Sex Differences in Predictors of Completion of a 6-month Adapted Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for People with Type 2 Diabetes and No Known Cardiac Disease

[Pre-, per- and post-allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant rehabilitation (SFGM-TC)]

Allogeneic transplantation of haematopoietic stem cells is still the only curative treatment for certain haematological malignancies. This treatment can be responsible for a number of side-effects, leading to multiple and interdependent physical and psychological deficiencies that affect patients' quality of life and social participation, and can be experienced as a handicap, sometimes for several years after the transplant. For several years now, the integration of post-transplant rehabilitation pathways has been becoming more widespread, and initiatives to provide multidisciplinary care at an increasingly early stage are being studied. The aim of this early management is to improve the patient's overall functional state before, during and after the transplant, in order to limit the impact of the treatment and ensure the quickest possible return to a life that is as satisfying as possible. The international literature and the experiments carried out throughout the French-speaking world describe heterogeneous practices. Based on this literature and experience, the aim of this study is to issue homogenous recommendations for good clinical practice and to identify areas for further research into pre-transplant, per-transplant and post-transplant rehabilitation of haematopoietic stem cells.

Sex differences and predictors of completion of a 6-month exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program in 1,536 people following stroke

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively examine sex-differences and predictors of completion in consecutively-referred patients to a 6-month exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) from 2006 to 2017.

MATERIALS/METHODS

People with hemiplegic gait participated in stroke-adapted-CRP; otherwise, traditional-CRP. Reasons for non-completion were ascertained by interview. Regression-analyses were conducted to determine non-completion in all patients and women and men separately.

RESULTS

There were 1536 patients (30.3% women), mean age 64.5 ± 12.5 with 23% initiating the stroke-adapted-CRP. Overall, 75.1% completed the CRP (87.3% stroke-adapted-CRP vs 71.5% traditional-CRP; p < .001). There was no difference in completion between women and men (74.5% vs 75.4%; p=0.7), or in attendance to pre-scheduled sessions (p=0.6) or reasons for non-completion (p > .05, all). The only sex difference in completion by age (decade) occurred in those <41 years (59% women vs 85% men; p=.02). Baseline predictors of non-completion among all patients included not being enrolled in the stroke-adapted-CRP, lower V̇O_2peak, smoking, diabetes (prescribed insulin) and depression but not sex (p=.5) or age (p=.15). Unique predictors in women vs men were younger age, lower V̇O_2peak, smoking, diabetes (prescribed insulin), depression, and cancer diagnoses. Unique to men was having >1 stroke and diabetes (any anti-diabetes medication). The strongest predictor of non-completion among all models was not being enrolled in stroke-adapted-CRP.

CONCLUSIONS

While there were no sex-differences in adherence to the CRP, women and men have mostly unique predictors of non-completion. Younger women are at greatest risk for non-completion. Practitioners should provide sex-specific, tailored strategies for enhancing completion with a focus on younger women and offering a stroke-adapted-CRP with close attention to those with diabetes.

Women-Focused Cardiovascular Rehabilitation: An International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guideline

Women-focused cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR; phase II) aims to better engage women, and might result in better quality of life than traditional programs. This first clinical practice guideline by the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (ICCPR) provides guidance on how to deliver women-focused programming. The writing panel comprised experts with diverse geographic representation, including multidisciplinary health care providers, a policy-maker, and patient partners. The guideline was developed in accordance with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealTh care (RIGHT). Initial recommendations were on the basis of a meta-analysis. These were circulated to a Delphi panel (comprised of corresponding authors from review articles and of programs delivering women-focused CR identified through ICCPR's audit; N = 76), who were asked to rate each on a 7-point Likert scale in terms of impact and implementability (higher scores positive). A Web call was convened to achieve consensus; 15 panelists confirmed strength of revised recommendations (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE]). The draft underwent external review from CR societies internationally and was posted for public comment. The 14 drafted recommendations related to referral (systematic, encouragement), setting (model choice, privacy, staffing), and delivery (exercise mode, psychosocial, education, self-management empowerment). Nineteen (25.0%) survey responses were received. For all but 1 recommendation, ≥ 75% voted to include; implementability ratings were < 5/7 for 4 recommendations, but only 1 for effect. Ultimately 1 recommendation was excluded, 1 separated into 2 and all revised (2 substantively); 1 recommendation was added. Overall, certainty of evidence for the final recommendations was low to moderate, and strength mostly strong. These recommendations and associated tools can support all programs to feasibly offer some women-focused programming.