Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair With Extended Clip Arms: Early Experience From a Multicenter Observational Study

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: An Observational Study

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIC-MVS) has been established as preferred treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), but mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair (M-TEER) is routinely performed in patients at high surgical risk and is increasingly performed in intermediate risk patients. Methods: From 2010 to 2021, we performed 723 M-TEER and 123 isolated MIC-MVS procedures. We applied a sensitivity analysis by matching age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), EuroSCORE II and etiology of MR. Results: Baseline characteristics showed significant differences in the overall cohort (p < 0.01): age 78.3 years vs. 61.5 years, EuroSCORE II 5.5% vs. 1.3% and LVEF 48.4% vs. 60.4% in M-TEER vs. MIC-MVS patients. Grade of MR at discharge was moderate/severe in 24.5% (171/697) in M-TEER vs. 6.5% (8/123) in MIC-MVS (p < 0.01). One-year survival was 91.5% (552/723) in M-TEER vs. 97.6% (95/123) in MIC-MVS (p = 0.04). A matching with 49 pairs (n = 98) showed comparable survival during follow-up, but a numerically higher mean mitral valve gradient of 4.1 mmHg (95% CI: 3.6-4.6) vs. 3.4 mmHg (95% CI: 3.0-3.8) in M-TEER (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients undergoing M-TEER had lower one-year survival than MIC-MVS, but differences disappeared after matching. Reduction in MR was less effective in M-TEER patients and postprocedural mitral valve gradients were higher.

Prognosis of Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Elevation in mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG) after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is common, however, evidence on its prognosis is scarce and debatable. Thus, this study aims to investigate the impact of increased MVPG after M-TEER on outcomes. Studies reporting the associations between the elevated MVPG after M-TEER and outcomes were identified in a systematic search of published literatures. Associations were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Seven observational studies with 2,730 patients (mean age, 77.7 ± 9.3 years; male, 64.4%; functional mitral regurgitation [MR], 65.2%) were eligible for the present analysis. M-TEER was performed entirely using the MitraClip system (Abbott), followed by 29.7% of patients having increased MVPG. Elevated postprocedural MVPG was not associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome, compared to low MVPG [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.58; p = 0.12; I2 = 53.5%). However, the prognosis of elevated MVPG was observed in degenerative MR patients (HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.84; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%), whereas not in functional MR patients. Patients with low MVPG + high residual MR had a higher risk of the primary outcome than those with high MVPG + low residual MR after M-TEER (HR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.10-2.03; p = 0.01; I2 = 13%). In conclusion, elevated MVPG seems to predict adverse outcomes mainly in patients with degenerative MR. Future studies are needed to prove these findings.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement with the Tendyne system

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as alternative to transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR); however, the role of TMVR with the Tendyne system among established treatments of MR is not well defined. We assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with the Tendyne system in the current clinical practice.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography and were judged eligible for the Tendyne system.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were eligible for TMVR with the Tendyne system. Of these, 17 patients underwent TMVR, and 46 were treated by TEER. Patients treated with the Tendyne system were more likely to have a high transmitral pressure gradient and unsuitable mitral valve morphology for TEER than those treated with TEER. TMVR with the Tendyne system reduced the severity of MR to less than 1 + in 94.1% of the patients at discharge and achieved a greater reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume at the 30-day follow-up compared with TEER. In contrast, patients treated with the Tendyne system had a higher 30-day mortality than those treated with TEER, while the mortality between 30 days and one year was comparable between Tendyne and TEER.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients eligible for the Tendyne system, approximately a quarter of the patients underwent TMVR with the Tendyne system, which led substantial reduction of MR and LV reverse remodeling than TEER. In contrast, the 30-day mortality rate was higher after TMVR with the Tendyne compared to TEER.

One-Year Outcomes According to Mitral Regurgitation Etiology Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair With the PASCAL System: Results From a Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

We previously reported procedural and 30-day outcomes of a German early multicenter experience with the PASCAL system for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). This study reports 1-year outcomes of mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the PASCAL system according to MR etiology in a large all-comer cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes up to 1-year were investigated according to MR etiology (degenerative [DMR], functional [FMR], or mixed [MMR]) in the first 282 patients with symptomatic MR 3+/4+ treated with the PASCAL implant at 9 centers in 2019. A total of 282 patients were included (33% DMR, 50% FMR, 17% MMR). At discharge, MR reduction to ≤1+/2+ was achieved in 58%/87% of DMR, in 75%/97% of FMR, and in 78%/98% of patients with MMR (P=0.004). MR reduction to ≤1+/2+ was sustained at 30 days (50%/83% DMR, 67%/97% FMR, 74%/100% MMR) and at 1 year (53%/78% DMR, 75%/97% FMR, 67%/91% MMR) with significant differences between etiologies. DMR patients with residual MR 3+/4+ at 1-year had at least complex valve morphology in 91.7%. Valve-related reintervention was performed in 7.4% DMR, 0.7% FMR, and 0.0% MMR (P=0.010). At 1-year, New York Heart Association Functional Class was significantly improved irrespective of MR etiology (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large all-comer cohort, mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the PASCAL system was associated with an acute and sustained MR reduction at 1-year in all causes. However, in patients with DMR, MR reduction was less pronounced, reflecting the high incidence of complex or very complex anatomies being referred for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in mitral regurgitation: A comparison of device systems and recommendations for tailored device selection. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with prohibitive surgical risks. The traditionally used device, MitraClip, showed both safety and effectiveness in M-TEER. PASCAL is a newer device that has emerged as another feasible option to be used in this procedure.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies that compared PASCAL to MitraClip devices in M-TEER. The electronic databases searched for relevant studies were PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcomes were technical success and the grade of MR at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, bleeding, device success and reintervention.

RESULTS

Technical success (PASCAL: 96.5% vs MitraClip: 97.6%, p = 0.24) and MR ≤ 2 at 30-day follow-up (PASCAL: 89.4vs MitraClip 89.9%, p = 0.51) were comparable between both groups. Both devices showed similar outcomes including all-cause mortality (RR: 0.68 [0.34, 1.38]; P = 0.28), major bleeding (RR: 1.87 [0.68, 5.10]; P = 0.22) and reintervention (RR: 1.02 [0.33, 3.16]; P = 0.97). Device success was more frequent with PASCAL device (PASCAL: 86% vs MitraClip 68.5%; P = 0.44), however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of PASCAL were comparable to those of MitraClip with no significant difference in safety and effectiveness. The choice between MitraClip and PASCAL devices should be guided by various factors, including mitral valve anatomy, etiology of regurgitation, and device-specific characteristics.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with extended clip arms for ventricular functional mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The new sizing options of the MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL, USA) with extended clip arms were recently developed. Its applicability and effectiveness for ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR) are yet to be investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with symptomatic VFMR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair between 2018 and 2022 at the Sakakibara Heart Institute. Pre- and post-procedural mitral valve morphologies were assessed using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

RESULTS

In a total of 104 VFMR patients, the posterior mitral leaflet length was 12.8 ± 2.8 mm and 92 % was indicative of the extended arm (≥9 mm). Although baseline VFMR was more severe in the patients treated with the extended arms (n = 35, XT group) than the patients treated with the standard arms (n = 69, NT group), the decrease in VFMR was greater in the XT group (delta three-dimensional vena contracta area - 43 ± 33 mm2 vs. -31 ± 22 mm2, p = 0.030) and residual VFMR was similar between the groups, with a significantly greater reduction in the mitral annulus anterior-posterior diameter (-4.9 ± 2.2 mm vs -3.1 ± 2.1 mm, p < 0.001) and mitral annulus area in the XT group. The use of extended arms was independently associated with shorter procedure time (81 ± 26 min vs 108 ± 41 min) after adjustment for device generation and the number of clips (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Most VFMR patients had enough leaflet lengths for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip with the extended arms, which was associated with shorter procedure time and a greater decrease in the mitral annular size.

Prognostic Significance of Flail Mitral Leaflet in Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation

Despite the growing experience with MitraClip in the broad spectrum of mitral regurgitation (MR), limited data are available regarding the independent prognostic role on survival of different mitral regurgitation etiology subtypes. We sought to evaluate the impact of flail leaflet etiology in a large series of patients with primary MR (PMR) who underwent MitraClip treatment. The study included 588 patients with significant PMR from the multicenter GIOTTO (Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology [GIse] registry Of Transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitaTiOn), stratified into 2 groups according to MR etiology: flail+ (n = 300) and flail- (n = 288). The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death and first rehospitalization for heart failure (HF). To account for the baseline differences, patients were propensity score-matched 1:1. Flail leaflet etiology was present in about a half of the patients. Acute technical success was achieved in 98% of the overall cohort, with no significant differences between the study groups (p = 0.789). At the 2-year Kaplan-Meier analysis, the primary end point occurred in 13% of flail+ patients compared with 23% in flail- (p = 0.009). The flail+ group presented lower rates of both cardiac death and rehospitalization for HF, whereas a similar overall death rate was observed between the groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified flail leaflet etiology as an independent predictor of favorable outcome in terms of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.141, 95% confidence interval 0.049 to 0.401, p <0.001). After propensity score matching, flail+ patients had confirmed lower rates of cardiac mortality and rehospitalization for HF but similar rates of overall death. In conclusion, flail leaflet-related etiology was common in patients with PMR who underwent MitraClip treatment and was an independent predictor of midterm favorable clinical outcomes.

Novel arm-width-expandable transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system: Preclinical experiment and first-in-human study

BACKGROUND

The ValveClasp system is a novel transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) device with an arm-width-expandable clip that allows treatment of patients with only one clip more frequently.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel TEER device in porcine models and patients.

METHODS

Fourteen young adult pigs were enrolled. A clip with an expanded arm was implanted under epicardial echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance. Five patients with at least moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation underwent TEER using the ValveClasp system to test the safety and effectiveness of the device.

RESULTS

The device success rate was 100% (14/14) in the animal experiments, and all clips were deployed at the A2P2 segments, forming a double-orifice mitral valve. Gross observations on day 180 showed a wide and continuous tissue bridge between the leaflets. The acute procedural success rate was 100% (5/5). Only one clip was required in all patients, and all achieved effective postoperative endpoints (grade ≤2+). During 30-day follow-up, no adverse events occurred. All patients' vena Contracta width (from 8.04 0.71 mm to 3.84 ± 1.18 mm, p = 0.012), mitral regurgitation area (from 12.75 ± 3.13 cm² to 3.50 ± 1.66 cm² , p = 0.008), and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (from 52.00 ± 2.92 mm to 46.00 ± 3.08 mm, p = 0.040) were considerably decreased, without obvious mitral stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel arm-width-expandable ValveClasp device is safe for TEER for treating severe mitral regurgitation.

PASCAL repair system for patients with mitral regurgitation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve has emerged as the standard treatment for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) with high surgical risk. Even though MitraClip is widely used, the novel PASCAL device system offers distinct technical features. We aim to study the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL repair system in clinically significant MR.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE were searched for articles published from August 2016 until June 2022 to identify studies that investigated the safety and efficacy of PASCAL for patients with degenerative, functional and mixed MR. Primary performance endpoints were technical, device, and procedural successes. Primary safety endpoint was composite 30 day major adverse events (MAE). Secondary endpoints were MR grade at discharge and 30 days, 30 day postprocedural NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included twelve retrospective and prospective observational studies and one randomized controlled study consisting of 1028 patients with severe, symptomatic MR (NYHA III-IV: 84.0%, MR ≥ 3+: 99.7%) and high surgical risk (mean logistic EuroSCORE of 16.4).Technical success was 95.7%, procedural success was 95.2%, and device success was 86.1% relative to the weighted average. MR grade was ≤2+ in 94.7% of patients at discharge and 94.0% patients at 30-day follow-up. Mean 30-day and 12-month mortality after device implantation were 4.54% and 12.2%.

CONCLUSION

The PASCAL repair system appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option to treat severe, symptomatic MR in high surgical risk patients.

Thirty-day and one-year outcomes following transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair versus transapical mitral valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

Background

A comparison of 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with pre-existing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) or transcatheter transapical mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has not previously been reported.

Aims

We aimed to compare 30-day and 1-year rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as well as rehospitalisation for heart failure (HFH).

Methods

All patients with severe (≥3+) symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) and an LV ejection fraction ≤50% who underwent TEER or TMVR over a 5-year period were evaluated.

Results

Ninety-six patients (50 TEER, age 80±9 years, 70% secondary MR and 46 TMVR, age 72±9 years, 91% secondary MR) were studied. Baseline demographic and transthoracic echocardiogram characteristics were well-matched, with the exception of age (TEER 80±9 vs TMVR 72±9; p=0.01). Successful device implantation occurred in 96% of TEER patients and 97.8% of TMVR patients. Ninety-two percent of TEER patients had ≤2+MR predischarge, whilst no TMVR patient had ≥1+MR (p<0.01). No significant difference in the combined endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality or HFH was observed (p>0.05). At 1 year, freedom from all-cause mortality and HFH was 79.2% across the entire study population but was significantly higher in patients undergoing TEER (TEER: n=45 [90%] hazard ratio 11.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.59-11.93 vs TMVR: n=39 [67.4%] 95% CI: 10.09-11.33; p=0.008).

Conclusions

Despite comparable rates of successful device implantation, MR reduction, and 30-day all-cause mortality/HFH, TEER patients had lower all-cause mortality and HFH rates at 1 year.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in mitral regurgitation: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Within the past 15 years, mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has developed from an experimental approach to a guideline-recommended, safe, and effective treatment option for patients with severe primary or secondary mitral regurgitation.

AREAS COVERED

This review covered relevant publications of M-TEER and summarizes the development of M-TEER devices within the last 15 years. It outlines anatomical challenges which drove the evolution of M-TEER devices, provides an overview about the current state of clinical application and research, and offers an outlook into the future of transcatheter mitral valve treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The development and refinement of new M-TEER device generations offer the possibility to treat a wide range of mitral valve anatomies. Choosing the best device for the individual anatomic properties of the patients and considering comorbidities is the key to maximized MR reduction, minimalized complication rates, and thus optimized postinterventional prognosis. Independent from prognostic implications, quality of life has become an important patient-centered outcome that can be improved by M-TEER in virtually all patients treated.

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease and, when left untreated, results in reduced quality of life, heart failure, and increased mortality. Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has matured considerably as a non-surgical treatment option since its commercial introduction in Europe in 2008. As a result of major device and interventional improvements, as well as the accumulation of experience by the interventional cardiologists, M-TEER has emerged as an important therapeutic strategy for patients with severe and symptomatic MR in the current European and American guidelines. Herein, we provide a comprehensive up-do-date overview of M-TEER. We define preprocedural patient evaluation and highlight key aspects for decision-making. We describe the currently available M-TEER systems and summarise the evidence for M-TEER in both primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). In addition, we provide recommendations for device selection, intraprocedural imaging and guiding, M-TEER optimisation and management of recurrent MR. Finally, we provide information on major unsolved questions and "grey areas" in M-TEER.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for secondary mitral regurgitation with third-generation devices in heart failure patients - results from the Global EXPAND Post-Market study

AIMS

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is a guideline-recommended treatment option for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). The purpose of this analysis was to report contemporary real-world outcomes in SMR patients treated with third-generation MitraClip systems.

METHODS AND RESULTS

EXPAND is a prospective, multicentre, international, single-arm study with 1041 patients treated for mitral regurgitation (MR) with MitraClip NTR/XTR, with 30-day and 1-year follow-up. All echocardiograms were analysed by an independent echocardiographic core lab. Study outcomes included procedural outcomes, durability of MR reduction, and major adverse events including all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations (HFH). A subgroup of 413 symptomatic patients (age 74.7 ± 10.1 years, 58% male) with severe SMR were included. MR reduction to MR ≤ 1+ and MR ≤ 2+ was achieved in 93.0% and 98.5% of patients, respectively, which was sustained at 1-year follow-up. All-cause mortality was 17.7% at 1-year- follow-up, and the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or first HFH occurred in 34% of patients. This combined endpoint was significantly less frequently observed in MR ≤ 1+ patients (Kaplan-Maier estimates: 29.7% vs. 69.6% for MR ≤ 1+ vs. MR  ≥ 2 +; p < 0.0001). New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved significantly from baseline (NYHA ≤ II: 17%) to 1-year follow-up (NYHA ≤ II: 78%) (p < 0.0001). While MR reduction was comparable between NTR-only vs. XTR-only treated patients, less XTR clips were required for achieving MR reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Under real-world conditions, optimal sustained MR reduction to MR ≤ 1+ was achieved in a high percentage of patients with third-generation MitraClip, which translated into symptomatic improvement and low event rates. These results appear to be comparable with recent randomized clinical trials.

Transcatheter edge to edge repair using the ease-of-use valve clamp system for functional mitral regurgitation: a primary report

PURPOSE

The ValveClamp system is a novel edge-to-edge mitral valve repair system designed for the ease of operation. We report the outcomes of our initial experience of treating functional mitral regurgitation (MR) with the ValveClamp system.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were patients with symptomatic functional MR despite standard medical therapy, who were treated with transapical ValveClamp implantation. The patients were divided into an atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) group and a ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR) group. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at baseline and then at the 3-month follow up.

RESULTS

Twelve patients, with a median age of 71 years (range 65-78 years), were assigned to the AFMR group (n = 5) or the VFMR group (n = 7). The device implantation rate was 100%, and 10 (83.3%) patients required implantation of only one clamp. The catheter time was less than 10 min in half of the patients, the fastest time being 5 min. There were no procedure-related complications. At the 3-month follow up, all patients were free from all-cause mortality, surgery, and rehospitalization. MR improved to ≤ 2 + in all 12 patients with MR grade 3 + or 4 + at baseline, (100%) and to ≤ 1 + in 9 of these patients (75%), with a low-pressure gradient. The left atrial diameter and the left ventricular end diastolic diameter decreased significantly in both the AFMR and VFMR groups. The left ventricular eject fraction at the 3-month follow up showed a rising trend in both the AFMR and VFMR groups, whereas PASP decreased remarkably. All 12 patients with baseline NYHA functional class III/IV (100%) showed improvement of at least 1 class, and 2 of these patients (16.7%) showed improvement of at least 2 classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The ValveClamp system is simple and effective for transapical transcatheter edge to edge repair in patients with functional MR.

Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Using MitraClip or PASCAL: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Comparison

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction in 2003, Abbott's MitraClip (MC) has become the most established catheter-based treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR). Recent approval of Edwards Lifescience's PASCAL device has extended the field of TEER.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare the PASCAL and MC regarding procedural results and short- and long-term outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

METHODS

Data from 3 high-volume centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was residual MR at discharge. Secondary endpoints were technical success, MR reduction, and 30-day mortality. After 1 year, all-cause mortality and residual MR were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients (216 MC, 196 PASCAL) treated between 2018 and 2020 were included. A total of 184 patients (92 in each treatment group) remained after propensity score matching. The rate of baseline MR ≥3 was 98.9% in both groups (P = 1.00). Both TEER systems achieved equally high technical success rates (97.8%; P = 1.00), resulting in residual MR ≤1 in 69.6% vs 77.1% of patients (P = 0.24) and MR reduction by ≥2 grades in 83.7% vs 92.4% of patients (P = 0.13) using the MC and PASCAL, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% in both cohorts (P = 0.98), and 1-year follow-up showed similar MR reductions (residual MR ≤1, 78.0% with MC vs 82.3% with PASCAL; P = 0.70) and comparable all-cause mortality (14.1% with MC vs 6.5% with PASCAL; P = 0.14). In multivariate regression analysis, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score independently correlated with an optimal result (MR ≤1), while device choice did not show a significant impact.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective multicenter study, the established MC and the novel PASCAL mitral valve TEER systems were safe and offered excellent performance with comparable short- and long-term outcomes.

Impact of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling on clinical outcomes of tricuspid regurgitation

BACKGROUND

In terms of pathophysiology, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and right ventricular (RV) function are linked to each other.

AIMS

This study sought to evaluate RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling and its impact on clinical outcomes of TR in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

METHODS

We calculated RV-PA coupling ratios in patients undergoing mitral TEER from August 2010 to March 2019 by dividing the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) by the echocardiographic estimated PA systolic pressure (PASP). TR was graded as none/trace, mild, moderate, or severe. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or rehospitalisation within 12 months.

RESULTS

Among 744 patients analysed, severe TR was documented in 22.3% of patients and the mean TAPSE/PASP was 0.43±0.25. Technical success of TEER was achieved in 97.2% of participants. Severe TR vs TR ≤moderate (adjusted HR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.39-2.66) and TAPSE/PASP (adjusted HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22-0.93) were associated with the outcome. Patients were divided according to the TAPSE/PASP tertile. Compared to patients with TR ≤moderate, patients with severe TR had a higher event rate (TAPSE/PASP <0.30: 32.9% vs 45.1%; 0.30≤ TAPSE/PASP <0.44: 27.8% vs 41.8%; TAPSE/PASP ≥0.44: 16.0% vs 40.4%), whereas the prognostic significance of TR was attenuated in patients with reduced TAPSE/PASP (i.e., RV-PA uncoupling; interaction term p=0.03). The trends were consistent in the multivariable regression models, spline curves, and sensitivity analysis using post-interventional parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

RV-PA coupling affects the outcome correlation of TR in patients undergoing mitral TEER. The prognostic impact of TR is attenuated in patients with RV-PA uncoupling.

Complications of the Percutaneous Mitral Valve Edge-To-Edge Repair: Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography

The use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for the treatment of mitral regurgitation has markedly increased in the last few years. The rate of adverse events related to the procedure is low; however, some of the complications that may occur are potentially dangerous. Due to the growing popularity of the technique, which is no longer limited to high-volume centers, knowledge of the complications related to the procedure is fundamental. Transesophageal echocardiography has a key role in the guidance of the intervention while allowing for the avoidance of most of these adverse events, as well as enabling us to diagnose them early. In this article, we review the main complications that might present during a transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair procedure (tamponade, thromboembolic events, single leaflet device attachment, device embolization, vascular injury…) while highlighting key aspects of transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring in the prevention and prompt diagnosis of these complications.

Prognostic Value of Increased Mitral Valve Gradient After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of an increased mean mitral valve pressure gradient (MVG) in patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

BACKGROUND

Conflicting data exist regarding impact of increased mean MVG on outcomes after TEER.

METHODS

This study included 419 patients with primary MR (mean age 80.6 ± 10.4 years; 40.6% female) who underwent TEER. Patients were divided into quartiles (Qs) based on discharge echocardiographic mean MVG. Primary outcome was the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the secondary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve reintervention.

RESULTS

The median number of MitraClips used was 2 per patient. MR reduction ≤moderate was achieved in 407 (97.1%) patients. Mean MVG was 1.9 ± 0.3 mm Hg, 3.0 ± 0.1 mm Hg, 4.0 ± 0.1 mm Hg, and 6.0 ± 1.2 mm Hg in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively. There was no significant differences across quartiles in the primary outcome (15.4%, 19.6%, 22.0%, and 21.9% in Q1-Q4, respectively; P = 0.63), all-cause mortality (15.9% vs 18.6% vs 19.4% vs 17.1%, respectively; P = 0.91), and the secondary composite endpoint at 2 years (33.3% vs 29.5% vs 22.0% vs 31.6%, respectively; P = 0.37). After multivariate adjustment for baseline clinical and procedural variables, the mean MVG in Q4 compared with Q1 to Q3 was not independently associated with the primary outcome (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.82-1.83; P = 0.33), all-cause mortality, and the secondary composite endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased mean MVG was not independently associated with adverse events after TEER in patients with primary MR.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the adverse impact of elevated postprocedural mitral valve pressure gradient (MPG) on outcome in a real-world population of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who underwent transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

BACKGROUND

TEER has become a routine treatment alternative for patients with severe MR at high surgical risk. The consequences of elevated MPG after TEER have been subject to controversial debates.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing TEER for either severe degenerative MR (DMR) or functional MR (FMR) at a high-volume center between September 2008 and January 2020 were prospectively included and followed periodically. Postprocedural MPG by discharge transthoracic echocardiography was considered elevated at ≥5 mm Hg. The primary combined endpoint was death or heart failure rehospitalization after 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 713 patients undergoing TEER (DMR, n = 265; FMR, n = 445) were included. Elevated postprocedural MPG was present in 37.0% of those with DMR (n = 98) and 22.0% of those with FMR (n = 98). In contrast to patients with FMR, 6-minute walk distance did not improve in patients with DMR with elevated MPG. Kaplan-Meier analyses did not demonstrate significant differences for the primary endpoint in patients with DMR (low vs elevated MPG, 67.3% vs 74.4%; P = 0.06) and those with FMR (78.6% vs 74.8%; P = 0.54). After adjustment, elevated MPG was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint in patients with DMR (HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03-2.45; P = 0.034) but not in those with FMR (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.63-1.22; P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated postprocedural MPG is an independent predictor of adverse clinical and functional outcomes in patients with DMR but not in those with FMR.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

OBJECTIVE

Up to 28% of patients may need mitral valve (MV) surgery after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). This study evaluates the outcomes of minimally invasive MV surgery after TEER. Methods: International multicenter registry of minimally invasive MV surgery after TEER between 2013 and 2020. Subgroups were stratified by the number of devices implanted (≤1 vs >1), as well as time interval from TEER to surgery (≤1 year vs >1 year). Results: A total of 56 patients across 13 centers were included with a mean age of 73 ± 11 years, and 50% were female. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS PROM) score for MV replacement was 8% (Q1-Q3 = 5% to 11%) and the ratio of observed to expected mortality was 0.9. The etiology of mitral regurgitation (MR) prior to TEER was primary MR in 75% of patients and secondary MR in 25%. There were 30 patients (54%) who had >1 device implanted. The median time between TEER and surgery was 252 days (33 to 636 days). Hemodynamics, including MR severity, MV area, and mean gradient, significantly improved after minimally invasive surgery and sustained to 1-year follow-up. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 7.1%, and 1-year actuarial survival was 85.6% ± 6%. Conclusions: Minimally invasive MV surgery after TEER may be achieved as predicted by the STS PROM. Most patients underwent MV replacement instead of repair. As TEER is applied more widely, patients should be informed about the potential need for surgical intervention over time after TEER. These discussions will allow better informed consent and post-procedure planning.

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Valve Repair in Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Background. Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) is increasingly performed. However, its efficacy in comparison with surgical MV treatment (SMV) is unknown. Methods. Consecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing TMVR (68% functional, 32% degenerative) or SMV (9% functional, 91% degenerative) were enrolled. To account for differences in baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed, including age, EuroSCORE-II, left ventricular ejection fraction, and NT-proBNP. A composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization/death served as primary endpoint. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression analyses were used to investigate associations between baseline, imaging, and procedural parameters and outcome. Results. Between July 2017 and April 2020, 245 patients were enrolled, of whom 102 patients could be adequately matched (73 y/o, 61% females, EuroSCORE-II: 5.7%, p > 0.05 for all). Despite matching, TMVR patients had more co-morbidities at baseline (higher rates of prior myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, pacemakers/defibrillators, and diabetes mellitus, p < 0.009 for all). Patients were followed for 28.3 ± 27.2 months, during which 27 events (17 deaths, 10 HF hospitalizations) occurred. Postprocedural MR reduction (MR grade <2: TMVR vs. SMV: 88% vs. 94%, p = 0.487) and freedom from HF hospitalization/death (log-rank: p = 0.811) were similar at 2 years. On multivariable Cox analysis, EuroSCORE-II (adj.HR 1.07 [95%CI: 1.00–1.13], p = 0.027) and residual MR (adj.HR 1.85 [95%CI: 1.17–2.92], p = 0.009) remained significantly associated with outcome. Conclusions. In this propensity-matched, all-comers cohort, two-year outcomes after TMVR versus SMV were similar. Given the reported favorable long-term durability of TMVR, the interventional approach emerges as a valuable alternative for a substantial number of patients with functional and degenerative MR.

Prediction of procedural success of transcatheter mitral valve repair with normal and extended clip arms

TMVR using different clip sizes is a treatment option for selected patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). This study sought to identify predictors of successful transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) by 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and to compare different effects of the larger XTR and the smaller NT/NTR devices. 3D transesophageal echocardiography was performed on 54 patients with secondary MR undergoing TMVR with one clip (55.6% NT/NTR, 44.4% XTR). All NT/NTR and 96% of XTR patients had MR reduction ≤ 2+. Despite more severe baseline MR (3D vena contracta area (VCA): 0.67 ± 0.34 cm2 vs. 0.43 ± 0.19 cm2, p = 0.004) and greater mitral valve area (MVA) (6.8 ± 2.1 cm2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.6 cm2, p = 0.001) in the XTR group, MR severity after TMVR was not different between XTR and NT/NTR patients (3D VCA: 0.19 ± 0.14 vs. 0.17 ± 0.10, p = 0.51). Baseline 3D VCA > 0.45 cm2 in NT/NTR (AUC = 0.802, 95% CI 0.602 to 1.000) and 3D VCA > 0.54 cm2 in XTR devices (AUC = 0.868, 95% CI 0.719 to 1.000) were associated with ineffective MR reduction defined as residual VCA ≤ 0.2 cm2. Baseline MVA ≤ 4.2 cm2 in NT/NTR (AUC = 0.920, 95% CI 0.809 to 1.000) and MVA ≤ 6.0 cm2 in XTR devices (AUC = 0.865, 95% CI 0.664 to 1.000) were associated with postprocedural transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) ≥ 5 mmHg. TMVR using the XTR device resulted in an equally effective reduction of MR despite of a greater baseline MR. Distinct cut-off values of baseline 3D VCA and MVA for prediction of successful MR reduction and postprocedural increase of TMPG were identified for the different devices.

Incidence and standardised definitions of mitral valve leaflet adverse events after transcatheter mitral valve repair: the EXPAND study

BACKGROUND

An independent panel of experts reviewed all investigator-reported cases of mitral valve leaflet adverse events (LAE) after MitraClip NTR/XTR in the EXPAND study.

AIMS

We aimed to report the findings of the expert panel and standardise definitions for LAE.

METHODS

Standard definitions for different types of LAE were formulated and events adjudicated after detailed review by the expert panel.

RESULTS

Enrolling centres reported LAE in 35 cases, 11 leaflet injuries (9 tears, 2 perforations) and 24 single leaflet device attachment (SLDA). The panel confirmed LAE in 20 cases (2.0% incidence), 18 patients had SLDA and 4 had leaflet injury (2 cases had both SLDA and injury). Leaflet injury occurred during device implant and resulted in surgical valve replacement or death. SLDA-alone events were identified during implant (n=2), pre-discharge (n=7) or at 30 days of follow-up (n=7) and were resolved (≤2+ residual MR) with additional clips in 75% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve repair with MitraClip NTR/XTR is safe. The rate of LAE is lower than previously reported using older-generation devices. The proposed definitions and findings will help to differentiate leaflet injury from inadequate leaflet insertion and SLDA and provide guidance for consistent diagnosis of LAE post MitraClip implantation.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in atrial functional mitral regurgitation: insights from the multi-center MITRA-TUNE registry

BACKGROUND

A-FMR is considered a specific sub-type of secondary MR in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Aim of the study was to investigate the acute and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr) with the MitraClip in atrial functional mitral regurgitation (A-FMR).

METHODS

The study included patients with A-FMR and concomitant AF who underwent to the MitraClip at 7 Italian Centers. Aim of the study was to assess the safety, efficacy and mid-term cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

After reviewing 1153 patients with FMR treated with TMVr from 2009 to 2021, 87 patients (median age 81 years, 61% female) with A-FMR were identified. Technical success was achieved in 97%, 30-day device success in 83% and 30-day procedural success in 80%. All-cause death at 30-day was 5%. Estimated two-year freedom from all-cause death and cardiac death was 60% and 77%, respectively, whereas freedom from all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization was 55%. Residual MR ≤ 2+ was encountered in 89% (n = 47/53) and improvement in NYHA class I/II in 79% (n = 48/61). Post-procedural MR ≥ 2+ (HR 5.400, CI 1.371-21.268) and inter-commissural annular diameter ≥ 35 mm (HR 4.159, CI 1.057-16.363) were independent predictors of all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization during the follow-up. Positive reverse remodeling of left atrium and mitral annular dimensions occurred after TMVr during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip resulted to be a safe and effective option to treat A-FMR in elderly patients.

Transcatheter mitral valve interventions

While there are dozens of novel transcatheter mitral devices in various stages of development, they remain years away from FDA approval. The existing approved transcatheter mitral interventions-transcatheter edge to edge repair for primary and secondary mitral regurgitations and transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring procedures for failing surgical prostheses-have seen a marked increase in both use and published data over the past several years. Transcatheter edge to edge repair with MitraClip has revolutionized the management of functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure with demonstrated reductions in mortality and heart failure hospitalization and is an appropriate option for patients with primary mitral regurgitation at high or prohibitive surgical risk. In patients with failing surgical mitral prostheses transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring procedures are an appealing alternative to repeat mitral valve surgery. Existing data and relevant concerns for these procedures are discussed herein.

Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes With Percutaneous Transcatheter Repair of Mitral Regurgitation With the MitraClip System: Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry From 2011 to 2017

BACKGROUND

Women have a higher rate of adverse events after mitral valve surgery. We sought to evaluate whether outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair intervention by sex have similar trends to mitral valve surgery.

METHODS

The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse events defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and any bleeding in the overall study cohort. Patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation with the MitraClip system in the Society of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry were evaluated. Linked administrative claims from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes. Associations between sex and outcomes were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model for in-hospital outcomes and Cox model for 1-year outcomes.

RESULTS

From November 2013 to March 2017, 5295 patients, 47.6% (n=2523) of whom were female, underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Females were less likely to have >1 clip implanted (P<0.001) and had a lower adjusted odds ratio of device success (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]), driven by lower odds of residual mitral gradient <5 mm Hg (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54 [CI, 0.46-0.63]) when compared with males. At 1-year follow-up, the primary outcome did not differ by sex. Female sex was associated with lower adjusted 1-year risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.68-0.94]), but the adjusted 1-year risk of stroke and any bleeding did not differ by sex.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, and any bleeding was observed between females and males. Adjusted 1-year all-cause mortality was lower in females compared with males.

Acute changes in mitral valve geometry after percutaneous valve repair with MitraClip XTR by three-dimensional echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve (MV) repair with MitraClip system is a safe treatment option for high-risk patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to characterize, by three-dimensional echocardiography (3D-E), changes occurring in MV after implantation of third generation MitraClip XT_R device, with specific reference to the underlying MR mechanism (functional vs degenerative, FMR vs DMR).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 59 patients, who underwent intra-procedural 3D-E before and after device deployment. Three-D datasets were analyzed off-line, using a dedicated semiautomatic software, to obtain parametric quantification of mitral anatomy.

RESULTS

Post-procedural MR of mild or lesser degree was achieved in 40 patients (68%), with no differences between FMR and DMR (p 0.9). After MitraClip XT_R implantation, the FMR group experienced an immediate annular resizing, with reduction of antero-posterior diameter (p 0.024) and sphericity index (p 0.017), next to a recovery of physiological saddle-shape, defined by lower non-planar angle (p ≤0.001) and higher annulus height to commissural width ratio (p ≤0.001). On the opposite, the DMR group revealed a significant decrease of maximum annular velocity (p 0.027), addressing a mechanic effect of the device deployment. Finally, baseline anterior mitral leaflet angle was found as an independent predictor of acute procedural result (OR 6.7, [CI 1.01-44.33], p 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip XT_R implantation acts in restoring the original mitral geometry, with distinctive effects according to MR mechanism. Three-D parametric quantification of MV sheds new light on changes occurring in the valvular apparatus, and helps identifying possible new predictors of acute procedural success.

Retrograde Retrieval of a Novel Large Mitral Clip After Embolization Into the Left Ventricle

We describe the successful retrieval of a novel large mitral clip, which embolized in a patient with severe secondary mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction, dilated left ventricle, and severely tethered mitral valve leaflets in the setting of a challenging anatomy for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. The description highlights planning, technical issues, and possible adverse events of this bailout procedure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Anatomical and Technical Predictors of Three-Dimensional Mitral Valve Area Reduction After Transcatheter Edge-To-Edge Repair

BACKGROUND

Among current transcatheter therapies for the treatment of mitral regurgitation, the MitraClip (MC; Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL) system is the most commonly used. MitraClip implantation is usually contraindicated in patients with a mitral valve area (MVA) < 4.0 cm². However, little is known about the real impact of MC implantation on MVA. Our goal was to investigate the factors influencing MVA reduction and derive the minimal MVA required to prevent the development of a clinically significant mitral stenosis (MVA < 1.5 cm²) in different clinical scenarios.

METHODS

Using three-dimensional data sets, the annulus and leaflet anatomy and MVA before clip implantation (MVA_BC) were assessed. After each MC implant (NTR or XTR), the relative MVA reduction and the absolute residual MVA were measured and their predictors evaluated.

RESULTS

The present analysis included 116 patients. An MC XTR was the first device implanted in 50% of the subjects, and 53% were treated with a single implant. The MVA reduction following one XTR was 57% ± 7% versus 52% ± 8% after one NTR (P = .001). A lower MVA reduction was observed when the MC was placed commissural/central versus paracentral (50% ± 8% vs 57% ± 7%, P < .0001). After a second device, the additional MVA reduction was higher when creating a triple-compared with a double-orifice morphology (34% ± 11% vs 25% ± 9%, P = .001). The MVA after one MC correlated with MVA_BC as well as with the clip type and position (r = 0.91, P < .0001). The MVA_BC, orifice morphology, and first device position predicted MVA after two implants (r = 0.82, P < .0001). Based on the mathematical relationship between these parameters, the minimal MVA_BC needed in eight different clinical scenarios was summarized in a decision algorithm: the values ranged from 3.5 to 4.7 cm² for one and 4.5 to 6.3 cm² for two MC strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The minimal native MVA preventing clinically relevant MS after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is predicted by the number and location of clip(s), orifice morphology, and device type. Based on these parameters, an algorithm has been derived to optimize patient selection and preprocedural planning.

Complications Following MitraClip Implantation

Purpose of Review

To provide a detailed overview of complications associated with MitraClip therapy and its development over time with the aim to alert physicians for early recognition of complications and to offer treatment strategies for each complication, if possible.

Recent Findings

The MitraClip system (MC) is the leading transcatheter technique to treat mitral regurgitation (MR) and has been established as a safe procedure with very low adverse event rates compared to mitral surgery at intermediate to high risk or in secondary MR. Lately, the fourth MC generation has been launched with novel technical features to facilitate device handling, decrease complication rates, and allow the treatment of even complex lesions.

Summary

Although the complication rate is low, adverse events are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The most common complications are bleeding, acute kidney failure, procedure-induced mitral stenosis, and an iatrogenic atrial septal defect with unknown clinical impact.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-021-01553-9.

German Multicenter Experience With a New Leaflet-Based Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System for Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the procedural and short-term safety and efficacy of a new leaflet-based transcatheter mitral valve repair system.

BACKGROUND

The PASCAL repair system has been recently approved for percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). Novel characteristics are broad paddles positioned around a central spacer and the ability for independent leaflet capture.

METHODS

Procedural and 30-day outcomes were investigated in the first 309 patients with symptomatic MR 3+/4+ treated with the PASCAL repair system at 10 sites. Primary efficacy endpoints were technical success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major adverse events (MAE).

RESULTS

Among the 309 patients (mean age 77 ± 10 years, 42% women, mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score 5.8 ± 4.5%) included in this study, MR etiology was degenerative in 33%, functional in 52%, and mixed in 16%. Eighty-six percent of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. The technical success rate was 96%. Of 308 patients discharged alive, MR was ≤2+ in 93.5%. At 30 days, the MAE rate was 4.1%, with an estimated all-cause mortality rate of 2.0%, and 72% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class ≤II (p < 0.001). Rates of device success and CLASP (Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System Study) trial-defined clinical success were 81.9% and 86.9%, respectively. Single-leaflet device attachment occurred in 7 patients (2.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve repair with the PASCAL system in the early post-approval phase was effective and safe, with high procedural success rates and low rates of MAE. MR was significantly reduced, accompanied by significant improvement in functional status.

Impact of Mitral Annular Dilation on Edge-to-Edge Therapy With MitraClip-XTR

[Figure: see text].

Devices for transcatheter mitral valve repair: current technology and a glimpse into the future

Introduction: Due to a large unmet need for the treatment of mitral regurgitation, transcatheter mitral valve repair devices have emerged in the last decade as an alternative therapeutic option. Given the complexity of this disease, several device systems for transcatheter mitral valve repair have been developed and are categorized according to its mechanism of action; each device has advantages and disadvantages for certain clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics, and in order to improve outcomes, proper patient selection among other key points are fundamental.Areas covered: The purpose of this article is to review the current state-of-the-art technologies available for transcatheter mitral valve repair, patient suitability, outcomes, and future perspectives.Expert opinion: Transcatheter therapy for mitral regurgitation improves outcomes and pushes the boundaries of biomedical technology while maintaining scientific rigor for device development. Surgical and percutaneous procedures should be viewed as complements to treat a wider spectrum of patients affected by this entity. Future directions from multidisciplinary innovation and cooperation will consolidate this therapeutic option.

Bail-out edge-to-edge mitral repair for an acute single leaflet device attachment: a case report

Background

An acute single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) may occur during transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TMVr), if an inadequate grasping of the target leaflet and/or a leaflet injury are concomitant. The bail-out TMVr often fails due to the complex pathophysiology.

Case summary

We report a case of an acute SLDA after TMVr with the PASCAL Repair System for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) with mixed aetiology, i.e., a thin-appeared posterior leaflet and pseudo-prolapse of the anterior mitral leaflet due to mitral annular dilatation. An acute SLDA occurred 2 min after the deployment, with device detachment of the posterior leaflet. A bail-out TMVr with the MitraClip XTR system led to an optimal MR reduction with the PASCAL stabilized. Despite an adequate leaflet insertion of the 1st device achieved, the posterior leaflet was tear due to its fragile tissue characteristics. At discharge, echocardiography confirmed an optimal MR reduction to mild grade with both devices stabilized.

Discussion

The pathology of the mitral valve leaflet is essential to achieve successful TMVr procedure using edge-to-edge repair device. Since the mechanical stress to the target leaflet appears to vary according to the edge-to-edge repair devices, the leaflet tissue characteristics should be respected during device selection.

State of the Art: Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Complex Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair has revolutionized the treatment of primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. The landmark EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study) and COAPT (Clinical Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for High Surgical Risk Patients) trials included only clinically stable patients with favorable mitral valve anatomy for edge-to-edge repair. However, since its initial commercial approval in the United States, growing operator experience, device iterations, and improvements in intraprocedural imaging have led to an expansion in the use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair to more complex mitral valve pathologies and clinical scenarios, many of which were previously considered contraindications for the procedure. Because patients with prohibitive surgical risk are often older and present with complex mitral valve disease, knowledge of the potential effectiveness, versatility, and technical approach to a broad range of anatomy is clinically relevant. In this review the authors examine the current experience with mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in various pathologies and scenarios that go well beyond the EVEREST II trial inclusion criteria.

The role of transcatheter mitral valve leaflet approximation for the treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation: current status and future prospects

Introduction: Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is one of the most common valvulopathies and is associated with poor prognosis. Over the past years, medical management and mitral valve repair options have rapidly evolved offering new opportunities for a wide range of patients.Areas covered: We provide an up-to-date review of the value of medical and transcatheter mitral valve leaflet approximation for SMR integrating the results of most recent trials and putting their findings into clinical perspective.Expert opinion: Treatment of SMR requires a multidisciplinary approach with a long-term perspective. After optimization of medical treatment, transcatheter mitral valve repair should be considered in patients with persisting symptomatic severe SMR to improve symptoms and prognosis.