The effect of serratus plane block performed under direct vision on postoperative pain in breast surgery

Effects of a Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Video-Assisted Lung Wedge Resection: A Single-Center, Prospective, and Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Objectives: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with less postoperative pain than traditional open thoracotomy. However, trocar and chest tube placement may damage the intercostal nerves, causing significant discomfort. An ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a promising mode of pain management; this reduces the need for opioids and the associated side-effects. This study evaluated whether SAPB, compared to intravenous analgesia alone, reduces opioid consumption after thoracoscopic lung wedge resection. Materials and Methods: In total, 22 patients undergoing VATS lung wedge resections were randomized into two groups (SAPB and control): both received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and one group received additional SAPB. The primary outcome was the cumulative intravenous fentanyl consumption at 8 h postoperatively. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and the incidence of postoperative complications were assessed over 48 h post surgery. Results: Fentanyl consumption by 8 h post surgery was significantly lower in the SAPB group than in the control group (183 ± 107 μg vs. 347 ± 202 μg, p = 0.035). Although the VAS scores decreased with time in both groups, the differences were not statistically significant. The SAPB group required fewer opioids by 48 h. No significant between-group differences were observed in postoperative complications, including nausea and vomiting. Conclusions: SAPB effectively reduced opioid consumption after VATS lung wedge resection. SABP may serve as a valuable component of multimodal pain management.

Relative Perioperative Analgesic Efficacy of Superficial Versus Deep Approach of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Anterior Chest Wall Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

Both superficial and deep serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks are effective for anterior chest wall surgeries, but there is little clarity on which is more effective. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of the 2 approaches for SAP block after anterior chest wall surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials for eligible RCTs from inception until August 2023. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period. The secondary outcomes included pain scores at various intervals, intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, block-related complications, opioid-related side effects, and patient satisfaction scores. Statistical analysis of the pooled data was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3.

RESULTS

We identified 7 RCTs published between 2020 and 2022, enrolling 371 patients (186 in the superficial SAP block and 187 in the deep SAP block). Moderate certainty of evidence suggests that both the approaches (deep and superficial) of SAP block were comparable for 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption with a mean difference (MD) of 3.78 mg (95% CI: -1.70 to 9.29; P = 0.18; I2 = 87%). The results of other secondary outcomes were comparable, including resting pain scores with an MD of 0.08 (95% CI: -0.27 to 0.43; P = 0.67; I2 = 87%) for early pain and MD of 0.63 (95% CI: -1.28 to 0.01; P = 0.05; I2 = 95%) for late pain scores, time to first analgesic request with MD of -0.41 hour (95% CI: -1.40 to 0.59; P = 0.42; I2 = 90%), and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio: 1.45 (95% CI: 0.72 to 2.90; P = 0.30; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence does not support the preference for one approach of SAP block over the other for postoperative pain. Based on the available data, we recommend further future trials to determine any differences between these interventions.

Pectoral Nerve Blocks Under Direct Vision During Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Breast Augmentation: A Novel, Effective Regional Blocking Approach

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation allows performing Pecs block under direct visualization. This study aimed to describe this new technique and demonstrat its short-term efficacy and safety with a preliminary clinical study.

METHODS

Patients enrolled for transaxillary endoscopic-assisted prosthetic breast augmentation between February 2022 and March 2023 in two medical centers were included in the pectoral nerve block group. Postoperative VAS scores at 1, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h, surgery duration, and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting were compared with a historical cohort of patients collected between February 2021 and January 2022 with the same inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

229 patients were included in the Pecs group and 116 patients were identified in the control group. No statistical difference was observed in patient characteristics. VAS score at postoperative 1 h and 72 h was similar between the two groups, whereas VAS score at postoperative 4 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h in Pecs group was significantly lower than control group. The occurrence of PONV in the Pecs group is significantly lower than in the control group. The duration of surgery is similar between the two groups. No block-related complication was observed in the Pecs group.

CONCLUSION

A novel approach by combining pectoral nerve blocks with transaxillary endoscopic-assisted breast augmentation to perform blocks under direct vision was proposed and its short-term efficacy and safety was determined by this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The effect of a local anesthetic cocktail in a serratus anterior plane and PECS 1 block for implant-based breast reconstruction

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to decrease opioid use and decrease patient hospital length of stay (LOS, days). Serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks anesthetize the T2 through T9 dermatomes of the breast and can be applied intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid (OME) consumption and LOS between a control group, an ERAS group, and an ERAS/local anesthetic cocktail group in patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction.

Methods

In this study, 142 women who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2020 were divided into Group A (46 patients), a historical cohort; Group B (73 patients), an ERAS/no-block control group; and Group C (23 patients), an ERAS/anesthetic cocktail study group. Primary outcomes of interest were postanesthesia care unit (PACU), inpatient and total hospital OME consumption, and PACU LOS.

Results

A significant decrease was observed from Group A to C in PACU LOS (103.3 vs. 80.2 vs. 70.5; p = 0.011), OME use (25.1 vs. 11.4 vs. 5.7; p < 0.0001), and total hospital OME (120.3 vs. 95.2 vs. 35.9; p < 0.05). No difference was observed in inpatient OMEs between the three groups (95.2 vs. 83.8 vs. 30.8; p = 0.212). Despite not reaching statistical significance, Group C consumed an average of 50-60 % less opioids per patient than did Group B in PACU, inpatient, and total hospital OMEs.

Conclusion

Local anesthetic blocks are important components of ERAS protocols. Our results demonstrate that a combination regional block with a local anesthetic cocktail in an ERAS protocol can decrease opioid consumption in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Fascial plane blocks for cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review

In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the limitations and risks associated with the overreliance on opioids in various surgical procedures, including cardiothoracic surgery.This shift on pain management toward reducing reliance on opioids, together with need to improve patient outcomes, alleviate suffering, gain early mobilization after surgery, reduce hospital stay, and improve patient satisfaction and functional recovery, has led to the development and widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.In this context, fascial plane blocks are emerging as part of a multimodal analgesic in cardiac surgery and as alternatives to conventional neuraxial blocks for thoracic surgery, and there is a growing body of evidence suggesting their effectiveness and safety in providing pain relief for these procedures. In this review, we discuss the most common fascial plane block techniques used in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, offering a comprehensive overview of regional anesthesia techniques and presenting the latest evidence on the use of chest wall plane blocks specifically in this surgical setting.

Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Recovery With Ambulatory Serratus Plane Catheter After Mastectomy: A Service Evaluation

Background Acute moderate to severe pain after mastectomy is common and impedes patient recovery. Ambulatory serratus plane catheter with infusion pump (ASPIP) is a novel method to provide continuous delivery of local anaesthetic agents in the immediate postoperative period for extended analgesia, early mobility, and return to function after mastectomy. The aim of this project was to evaluate the introduction of ASPIP service and its effect on postoperative pain, opioid use, hospital stay, and recovery. Methods This was a service evaluation project. Eligible mastectomy patients were included over six months. All patients provided consent for intraoperative catheter insertion and ASPIP use. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) tool were used to assess postoperative pain and the quality of recovery, respectively. Overall satisfaction, sleep quality, and recommendations for the catheter were collected. Day-case rates of mastectomy with or without reconstruction were also measured. Data were presented using descriptive statistics. Mean (SD) and median (quartiles) were used for the continuous variables with percentages to report rates. Approval of the institution's Audit & Quality Improvement Department was obtained. Results Thirty-two consecutive mastectomy patients were included over six months. The mean age was 60 years and the mean BMI was 25.8. Mean pain NRS (10 maximum) at rest and on movement were 1.88 vs. 2.56, 2.03 vs. 2.84, and 1.85 vs. 2.3 out of 10 on postoperative day (POD) one, two, and three, respectively. Six patients required opioids on POD one, four patients on POD two, and none on the third day. Sleep disturbance was observed in three, five, and three patients in the first three days, respectively. The mean overall satisfaction was 9.25/10 (SD: 1.18). All patients recommended ASPIP to other patients. QoR-15 scores reported as median (quartiles) were 143 (136, 147) preoperatively and 135 (126.5, 143) postoperatively, with a median difference of -3 (95% CI: -6 to 0). The day-case rate for mastectomy +/- reconstruction was 66% and 39%, respectively. There were no major complications from the catheter with minor issues in four patients. Conclusion The ASPIP is an effective and safe method of managing postoperative pain after mastectomy with positive patient experience and reduced opioid requirement. As part of an enhanced recovery pathway, it can also increase mastectomy day-case rates, including immediate implant reconstruction.

Research Progress on Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Breast Surgery: A Narrative Review

Breast surgery, especially radical mastectomy, is often accompanied by moderate to severe acute pain, which significantly reduces postoperative quality of life. Effective pain management can accelerate patient recovery. Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a new type of fascial plane block technique, which can better target the nerve network innervating the chest wall and breast and provide good analgesia in the anterolateral chest wall. Current clinical research evidence indicates that SAPB has significant benefits in breast surgery. Further research avenues for this technology include optimal local anesthetic dosing strategy, the type of SAPB which is more suitable for breast surgery, comparison of SAPB and pectoral nerve block II (PECS II) in breast surgery, and high-quality randomized controlled study with outcomes of chronic pain or cancer prognosis.

Analgesic Efficacy of Pectoral Nerve Blocks in Implant-Based Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the analgesic effect of pectoral nerve block in implant-based mammoplasty.

METHODS

EMbase, PubMed, Web of science, MEDLINE, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP and other databases were searched from establishment to February 2022 by computer to collect randomized controlled trials which applied pectoral nerve block in implant-based mammoplasty, and meta-analysis was conducted after data extraction and quality evaluation of the literature meeting the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients in seven RCT studies were included in this study. Pectoral nerve block has a significant effect on postoperative analgesia in patients with implant-based mammoplasty with 1h VAS score significantly reduced in the resting state (MD=-1.85, 95%CI: -2.64~-1.07, P<0.00001); VAS score was significantly decreased 4-6 hours after operation (MD=-1.51, 95%CI: -2.47~-0.55, P=0.002); postoperative opioid consumption was reduced (SMD=-1.37, 95%CI: -2.51~-0.24, P=0.02) in PECS block group; and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the PECS block group was significantly lower (RR: 0.30, 95 %CI: 0.19-0.38, P<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of PECS block in submuscular implant-based mammoplasty can effectively reduce the degree of acute postoperative pain, opioid consumption and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, indicating its broad prospects in clinical application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effect of Perineural Dexamethasone with Ropivacaine in Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficiency of dexamethasone with ropivacaine in continuous serratus anterior plane block (cSAPB) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Patients and Methods

Sixty-six patients who underwent VATS were randomized into two groups. All patients received cSAPB postoperatively, and patients in Group RD received 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.02 mg/kg/hour dexamethasone at a rate of 5 mL/h in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Patients in Group R received 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with normal saline followed by an infusion of 5 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine in PCA pump. Fifty milligrams of tramadol was given as rescue medication when the visual analog scale (VAS) score was ≥4 at rest. The primary outcomes were the sum of pressing number within 48 hours postoperatively and the time to the first patient-controlled bolus. The secondary outcomes were VAS scores, the incidence of rescue analgesia, wound infection and nausea/vomiting.

Results

Within 48 hours postoperatively, the sum of pressing number was more in Group R (18.33 ± 3.149 vs 16.09 ± 3.292, P = 0.006), and the Log Rank Test showed a significant difference in time to the first patient-controlled bolus (P = 0.006). After the PCA infusion finished, there were significantly lower VAS scores in Group RD at 60 and 72 hours postoperatively (P < 0.001). Additionally, the incidence of rescue analgesia in Group R was significantly more than that in Group RD (P < 0.001). No incision infection was observed in any patient.

Conclusion

The cSAPB with ropivacaine plus dexamethasone prolonged the duration of analgesia and motor blockade, reduced pain intensity and rescued analgesia requirements after the end of PCA infusion for patients undergoing VATS, which provide further improvement to continuous perineural block.

Updates on Wound Infiltration Use for Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review

Local anesthetic wound infiltration (WI) provides anesthesia for minor surgical procedures and improves postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after general or regional anesthesia. Although pre-incisional block is preferable, in practice WI is usually done at the end of surgery. WI performed as a continuous modality reduces analgesics, prolongs the duration of analgesia, and enhances the patient’s mobilization in some cases. WI benefits are documented in open abdominal surgeries (Caesarean section, colorectal surgery, abdominal hysterectomy, herniorrhaphy), laparoscopic cholecystectomy, oncological breast surgeries, laminectomy, hallux valgus surgery, and radical prostatectomy. Surgical site infiltration requires knowledge of anatomy and the pain origin for a procedure, systematic extensive infiltration of local anesthetic in various tissue planes under direct visualization before wound closure or subcutaneously along the incision. Because the incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity is 11% after subcutaneous WI, appropriate local anesthetic dosing is crucial. The risk of wound infection is related to the infection incidence after each particular surgery. For WI to fully meet patient and physician expectations, mastery of the technique, patient education, appropriate local anesthetic dosing and management of the surgical wound with “aseptic, non-touch” technique are needed.

Superficial vs. deep serratus anterior plane block for analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy: A randomized prospective trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

In the initial description of the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), both superficial and deep SAPB provided effective blockade. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia between superficial and deep SAPB for patients undergoing mastectomy.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective trial.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS

64 women, >18 years of age, ASA I-III, undergoing single or bilateral mastectomy, with and without lymph node biopsy, with and without tissue expander reconstruction.

INTERVENTION

Either superficial or deep SAPB by an ultrasound-guided technique in addition to multimodal analgesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, satisfaction scores, incidence of PONV, length of stay and block performance time.

RESULTS

Subjects who received a deep SAPB required 30% less oral morphine equivalents (OME) (113.5 mg vs. 147 mg, p = 0.009) and reported lower pain scores. There were no significant differences in satisfaction scores, incidence of PONV, LOS, or block performance time between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference in opioid consumption between the deep and superficial SAPB groups. Subjects in the deep SAPB group had lower pain scores at 12 h; however, the difference was not statistically significant at other time points. While both the superficial and the deep SAPB can be used for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy, our study suggests that the deep SAPB may improve analgesia to a greater degree than the superficial SAPB as shown through decreased opioid consumption of 30% over a 24-h period post-block. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03154658.

Practical Review of Abdominal and Breast Regional Analgesia for Plastic Surgeons: Evidence and Techniques

Regional analgesia has been increasing in popularity due to its opioid- sparing analgesic effects and utility in multimodal analgesia strategies. Several regional techniques have been used in plastic surgery; however, there is a lack of consensus on the indications and the comparative efficacy of these blocks. The goal of this review is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the most relevant types of interfascial plane blocks for abdominal and breast surgery. A systematic search of the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the evidence associated with the different interfascial plane blocks used in plastic surgery. The search included all studies from inception to March 2020. A total of 126 studies were included and used in the synthesis of the information presented in this review. There is strong evidence for using the transversus abdominis plane blocks in both abdominoplasties as well as abdominally-based microvascular breast reconstruction as evidenced by a significant reduction in post-operative pain and opioid consumption. Pectoralis (I and II), serratus anterior, and erector spinae plane blocks all provide good pain control in breast surgeries. Finally, the serratus anterior plane block can be used as primary block or an adjunct to the pectoralis blocks for a wider analgesia coverage of the breast. All the reviewed blocks are safe and easy to administer. Interfascial plane blocks are effective and safe modalities used to reduce pain and opioid consumption after abdominal and breast plastic surgery.

A Prospective Randomised Study to Assess the Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy Under General Anaesthesia

Objective

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and often requires surgery for the removal of the tumour. Uncontrolled pain after breast surgeries is a common problem. Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is a recently designed technique to block the lateral cutaneous branches of the ventral rami of thoracic intercostal nerves and may cover the area of surgical dissection for modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of SAP block on the time to first rescue analgesic in the post-operative period in patients undergoing MRM.

Methods

A randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial was conducted in a single teaching hospital. A total of 100 patients undergoing MRM were randomised in a 1:1 ratio into 2 groups: MRM under general anaesthesia (GA) alone (group G, n=50) or GA with SAP block (group S, n=50). Blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the level of the 5^th rib in the midaxillary line with 0.4 mL kg⁻¹ of 0.375% ropivacaine.

Results

The time to request of first rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in group S compared with group G (p=0.008). Median (interquartile range) for time to rescue analgesia in group S was 120 (60–300) min, whereas in group G, it was 60 (15–120) min. Post-operative pain scores and the number of patients requiring intra-operative additional fentanyl were significantly less in group S. No technique-related adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

SAP block improved perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing MRM.

Clinical trial registry number

CTRI/2017/11/010424. (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/regtrial.php?modid=1&compid=19&EncHid=45912.14862)

Association of race and ethnicity in the receipt of regional anesthesia following mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthetic techniques have become increasingly used for the purpose of pain management following mastectomy. Although a variety of beneficial techniques have been described, the delivery of regional anesthesia following mastectomy has yet to be examined for racial or ethnic disparities. We aimed to examine the association of race and ethnicity on the delivery of regional anesthesia in patients undergoing surgical mastectomy using a large national database.

METHODS

We used the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify adult patients aged ≥18 years old who underwent mastectomy from 2014 to 2016. We reported unadjusted estimates of regional anesthesia accordingly to race and ethnicity and examined differences in sociodemographic characteristics and health status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to report the association of race and ethnicity with use of regional anesthesia.

RESULTS

A total of 81 345 patients who underwent mastectomy were included, 14 887 (18.3%) of whom underwent regional anesthesia. The unadjusted rate of use of regional anesthesia was 18.9% for white patients, 16.8% for black patients, 15.6% for Asian patients, 16.5% for Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients, 17.8% for American Indian or Alaska Native and 17.4% for unknown race (p<0.001). With respect to ethnicity, the unadjusted rate of regional anesthesia use was 18.4% for non-Hispanic patients vs 16.1% for Hispanic patients vs 18.6% for the unknown ethnicity cohort (p<0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of receipt of regional anesthesia was 12% lower in black patients and 21% lower in Asian patients compared with white patients (p<0.001). The odds of regional anesthesia use were 13% lower in Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Black and Asian patients had lower odds of undergoing regional anesthesia following mastectomy compared with white counterparts. In addition, Hispanic patients had lower odds of undergoing regional anesthesia than non-Hispanic counterparts. These differences underlie the importance of working to deliver equitable healthcare irrespective of race or ethnicity.

Regional Anesthetic Blocks in Plastic Surgery Using Portable Ultrasound: A Simplified Approach

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of latest generation ultrasound technology and its easy availability and portability, regional anesthetic blocks, which were formally in the domain of anesthesiologists, have now become available to practicing plastic surgeons. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for other specialties such as orthopedics and colorectal surgery have incorporated regional anesthetic blocks. These regional blocks have been shown to be effective in improving the patient comfort and experience and decreasing reliance on opioid medications.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective plastic surgery received PEC-1, serratus anterior plane, or transversus abdominis plane blocks as indicated for the proposed procedure. All blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance using the Philips Lumify system with the linear array 12-4 probe by the operating surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients received regional anesthetic blocks by the senior author. Thirty-three patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation or implant-based breast reconstruction received the PEC-1 and the serratus anterior plane blocks after the induction of anesthesia but before the prep and drape. Fifty patients undergoing either abdominoplasty or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction received intraoperative transversus abdominis plane blocks. Anatomic planes were clearly visualized with this new ultrasound technology. Patients experienced good to excellent analgesia with less reliance on opioid medications and decreased need for refills. For hospitalized patients, length of stay in some cases was decreased up to 1 day, and PCA pumps were eliminated. There were no complications or adverse sequelae observed in any of these patients related to the regional blocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of these known regional anesthetic techniques in this single-surgeon experience seems to confirm reports of effectiveness in the anesthesia literature and may be of benefit to a wide range of plastic surgery patients.

Too Deep or Not Too Deep?: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of a Superficial Versus Deep Serratus Fascial Plane Block for Ambulatory Breast Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Serratus fascial plane block can reduce pain following breast surgery, but the question of whether to inject the local anesthetic superficial or deep to the serratus muscle has not been answered. This cohort study compares the analgesic benefits of superficial versus deep serratus plane blocks in ambulatory breast cancer surgery patients at Women's College Hospital between February 2014 and December 2016. We tested the joint hypothesis that deep serratus block is noninferior to superficial serratus block for postoperative in-hospital (pre-discharge) opioid consumption and pain severity.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-six patients were propensity matched among 2 groups (83/group): superficial and deep serratus blocks. The cohort was used to evaluate the effect of blocks on postoperative oral morphine equivalent consumption and area under the curve for rest pain scores. We considered deep serratus block to be noninferior to superficial serratus block if it were noninferior for both outcomes, within 15 mg morphine and 4 cm·h units margins. Other outcomes included intraoperative fentanyl requirements, time to first analgesic request, recovery room stay, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Deep serratus block was associated with postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores area under the curve that were noninferior to those of the superficial serratus block. Intraoperative fentanyl requirements, time to first analgesic request, recovery room stay, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were not different between blocks.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative in-hospital analgesia associated with deep serratus block is as effective (within an acceptable margin) as superficial serratus block following ambulatory breast cancer surgery. These new findings are important to inform both current clinical practices and future prospective studies.

Analgesic efficacy of modified pectoral block plus serratus plane block in breast augmentation surgery: A randomised, controlled, triple-blind clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Prosthetic breast surgery is a very common plastic surgery procedure, but its postoperative analgesic management is a challenge for the surgical team. The purpose of the present study is to validate the analgesic efficacy of pectoral block and serratus plane block in retropectoral mammoplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomised, controlled, triple-blind, clinical trial was designed, and included 30 patients undergoing retropectoral augmentation mammoplasty. All of them had a modified PECII block and a serratus plane block with a total volume of 40ml per breast. In 15 of them bupivacaine 0.25% (GPEC) was injected and in the other 15 patients saline was used (GC). Standardised management of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia was performed. Intra-operative haemodynamic parameters required for postoperative analgesia, and a numeric verbal scale on arrival in the recovery unit were measured and at 3, 6, and 24h. The quality perceived by patients and surgeons was also measured.

RESULTS

Post-operative pain was significantly better in GPEC (5.3±2.3 vs. 2.9±2.7; P=.018). No significant differences were observed at 3, 6, and 24h. The surgeons rated the anaesthetic-analgesic quality as very good in 80% of the cases in GPEC versus 33% in CG (P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of these blocks is a good perioperative analgesic strategy in the multimodal management of retropectoral augmentation mammoplasty.

Newer regional analgesia interventions (fascial plane blocks) for breast surgeries: Review of literature

Surgical resection of the primary tumour with axillary dissection is one of the main modalities of breast cancer treatment. Regional blocks have been considered as one of the modalities for effective perioperative pain control. With the advent of ultrasound, newer interventions such as fascial plane blocks have been reported for perioperative analgesia in breast surgeries. Our aim is to review the literature for fascial plane blocks for analgesia in breast surgeries. The research question for initiating the review was 'What are the reported newer regional anaesthesia techniques (fascial plane blocks) for female patients undergoing breast surgery and their analgesic efficacy?.' The participants, intervention, comparisons, outcomes and study design were followed. Due to the paucity of similar studies and heterogeneity, the assessment of bias, systematic review or pooled analysis/meta-analysis was not feasible. Of the 989 manuscripts, the present review included 28 manuscripts inclusive of all types of published manuscripts. 15 manuscripts directly related to the administration of fascial plane blocks for breast surgery across all type of study designs and cases were reviewed for the utility of fascial plane blocks in breast surgeries. Interfascial blocks score over regional anaesthetic techniques such as paravertebral block as they have no risk of sympathetic blockade, intrathecal or epidural spread which may lead to haemodynamic instability and prolonged hospital stay. This review observed that no block effectively covers the whole of breast and axilla, thus a combination of blocks should be used depending on the site of incision and extent of surgical resection.

The effect of sevoflurane compared to propofol maintenance on post-surgical quality of recovery in patients undergoing an ambulatory gynecological surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the effect of propofol used as anesthetic maintenance compared to sevoflurane on global post-surgical quality of recovery in female patients undergoing ambulatory gynecological surgery.

DESIGN

The study was a prospective randomized double blinded, controlled, clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Healthy female subjects were randomized to receive propofol or sevoflurane as anesthetic maintenance.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 40 (QOR-40) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Other data collected included opioid consumption, pain scores and time to hospital discharge. P<0.05 was used to reject the null hypothesis for the primary outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety subjects were randomized and sixty seven completed the study. Patient's baseline characteristics and surgical factors were not different between study groups. There was not a clinically significant difference in the global QoR-40 scores between the sevoflurane and the propofol groups, median (IQR) of 175 (163 to 181) and 176 (163 to 184), respectively, P=0.97. There was an inverse relationship (ρ=-0.42) between the opioid consumption in PACU (IV morphine equivalents) and 24h postoperative quality of recovery (P<0.001) and an inverse relationship (ρ=-0.48) between the oral opioid consumption at home (oral morphine equivalents) and 24h postoperative quality of recovery, P<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Our current results do not support the use of total intravenous anesthesia as an efficacious strategy to improve global quality of recovery after ambulatory surgery. Opioid consumption in the PACU is an earlier surrogate that can be utilized to identify ambulatory patients with a high likelihood to develop poor global quality of recovery and who may benefit from more efficacious strategies to improve global quality of recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov; url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; registration identified: NCT 01755234.