Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes

ECLIPSES: Early initiation of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes following acute coronary syndrome and subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of data evaluating early initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with diabetes following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the efficacy and safety of SGLT2i initiated early after CABG in patients with type 2 diabetes who experienced ACS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who experienced ACS and subsequent CABG with follow up at 3 and 12 months. Patients who filled a SGLT2i prescription within 14 days of discharge were allocated to the SGLT2i group and those who did not were included in the no SGLT2i group. The primary efficacy end point was first occurrence of a 4-point Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE), and the primary safety end point was a composite of hypoglycemia, hypotension, diabetic ketoacidosis, acute kidney injury, and urinary tract infection. Secondary end points included a comparative analysis of the primary outcome, 30-day readmission rates, and subgroup analyses of key populations.

RESULTS

A total of 1629 patients were included: 226 received a SGLT2i within 14 days of discharge and 1403 did not. At 12 months, 8.9% and 15.3% of patients experienced MACE in the SGLT2i and no SGLT2i groups, respectively (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-1.04). The primary safety outcome occurred in 12.0% of the SGLT2i group and 19.1% of the no SGLT2i group at 12 months (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.01).

CONCLUSION

Early initiation of SGLT2i use was not associated with a reduction in MACE in patients with T2DM who experienced ACS and underwent subsequent CABG surgery. However, no apparent safety concerns were identified. Adequately powered trials are required to confirm this finding.

International guideline comparison of lifestyle management for acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A rapid review

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition, with ACS-associated morbidity and mortality causing substantial human and economic challenges to the individual and health services. Due to shared disease determinants, those with ACS have a high risk of comorbid Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite this, the two conditions are managed separately, duplicating workload for staff and increasing the number of appointments and complexity of patient management plans. This rapid review compared current ACS and T2DM guidelines across Australia, Canada, Europe, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. Results highlighted service overlap, repetition, and opportunities for integrated practice for ACS-T2DM lifestyle management across diet and nutrition, physical activity, weight management, clinical and psychological health. Recommendations are made for potential integration of ACS-T2DM service provision to streamline care and reduce siloed care in the context of the health services for ACS-T2DM and similar comorbid conditions.

Basic types of the first-day glycemia in acute myocardial infarction: Prognostic, diagnostic, threshold and target glycemia

We described the importance of stress hyperglycemia (SH) in critical illnesses and their evaluation in the emergency department (ED) and coronary care unit (CCU). Hyperglycemia is found in over half of the patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). SH can be used for several purposes in AMI. Receiver operating characteristic curves are needed to find optimal cut-offs to divide blood glucose levels associated with good from bad prognosis in AMI. There is a need for a consensus for pragmatic classification of first day glycemia in order to be useful in a busy ED and CCU.

Safe care for people with diabetes in hospital

Diabetes is the most prevalent long-term condition, occurring in approximately 6.5% of the UK population. However, an average of 18% of all acute hospital beds are occupied by someone with diabetes. Having diabetes in hospital is associated with increased harm - however that may be defined. Over the last few years the groups such as the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care have produced guidelines to help medical and nursing staff manage inpatients with diabetes. These guidelines have been rapidly adopted across the UK. The National Diabetes Inpatient Audit has shown that over the last few years the care for people with diabetes has slowly improved, but there remain challenges in terms of providing appropriate staffing and education. Patient safety is paramount, and thus there remains a lot to do to ensure this vulnerable group of people are not at increased risk of harm.