1
|
Lin W, Yang Y, Zhuo Y, Qiu C, Guo Y, Yao Y. Efficacy of intraoperative systemic lidocaine on quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Med 2024; 56:2315229. [PMID: 38346397 PMCID: PMC10863528 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2315229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of intraoperative systemic lidocaine administration in major abdominal surgeries. We tested the hypothesis that systemic lidocaine is associated with an enhanced early quality of recovery in patients following laparoscopic colorectal resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS We randomly allocated 126 patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lidocaine (1.5 mg kg-1 bolus over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion at 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of surgery) or identical volumes and rates of saline. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 score assessed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were areas under the pain numeric rating scale curve over time, 48-h morphine consumption, and adverse events. RESULTS Compared with saline, systemic lidocaine improved the Quality of Recovery-15 score 24 h postoperatively, with a median difference of 4 (95% confidence interval: 1-6; p = 0.015). Similarly, the area under the pain numeric rating scale curve over 48 h at rest and on movement was reduced in the lidocaine group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, these differences were not clinically meaningful. Lidocaine infusion reduced the intraoperative remifentanil requirements but not postoperative 48-h morphine consumption (p < 0.001 and p = 0.34, respectively). Additionally, patients receiving lidocaine had a quicker and earlier return of bowel function, as indicated by a shorter time to first flatus (log-rank p < 0.001), yet ambulation time was similar between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, intraoperative systemic lidocaine resulted in statistically but not clinically significant improvements in quality of recovery (see Graphical Abstract).Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; ChiCTR1900027635.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjun Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ying Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yifen Zhuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Haicang Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Chunlin Qiu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yanhua Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yusheng Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shafa A, Abediny R, Shetabi H, Shahhosseini S. The Effect of Preoperative Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine vs. Intravenous Ketamine on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Anesth Pain Med 2023; 13:e130991. [PMID: 37645009 PMCID: PMC10461382 DOI: 10.5812/aapm-130991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ketamine is widely used in pediatric sedation. New studies have recommended combination therapy to reduce the side effects of ketamine. Objectives This study investigated the effect of adding intravenous (IV) lidocaine to ketamine on hemodynamic parameters, endoscopist satisfaction, and recovery time of children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods This triple-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran (2021). One hundred twenty children between the ages of 1 and 6 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The intervention group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV lidocaine and 1.0 mg/kg of IV ketamine, and the placebo group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV ketamine and placebo 2 minutes before entering the endoscopic room. Patients in both groups were sedated with 1.0 mg/kg of propofol, 0.1 mg/kg of midazolam, and 2.0 ug/kg of fentanyl for the procedure. The pulse rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded 1 minute before injection and every 5 minutes afterward. Results The mean (SD) ages of the intervention and control groups were 3.4 (1.5) and 3.4 (1.7), respectively. The mean difference in hemodynamic parameters between the 2 groups was insignificant during the investigation (P > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found regarding endoscopist satisfaction scores and length of recovery room stay (P > 0.05). Conclusions Adding low-dose IV lidocaine to ketamine for pediatric sedation does not significantly affect the hemodynamic status, endoscopist satisfaction, and recovery time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Shafa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Reza Abediny
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Shetabi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Sedighe Shahhosseini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singh A, Kayina CA, Naik N, Ganesh V, Kumar S, Pandey VK, Bora GS, Saini K, Soni SL, Kaloria N, Samra T, Saini V. Transurethral lidocaine (100 mg) bladder irrigation (TULI100) reduces the incidence of catheter related bladder discomfort in transurethral resection of bladder tumors: A randomized, double blind, controlled trial. Int J Urol 2023; 30:264-270. [PMID: 36375083 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) surgeries requires post-resection catheterization for continuous irrigation of the bladder. This indwelling catheter is associated with distressing catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and increases postoperative pain and agitation. OBJECTIVES To prove the hypothesis that transurethral 100 mg lidocaine irrigation at the end of TURBT can reduce the frequency of moderate-to-severe postoperative CRBD. METHODS 116 patients scheduled for TURBT were screened, 94 were recruited and completed the study. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-II adult patients, 20-75 years of age undergoing elective TURBT surgery under general anesthesia were included. Transurethral normal saline with 0.01% lidocaine (100 mg in 1 L NS) was used for irrigation 30 min before the completion of surgery in group L, while only normal saline was used for transurethral irrigation in group N. The main outcomes were frequency of CRBD, pain and patient satisfaction at 0, 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 94 patients were analyzed in the study. The incidence of moderate-severe CRBD was significantly lower in group L as compared to group C at 0, 1, and 2 h (65.9% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.01; 31.9% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.012; 21.3% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.004, respectively). At the 6-h mark, the incidence of CRBD was lower in group L, although this did not achieve statistical significance (6.38% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.613). CONCLUSION Irrigation with 0.01% lidocaine (100 mg) towards the end of TURBT reduces the incidence of moderate-severe CRBD by 52% and increases patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Singh
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Naveen Naik
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Venkata Ganesh
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sumit Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | - Kulbhushan Saini
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shiv Lal Soni
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Narender Kaloria
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Tanvir Samra
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vikas Saini
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu F, Xiong LL, Li TT, Chen YJ, Ma W, Li QJ, Li Q, Wang TH. Analgesic Effects and Adverse Reactions of Lidocaine for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Patients Undergoing Open Hepatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis. J Perianesth Nurs 2023; 38:39-44. [PMID: 35989234 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.05.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lidocaine for patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients who underwent open hepatectomy. DESIGN A retrospective analysis. METHODS A total of 281 patients who underwent open hepatectomy from July 2018 to December 2018 were included. All patients were assigned into two groups: the lidocaine group (PCIA consisted of lidocaine, sufentanil, tramadol and granisetron) and the control group (PCIA consisted of sufentanil, tramadol and granisetron). The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and complications (including respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, numbness of the corners of the mouth, dizziness) between the groups were compared. FINDINGS There were no significant differences between the characteristics, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and recovery of postoperative activity between the two groups. In the first 3 days after the operation, the postoperative VAS score of the lidocaine group was lower than that of the control group at resting state, while after activity, the postoperative VAS contrast results were completely opposite. In particularly, the resting state at 48 hours (h) (1.05 ± 1.25 vs 1.57 ± 1.54) after surgery and the activity state at 72 h (3.02 ± 1.51 vs 2.2 ± 1.66) after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidence of mouth numbness and dizziness were significantly increased in the lidocaine group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The addition of lidocaine in PCIA was not beneficial to improve the pain during activities and increased the incidence of perioral numbness and dizziness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Liu-Lin Xiong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Ting-Ting Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Anesthesiology, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan-Jun Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qi-Jun Li
- Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Sichuan University, Luzhou, China
| | - Qian Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting-Hua Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Intravenous lidocaine simultaneously infused with sufentanil to accelerate gastrointestinal function recovery in patients after thoracolumbar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:313-320. [PMID: 36394651 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07456-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction is one of the common complications of surgery, especially after surgery for a thoracolumbar spinal fracture. Intravenous lidocaine is a potential method to improve postoperative gastrointestinal function in surgical patients, reduce opioid use and shorten hospital stays. The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients after thoracolumbar surgery. METHODS In this study, 48 eligible patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spine fractures resection and internal fixation surgery were enrolled to receive intravenous injections of lidocaine in different concentrations during the perioperative period. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: control group (group A), low concentration of lidocaine group (group B) and high concentration of lidocaine group (group C), 16 patients in each group. First postoperative exhaust time, numbers of bowel sound at preoperative and postoperative 3, 6, 12, 24 h, pain scores at postoperative 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 h, total sufentanil use in PACU and perioperative periods, postoperative hospital stay and analgesic remedy within postoperative 48 h were recorded and compared. The primary endpoints include: the time of first flatus passage after the operation, the number of bowel sounds per minute counted with stethoscope at 30 min before anesthesia induction and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperative. The secondary endpoints included: the pain scores at PACU (after entering into PACU), 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperative, the amount of sufentanil administrated by intravenous push during operation and the numbers of patients needed rescuing sufentanil in PACU, and the numbers of patients needed administration of gastric motility drugs or non-steroidal analgesics at ward within 48 h postoperation, length of hospital stay (from the first day after surgery to discharge from hospital) and the incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS Compared with group A, the first postoperative exhaust time in group B and C occurred much earlier (23.3 ± 11.0 h vs. 16.0 ± 6.6 h, 16.6 ± 5.1 h, P < 0.05). Compared with preoperation, the numbers of bowel sound significantly increased at 24 h postoperatively in group B, while group B at 6 h and group C at 6 and 24 h postoperatively had significantly more active bowel sounds compared to group A (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences in VAS scores within 12 h postoperatively among three groups, and however, significantly lower VAS scores were found at 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively in group C when comparing to Group A (p < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of postoperative flatulence and nausea and vomiting, the number of patients needed rescuing sufentanil in PACU, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the number of patients requiring non-steroidal analgesics at ward within 48 h postoperation. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous lidocaine infusion together with patient-controlled analgesia of sufentanil expedited the early recovery of gastrointestinal function and improved analgesic quality of sefentanyl in patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgeries.
Collapse
|
6
|
Jayaprabhu NB, Avula J, Chandy TT, Varghese G, Yadav B, Rebekah G. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion With Thoracic Epidural for Perioperative Analgesia and Quality of Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Left-Sided Colon and Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Resection Surgery. Cureus 2022; 14:e23758. [PMID: 35509732 PMCID: PMC9059900 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Protocols for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) have been constantly evolving, and the best method of managing perioperative pain, especially in laparoscopic surgeries, is still debatable. The primary goal of these protocols is to steer toward opioid-sparing analgesia. Intravenous lidocaine, which has both analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, may improve the overall recovery of patients. Objectives The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion (IVL) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in the management of perioperative pain and recovery in the laparoscopic left-sided colon and sphincter-sparing rectal surgery. Methods In this study, 37 patients were randomized to either the IVL group or the TEA group. IVL infusion was started before the surgical incision and stopped 30 minutes after transferring the patient to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesic doses, quality of recovery scores, time to discharge, and adverse events were recorded prospectively. Data were analyzed using two independent sample t-test and paired t-test, with p < 0.05 taken as statistically significant. Results The mean difference of overall NRS (numerical rating scale) pain scores in the ward was significantly higher in the IVL group as compared to the TEA group, which was 3.58 (2.29) vs 2.23 1.95) (p < 0.001). The IVL group required more mean rescue opioid boluses than the TEA group, which was 11.36 (8.684) vs 5.96 (6.215) (p < 0.001). However, both IVL and TEA groups had similar pain scores intraoperatively and in the PACU. Conclusions TEA provides better analgesia and decreased opioid requirements compared to intravenous lidocaine during the 24-hour period in the ward after laparoscopic left-sided colon and sphincter-sparing rectal surgery, although there was no difference in the quality of recovery between IVL and TEA groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jyothi Avula
- Anaesthetics, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, IND
| | - Tony T Chandy
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, IND
| | - Gigi Varghese
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital (RSUH) University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNM), Stoke On Trent, GBR
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, IND
| | - Bijesh Yadav
- Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, IND
| | - Grace Rebekah
- Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, IND
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McEvoy MD, Raymond BL, Krige A. Opioid-Sparing Perioperative Analgesia Within Enhanced Recovery Programs. Anesthesiol Clin 2022; 40:35-58. [PMID: 35236582 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Opioid-based analgesia in the perioperative period can provide excellent pain control, but this approach exposes the patient to avoidable side effects and possible harm. Optimal analgesia, an approach that targets the fastest functional recovery with adequate pain control while minimizing side effects, can be achieved with opioid minimization. Many different options for nonopioid multimodal analgesia exist and have been shown to be efficacious, with certain modalities being more beneficial for specific surgeries. This review will present the evidence and practical tips for these management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D McEvoy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4619, Nashville, TN 37221, USA; Perioperative Medicine Fellowship, Hi-RiSE Perioperative Optimization Clinic, Perioperative Consult Service, VUMC ERAS Executive Steering Committee, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4648, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| | - Britany L Raymond
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4619, Nashville, TN 37221, USA; Perioperative Medicine Fellowship, Hi-RiSE Perioperative Optimization Clinic, Perioperative Consult Service, VUMC ERAS Executive Steering Committee, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, TVC 4648, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Anton Krige
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Haslingden Road, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daghmouri MA, Chaouch MA, Oueslati M, Rebai L, Oweira H. Regional techniques for pain management following laparoscopic elective colonic resection: A systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 72:103124. [PMID: 34925820 PMCID: PMC8648937 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pain management is an integral part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) following laparoscopic colonic resection. A variety of regional and neuraxial techniques were proposed, but their efficacy is still controversial. This systematic review evaluates published evidence on analgesic techniques and their impact on postoperative analgesia and recovery for laparoscopic colonic surgery patients. Methods We conducted bibliographic research on May 10, 2021, through PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google scholar. We retained meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials. We graded the strength of clinical data and subsequent recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Results Twelve studies were included. Thoracic epidural analgesia improved postoperative analgesia and bowel function following laparoscopic colectomy. However, it lengthens the hospital stay. Transversus abdominis plane block was as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia concerning pain control but with better postoperative recovery and lower length of hospital stay. Moreover, Lidocaine intravenous infusion improved postoperative pain management and recovery; Quadratus lumborum block provided similar postoperative analgesia and recovery. Finally, wound infiltration reduced postoperative pain without improving recovery of bowel function, and it could be proposed as an alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia. Conclusions Several analgesic techniques have been investigated. We found that abdominal wall blocks were as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia for pain management but with lower hospital stay and better recovery. We registered this review on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021279228). First systematic review assessing the efficacy of analgesic techniques following laparoscopic elective colonic resection. Only colonic resection was evaluated contrary to other studies, including rectal surgery. High-quality studies (randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses) were assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Maroua Oueslati
- Department of Anesthesia, Trauma Center of Ben Arrous, University of Manar, Tunisia
| | - Lotfi Rebai
- Department of Anesthesia, Trauma Center of Ben Arrous, University of Manar, Tunisia
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, S, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leech J, Oswalt K, Tucci MA, Alam Mendez OA, Hierlmeier BJ. Opioid Sparing Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cureus 2021; 13:e19558. [PMID: 34917438 PMCID: PMC8669974 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Opioid sparing anesthesia and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are not innovative ideas. However, the utilization of pancreaticoduodenectomy is limited. With the rise in awareness of the opioid epidemic in the United States, we have created a multimodal approach to anesthesia and postoperative care to limit adverse effects of opioids and curb the use of opioids postoperatively. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study performed by chart review of an opioid-sparing anesthetic and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol initiated jointly by the anesthesiology departments and transplant surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2017 to October 2019. Results Demographic data was found to be comparable between the control and protocol groups. Hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and opioid requirements significantly decreased in the protocol group. Hospital length of stay decreased from 8.92 to 5.72 days, ICU days decreased from 1.52 to 0.42 days, and narcotics for the first five hospital days were significantly decreased from 130.13 to 71.2 morphine milligram equivalents. Conclusion Proper postoperative pain management can improve patient satisfaction and decrease complication rates. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complicated procedure with relatively limited data regarding enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Likewise, there is limited data regarding opioid-sparing anesthesia techniques. Our protocol produced promising hospital length of stay and reduced opioid administration during the first five hospital days without increasing 30-day readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Leech
- Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Kenneth Oswalt
- Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Michelle A Tucci
- Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim SJ, Choi YS, Chun YM, Kim HJ, Han C, Shin S. Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Under General Anesthesia - A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Pain 2021; 38:1-7. [PMID: 34636752 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is known to cause severe postoperative pain which may interfere with recovery. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-hyperalgesic effects, and is being used in various types of surgeries. However, the effect of IV lidocaine in ARCR is not well known. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients undergoing ARCR were randomly allocated to receive IV lidocaine (1.5▒mg/kg bolus of 1% lidocaine after anesthesia induction followed by a continuous infusion of 2▒mg/kg/h up to 1▒h after surgery) or an equal volume of saline. In both groups, an IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device was used which contained fentanyl 10▒µg/mL, infused at 1▒mL/h with a 1▒mL bolus dose. The primary outcome was fentanyl requirements given via IV PCA during the first 24 hours after surgery. Perioperative pain scores and functional recovery were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS The amount of fentanyl administered via IV PCA up to 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the Lidocaine group compared to the Control group (329 [256.2-428.3] vs. 394.5 [287.0-473.0], P=0.037) The number of PCA bolus attempts were lower in the Lidocaine group without statistical significance. There were no differences in postoperative pain scores or functional shoulder scores between the two groups. DISCUSSION IV lidocaine appears to be helpful in reducing opioid requirements during the acute postoperative period in patients undergoing ARCR. IV lidocaine may be a viable option as a component of multimodal analgesia in ARCR when regional analgesia is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seon Ju Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204659. [PMID: 34682777 PMCID: PMC8537195 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) provides anesthesia for minor surgical procedures and improves postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after general or regional anesthesia. Although pre-incisional block is preferable, in practice WI is usually done at the end of surgery. WI performed as a continuous modality reduces analgesics, prolongs the duration of analgesia, and enhances the patient’s mobilization in some cases. WI benefits are documented in open abdominal surgeries (Caesarean section, colorectal surgery, abdominal hysterectomy, herniorrhaphy), laparoscopic cholecystectomy, oncological breast surgeries, laminectomy, hallux valgus surgery, and radical prostatectomy. Surgical site infiltration requires knowledge of anatomy and the pain origin for a procedure, systematic extensive infiltration of local anesthetic in various tissue planes under direct visualization before wound closure or subcutaneously along the incision. Because the incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity is 11% after subcutaneous WI, appropriate local anesthetic dosing is crucial. The risk of wound infection is related to the infection incidence after each particular surgery. For WI to fully meet patient and physician expectations, mastery of the technique, patient education, appropriate local anesthetic dosing and management of the surgical wound with “aseptic, non-touch” technique are needed.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hyland SJ, Brockhaus KK, Vincent WR, Spence NZ, Lucki MM, Howkins MJ, Cleary RK. Perioperative Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship: A Practical Guide. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:333. [PMID: 33809571 PMCID: PMC8001960 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9030333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical procedures are key drivers of pain development and opioid utilization globally. Various organizations have generated guidance on postoperative pain management, enhanced recovery strategies, multimodal analgesic and anesthetic techniques, and postoperative opioid prescribing. Still, comprehensive integration of these recommendations into standard practice at the institutional level remains elusive, and persistent postoperative pain and opioid use pose significant societal burdens. The multitude of guidance publications, many different healthcare providers involved in executing them, evolution of surgical technique, and complexities of perioperative care transitions all represent challenges to process improvement. This review seeks to summarize and integrate key recommendations into a "roadmap" for institutional adoption of perioperative analgesic and opioid optimization strategies. We present a brief review of applicable statistics and definitions as impetus for prioritizing both analgesia and opioid exposure in surgical quality improvement. We then review recommended modalities at each phase of perioperative care. We showcase the value of interprofessional collaboration in implementing and sustaining perioperative performance measures related to pain management and analgesic exposure, including those from the patient perspective. Surgery centers across the globe should adopt an integrated, collaborative approach to the twin goals of optimal pain management and opioid stewardship across the care continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J. Hyland
- Department of Pharmacy, Grant Medical Center (OhioHealth), Columbus, OH 43215, USA
| | - Kara K. Brockhaus
- Department of Pharmacy, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA;
| | | | - Nicole Z. Spence
- Department of Anesthesiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA;
| | - Michelle M. Lucki
- Department of Orthopedics, Grant Medical Center (OhioHealth), Columbus, OH 43215, USA;
| | - Michael J. Howkins
- Department of Addiction Medicine, Grant Medical Center (OhioHealth), Columbus, OH 43215, USA;
| | - Robert K. Cleary
- Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xie C, Wang Q, Huai D. Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine Can Accelerate Postoperative Early Recovery in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e926990. [PMID: 33529177 PMCID: PMC7870156 DOI: 10.12659/msm.926990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is defined by intermittent and recurrent episodes of partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep. Intermittent and recurrent hypoxia/reoxygenation is the main pathophysiological mechanism of OSA. Its consequences include systemic inflammation, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, and release of oxygen free radicals. Infusion of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has anti-inflammatory, antihyperalgesic, and analgesic properties, supporting its use as an anesthetic adjuvant. Lidocaine can reduce nociception and/or cardiovascular responses to surgical stress, as well as postoperative pain and/or analgesic requirements. Because of the high prevalence of OSA in obese patients, the use of opioids to manage postoperative pain in that population is often accompanied by the development of adverse respiratory events, such as hypoventilation and hypoxemia. IV infusion of lidocaine has been shown to enhance the quality of early recovery after laparoscopic bariatric and upper airway surgery. However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in patients undergoing surgery for OSA. In addition, whether IV infusion of lidocaine can improve postoperative early recovery in patients undergoing surgery for OSA remains unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized that IV infusion of lidocaine can improve postoperative early recovery in patients undergoing surgery for OSA. Perioperative infusion also may be a promising analgesic adjunct to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenglan Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Huaian Second People’s Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Qiao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Huaian Second People’s Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - De Huai
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, The Affiliated Huaian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and Huaian Second People’s Hospital, Huaian, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aches and Pain in the Geriatric Trauma Patient. CURRENT TRAUMA REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40719-020-00202-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
15
|
Carabalona JF, Delwarde B, Duclos A, Le Goff MC, Moulsma M, Citterio-Quentin A, Bouffard Y, Rimmelé T. Serum Concentrations of Lidocaine During Bariatric Surgery. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:e5-e8. [PMID: 30399021 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Lidocaine has been shown to be clinically beneficial during bariatric surgery. However, information about lidocaine serum concentrations in this setting is scarce. This prospective clinical trial included 42 obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. They received lidocaine based on adjusted body weight. Administration began with a 1.5 mg·kg bolus of intravenous lidocaine followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg·kg·hour. After skin closure, administration was decreased to 1 mg·kg·hour until discharge from the recovery room. No serum concentrations of lidocaine were outside the usual accepted range (1.5-5 µg·mL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-François Carabalona
- From the *Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupement Hospitalier Édouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France †Equipe d'Accueil 7426 "Pathophysiology of Injury-Induced Immunosuppression" Hospices Civils de Lyon - bioMérieux - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France ‡Pôle de Santé publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, F-69003 Lyon, France §Health Services and Performance Research Laboratory, HEalth Services and PERformance Research Equipe d'Accueil 7425, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69008 Lyon, France ‖Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi Sites du Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lyon, unité de Pharmacologie, Toxicologie et Eléments trace, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France ¶Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Multi Sites du Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lyon, unité de Pharmacologie, Toxicologie et Eléments trace, Groupement Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Batko I, Kościelniak-Merak B, Tomasik PJ, Kobylarz K, Wordliczek J. Lidocaine as an element of multimodal analgesic therapy in major spine surgical procedures in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Pharmacol Rep 2020; 72:744-755. [PMID: 32297162 PMCID: PMC7329801 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-020-00100-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Introducing the principles of multimodal analgesic therapy is necessary to provide appropriate comfort for the patient after surgery. The main objective of the study was evaluating the influence of perioperative intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine infusion on postoperative morphine requirements during the first 48 h postoperatively in children undergoing major spine surgery. Materials and methods Prospective, randomized, double-blind study: 41 children, qualified to multilevel spine surgery, were randomly divided into two treatment groups: lidocaine and placebo (control). The lidocaine group received lidocaine as a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg over 30 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at 1 mg/kg/h to 6 hours after surgery. The protocol of perioperative management was identical for all patients. Measurements: morphine demand, intensity of postoperative pain (the Numerical Rating Scale), oral feeding initiation time, first attempts at assuming erect position, postoperative quality of life (the Acute Short-form /SF-12/ health survey). Results Patient data did not differ demographically. Compared to the control group, lidocaine treatment reduced the demand for morphine during the first 24h [95% CI 0.13 (0.11-0.28) mg/kg, p = 0.0122], 48h [95% CI 0.46 (0.22-0.52) mg/kg, p = 0.0299] after surgery and entire hospitalization [95% CI 0.58 (0.19-0.78) mg/kg, p = 0.04]; postoperative pain intensity; nutritional withdrawal period [introduction of liquid diet (p = 0.024) and solid diet (p = 0.012)], and accelerated the adoption of an upright position [sitting (p = 0.048); walking (p = 0.049)]. The SF-12 generic health survey did not differ between groups before operation, 2 months and 4 years after surgery. Conclusions Perioperative lidocaine administration, as a part of the applied analgesic therapy regimen, may decrease postoperative opioid demand and accelerates convalescence of children undergoing major surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Batko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Children's Hospital, 265 Wielicka St, 30-663, Cracow, Poland.
| | - Barbara Kościelniak-Merak
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Children's Hospital, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Przemysław J Tomasik
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Children's Hospital, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Kobylarz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Children's Hospital, 265 Wielicka St, 30-663, Cracow, Poland.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Jerzy Wordliczek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.,Department of Interdisciplinary Intensive Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg 2020; 44:2056-2084. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
18
|
Khan JS, Hodgson N, Choi S, Reid S, Paul JE, Hong NJL, Holloway C, Busse JW, Gilron I, Buckley DN, McGillion M, Clarke H, Katz J, Mackey S, Avram R, Pohl K, Rao-Melacini P, Devereaux P. Perioperative Pregabalin and Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion to Reduce Persistent Neuropathic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter, Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2019; 20:980-993. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
19
|
Awad H, Ahmed A, Urman RD, Stoicea N, Bergese SD. Potential role of pharmacogenomics testing in the setting of enhanced recovery pathways after surgery. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2019; 12:145-154. [PMID: 31440074 PMCID: PMC6666379 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s198224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2001, a group of European academic surgeons created the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) study group and established the first official ERAS protocol. One of the most significant challenges during ERAS implementation is variability of drugs used throughout the perioperative period. Pharmacogenomic testing (blood or saliva) results (obtained within approximately 48 hrs) provide guidelines on how to prescribe the optimal drug with the optimal dosage to each patient based on an individual's unique genetic profile. Pharmacogenomic testing of various methods of multimodal analgesia is an essential element of ERAS protocols spanning the entire perioperative period to ultimately optimize postoperative pain control. The key goal for anesthetic management in ERAS protocols is to facilitate rapid emergence by using the shortest acting agents available, thus accelerating recovery and reducing length of stay, hospital expenses, and postoperative complications. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an additional challenge that should be overcome to ensure an enhanced recovery and shorter length of stay with the use of antiemetics. Postoperative ileus (POI) can result in longer hospital stay with increasing susceptibility to associated morbidities along with an increase in associated hospitalization costs. Genetics-guided pharmacotherapy and its impact on clinical outcomes should be thoroughly studied for better understanding and managing drug administration in the settings of ERAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamdy Awad
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Ahmed
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicoleta Stoicea
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sergio D Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Soffin EM, Gibbons MM, Wick EC, Kates SL, Cannesson M, Scott MJ, Grant MC, Ko SS, Wu CL. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: Focus on Anesthesiology for Hip Fracture Surgery. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:1107-1117. [PMID: 31094775 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols represent patient-centered, evidence-based, multidisciplinary care of the surgical patient. Although these patterns have been validated in numerous surgical specialities, ERAS has not been widely described for patients undergoing hip fracture (HFx) repair. As part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery, we have conducted a full evidence review of interventions that form the basis of the anesthesia components of the ERAS HFx pathway. A literature search was performed for each protocol component, and the highest levels of evidence available were selected for review. Anesthesiology components of care were identified and evaluated across the perioperative continuum. For the preoperative phase, the use of regional analgesia and nonopioid multimodal analgesic agents is suggested. For the intraoperative phase, a standardized anesthetic with postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis is suggested. For the postoperative phase, a multimodal (primarily nonopioid) analgesic regimen is suggested. A summary of the best available evidence and recommendations for inclusion in ERAS protocols for HFx repair are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M Soffin
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Melinda M Gibbons
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen L Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Maxime Cannesson
- Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael J Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael C Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samantha S Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ban KA, Gibbons MM, Ko CY, Wick EC, Cannesson M, Scott MJ, Grant MC, Wu CL. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:879-889. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
22
|
Li SY, Li H, Ni J, Ma YS. Comparison of intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion for prevention of postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19:37. [PMID: 30885134 PMCID: PMC6421662 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0708-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) frequently occurs during recovery in patients who undergo intra-operative urinary catheterization. We conducted this study to compare the effect of intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion for preventing CRBD. METHODS 120 patients undergoing elective open abdominal hysterectomy or hysteromyomectomy requiring urinary bladder catheterization were randomly allocated into three groups of 40 each. Group L received a 2 mg/kg lidocaine bolus followed by infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h; Group D received a 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine bolus followed by infusion of 0.4 μg/kg/h; Group C received a bolus and infusion of normal saline of equivalent volume. The incidence and different severity (mild, moderate, and severe) of CRBD were assessed on arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit at 0, 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively. RESULTS The incidence of CRBD was significantly lower in Group L and Group D compared with Group C at 0, 1, and 2 h. However, there was no significant difference among the three groups regarding the different severity of CRBD at all time points. The requirement of rescue tramadol for CRBD was lower in group L and group D than in group C. The incidence of sedation was significantly higher in Group D compared to Group L and Group C, though no difference in other adverse effects was observed. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion reduced the incidence of CRBD as well as the additional tramadol requirement for CRBD, but had no effect on the different severity of CRBD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR-INR-16009162 . Registered on 5 September 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Y Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, No.20, Section 3, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, China
| | - H Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, No.20, Section 3, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, China
| | - J Ni
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, No.20, Section 3, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, China.
| | - Y S Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, No.20, Section 3, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Soffin EM, Gibbons MM, Ko CY, Kates SL, Wick EC, Cannesson M, Scott MJ, Wu CL. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:454-465. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
24
|
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 2019; 43:659-695. [PMID: 30426190 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 961] [Impact Index Per Article: 192.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. METHODS A wide database search on English literature publications was performed. Studies on each item within the protocol were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts and examined, reviewed and graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS All recommendations on ERAS® protocol items are based on best available evidence; good-quality trials; meta-analyses of good-quality trials; or large cohort studies. The level of evidence for the use of each item is presented accordingly. CONCLUSIONS The evidence base and recommendation for items within the multimodal perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS® Society in this comprehensive consensus review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U O Gustafsson
- Department of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M J Scott
- Department of Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - M Hubner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J Nygren
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Francis
- Colorectal Unit, Yeovil District Hospital, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK
- University of Bath, Wessex House Bath, BA2 7JU, UK
| | - T A Rockall
- Department of Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, and Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit (MATTU), Guildford, UK
| | - T M Young-Fadok
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - A G Hill
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - M Soop
- Irving National Intestinal Failure Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - H D de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - G J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Fichera
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H Kessler
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA
| | - F Grass
- Department of Visceral Surgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - E E Whang
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W J Fawcett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - F Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - K E Rollins
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - A Balfour
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Services, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - G Baldini
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - B Riedel
- Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - O Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital, Örebro & Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Soffin EM, Gibbons MM, Ko CY, Kates SL, Wick E, Cannesson M, Scott MJ, Wu CL. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:441-453. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
26
|
Soffin EM, Wu CL. Regional and Multimodal Analgesia to Reduce Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review. HSS J 2019; 15:57-65. [PMID: 30863234 PMCID: PMC6384219 DOI: 10.1007/s11420-018-9652-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective total joint arthroplasty may be a gateway to long-term opioid use. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE We sought to review the literature on multimodal and regional analgesia as a strategy to minimize perioperative opioid use and control pain in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS We conducted a narrative review to assess the state of the evidence informing opioid-sparing analgesics for THA and TKA. A PubMed search was conducted for English-language articles published before April 2018. We preferentially included well-designed randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where the highest levels of evidence were not yet apparent, we evaluated retrospective and/or observational studies. RESULTS Multimodal analgesia emphasizing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and acetaminophen is associated with decreases in perioperative opioid use for THA and TKA. Regional analgesia, including peripheral nerve blocks and local infiltration analgesia, is also associated with decreased perioperative opioid use for THA and TKA. Emerging topics in post-arthroplasty analgesia include (1) the value of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, (2) the use of peripheral nerve catheters and extended-release local anesthetics to prolong the duration of opioid-free analgesia, and (3) novel peripheral nerve blocks, exemplified by the IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee) block for TKA. CONCLUSIONS The use of multimodal analgesia with regional techniques may decrease perioperative opioid use for patients undergoing THA and TKA. These techniques should be part of a comprehensive perioperative plan to promote adequate analgesia while minimizing overall opioid exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M. Soffin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St., New York, NY 10021 USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY USA
| | - Christopher L. Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St., New York, NY 10021 USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY USA
- Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs 2018; 78:1229-1246. [DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
28
|
Kendall MC, Castro-Alves LJ. Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption in the Acute Postoperative Period after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:1134. [PMID: 29644556 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3776-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Kendall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| | - Lucas J Castro-Alves
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Baseline Morphine Consumption May Explain Between-Study Heterogeneity in Meta-analyses of Adjuvant Analgesics and Improve Precision and Accuracy of Effect Estimates. Anesth Analg 2018; 126:648-660. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000002237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
30
|
Estebe JP. Intravenous lidocaine. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2017; 31:513-521. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 05/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
31
|
Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ, Panaro S, Goodwin E, Bialek JM, Nader A, De Oliveira GS. The Effect of Intraoperative Systemic Lidocaine on Postoperative Persistent Pain Using Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials Criteria Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Cont. Pain Pract 2017; 18:350-359. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.12611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C. Kendall
- Anesthesiology Department; Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago Illinois U.S.A
| | - Robert J. McCarthy
- Anesthesiology Department; Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago Illinois U.S.A
| | - Steve Panaro
- Anesthesiology Department; Alpert School of Medicine; Rhode Island Hospital; Brown University; Providence Rhode Island U.S.A
| | - Emily Goodwin
- Anesthesiology Department; Alpert School of Medicine; Rhode Island Hospital; Brown University; Providence Rhode Island U.S.A
| | - Jane M. Bialek
- Anesthesiology Department; Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago Illinois U.S.A
| | - Antoun Nader
- Anesthesiology Department; Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago Illinois U.S.A
| | - Gildasio S. De Oliveira
- Anesthesiology Department; Alpert School of Medicine; Rhode Island Hospital; Brown University; Providence Rhode Island U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
McEvoy MD, Scott MJ, Gordon DB, Grant SA, Thacker JKM, Wu CL, Gan TJ, Mythen MG, Shaw AD, Miller TE. American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on optimal analgesia within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery: part 1-from the preoperative period to PACU. Perioper Med (Lond) 2017; 6:8. [PMID: 28413629 PMCID: PMC5390366 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-017-0064-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP), the approach to treating pain should be multifaceted and the goal should be to deliver “optimal analgesia,” which we define in this paper as a technique that optimizes patient comfort and facilitates functional recovery with the fewest medication side effects. Methods With input from a multi-disciplinary, international group of clinicians, and through a structured review of the literature and use of a modified Delphi method, we achieved consensus surrounding the topic of optimal analgesia in the perioperative period for colorectal surgery patients. Discussion As a part of the first Perioperative Quality Improvement (POQI) workgroup meeting, we sought to develop a consensus document describing a comprehensive, yet rational and practical, approach for developing an evidence-based plan for achieving optimal analgesia, specifically for a colorectal surgery ERP. The goal was two-fold: (a) that application of this process would lead to improved patient outcomes and (b) that investigation of the questions raised would identify knowledge gaps to aid the direction for research into analgesia within ERPs in the years to come. This document details the evidence for a wide range of analgesic components, with particular focus from the preoperative period to the post-anesthesia care unit. The overall conclusion is that the combination of analgesic techniques employed in the perioperative period is not important as long as it is effective in delivering the goal of optimal analgesia as set forth in this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D McEvoy
- Department of Anesthesiology, CIPHER (Center for Innovation in Perioperative Health, Education, and Research) Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2301VUH, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Michael J Scott
- Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Hospital, Surrey, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.,University College London, London, UK
| | - Debra B Gordon
- Harborview Integrated Pain Care Program, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Stuart A Grant
- Division of Regional Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Julie K M Thacker
- Division of Advanced Oncologic and GI Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Christopher L Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Tong J Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Suffolk, USA
| | - Monty G Mythen
- UCL/UCLH National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Andrew D Shaw
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
| | - Timothy E Miller
- Division of General, Vascular and Transplant Anesthesia, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Scott MJ, McEvoy MD, Gordon DB, Grant SA, Thacker JKM, Wu CL, Gan TJ, Mythen MG, Shaw AD, Miller TE. American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) Joint Consensus Statement on Optimal Analgesia within an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Colorectal Surgery: Part 2-From PACU to the Transition Home. Perioper Med (Lond) 2017; 6:7. [PMID: 28413628 PMCID: PMC5390469 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-017-0063-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP), the approach to treating pain should be multifaceted and the goal should be to deliver "optimal analgesia", which we define in this paper as a technique that optimizes patient comfort and facilitates functional recovery with the fewest medication side effects. METHODS With input from a multidisciplinary, international group of experts and through a structured review of the literature and use of a modified Delphi method, we achieved consensus surrounding the topic of optimal analgesia in the perioperative period for colorectal surgery patients. DISCUSSION As a part of the first Perioperative Quality Improvement (POQI) workgroup meeting, we sought to develop a consensus document describing a comprehensive, yet rational and practical, approach for developing an evidence-based plan for achieving optimal analgesia, specifically for a colorectal surgery within an ERP. The goal was twofold: (a) that application of this process would lead to improved patient outcomes and (b) that investigation of the questions raised would identify knowledge gaps to aid the direction for research into analgesia within ERPs in the years to come. This document details the evidence for a wide range of analgesic components, with particular focus on care in the post-anesthesia care unit, general care ward, and transition to home after discharge. The preoperative and operative consensus statement for analgesia was covered in Part 1 of this paper. The overall conclusion is that the combination of analgesic techniques employed in the perioperative period is not important as long as it is effective in delivering the goal of "optimal analgesia" as set forth in this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 East Broad Street, P.O. Box 980695, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0695 USA
- University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew D. McEvoy
- CIPHER (Center for Innovation in Perioperative Health, Education, and Research), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2301VUH,, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Debra B. Gordon
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Harborview Integrated Pain Care Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Stuart A. Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Student Education, Division of Regional Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, UK
| | - Julie K. M. Thacker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Advanced Oncologic and GI Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, UK
| | - Christopher L. Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Tong J. Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, USA
| | - Monty G. Mythen
- University College London Hospitals National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Andrew D. Shaw
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA
| | - Timothy E. Miller
- Division of General, Vascular and Transplant Anesthesia, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dewinter G, Moens P, Fieuws S, Vanaudenaerde B, Van de Velde M, Rex S. Systemic lidocaine fails to improve postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative recovery and quality of life in patients undergoing posterior spinal arthrodesis. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118:576-585. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
35
|
Mo Y, Thomas MC, Antigua AD, Ebied AM, Karras GE. Continuous Lidocaine Infusion as Adjunctive Analgesia in Intensive Care Unit Patients. J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 57:830-836. [PMID: 28168730 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Despite a paucity of data, the role of intravenous lidocaine (IVLI) as adjunctive analgesia in the intensive care unit (ICU) seems promising due to a low potential to contribute to respiratory depression. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of IVLI for the treatment of pain in ICU patients with varying degrees of organ dysfunction from March 2014 to March 2016. The primary outcomes included the time to a ≥20% reduction in pain scores after the initiation of IVLI and the difference in opioid requirements as well as pain scores prior to and during IVLI therapy. Other variables included the presence of IVLI-related adverse events and the dosage and duration of IVLI. A total of 21 ICU patients were included from 2 different hospitals. The mean time to a ≥20% reduction in pain scores from the start of IVLI was 3.3 hours (SD = 2.2). The median morphine dose equivalents required during 6, 12, and 24 hours pre-IVLI were significantly higher compared to the same time periods after IVLI (18.3 vs 10 mg, P = .002; 41.8 vs 18.3 mg, P = .002; 93.5 vs 30.5 mg, P = .037). Neurological adverse effects of lidocaine were noted in 3 patients, but the effects were reversed on IVLI discontinuation. This report suggests that IVLI as an adjunctive agent in the treatment of acute pain may be a potential option in ICU patients who are refractory to opioids or those in whom opioid-induced respiratory depression is a concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoonsun Mo
- Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Michael C Thomas
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Alex M Ebied
- University of Florida Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - George E Karras
- Critical Care Unit, Wound & Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Center, and Respiratory Care Services, Mercy Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Daykin H. The efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for analgesia in the older adult: a literature review. Br J Pain 2016; 11:23-31. [PMID: 28386401 DOI: 10.1177/2049463716676205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioids remain the mainstay of analgesia for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain. Even in the young, the use of opioids can be associated with an increased incidence of post-operative complications such as respiratory depression, vomiting, pruritus, excessive sedation, slowing of gastrointestinal function, and urinary retention. The need to manage acute pain in the older patient is becoming more common as the population ages, and increasingly older patients are undergoing more major surgery. Medical conditions are more common in older people and can result in the requirement of systemic analgesia for fractures, malignancy, nociceptive or neuropathic pain and peripheral vascular disease. Effective pain control can be difficult in older patients as there is a higher incidence of coexistent diseases, polypharmacy and age-related changes in physiology, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Consequently, due to the fear of respiratory depression in older people, this leads to inadequate doses of opioid being given for the treatment of their pain. Lidocaine has analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties and is metabolized by the liver which is limited by perfusion, and heart failure or drugs can alter this, affecting its clearance. Therefore, there are concerns regarding safety in older patients as plasma concentrations have both intersubject and intrasubject variability. The aim of this literature review is to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine as an adjuvant in pain management for the older patient. In total, 12 studies fulfilled the criteria. Lidocaine infusions were found to reduce pain scores and be opioid sparing in abdominal and urological surgery, in patients with opioid-refractory malignancy pain, neuropathic pain and critical limb ischaemia. Patients with malignancy were more likely to develop adverse effects, but no patients required treatment for lidocaine toxicity.
Collapse
|
37
|
Eldawlatly A. Is enhanced recovery after anesthesia a synonym to enhanced recovery after surgery? Saudi J Anaesth 2016; 10:119-20. [PMID: 27051358 PMCID: PMC4799599 DOI: 10.4103/1658-354x.177413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelazeem Eldawlatly
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|