioxanone) bioresorbable stent with mechanically self-reinforced structure for congenital heart disease treatment

Recent progress in bioresorbable stents (BRSs) has provided a promising alternative for treating coronary artery disease. However, there is still lack of BRSs with satisfied compression and degradation performance for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, leading to suboptimal therapy effects. Here, we developed a mechanically self-reinforced composite bioresorbable stent (cBRS) for congenital heart disease application. The cBRS consisted of poly(p-dioxanone) monofilaments and polycaprolactone/poly(p-dioxanone) core-shell composite yarns. Interlacing points in cBRS structure were partially bonded, offering the cBRS with significantly higher compression force compared to typical braids and remained good compliance. The suitable degradation profile of the cBRS can possibly preserve vascular remodeling and healing process. In addition, the controllable structural organization provides a method to customize the performance of the cBRS by altering the proportion of different components in the braids. The in vivo results suggested the cBRS supported the vessel wall similar to that of metallic stent. In both abdominal aorta and iliac artery of porcine, cBRS was entirely endothelialized within 1 month and maintained target vessels with good patency in the 12-month follow-up. The in vivo degradation profile of the cBRS is consistent with static degradation results in vitro. It is also demonstrated that there is minimal impact of pulsatile pressure of blood flow and variation of radial force on the degradation rate of the cBRS. Moreover, the lumen of cBRS implanted vessels were enlarged after 6 months, and significantly larger than the vessels implanted with metallic stent in 12 months.

Predictors of scaffold failure and impact of optimized scaffold implantation technique on outcome: Results from the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy

AIMS

We aimed to investigate predictors of scaffold failure and the potential impact of an optimized scaffold implantation technique by means of a learning curve on long-term clinical outcome after bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) implantation and to evaluate predictors of scaffold failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3326 patients were included in this prospective, observational, multi-center study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02066623) of consecutive patients undergoing BRS implantation between November 2013 and January 2016. The 3144 patients completed follow-up after 24 months, 3265 patients were eligible for time-to-event-analysis. Clinical endpoints were major adverse cardiac events-a composite endpoint of death, target vessel revascularization and myocardial infarction, and scaffold thrombosis (ScT). Patients were grouped according to treatment before or since 2015. During follow-up MACE rate improved from 2.52% after 30 days, 5.45% after 6 months and 12.67% after 24 months to 1.52%, 3.44%, and 10.52%, respectively. A total of 75 ScT occurred. In multiple regression analysis, treatment of bifurcations, long lesions, and procedures performed earlier than 2014 were identified as predictors for the occurrence of ScT.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of bifurcation lesions is the strongest predictor of ScT following BRS implantation. A significantly lower incidence of ScT and 24-month target lesion revascularization in patients recruited after 2014 into our observational registry suggests the influence of a learning curve.

Thinner Strut Sirolimus-Eluting BRS Versus EES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: FUTURE-II Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of thinner strut Firesorb (100/125 μm) sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

First-generation thicker strut BRS were associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Eligible patients with 1 or 2 de novo noncomplex coronary lesions were randomized to the Firesorb BRS group or CoCr-EES group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 1-year angiographic in-segment late loss (LL), powered for noninferiority testing. The key secondary endpoint was the 1-year proportion of covered struts assessed on optical coherence tomography, powered for noninferiority and subsequent superiority testing.

RESULTS

A total of 433 participants from 28 Chinese centers were randomized to the Firesorb BRS group (n = 215) or CoCr-EES group (n = 218). Patient-level 1-year in-segment LL was 0.17 ± 0.27 mm in the Firesorb BRS group and 0.18 ± 0.37 mm in the CoCr-EES group (difference -0.01 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.07 to 0.06; p_{noninferiority} < 0.0001) in the intention-to-treat population and was 0.17 ± 0.27 mm in the Firesorb BRS group and 0.19 ± 0.37 mm in the CoCr-EES group (difference -0.005 mm; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.06; p_{noninferiority} < 0.0001) in the per-protocol set. The proportion of covered struts was 99.3% in the Firesorb BRS group and 98.8% in the CoCr-EES group (difference 0.8%; 95% CI: -0.5% to 2.1%; p_{noninferiority} < 0.0001; p_superiority = 0.21). One-year clinical outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The thinner strut Firesorb BRS was noninferior to the CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of 1-year angiographic in-segment LL and the key secondary endpoint of 1-year proportion of covered struts by optical coherence tomography. (A Trial of Firesorb in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: FUTURE-II [FUTURE-II]; NCT02890160).

Biosafety and efficacy evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium-based drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary artery

Although the drug-eluting stent (DES) has become the standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based revascularization, concerns remain regarding the use of DES, mainly due to its permanent rigid constraint to vessels. A drug-eluting bioresorbable stent (BRS) was thus developed as an alternative to DES, which can be absorbed entirely after its therapeutic period. Magnesium (Mg)-based BRSs have attracted a great deal of attention due to their suitable mechanical properties, innovative chemical features, and well-proven biocompatibility. However, the primary disadvantage of Mg-based BRSs is the rapid degradation rate, resulting in the early loss of structural support long before the recovery of vascular function. Recently, a new type of patented Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy (JDBM) was developed at Shanghai Jiao Tong University to reduce the degradation rate compared to commercial Mg alloys. In the present investigation, a poly(D,L-lactic acid)-coated and rapamycin eluting (PDLLA/RAPA) JDBM BRS was prepared, and its biosafety and efficacy for coronary artery stenosis were evaluated via in vitro and in vivo experiments. The degree of smooth muscle cell adhesion to the PDLLA/RAPA coated alloy and the rapamycin pharmacokinetics of JDBM BRS were first assessed in vitro. JDBM BRS and commercial DES FIREHAWK were then implanted in the coronary arteries of a porcine model. Neointimal hyperplasia was evaluated at 30, 90, and 180 days, and re-endothelialization was evaluated at 30 days. Furthermore, Micro-CT and optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses were performed 180 days after stent implantation to evaluate the technical feasibility, biocompatibility, and degradation characteristics of JDBM BRS in vivo. The results show the ability of a PDLLA/RAPA coated JDBM to inhibit smooth muscle cell adhesion and moderate the drug release rate of JDBM BRS in vitro. In vivo, low local and systemic risks of JDBM BRS were demonstrated in the porcine model, with preserved mechanical integrity after 6 months of implantation. We also showed that this novel BRS was associated with a similar efficacy profile compared with standard DES and high anti-restenosis performance. These findings may confer long term advantages for using this BRS over a traditional DES.

Current perspectives on bioresorbable scaffolds in coronary intervention and other fields

Introduction: The first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) had a large strut profile to compensate for the insufficient radial strength of bioresorbable polymer materials, resulting in higher scaffold thrombosis rates than conventional drug-eluting stents. To improve the clinical safety and efficacy, the new generation BRSs have been improved by optimal structure design, post-processing of bioresorbable polymer materials, or altering bioresorbable metallic alloys.Areas covered: This review summarizes the lessons learned from the first-generation BRS, updates the clinical outcomes of trials evaluating ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold at long-term and bioresorbable metallic alloy-based devices, and examines recent outcomes of BRS treated in STEMI patients. This review also provides an overview of the current clinical data of seven BRSs manufactured in Asia, and of the BRSs extended application in other clinical arenas.Expert opinion: Drawbacks of the first-generation BRSs need to be addressed by the next generation of these stents with novel materials and technologies. Clinical research, including randomized controlled trials, are required to further evaluate BRSs application in coronary artery disease. The encouraging results of BRSs innovation applied in the peripheral arteries and gastrointestinal tracts support other potential clinical applications of BRS technology.

The Use of Bioactive Polymers for Intervention and Tissue Engineering: The New Frontier for Cardiovascular Therapy

Coronary heart disease remains one of the leading causes of death in most countries. Healthcare improvements have seen a shift in the presentation of disease with a reducing number of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs), largely due to earlier reperfusion strategies such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Stents have revolutionized the care of these patients, but the long-term effects of these devices have been brought to the fore. The conceptual and technologic evolution of these devices from bare-metal stents led to the creation and wide application of drug-eluting stents; further research introduced the idea of polymer-based resorbable stents. We look at the evolution of stents and the multiple advantages and disadvantages offered by each of the different polymers used to make stents in order to identify what the stent of the future may consist of whilst highlighting properties that are beneficial to the patient alongside the role of the surgeon, the cardiologist, engineers, chemists, and biophysicists in creating the ideal stent.

The DESolve® novolimus bioresorbable scaffold

A longtime aspiration of interventional cardiologists remains to improve the long-term impact of stent permanence in coronaries to restore original vessel patency and physiological endothelium response. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds were considered revolutionary in coronary devices, but several trials were disappointing; thus, the challenge in this field remains. DESolve is a novolimus-eluting poly-L lactide-based polymer scaffold that dissolves through a bio-reabsorption mechanism, vanishing completely in 2 years. Its ability to supply the necessary radial strength to support the vessel for the critical early months after delivery is an important feature showing a unique self-correction property, which reduces incomplete stent apposition. Overexpansion has a good, safe margin with DESolve. This review aims to provide an overview of this controversial topic.

Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Facing Old Problems, Raising New Hopes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss about the reasons behind the failure of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) device and about the challenges the future holds for the next generation of the bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) technology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Absorb BVS was burdened by intrinsic structural limitations which resulted in augmented rates of device thrombosis and clinical adverse events compared to current-generation metallic stent. Nevertheless, new generation devices with novel design and materials are in development. Second generation BRS have enhanced mechanical strength, smaller footprints, less thrombogenicity and modified bioresorption. These features, paired with proper patient and lesion selection and optimal "user-friendly" implant techniques, could possibly overcome the previous BRS generation limitations, rekindling physicians, and industry interest on this promising technology.

Designing Better Cardiovascular Stent Materials - A Learning Curve

Cardiovascular stents are life-saving devices and one of the top 10 medical breakthroughs of the 21st century. Decades of research and clinical trials have taught us about the effects of material (metal or polymer), design (geometry, strut thickness, and the number of connectors), and drug-elution on vasculature mechanics, hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, and patient health. Recently developed novel bioresorbable stents are intended to overcome common issues of chronic inflammation, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis associated with permanent stents, but there is still much to learn. Increased knowledge and advanced methods in material processing have led to new stent formulations aimed at improving the performance of their predecessors but often comes with potential tradeoffs. This review aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of stent material interactions with the host within five areas of contrasting characteristics, such as 1) metal or polymer, 2) bioresorbable or permanent, 3) drug elution or no drug elution, 4) bare or surface-modified, and 5) self-expanding or balloon-expanding perspectives, as they relate to pre-clinical and clinical outcomes and concludes with directions for future studies.

Twelve-month clinical and imaging outcomes of the uncaging coronary DynamX bioadaptor system

AIMS

We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the DynamX Novolimus-Eluting Coronary Bioadaptor System, a novel device that initially acts as a second-generation drug-eluting stent, but after six months frees the vessel through uncaging elements.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre study enrolled 50 patients with single de novo lesions. In-device acute lumen gain was 1.61±0.34 mm, and device and procedure success was 100%. Up to 12 months, two target lesion failures occurred: both were cardiac deaths (day 255 and day 267 post procedure). No definite or probable device thrombosis was observed. Mean late lumen loss was 0.12±0.18 mm in-device and 0.11±0.16 mm in-segment. Per intravascular ultrasound, the mean device area and mean vessel area increased significantly by 5% and 3%, respectively, while the mean lumen area was maintained. Stationary optical coherence tomography in seven patients demonstrated restoration of cyclic pulsatility, with an approximate lumen area variance of 11% between systole and diastole.

CONCLUSIONS

The DynamX bioadaptor showed drug-eluting stent-like acute performance and safety and efficacy up to one year. Positive remodelling with an increase of vessel and device area while maintaining the mean lumen area was demonstrated. Long-term follow-up and randomised trials are required to assess the benefit of this device on events beyond one year.

Long-term comparison of everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in real world patients

INTRODUCTION

Elevated risk of adverse events in comparison to metallic stents resulted in withdrawal of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (eBVS), known as the most intensively studied BVS. There is a paucity of data comparing the two different BVS.

AIM

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of the novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (nBVS) compared with eBVS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients treated with nBVS or eBVS in our center were screened. The primary outcome was the 3-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

After matching, 98 patients treated with 135 eBVS were compared with 98 patients treated with 136 nBVS. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and lesion characteristics were comparable in both groups. The 3-year MACE rate was higher in the eBVS group (17.3% vs. 6.1%; p log-rank = 0.02). The occurrence of TLR (16.3% vs. 5.1%; p log-rank = 0.02) and TV-MI (8.2% vs. 0 %; p log-rank = 0.004) was also higher in the eBVS group except for cardiac deaths (1% vs. 2%; p log-rank = 0.98, eBVS vs. nBVS, respectively). Of note, definite device thrombosis rate was markedly increased in the eBVS group (5.1% vs. 0%; p log-rank = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed that the 3-year event risk was lower for nBVS compared to eBVS. More evidence is needed to evaluate long-term performance of novolimus-eluting biovascular platforms.

Long-term follow-up of therapeutic efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in comparison to everolimus-eluting stent in treatment of chronic total occlusion guided by intracoronary imaging

Background

We hypothesized that 1st generation everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) stent associated with less complication and less restenosis rate than everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization guided by intracoronary imaging. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and performance of BVS stent in CTO revascularization in comparison to EES guided by intracoronary imaging.

Our prospective comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 60 CTO patients divided into two groups according to type of stent revascularization: group I (EES group): 40 (66.7%) patients and group II (BVS group): 20 (33.3%) patients. All patients were subjected to history taking, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, laboratory investigation, stress thallium study to assess viability before revascularization. Revascularization of viable CTO lesion guided by intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Then, long-term follow-up over 1 year clinically and by multi-slice CT coronary angiography (MSCT). Our clinical and angiographic endpoints were to detect any clinical or angiographic complications during the follow-up period.

Results

At 6 months angiographic follow-up, BVS group had not inferior angiographic parameters but without statistically significant difference (p = 0.566). At 12 months follow-up, there was no difference at end points between the two groups (p = 0.476).

No differences were found at angiographic or clinical follow-up between BVS and EES.

Conclusion

This study shows that 1st generation everolimus-eluting BVS is non-inferior to EES for CTO revascularization. Further studies are needed to clearly state which new smaller footprint BVS, faster reabsorption, magnesium-based less thrombogenicity, and advanced mechanical properties is under development. We cannot dismiss the efficacy and safety of new BVS technology.

Trial registration

ZU-IRB#2498/3-12-2016 Registered 3 December 2016, email: IRB_123@medicine.zu.edu.eg

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions

Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic implants not only prevents the process of positive vessel remodeling and the restoration of vascular physiology but also makes the future revascularization of target vessels more difficult. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have been developed as a potential solution to avoid the above adverse reactions caused by permanent metallic devices. BRSs provide temporary support to the vessel wall in the short term and then gradually degrade over time to restore the natural state of coronary arteries. Nonetheless, long-term follow-up of large-scale trials has drawn considerable attention to the safety of BRSs, and the significantly increased risk of late scaffold thrombosis (ScT) limits its clinical application. In this review, we summarize the current status and clinical experiences of BRSs to understand the application prospects and limitations of these devices. In addition, we focus on ScT after implantation, as it is currently the primary drawback of BRS. We also analyze the causes of ScT and discuss improvements required to overcome this serious drawback and to move the field forward.

Poly (l-lactic acid) bioresorbable scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been proposed for overcoming the long-term limitations of permanent metallic stents, while theoretically warranting similar advantages in plaque stabilization and anti-restenotic drug delivery in the early postrevascularization phase. However, increased rates of malapposition, restenosis, or thrombosis have emerged from initial trials with BVS, that were nevertheless underpowered for the evaluation of the real outcome benefits of these coronary devices. The recent completion of newer randomized clinical trials paves the way to the present meta-analysis, aiming at the comparison of Poly (l-Lactic acid) BVS (PLLA-BVS) versus metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary stenoses.

METHODS

Literature and main scientific session abstracts were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing drug-eluting BVS versus metallic DES for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The primary efficacy endpoint was mortality, secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis and the composite of device-oriented target lesion failure (TLF).

RESULTS

We included 11 randomized trials, for a total population of 10,707 patients, 54.5% treated with BVS. The major indication for PCI was stable CAD, whereas acute coronary syndrome represented 30% of the patients. At a mean follow-up of 2.64 years (1-5 years), mortality occurred in 2.71% of the patients, with no difference according to the type of implanted stent (OR[95%CI] = 0.94 [0.74, 1.20], p = .62). No interaction was observed according to patients' risk profile or the rate of diabetes and ACS. However, a significant increase in myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, TLR and TLF was observed with BVS as compared to DES.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis provides the most updated data on the use of PLLA-BVS for the treatment of CAD. We documented a poorer performance of these new coronary devices, as compared to new generation metallic DES, being associated with an increased rate of recurrent cardiovascular events. However, such ischemic complications did not impact on mortality, with a comparable survival independently from the type of stent.

Outcomes of the novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in real world clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Most of the current data regarding the use of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) come from everolimus-eluting stent platforms. Adverse events with the everolimus-eluting BRSs which are the most comprehensively characterized BRS, hampered the clinical use of other BRS. There is paucity of published data regarding long term use of novolimus-eluting BRS.

METHODS

This study sought to evaluate the performance of novolimus-eluting BRS device at midterm follow-up in real world clinical practice. One hundred and forty-four patients (mean age 57.5±9.7 years, 78.5% male) treated with 206 scaffolds between October 2015 and December 2017 were enrolled. A device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and rate of scaffold thrombosis were investigated.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 33±9 months, DOCE occurred in 9 patients (6.3%) of which cardiac death occurred in 2 patients (1.4%), and clinically driven TLR in 7 patients (4.9%), TV-MI in one patient. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was observed in nine patients. None of the patients experienced scaffold thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of novolimus-eluting BRS in this real-world population achieved good clinical outcomes.

Preclinical comparative assessment of a dedicated pediatric poly-L-lactic-acid-based bioresorbable scaffold with a low-profile bare metal stent

BACKGROUND

Polymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (PBBS) have been assessed for coronary revascularization with mixed outcomes. Few studies have targeted pediatric-specific scaffolds. We sought to assess safety, efficacy, and short-term performance of a dedicated drug-free PBBS pediatric scaffold compared to a standard low-profile bare metal stent (BMS) in central and peripheral arteries of weaned piglets.

METHODS

Forty-two devices (22 Elixir poly-L-lactic-acid-based pediatric bioresorbable scaffolds [BRS] [6 × 18 mm] and 20 control BMS Cook Formula 418 [6 × 20 mm]) were implanted in the descending aorta and pulmonary arteries (PAs) of 14 female Yucatan piglets. Quantitative measurements were collected on the day of device deployment and 30 and 90 days postimplantation to compare device patency and integrity.

RESULTS

The BRS has a comparable safety profile to the BMS in the acute setting. Late lumen loss (LLL) and percent diameter stenosis (%DS) were not significantly different between BRS and BMS in the PA at 30 days. LLL and %DS were greater for BRS versus BMS in the aorta at 30 days postimplantation (LLL difference: 0.96 ± 0.26; %DS difference: 16.15 ± 4.51; p < .05). At 90 days, %DS in the aortic BRS was less, and PA BRS LLL was also less than BMS. Histomorphometric data showed greater intimal proliferation and area stenosis in the BRS at all time points and in all vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated PBBS pediatric BRS has a favorable safety profile in the acute/subacute setting and demonstrates characteristics that are consistent with adult BRSs.

Is the Dream of Vascular Restoration Still Alive? A Case of 7 Years, Follow-Up After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) have the aim to combine short-term radial force by vessel scaffold (which should dissolve after few months), with drug eluting capability. It has been hypothesized that complete resorption would result in restoration of vasomotion, reduction in angina and reduction of restenosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of 7 years angiographic follow up after DESolve Novolimus eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System implantation.

CONCLUSION

The invasive control showed persistence of scaffold patency and evidence of restored vascular motility by the growing in vessel diameter at QCA control after nitrates administration.

Bioresorbable vascular stents and drug-eluting stents in treatment of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable vascular stents (BVS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in coronary heart disease.

METHODS

The full text of clinical studies involving BVS and DES was retrieved in PubMed, Springer, EMBASE, Wiley-Blackwell, and Chinese Journal Full-text Database. Review Manager 5.3 was used for meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of target lesion failure, stent thrombosis and cardiac death in BVS and DES.

RESULTS

Finally, 10 studies with 6383 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with DES group, BVS group had significantly increased risk of target lesion failure (OR = 1.46, 95%CI 1.20-1.79, P = 0.0002; P _{Heterogeneity} = 0.68, I² = 0%), stent thrombosis (OR = 2.70, 95%CI 1.57-4.66, P = 0.0003; P _{Heterogeneity} = 1.00, I² = 0%) and cardiac death (OR = 2.19, 95%CI 1.17-4.07, P = 0.01; P _{Heterogeneity} = 0.93, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that DES is a safer treatment than BVS for coronary revascularization.

Fully bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: lessons learned and future directions

Fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were designed to overcome the limitations of metallic drug-eluting stents, which permanently cage the vessel wall, thereby preventing normal coronary vasomotion, preclude bypass grafting and can provoke long-term foreign-body responses. Although multiple scaffolds have been or are in development, the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS; Abbott Vascular) was the first FDA-approved device and was widely expected to fulfil the dream of interventional cardiologists of a transient scaffold that would disappear 'when the job was done' and would not hamper further treatment options. Although early, small studies and even large, randomized trials showed beneficial outcomes up to 1 year of follow-up, longer-term results have been disappointing, with increased rates of device thrombosis and target-lesion revascularization. The Absorb BVS device was withdrawn from the market because of low demand. In this Review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical data available for BRS to understand how the vascular biological reactions to these devices differ from biological reactions to metallic drug-eluting stents and how these responses translate into clinical outcomes. We also discuss next-generation BRS and outline modifications that are needed to improve the long-term outcomes with these devices so that they eventually become a viable option for patients with symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease.

First-in-man study of a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (FUTURE-I): Three-year clinical and imaging outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The FUTURE-I study aimed to assess preliminary safety and effectiveness with the long-term clinical and imaging follow-up for the Firesorb (MicroPort, Shanghai, China), a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS).

BACKGROUND

First-generation BRS has been associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, first-in-man study, patients with single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized 2:1 into two cohorts after successful Firesorb implantation: cohort 1 (n = 30) underwent multimodality imaging assessment at 6 and 24 months; and cohort 2 (n = 15) at 12 and 36 months. All patients underwent clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually up to 5 years.

RESULTS

Between January and March 2016, 45 patients were enrolled. At 3-year follow-up, one patient had experienced target lesion failure and none scaffold thrombosis. In-scaffold minimal lumen diameter decreased significantly from 6-month to 2-year (2.53 ± 0.24 mm vs. 2.27 ± 0.37 mm, p = .0003), and only numerically from 1-year to 3-year follow-up (2.48 ± 0.28 mm vs. 2.22 ± 0.13 mm, p = .08). By optical coherence tomography, neointimal strut coverage at 3-year follow-up was 99.8%, and very low rate of late scaffold discontinuity was observed, only in one patient on two cross sections with three malapposed struts.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3-year follow-up of the FUTURE-I study, implantation of the thinner-strut Firesorb BRS appeared preliminary feasible and effective in the treatment of patients with noncomplex coronary lesions.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Percutaneous coronary interventions with stent-based restorations of vessel patency have become the gold standard in the treatment of acute coronary states. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been designed to combine the efficiency of drug-eluting stents (DES) at the time of implantation and the advantages of a lack of foreign body afterwards. Complete resolution of the scaffold was intended to enable the restoration of vasomotor function and reduce the risk of device thrombosis. While early reports demonstrated superiority of BVS over DES, larger-scale application and longer observation exposed major concerns about their use, including lower radial strength and higher risk of thrombosis resulting in higher rate of major adverse cardiac events. Further focus on procedural details and research on the second generation of BVS with novel properties did not allow to unequivocally challenge position of DES. Nevertheless, BVS still have a chance to present superiority in distinctive indications. This review presents an outlook on the available first and second generation BVS and a summary of results of clinical trials on their use. It discusses explanations for unfavorable outcomes, proposed enhancement techniques and a potential niche for the use of BVS.

OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze individual differences in resorption of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) through optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis and to identify factors potentially influencing the resorption process.

METHODS

Between April 2016 and July 2017 clinically driven invasive coronary angiography and OCT examinations were performed in 36 patients who had previously been treated with a total of 48 BRS (ABSORB BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). For each scaffold, a new BRS-RESORB-INDEX (BRI) was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean time interval since implantation was 789 ± 321 days. In OCT, BRS struts remained detectable in all 48 BRS. Normalized light intensity as a marker for the resorption of BRS struts increased with time in a linear fashion (Spearman Rho: p < .001, correlation coefficient = .90; R² [linear] = .91). Multivariable analysis identified diabetes (BRI of patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes: 0.34 ± 0.13 vs. 0.58 ± 0.22; p = .002) and presence of Peri-strut low intensity areas (PSLIA, BRI of 10 patients with PSLIA vs. 26 patients without PSLIA: 0.44 ± 0.21 vs. 0.61 ± 18; p = .027) as independent predictors for a prolonged BRS resorption, whereas the resorption rate in ACS patients (STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina; n = 13) was significantly higher as compared to patients without ACS (0.62 ± 0.17 vs. 0.43 ± 0.24; p = .012).

CONCLUSION

In humans, BRS resorption rate is significantly influenced by numerous factors. Our data suggest that diabetes and PSLIA are associated with a prolonged resorption process, whereas in ACS patients, BRS resorption appears to be significantly faster.

Three-year clinical and two-year multimodality imaging outcomes of a thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: MeRes-1 trial

AIMS

Although the proof of concept of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) is well documented, device-related adverse outcomes with first-generation BRS indicate longer-term surveillance. The current study provides insights into the safety and performance of the MeRes100, a novel second-generation sirolimus-eluting BRS, beyond one-year up to three-year follow-up (FU).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 108 enrolled patients with de novo coronary artery lesions who underwent implantation of MeRes100 as part of the first-in-human MeRes-1 trial were followed up clinically beyond one year at two and three years and with multiple modality imaging at six months and two years. At three-year FU, the cumulative major adverse cardiac events rate was 1.87%, in the form of two ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisations. No scaffold thrombosis was reported. Between six months and two years at quantitative coronary angiography, in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) (0.15±0.22 mm vs. 0.23±0.32 mm; p=0.18) and in-scaffold LLL (0.13±0.22 mm vs. 0.24±0.34 mm; p=0.10) changed insignificantly. IVUS subset analysis revealed a non-significant reduction in mean lumen area (6.17±1.28 mm2 vs. 5.47±1.50 mm2; p=0.21) and minimum lumen area (5.14±1.19 mm2 vs. 4.05±1.42 mm2; p=0.10) at two years compared to post-procedural measurements. OCT subset analysis demonstrated 99.24±2.27% neointimal strut coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

The extended outcomes of the MeRes-1 trial demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety of the MeRes100 BRS with maintained lumen patency up to two years by multimodality imaging and no very late scaffold thrombosis up to three-year clinical FU.The MeRes-1 trial is registered at the Clinical Trials Registry-India. CTRI Number: CTRI/2015/04/005706.

Guided de-escalation of DAPT in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with BVS implantation: a post-hoc analysis from the randomized TROPICAL-ACS trial

To investigate the safety and efficacy of an early platelet function testing (PFT)-guided de-escalation of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). Early DAPT de-escalation is a new non-inferior alternative to 12-months DAPT in patients with biomarker positive ACS treated with stent implantation. In this post-hoc analysis of the TROPICAL-ACS trial, which randomized 2610 ACS patients to a PFT-guided DAPT de-escalation (switch from prasugrel to clopidogrel) or to control group (uniform prasugrel), we compared clinical outcomes of patients (n = 151) who received a BVS during the index PCI. The frequency of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or BARC ≥ 2 bleeding) was 8.8% (n = 6) in the de-escalation group vs. 12.0% (n = 10) in the control group (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.26–1.98, p = 0.52) at 12 months. One early definite stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in the control group (day 19) and 1 possible ST (sudden cardiovascular death) in the de-escalation group (day 86), both despite prasugrel treatment and in a background of high on-treatment platelet reactivity assessed at day 14 after randomization (ADP-induced platelet aggregation values of 108 U and 59 U, respectively). A PFT-guided DAPT de-escalation strategy could potentially be a safe and effective strategy in ACS patients with BVS implantation but the level of platelet inhibition may be of particular importance. This hypothesis-generating post-hoc analysis requires verification in larger studies with upcoming BVS platforms.

Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate novolimus-eluting BRS (DESolve) as interventional treatment for patients with ACS, and to compare its 12-month outcomes with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (Absorb).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with ACS (including unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) treated with either the Absorb or the DESolve BRS were evaluated in a 1:1 matched-pair analysis. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, were evaluated as a major endpoint. The occurrence of scaffold thrombosis was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were eligible for this analysis. The rate of MACE at 12 months was comparable between the Absorb and the DESolve group (8.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.738). The occurrence of target lesion revascularization (6.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.700) and scaffold thrombosis (4.1% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.580) was comparable as well. All instances of scaffold thrombosis occurred within 30 days of the index procedure.

CONCLUSION

In this study, similar 12-month event rates were observed for both BRS types after implantation for the treatment of ACS.

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes With a Novel Radiopaque Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

Background A novel bioresorbable scaffold, the sirolimus-eluting Fantom, incorporates a radiopaque polymer, struts with a thickness of 125 µm, and a crossing profile of 1.35 mm. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 9-month angiographic and 12-month clinical outcomes of the FANTOM scaffold in a larger patient population. Methods and Results The FANTOM II study (Safety & Performance Study of the Fantom Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold - First Report on Initial 24 Month Outcomes) was a prospective, multicenter trial which enrolled 240 patients with single de novo coronary stenosis with reference vessel diameter 2.5 to 3.5 mm diameter and lesion length ≤20 mm. Major adverse cardiac events through 12-month follow-up were assessed. Angiographic follow-up was performed in consecutive patient cohorts at 6 months (n=117) and 9 months (n=123). Acute delivery success, acute technical success, acute procedural success, and clinical procedural success rates as defined in the clinical protocol were 97.9% (235/240), 95.8% (230/240), 99.1% (228/230), and 99.6% (227/228), respectively. The mean in-stent late lumen loss at 6 months and 9 months were 0.25±0.40 mm and 0.33±0.36 mm, respectively, and in-segment binary restenosis occurred in 2.0% and 7.6% of patients, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events and target lesion failure through 12 months occurred in 4.2% of 240 patients; scaffold thrombosis developed in only one patient (0.4%). Conclusions The Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold demonstrated favorable safety and effectiveness performance at 12-month follow-up. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing to examine the late outcomes with this novel device. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02539966.

Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions

We aimed to evaluate feasibility, early healing and self-correcting properties of the Desolve 150 bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) implanted in bifurcation lesions, using the simple, provisional side branch (SB) stenting technique. BIFSORB pilot was a proof-of-concept study enrolling 10 patients with stable angina pectoris and a bifurcation lesion with SB ≥ 2.5 mm and less than 50% diameter stenosis. Procedure and 1-month outcome was evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess scaffold performance and healing patterns. Nine patients were treated with Desolve 150 BRS and one delivery to the target bifurcation failed. Thrombus formation in the jailed SB ostium was seen in three cases, but was completely resolved at 1-month. OCT confirmed acute self-correcting properties. No clinical events were reported after six months. Scaffold diameter by OCT increased in the proximal main vessel from 3.09 ± 0.16 mm to 3.34 ± 0.18 mm (p = 0.01) and in distal main vessel from 2.82 ± 0.26 mm to 3.02 ± 0.29 mm (p < 0.01) at one-month follow-up. SB ostial diameter stenosis improved from 42 ± 15% to 34 ± 12% (p = 0.01). Malapposition was effectively reduced after 1 month from 4.1 (1.4; 6.1)% to 0.1 (0; 0.6)% (p = 0.002). Treatment of bifurcation lesions using Desolve 150 BRS was feasible except for a delivery failure and unsettling thrombus formation behind jailing SB struts, which was completely resolved at 1-month. Self-correcting and even self-expanding properties were confirmed.

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: learning from the past to improve the future

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were developed to overcome the long-term limitations of metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). Shortcomings of DES include their permanent metallic cage which prevents normal coronary vasomotion, vascular remodeling, precludes future bypass grafting, and creates a nidus for very late stent thrombosis. With its transient scaffold which provides early mechanical support and subsequently resorbs thereby restoring physiologic properties and architecture of the vasculature, BVS offers a promising development within the field of interventional cardiology. Even though various BVS have been or are currently under development, the ABSORB BVS from Abbott Vascular was the first FDA approved device. In this review, we shed light on shortcomings of the current generation DES and theoretical advantages of BVS. In addition, we will discuss in detail clinical data from observational studies, meta-analyses, registries, and randomized controlled trials as it pertains to the efficacy and safety outcomes with everolimus-eluting BVS as compared to the current generation everolimus-eluting metallic stents (EES). We will summarize reasons behind the disappointing results from clinical trials and the failure of first generation BVS leading to its withdrawal from the market. Lastly, we will briefly review ongoing developments with the newer-generation BVS and future pre-clinical and clinical studies that are underway to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-generation BVS.

An Experimental Study of Paclitaxel Embolisation During Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

Drug coated balloons (DCB) improve the patency of femoropopliteal angioplasty but their use in infrapopliteal lesions is debateable as paclitaxel (PTX) particle embolisation has been suspected in some trials. The aim of this study was to compare experimentally five DCBs in terms of distal embolism of PTX.

METHODS

Twenty-five New Zealand rabbits were divided into five groups according to the DCB used: Lutonix (Bard), In.Pact (Medtronic), Passeo-18 Lux (Biotronik), Ranger (Boston Scientific), and Stellarex (Spectranetics) (n = 5 in each group). After ligation of the right common iliac artery, a 4 × 40 mm DCB was inflated in the infrarenal aorta for 180 seconds. Rabbits were euthanised two hours after inflation of the DCB. The infrarenal aorta, a blood sample and three left hind leg muscles (tensor fasciae latae [TFL], vastus lateralis [VL], and tibialis anterior [TA] muscles) were harvested for blind measurement of PTX concentrations and histological analysis (PTX emboli count).

RESULTS

In the TA muscle (the most distal), concentrations of PTX were significantly lower for the Ranger (0.067 ng/mg) than for the Lutonix (0.342 ng/mg; p = .008), In.Pact (0.370 ng/mg; p = .012), and Passeo-18-Lux (0.160 ng/mg; p = .021) DCBs. Similarly, concentrations of PTX were significantly lower for the Passeo-18-Lux than for the In.Pact (p = .028). Concentrations of PTX were not significantly different between DCBs in the TFL and VL muscles. Concentrations of PTX were found to be significantly higher in the plasma and lower in the aorta and on the DCBs after use of Lutonix compared with the four other DCBs. Histological analysis revealed evidence of embolised PTX crystals in small arterioles of all muscle tissue samples without any significant difference between the DCBs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests some differences regarding distal embolisation profiles between the five assessed DCBs. Although clinical implications remain to be demonstrated, the present results may have implications when choosing a DCB, especially in a critical limb ischaemia setting.

Targeted Delivery of Bioactive Molecules for Vascular Intervention and Tissue Engineering

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in the United States. Treatment often requires surgical interventions to re-open occluded vessels, bypass severe occlusions, or stabilize aneurysms. Despite the short-term success of such interventions, many ultimately fail due to thrombosis or restenosis (following stent placement), or incomplete healing (such as after aneurysm coil placement). Bioactive molecules capable of modulating host tissue responses and preventing these complications have been identified, but systemic delivery is often harmful or ineffective. This review discusses the use of localized bioactive molecule delivery methods to enhance the long-term success of vascular interventions, such as drug-eluting stents and aneurysm coils, as well as nanoparticles for targeted molecule delivery. Vascular grafts in particular have poor patency in small diameter, high flow applications, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Grafts fabricated from a variety of approaches may benefit from bioactive molecule incorporation to improve patency. Tissue engineering is an especially promising approach for vascular graft fabrication that may be conducive to incorporation of drugs or growth factors. Overall, localized and targeted delivery of bioactive molecules has shown promise for improving the outcomes of vascular interventions, with technologies such as drug-eluting stents showing excellent clinical success. However, many targeted vascular drug delivery systems have yet to reach the clinic. There is still a need to better optimize bioactive molecule release kinetics and identify synergistic biomolecule combinations before the clinical impact of these technologies can be realized.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation: to go too far is as bad as to fall short

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is key for secondary prevention of recurrent coronary ischemic events and stent thrombosis. For this purpose, DAPT showed superior efficacy compared to aspirin alone, but it is also associated with an increased risk of major, and potentially fatal, bleeding. Hence, while secondary prevention with aspirin monotherapy is generally maintained for an indefinite period, the duration of DAPT after the index event is still debated. Multiple trials have challenged the guideline recommended standard of care of 12 months of DAPT duration. These studies tested on one side a treatment reduction to 6 or 3 months, and on the other side an extension of treatment beyond 12 months in order to define the optimal DAPT duration maximizing the anti-ischemic protection and minimizing bleeding. In this document we sought to summarize the existing evidence from more than 18 randomized controlled trials in the field, and discuss the benefit and risks of prolonging/shortening DAPT duration. In addition, a specific focus on treatment individualization will outline the current, evidence-based, decision-making process for optimal DAPT duration selection after coronary stenting.

Safety and clinical performance of a drug eluting absorbable metal scaffold in the treatment of subjects with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries: Pooled 12-month outcomes of BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III

OBJECTIVES

Based on outcomes of the BIOSOLVE-II study, a novel second generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold gained CE-mark in 2016. The BIOSOLVE-III study aimed to confirm these outcomes and to obtain additional 12-month angiographic data.

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable scaffolds are intended to overcome possible long-term effects of permanent stents such as chronic vessel wall inflammation, stent crushing, and fractures.

METHODS

The prospective, multicenter BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III studies enrolled 184 patients with 189 lesions (123 patients in BIOSOLVE-II and 61 patients in BIOSOLVE-III). Primary endpoints were in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months (BIOSOLVE-II) and procedural success (BIOSOLVE-III).

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 65.5 ± 10.8 years and mean lesion reference diameter was 2.70 ± 0.43 mm. In BIOSOLVE-III, there were significantly more type B2/C lesions than in BIOSOLVE-II (80.3% versus 43.4%, P < 0.0001) and significantly more moderate-to-severe calcifications (24.2% versus 10.7%, P = 0.014). At 12 months, there was no difference in late lumen loss between the two studies; in the overall population, it was 0.25 ± 0.31 mm in-segment and 0.39 ± 0.34 mm in-scaffold. Target lesion failure occurred in six patients (3.3%) and included two cardiac deaths, one target-vessel myocardial infarction, and three clinically driven target lesion revascularizations. No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis was observed.

CONCLUSION

The pooled outcomes of BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III provide further evidence on the safety and performance of a novel drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold with constant clinical and angiographic performance parameters at 12 months and no definite or probable scaffold thrombosis.

Effect of Plaque Composition, Morphology, and Burden on DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Expansion and Eccentricity - An Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study of patients treated with novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) investigated the impact of plaque burden on the acute mechanical performance of the BRS and the short-term outcome.

METHODS

A total of 15 patients were enrolled. The following parameters were derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT) during the final pullback: mean and minimum area, residual area stenosis, incomplete strut apposition, tissue prolapse, scaffold expansion index (SEI), scaffold eccentricity index (SEC), symmetry index, strut fracture, and edge dissection. Fibrous plaque (FP) and calcific plaque (CP) characteristics were measured at each 200 μm longitudinal cross-section. The patients were divided into two groups based on their medians of the respective plaque characteristics.

RESULTS

OCT analysis showed a lumen area of 11.4 ± 1.9 mm² and a scaffold area of 11.5 ± 2.1 mm². The mean eccentricity index overall was 0.65 ± 0.16 and mean symmetry index 0.39 ± 0.25. Statistically, scaffold expansion was not significantly influenced by a greater plaque burden as represented by greater CP area (SEI in group with CP area <0.52 mm² 84.1% vs. SEI of 86.6% in group with CP area ≥0.52 mm², p = 0.06), thicker CP (85.7% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.06), greater CP arc angle (88.0% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.08), and CP being closer to the lumen (84.2% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.08). Scaffold expansion was also not significantly influenced by FP burden. The eccentricity of the implanted scaffolds was not dependent on the CP burden. On the other hand, a greater FP burden favoured a lower eccentricity index, indicating less circular expansion. Thus, greater FP area, FP thickness, and FP arc angle resulted in a more eccentric scaffold expansion.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to previously studied BRS, the expansion and eccentricity characteristics of the novolimus-eluting scaffold did not show the strong dependency of plaque composition, morphology, and burden. As assessed by OCT, only eccentricity was significantly affected by the FP burden. A greater FP plaque arc in our cohort and device-specific properties, e.g. self-correction, may explain the lack of a relationship between plaque, expansion, and eccentricity.

6-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of a Novel Radiopaque Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The FANTOM II Study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the novel Fantom coronary bioresorbable scaffold at 6 months.

BACKGROUND

The Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold incorporates a unique proprietary iodinated, polycarbonate copolymer of tyrosine analogs that is radiopaque, with thin struts (125 μm) that facilitate device delivery and precise target lesion treatment.

METHODS

The 6-month outcomes and performance of the Fantom scaffold were evaluated in 117 patients with single de novo native coronary artery lesions of length ≤20 mm and reference vessel diameter 2.5 to 3.5 mm. The primary angiographic endpoint was mean late lumen loss at 6 months measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Procedural outcomes were categorized as short-term technical success, short-term procedural success, and clinical procedural success. The primary clinical endpoint was major adverse cardiac events at 6 months, the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

Short-term technical success, short-term procedural success, and clinical procedural success were achieved in 96.6%, 99.1%, and 99.1% of patients, respectively. Mean 6-month in-stent late lumen loss was 0.25 ± 0.40 mm (n = 100). Binary restenosis was present in 2 patients (2.0%). Major adverse cardiac events within 6 months occurred in 3 patients (2.6%), including no deaths, 2 MIs, and 2 TLRs (1 patient had both an MI and TLR). Scaffold thrombosis occurred in 1 patient (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical results from 117 patients enrolled in cohort A of the multicenter FANTOM II (Safety & Performance Study of the FANTOM Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold) study demonstrate favorable 6-month outcomes of this novel device in the treatment of noncomplex coronary artery disease.