Long-Term Risk of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the SwissTAVI Registry

Incidence, Predictors, and Prognostic Impact of Neurologic Events After TAVR According to VARC-3 Criteria

BACKGROUND

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition for neurologic events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) lacks clinical validation.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of neurologic events following TAVR as defined by VARC-3 criteria.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study including 2,924 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. Based on Neurologic Academic Research Consortium (NeuroARC) classification, neurologic events were classified as NeuroARC type 1 (stroke), NeuroARC type 2 (covert central nervous system injury), and NeuroARC type 3 (transient ischemic attack and delirium). Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 13 (7-37) months, neurologic events occurred in 471 patients (16.1%), NeuroARC type 1, 2, and 3 in 37.4%, 4.7%, and 58.0% of cases, respectively, and the majority (58.6%) were periprocedural. Advanced age, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, major vascular complications, and in-hospital bleeding determined an increased risk of periprocedural events (P < 0.03 for all). Neurologic events occurring during the periprocedural time frame were independently associated with a substantial increase in mortality at 1 year after the intervention (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.23-2.97; P = 0.004). However, although NeuroARC type 1 was associated with an increased mortality risk (IRR: 3.38; 95% CI: 2.30-5.56; P < 0.001 and IRR: 21.7; 95% CI: 9.63-49.1; P < 0.001 for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively), the occurrence of NeuroARC type 3 events had no impact on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic events after TAVR were associated with poorer short- and long-term survival. This correlation was related to the type of NeuroARC event defined by the VARC-3 criteria. Given the negative impact on clinical outcomes, every attempt should be made to reduce the risk of neurologic complications after TAVR.

Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an efficient and safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While severe aortic stenosis as well as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) are known to negatively impact left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prior studies have shown that TAVR can lead to an improvement in LVEF. Thus far, little is known about the prognostic implication of LVEF improvement as a sole predictor of outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of LVEF impairment before TAVR, as well as early LVEF improvement in patients undergoing TAVR. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR in a large tertiary university hospital were consecutively included in a prospective registry. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, after 1 month and annually thereafter. Significant LVEF improvement was defined as a relative increase of ≥10% in LVEF at 30 days compared to baseline LVEF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and unplanned re-interventions of the aortic valve at 5 years. Results: Among 1655 patients who underwent TAVR between September 2011 and April 2024, the LVEF at baseline was available for 1556 patients. Of these, 1031 patients (66.2%) had preserved LVEF at baseline (LVEF ≥ 53%), whereas 303 patients (19.5%) had moderately reduced LVEF (40-52%) and 222 patients (14.3%) had severely reduced LVEF (<40%). Out of the patients with impaired LVEF, 155 (40.4%) patients showed a significant improvement in LVEF ≥10% after 30 days, while 229 (60.6%) patients showed no significant LVEF improvement (<10%). Patients with preserved LVEF at baseline had significantly better mortality outcomes than those with severely reduced LVEF (p < 0.001). LVEF improvement was associated with a survival benefit after 1 year (p = 0.009, HR 2.68, 0.95 CI 1.23-5.85) which diminished after 5 years (p = 0.058), but patients with LVEF improvement showed lower MACE rates at 5 years (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Preserved LVEF before TAVR is an independent predictor for improved outcomes. Additionally, early improvement in LVEF is associated with beneficial outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.

Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries

OBJECTIVE

Recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at low surgical risk has resulted in a rapid real-world expansion of TAVR in patients not otherwise examined in recent low-risk trials. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus TAVR in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

Using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries undergoing isolated SAVR (n = 33,210) or TAVR (n = 77,885) (2018-2020). International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes were used to define variables and frailty was defined by the validated Kim index. Doubly robust risk adjustment was performed with inverse probability weighting and multilevel regression models, as well as competing-risk time to event analysis. A low-risk cohort was identified to simulate recent low-risk trials.

RESULTS

A total of 15,749 low-risk patients (8144 SAVR and 7605 TAVR) were identified. Comparison was performed with doubly robust risk adjustment accounting for all factors. TAVR was associated with lower perioperative stroke (odds ratio, 0.62; P < .001) and hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.16; P < .001) compared with SAVR. However, risk-adjusted longitudinal analysis demonstrated TAVR was associated with higher late risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.65; P < .001), readmission for valve reintervention (hazard ratio, 1.88; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.54; P < .001) compared with SAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Among low-risk Medicare beneficiaries younger than age 75 years undergoing isolated AVR, SAVR was associated with higher index morbidity and mortality but improved 3-year risk-adjusted stroke, valve reintervention, and survival compared with TAVR.