Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass - A single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation - A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Comparison of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in thoracic surgery procedures requiring one-lung ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective, non-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Operating theater at a university hospital, Austria.

PATIENTS

Patients scheduled for elective, thoracic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants received ventilation randomly either with FCV or PCV per-protocol for the duration of anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary endpoint was oxygenation assessed by paO2 / FiO2 ratio 30 min after the start of OLV. Secondary endpoints included the required minute volume for CO2 removal, applied mechanical power and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were enrolled and 43 included in the primary analysis. The primary endpoint paO2 / FiO2 ratio was significantly higher in the FCV group (n = 21) compared to the control group (PCV n = 22) (187 vs 136 mmHg, MD 39 (95 % CI 1 to 75); p = 0.047). The required respiratory minute volume to obtain comparable mild hypercapnia during OLV was significantly lower in FCV (3.0 vs 4.5 l/min, MD -1.3 (95 % CI -1.9 to -0.8); p < 0.001). The applied mechanical power was also significantly lower (3.5 versus 7.6 J/min, MD -3.8 (95 % CI -5.3 to -2.7); p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center randomized controlled trial, flow-controlled ventilation improved gas exchange parameters in terms of oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and reduced the mechanical impact of artificial ventilation.

Sex related differences in applied tidal volume with flow-controlled ventilation: a subgroup analysis

BACKGROUND

Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) ensures a constant gas flow whereby precise determination of dynamic compliance is feasible. Accordingly, ventilator pressure settings can be adjusted to achieve the highest compliance. This setting will automatically adapt tidal volume to the functionally available lung volume as a personalized approach. This is in contrast to current ventilation settings, where fixed tidal volumes according to predicted body weight (PBW) are recommended. Aim of this subgroup-analysis was to determine whether applied tidal volume differs in male and female patients after compliance guided individualization of ventilation parameters.

METHODS

A sub-group analysis of 24 patients randomized to receive flow-controlled ventilation in cardiac surgery was performed. Linear mixed-effects model was used in order to investigate sex related differences in respiratory parameters.

RESULTS

Compliance guided pressure titration led to comparable pressure settings in male (N.=18) and female (N.=6) patients. In contrast, the applied tidal volume was significantly lower in female patients (8.6 vs. 9.9, 95% CI: -2.3 to -0.2 mL/kg PBW; P=0.029) compared to male individuals, due to a significantly lower compliance (49.3 vs. 70.3, 95% CI: -33.1 to -8.8 mL/cmH2O; P=0.003). Gas exchange parameters were comparable in either sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients were found to receive lower tidal volumes after compliance guided individualization compared to men during cardiac surgery. This finding may indicate that the functionally available lung volume in women is lower and thus using PBW may not adequately comply with sex related differences, which supports the use of a personalized ventilation strategy.

Flow-controlled ventilation decreases mechanical power in postoperative ICU patients

BACKGROUND

Mechanical power (MP) is the energy delivered by the ventilator to the respiratory system and combines factors related to the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a new ventilation mode using a constant low flow during both inspiration and expiration, which is hypothesized to lower the MP and to improve ventilation homogeneity. Data demonstrating these effects are scarce, since previous studies comparing FCV with conventional controlled ventilation modes in ICU patients suffer from important methodological concerns.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the difference in MP between FCV and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Secondary aims were to explore the effect of FCV in terms of minute volume, ventilation distribution and homogeneity, and gas exchange.

METHODS

This is a physiological study in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU. During PCV at baseline and 90 min of FCV, intratracheal pressure, airway flow and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were measured continuously, and hemodynamics and venous and arterial blood gases were obtained repeatedly. Pressure-volume loops were constructed for the calculation of the MP.

RESULTS

In 10 patients, optimized FCV versus PCV resulted in a lower MP (7.7 vs. 11.0 J/min; p = 0.004). Although FCV did not increase overall ventilation homogeneity, it did lead to an improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions. A stable gas exchange at lower minute volumes was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

FCV resulted in a lower MP and improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients on the ICU. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05644418. Registered 1 December 2022, retrospectively registered.

Individualised flow-controlled ventilation reduces applied mechanical power and improves ventilation efficiency in a porcine intra-abdominal hypertension model

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and effects of individualised flow-controlled ventilation (FCV), based on compliance guided pressure settings, compared to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in a porcine intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) model. The primary aim of this study was to investigate oxygenation. Secondary aims were to assess respiratory and metabolic variables and lung tissue aeration.

METHODS

Pigs were randomly assigned to FCV (n = 9) and PCV (n = 9). IAH was induced by insufflation of air into the abdomen to induce IAH grades ranging from 0 to 3. At each IAH grade FCV was undertaken using compliance guided pressure settings, or PCV (n = 9) was undertaken with the positive end-expiratory pressure titrated for maximum compliance and the peak pressure set to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg. Gas exchange, ventilator settings and derived formulas were recorded at two timepoints for each grade of IAH. Lung aeration was assessed by a computed tomography scan at IAH grade 3.

RESULTS

All 18 pigs (median weight 54 kg [IQR 51-67]) completed the observation period of 4 h. Oxygenation was comparable at each IAH grade, but a significantly lower minute volume was required to secure normocapnia in FCV at all IAH grades (7.6 vs. 14.4, MD - 6.8 (95% CI - 8.5 to - 5.2) l/min; p < 0.001). There was also a significant reduction of applied mechanical power being most evident at IAH grade 3 (25.9 vs. 57.6, MD - 31.7 (95% CI - 39.7 to - 23.7) J/min; p < 0.001). Analysis of Hounsfield unit distribution of the computed tomography scans revealed a significant reduction in non- (5 vs. 8, MD - 3 (95% CI - 6 to 0) %; p = 0.032) and poorly-aerated lung tissue (7 vs. 15, MD - 6 (95% CI - 13 to - 3) %, p = 0.002) for FCV. Concomitantly, normally-aerated lung tissue was significantly increased (84 vs. 76, MD 8 (95% CI 2 to 15) %; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Individualised FCV showed similar oxygenation but required a significantly lower minute volume for CO2-removal, which led to a remarkable reduction of applied mechanical power. Additionally, there was a shift from non- and poorly-aerated lung tissue to normally-aerated lung tissue in FCV compared to PCV.