Sex-Related Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Prediction Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention

Simplified Outcome Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention by Survival Tree-Based Modelling

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) typically present with heterogeneity in the extent of cardiac dysfunction and extra-cardiac comorbidities, which play a decisive role for survival after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI).

OBJECTIVES

This aim of this study was to create a survival tree-based model to determine the cardiac and extra-cardiac features associated with 2-year survival after TTVI.

METHODS

The study included 918 patients (derivation set, n = 631; validation set, n = 287) undergoing TTVI for severe TR. Supervised machine learning-derived survival tree-based modelling was applied to preprocedural clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic data.

RESULTS

Following univariate regression analysis to pre-select candidate variables for 2-year mortality prediction, a survival tree-based model was constructed using 4 key parameters. Three distinct cluster-related risk categories were identified, which differed significantly in survival after TTVI. Patients from the low-risk category (n = 261) were defined by mean pulmonary artery pressure ≤28 mm Hg and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≤2,728 pg/mL, and they exhibited a 2-year survival rate of 85.5%. Patients from the high-risk category (n = 190) were defined by mean pulmonary artery pressure >28 mm Hg, right atrial area >32.5 cm2, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤51 mL/min, and they showed a significantly worse 2-year survival of only 52.6% (HR for 2-year mortality: 4.3, P < 0.001). Net re-classification improvement analysis demonstrated that this model was comparable to the TRI-Score and outperformed the EuroScore II in identifying high-risk patients. The prognostic value of risk phenotypes was confirmed by external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple survival tree-based model effectively stratifies patients with severe TR into distinct risk categories, demonstrating significant differences in 2-year survival after TTVI.

Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique

INTRODUCTION

Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is more prevalent among females. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) using the edge-to-edge technique represents an alternative to surgery in patients with severe TR and high surgical risk. This study aims to investigate sex differences among patients undergoing TTVR.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TTVR at our center were retrospectively included. We compared baseline characteristics, intra-hospital, and one-year outcomes between males and females.

RESULTS

A total of 105 consecutive patients underwent TTVR. Females were more prevalent in the study cohort (n = 63, 60%). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was more evident in males than females (71.4% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.016). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also worse in males (48.8 ± 13.4 vs. 58 ± 6.8, p < 0.001). Other clinical characteristics were similar between both groups. The Success of the procedure (88.1% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.177) and intra-hospital mortality (4.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.255) were similar among males and females. At one-year follow-up, mortality was similar between both groups (24.3% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.863). Furthermore, hospitalization due to acute heart failure was also similar between both groups (40.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.768), as was a composite endpoint of death or hospitalization. In patients with successful procedures and who survived one year, TR severity was comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our real-world cohort, more females underwent TTVR than males. No difference was observed in outcomes between males and females at one-year follow-up.

Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair

In the realm of innovative medical procedures, TEER (transcatheter edge-to-edge repair) has emerged as a promising field, showcasing significant growth and advancements. Mitral TEER has been performed for the last two decades; in contrast, tricuspid TEER is newer, with long-term outcomes pending. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature, with a primary focus on outcomes and potential complications associated with both procedures. Both procedures carry a low risk of complications when done by experienced providers. A team approach involving specialists in cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, cardiac imaging and heart failure ensures comprehensive care. A unified approach encompassing preprocedural workup, risk assessment, and standardised care throughout the procedure and recovery contributes to successful outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Cardioband in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Arm Trials and Observational Studies

Background/Objectives: The incidence and prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are increasing worldwide. "Traditional" drug therapy with diuretics is often ineffective and the identification of new strategies, including non-pharmacological ones, is an urgent need. The aim of this study was to summarize the results on the efficacy and safety of Cardioband, one of the few approved transcatheter tricuspid valve repair systems, in patients with TR. Methods: Three databases (Medline, Scopus, and CENTRAL) were searched to identify clinical trials and observational studies on the efficacy (primary outcome) and safety (secondary outcome) of Cardioband. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with R software (version 4.3.3). Survival and freedom from heart failure (HF) hospitalization were estimated with the method of reconstructing individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves (IPDfromKM). Results: Eleven studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardioband significantly reduced annulus diameter (-9.31 mm [95% Confidence Interval, CI: -11.47; -7.15]), vena contracta (-6.41 mm [95% CI: -8.34; -4.49]), and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) (-0.50 cm2 [95% CI: -0.72; -0.28]) in patients with TR. Cardioband reduced the severity of TR and the extent of heart failure in 91% [95% CI: 85; 97] and 63% [95% CI: 52-75] of patients, respectively. Finally, Cardioband implantation was associated with prolonged survival and freedom from HF hospitalization (80.1% and 57.8% at 24 months, respectively). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that Cardioband implantation leads to cardiac remodeling and mechanical improvements, reduces the severity of TR, and improves quality of life. Therefore, Cardioband is an effective option for the non-pharmacological treatment of TR.

Imaging Advances in Heart Failure

This paper delves into the significance of imaging in the diagnosis, aetiology and therapeutic guidance of heart failure, aiming to facilitate early referral and improve patient outcomes. Imaging plays a crucial role not only in assessing left ventricular ejection fraction, but also in characterising the underlying cardiac abnormalities and reaching a specific diagnosis. By providing valuable data on cardiac structure, function and haemodynamics, imaging helps diagnose the condition, evaluate haemodynamic status and, consequently, identify the underlying pathophysiological phenotype, as well as stratifying the risk for outcomes. In this article, we provide a comprehensive exploration of these aspects.

Congestion patterns in severe tricuspid regurgitation and transcatheter treatment: Insights from a multicentre registry

AIMS

While invasively determined congestion holds mechanistic and prognostic significance in acute heart failure (HF), its role in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR)-related right- heart failure (HF) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) is less well established. A comprehensive understanding of congestion patterns might aid in procedural planning, risk stratification, and the identification of patients who may benefit from adjunctive therapies before undergoing TTVI. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of congestion patterns in patients with severe TR and its implications for TTVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Within a multicentre, international TTVI registry, 813 patients underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) prior to TTVI and were followed up to 24 months. The median age was 80 (interquartile range 76-83) years and 54% were women. Both mean right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were associated with 2-year mortality on Cox regression analyses with Youden index-derived cut-offs of 17 mmHg and 19 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.01 for all). However, RAP emerged as an independent predictor of outcomes following multivariable adjustments. Pre-interventionally, 42% of patients were classified as euvolaemic (RAP <17 mmHg, PCWP <19 mmHg), 23% as having left-sided congestion (RAP <17 mmHg, PCWP ≥19 mmHg), 8% as right-sided congestion (RAP ≥17 mmHg, PCWP <19 mmHg), and 27% as bilateral congestion (RAP ≥17 mmHg, PCWP ≥19 mmHg). Patients with right-sided or bilateral congestion had the lowest procedural success rates and shortest survival times. Congestion patterns allowed for discerning specific patient's physiology and specifying prognostic implications of right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling surrogates.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of invasively characterized patients undergoing TTVI, congestion patterns involving right-sided congestion were associated with low procedural success and higher mortality rates after TTVI. Whether pre-interventional reduction of right-sided congestion can improve outcomes after TTVI should be established in dedicated studies.

Artificial intelligence-enabled assessment of right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

AIMS

Right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling has been established as a prognostic marker in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI). RV-PA coupling assesses right ventricular systolic function related to pulmonary artery pressure levels, which are ideally measured by right heart catheterization. This study aimed to improve the RV-PA coupling concept by relating tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) levels. Moreover, instead of right heart catheterization, this study sought to employ an extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm to predict mPAP levels based on standard echocardiographic parameters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre study included 737 patients undergoing TTVI for severe TR; among them, 55 patients from one institution served for external validation. Complete echocardiography and right heart catheterization data were available from all patients. The XGB algorithm trained on 10 echocardiographic parameters could reliably predict mPAP levels as evaluated on right heart catheterization data from external validation (Pearson correlation coefficient R: 0.68; P value: 1.3 × 10-8). Moreover, predicted mPAP (mPAPpredicted) levels were superior to echocardiographic systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAPechocardiography) levels in predicting 2-year mortality after TTVI [area under the curve (AUC): 0.607 vs. 0.520; P value: 1.9 × 10-6]. Furthermore, TAPSE/mPAPpredicted was superior to TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography in predicting 2-year mortality after TTVI (AUC: 0.633 vs. 0.586; P value: 0.008). Finally, patients with preserved RV-PA coupling (defined as TAPSE/mPAPpredicted > 0.617 mm/mmHg) showed significantly higher 2-year survival rates after TTVI than patients with reduced RV-PA coupling (81.5% vs. 58.8%, P < 0.001). Moreover, independent association between TAPSE/mPAPpredicted levels and 2-year mortality after TTVI was confirmed by multivariate regression analysis (P value: 6.3 × 10-4).

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence-enabled RV-PA coupling assessment can refine risk stratification prior to TTVI without necessitating invasive right heart catheterization. A comparison with conservatively treated patients is mandatory to quantify the benefit of TTVI in accordance with RV-PA coupling.

Applying the TRILUMINATE Eligibility Criteria to Real-World Patients Receiving Tricuspid Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

BACKGROUND

According to the TRILUMINATE (Clinical Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Treated With the Tricuspid Valve Repair System) trial, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) improves quality of life beyond medical treatment, while no effects on heart failure hospitalization (HFH) and survival were observed at 1 year. However, the generalizability of the TRILUMINATE trial to real-world conditions remains a subject of discussion.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to apply the clinical TRILUMINATE inclusion and exclusion criteria to a real-world T-TEER patient group and evaluate symptomatic and survival outcome in TRILUMINATE-eligible and TRILUMINATE-ineligible patients.

METHODS

Clinical TRILUMINATE inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to a cohort of patients who underwent T-TEER at 5 European centers from 2016 to 2022. Study patients were compared regarding baseline characteristics, survival, HFH, and symptomatic outcomes as measured by NYHA functional class, a quality-of-life questionnaire and 6-minute walk distance.

RESULTS

Of 962 patients, 54.8% were classified as TRILUMINATE eligible, presenting with superior left ventricular function and fewer comorbidities compared with the ineligible population. Tricuspid regurgitation reduction, improvement in NYHA functional class, quality of life, and exercise capacity were comparable in both groups. However, the 1-year survival and HFH rates significantly differed (tricuspid regurgitation ≤2+ at discharge, 82% vs 85%; survival, 85% vs 75%; HFH, 14% vs 22% for eligible vs ineligible patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed differences in survival and HFH outcomes suggest a limited generalizability of TRILUMINATE to real-world conditions and indicate the need for additional studies evaluating the outcomes after T-TEER in less selected patient populations.

The Appropriateness of Medical Devices Is Strongly Influenced by Sex and Gender

Until now, research has been performed mainly in men, with a low recruitment of women; consequentially, biological, physiological, and physio-pathological mechanisms are less understood in women. Obviously, without data obtained on women, it is impossible to apply the results of research appropriately to women. This issue also applies to medical devices (MDs), and numerous problems linked to scarce pre-market research and clinical trials on MDs were evidenced after their introduction to the market. Globally, some MDs are less efficient in women than in men and sometimes MDs are less safe for women than men, although recently there has been a small but significant decrease in the sex and gender gap. As an example, cardiac resynchronization defibrillators seem to produce more beneficial effects in women than in men. It is also important to remember that MDs can impact the health of healthcare providers and this could occur in a sex- and gender-dependent manner. Recently, MDs' complexity is rising, and to ensure their appropriate use they must have a sex-gender-sensitive approach. Unfortunately, the majority of physicians, healthcare providers, and developers of MDs still believe that the human population is only constituted by men. Therefore, to overcome the gender gap, a real collaboration between the inventors of MDs, health researchers, and health providers should be established to test MDs in female and male tissues, animals, and women.

Unveiling Sex Differences in Tricuspid Valve Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical Management

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a heart condition where blood flows backward through the tricuspid valve. Tricuspid valve disease constitutes a major valvular heart condition that is receiving heightened attention due to tailored treatment options and sex-specific differences in treatment outcomes. The study aims to investigate whether biological sex has a significant influence on the development, progression, and treatment outcomes of tricuspid valve disease in adults. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify studies examining the impact of sex on the pathophysiology of TR as well as treatment outcomes in patients with TR. We searched PUBMED/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) from inception to September 2023 to identify relevant studies. Twelve studies totaling 22,574 patients met our eligibility criteria. These studies were categorized into three subgroups: patients with TR without intervention (3,848 patients, with 48.1% males and 51.9% females), those who underwent open heart surgery (17,498 patients: 46.2% males and 53.8% females), and those who underwent transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement (TTVR; 1,687 patients: 41.6% males and 58.4% females). Analysis revealed no major differences in terms of TR etiology. Males tended to have a slightly lower mean age difference (mean difference (MD): -0.60 years; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-1.49, -0.04); p = 0.10) but had more frequent chronic lung disease (risk ratio (RR): 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.25), p = 0.03). Males showed higher baseline TR volume (MD: 4.11, 95% CI (0.53, 7.68), p = 0.02) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (MD: -5.85, 95% CI (-6.97, -4.73), p < 0.00001). Following open heart surgery for TR treatment, males required more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM; RR: 1.57, 95% CI (1.21, 2.03), p = 0.0006). Similarly, TTVR showed a higher need for PPM in males (RR: 1.45, 95% CI (1.10, 1.93), p = 0.010). In-hospital mortality exhibited no sex differences, but males had a slightly elevated late mortality risk. Sex differences in TR patients were notable in baseline characteristics, with males having a higher risk of certain conditions. The more frequent requirement for PPM was a major sex-based difference in terms of prognosis.

Sex Differences in Transcatheter Structural Heart Disease Interventions: How Much Do We Know?

The number of structural heart disease interventions has greatly increased in the past decade. Moreover, interest in the sex-specific outcomes of various cardiovascular conditions and procedures has increased. In this review, we discuss the sex differences in the clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing the most commonly performed structural procedures: transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter edge to edge repair of the mitral and tricuspid valve, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, patent foramen ovale closure and left atrial appendage occlusion. We shed light on potential reasons for these differences and emphasize the importance of increasing the representation of women in randomized clinical trials, to understand these differences and support the application of these cutting-edge technologies.