Knowledge Confidence and Desire for Further Diabetes-Management Education among Nurses and Personal Support Workers in Long-Term Care

Trends in diabetes care and education by primary health care nurses in Auckland, New Zealand

AIMS

To examine trends in the management of patients with diabetes by primary health care nurses, its association with diabetes education and how valued and supported nurses feel in Auckland, New Zealand.

METHODS

Two representative cross-sectional surveys of all nurses providing community-based care, and patients with diabetes they consult, were conducted in 2006-8 and 2016. All participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on biographical details and a telephone interview on their provision of diabetes care.

RESULTS

Significantly more nurses discussed serum glucose and medications with patients, planned follow-up and scheduled practice nurse appointments in 2016 compared with 2006-8, and fewer specialist diabetologist appointments were made (12% versus 2%). Fewer nurses in 2016 than in 2006-8 felt valued (62% versus 75%) and supported (78% versus 89%) when managing patients (p-values = 0.0004). Nurses diabetes education was associated with recommended practice and feeling valued. Significantly more patients were prescribed metformin (81%) and insulin (46%) in 2016 compared with 58% and 30% in 2006-8. Despite this, HbA_1c levels remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribed glycaemic-related medications increased, and more nurses engaged with patients about glycaemic control and medications in 2016 compared with 2006-8. Nurses undertaking diabetes education was strongly associated with best management practices and nurses feeling valued.

The diabetes quality of life brief clinical inventory in combination with the management strategies in type 1 diabetes mellitus with or without the use of insulin pump

Aims

The aims of this study are to evaluate any differences in the Quality of life among Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) and Multiple Dose Injection (MDI) insulin delivery, applying the Diabetes Quality of life Brief Clinical Inventory (DQoL-BCI) questionnaire, and assess the diabetes management strategies between the two groups.

Methods

One hundred and ten adult participants (male/female ratio 1:2.7) with type 1 diabetes were recruited in this online survey. Forty-eight of them were using CSII and the rest 62 (were using) MDI insulin delivery. A 23-item socio-demographic/diabetes management strategies questionnaire and the 15-item DQoL-BCI were administered.

Results

CSII users scored statistically, significantly better at the satisfaction treatment subscale (p = 0.032) of the DQoL-BCI and emerged that they were implemented more management strategies such as dietician guidance services (p = 0.002), carbohydrate education seminars (p = 0.03). Predictive factors were also detected regarding the HbA_1c < 7% (53 mmol/mol) and β-coefficients in relation to DQoL-BCI questionnaire with the subscales of a negative impact and satisfaction treatment.

Conclusion

Diabetes self-management education plays a key role to a better compliance with the treatment. Client-centered multidisciplinary centers in T1DM education are essential so that they be applicable for all T1DM patients irrespective of the type of insulin delivery they used.

A Successful Diabetes Management Model of Care in Long-Term Care Facilities

The management of diabetes in long-term care (LTC) facilities requires facility staff to perform most self-care activities on the behalf of the residents. A practical model of care to improve diabetes management was developed and implemented at 6 LTC facilities in the Northeast United States between 2009 and 2012. The components of the program included (1) developing an individualized education curriculum and educating LTC interdisciplinary staff; (2) educating patients and caregivers; and (3) developing a clinical care algorithm. Over 500 staff members were educated and achieved competence. There were 1031 residents screened for risk of hypo- or hyperglycemia on admission, and 245 residents (24%) experienced hypoglycemia and 240 residents (23%) experienced hyperglycemia. Hypoglycemia episodes resolved without recurrence in 73%-90% cases because of interventions initiated by LTC staff. The implementation of a practical model of diabetes management in LTC facilities can improve staff education and lead to improved diabetes management.

Type 2 Diabetes in Older Adults in Long-Term Care Homes: An Educational Intervention to Improve Diabetes Care

OBJECTIVES

Over 25% of nursing home residents have diabetes. Nurses (registered nurses and registered practical nurses), registered dietitians and personal support workers (PSWs) provide the bulk of diabetes care in long-term care (LTC) homes, but their self-rated diabetes knowledge is poor. In this study, we evaluated the impact of an educational intervention on comfort with, and knowledge of, diabetes management among frontline LTC staff.

METHODS

We implemented an educational intervention in 2 LTC homes in Ontario that targeted nurses and dietitians, PSWs and physicians. A self-assessment questionnaire and a knowledge test were administered to nurses and dietitians and PSWs before and after the intervention. We also measured pre- and postintervention glycated hemoglobin levels, use of sliding scale insulin and type and dose of diabetes medications prescribed.

RESULTS

After the intervention, both the nurses and dietitians and PSWs groups demonstrated increased comfort with diabetes management and improved self-appraised knowledge. Among PSWs, knowledge of foot care improved the most, and the nurses and dietitians group had the greatest improvement in knowledge of blood glucose monitoring. In addition, there was reduced use of sliding scale insulin, and in the number of residents requiring renal-based dose reductions of glucose-lowering medications. This intervention was innovative as it targeted different LTC health-care providers; it demonstrated the potential to increase LTC health-care providers' confidence in diabetes management. Future studies could assess the clinical benefits of an educational intervention on rates of hypoglycemia and improving A1C targets.

CONCLUSIONS

An educational intervention can improve knowledge and comfort of diabetes management of frontline LTC staff.

[Assessing nurses’ knowledge of insulin administration and the impact of the introduction of concentrated insulins.]

Insulin is a high-risk medication, and even slight changes in blood levels can lead to serious side effects or can even result in death. Error in administering drugs is one of the main causes of over- or under-dosing, and the recent introduction of concentrated insulins (CI) has increased this risk. We assessed nurses’ knowledge of these CI, their beliefs about the “insulin unit” (IU), and the impact that this knowledge had on the risk of making medication errors. A direct interview survey was conducted in eight departments of medicine and surgery in a university hospital. Sixty-eight nurses and midwives were interviewed. Twenty-six percent of them had already encountered a CI prescription and only 51.5 percent correctly defined the notion of IU. Only 18 percent responded correctly to a practical case of a CI prescription, whilst 35 percent multiplied the dose by two and 24 percent divided it by two. Sixty percent indicated that they regularly use a U-100 graduated insulin syringe to withdraw insulin from the pen. Insulin administration errors related to this misuse, which are very well documented in the literature, are linked to nurses’ lack of knowledge about the true definition of IU. These administration errors have increased with the introduction of concentrated insulins.

The role of unregulated care providers in Canada-A scoping review

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This scoping review explored: (i) the role of unregulated care providers in the healthcare system; (ii) their potential role on interprofessional teams; (iii) the impact of unregulated care provider's role on quality of care and patient safety; and (iv) education and employment standards.

BACKGROUND

Unregulated care providers in Canada assist older adults with personal support and activities of daily living in a variety of care settings. As the care needs of an aging population become increasingly complex, the role of unregulated care providers in healthcare delivery has also evolved. Currently, many unregulated care providers are performing tasks previously performed by regulated health professionals, with potential implications for quality of care and patient safety. Information is fragmented on the role, education and employment standards of unregulated care providers.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following the methods outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 2005, 19) and Levac, Colquhoun, and O'Brien (Implementation Science, 5, 2010, 69). An iterative search of published and grey literature was conducted from January 2000 to September 2016 using Medline, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Google. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to identify relevant studies published in English.

RESULTS

The search yielded 63 papers for review. Results highlight the evolving role of unregulated care providers, a lack of recognition and a lack of authority for unregulated care provider decision-making in patient care. Unregulated care providers do not have a defined scope of practice. However, their role has evolved to include activities previously performed by regulated professionals. Variations in education and employment standards have implications for quality of care and patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Unregulated care providers are part of an important workforce in the long-term care and community sectors in Canada. Their evolving role should be recognised and efforts made to leverage their experience on interprofessional teams and reduce variations in education and employment standards.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study highlights the evolving role of unregulated care providers in Canada and presents a set of recommendations for implementation at micro, meso, and macro policy levels.