Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Before and After Standardized Optimization Protocols

Impact of Post-PCI Lipid Core Burden Index on Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes: Insights From NIRS-IVUS

BACKGROUND

The impact of lipid core burden index (LCBI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the stented segment assessed by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy on the outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we aimed to assess the impact of post-PCI LCBI on late luminal loss and clinical outcomes. Post-PCI intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy imaging was performed in the stented segment after PCI. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on the post-PCI maxLCBI4mm with a cut-off value of 200. Angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared at 12 months. The primary end point was angiographic late luminal loss. The secondary end point was target lesion failure (composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, and stroke).

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients with 278 target lesions were followed up for 1 year. One-year follow-up angiography was performed on 198 lesions in 163 patients. Follow-up quantitative coronary angiography revealed that stented segments with post-PCI maxLCBI4mm ≥200 had higher late luminal loss compared with those with a post-PCI maxLCBI4mm <200 (mean, 0.503±0.683 mm versus 0.115±0.326 mm; P<0.001; median, 0.250 mm versus 0.050 mm; P<0.001). Patients with post-PCI maxLCBI4mm ≥200 had a significantly higher 1-year cumulative incidence of both target lesion failure (6.9% versus 0.6%; P=0.002) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (15.1% versus 2.2%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-PCI LCBI assessed by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound was associated with late luminal loss as well as subsequent target lesion failure and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention according to lesion complexity

BACKGROUND

Recent trials have shown that intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcome, as compared to angiography-guided PCI, in complex coronary artery lesions. However, it is unclear whether this benefit is affected by overall lesion complexity in each patient.

AIMS

The present study sought to investigate the impact of overall lesion complexity on the benefit of IVI-guided PCI.

METHODS

A total of 4,611 patients with complex coronary artery lesions from the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial (n=1,639) and the institutional registry of the Samsung Medical Center (n=2,972) were classified according to the number of complex lesion features found in each patient. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation.

RESULTS

The cutoff value for the number of complex lesion features to predict TVF, determined using the maximally selected log-rank test, was 3. Patients with ≥3 complex lesion features had a higher risk of TVF than those with <3 complex lesion features (11.0% vs 7.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.96; p<0.001). IVI-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of TVF compared with angiography-guided PCI in both groups (≥3 complex lesion features: 7.4% vs 14.4%, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.69; p<0.001; <3 complex lesion features: 5.7% vs 8.1%, HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98; p=0.039). The benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as the number of complex lesion features increased (absolute risk reduction for TVF: -0.012 vs -0.027 vs -0.055 vs -0.077, respectively, for 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs ≥4 complex lesion features; interaction p=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with complex coronary artery lesions, IVI-guided PCI showed a lower risk of TVF across all degrees of lesion complexity. The prognostic benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as patients had more complex lesion features. (RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03381872]; Institutional cardiovascular catheterisation database of the Samsung Medical Center [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03870815]).

Intravascular Imaging Predictors Associated With Cardiovascular Events After Complex PCIs

BACKGROUND

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery lesions compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the prognostic impact of suboptimal findings on intravascular imaging such as stent underexpansion, malapposition, or dissection is unclear in the era of contemporary drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

From RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) which compared imaging-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in patients with complex lesions, post-PCI intravascular imaging findings, including minimum stent area (MSA), relative stent underexpansion (MSA≤80% of the average reference lumen area), malapposition, or dissection, were assessed in nonleft main target lesions. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or definite stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

A total of 897 nonleft main lesions from 714 patients undergoing imaging-guided PCI were included. During a median follow-up duration of 2.1 years, the optimal cutoff value of MSA to predict the occurrence of TLF was 5.5 mm2, and MSA<5.5 mm2 was associated with a significantly higher risk of TLF than MSA≥5.5 mm2 (2.2% versus 4.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.01-9.50]; P=0.048). Compared with the reference group (MSA≥5.5 mm2 and no suboptimal findings), the subgroup of patients with MSA≥5.5 mm2 and post-PCI intravascular imaging findings of relative stent underexpansion, major malapposition, or major dissection was associated with a numerically increased risk of TLF (0.0% versus 3.2%; P=0.057). Compared with the same reference group, the subgroup of patients with MSA<5.5 mm2 and suboptimal post-PCI intravascular imaging findings was associated with a significantly increased risk of TLF (0.0% versus 4.7%; P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

After intravascular imaging-guided PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents for nonleft main complex lesions, inadequate absolute stent expansion was independently associated with a higher risk of TLF. Suboptimal post-PCI intravascular imaging findings of relative stent underexpansion, major malapposition, and major dissection seem to contribute to the risk of TLF.

REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.

Innovations in Intracoronary Imaging: Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks

Engaging intracoronary imaging (IC) techniques such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography enables the precise description of vessel architecture. These imaging modalities have well-established roles in providing guidance and optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. Furthermore, IC is increasingly recognized for its diagnostic capabilities, as it has the unique capacity to reveal vessel wall characteristics that may not be apparent through angiography alone. This manuscript thoroughly reviews the contemporary landscape of IC in clinical practice. Focused on current methodologies, the review explores the utility and advancements in IC techniques. Emphasizing their role in clarifying coronary pathophysiology, guiding PCI, and optimizing patient outcomes, the manuscript critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of each modality. Additionally, the integration of IC into routine clinical workflows and its impact on decision-making processes are discussed. By synthesizing the latest evidence, this review provides valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals involved in the dynamic field of interventional cardiology.