1
|
Peters AE, Jones WS, Anderson B, Bramante CT, Broedl U, Hornik CP, Kehoe L, Knowlton KU, Krofah E, Landray M, Locke T, Patel MR, Psotka M, Rockhold FW, Roessig L, Rothman RL, Schofield L, Stockbridge N, Trontell A, Curtis LH, Tenaerts P, Hernandez AF. Framework of the Strengths and Challenges of Clinically Integrated Trials: An Expert Panel Report. Am Heart J 2024:S0002-8703(24)00124-8. [PMID: 38795793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
The limitations of the explanatory clinical trial framework include the high expense of implementing explanatory trials, restrictive entry criteria for participants, and redundant logistical processes. These limitations can result in slow evidence generation that is not responsive to population health needs, yielding evidence that is not generalizable. Clinically integrated trials, which integrate clinical research into routine care, represent a potential solution to this challenge and an opportunity to support learning health systems. The operational and design features of clinically integrated trials include a focused scope, simplicity in design and requirements, the leveraging of existing data structures, and patient participation in the entire trial process. These features are designed to minimize barriers to participation and trial execution and reduce additional research burdens for participants and clinicians alike. Broad adoption and scalability of clinically integrated trials are dependent, in part, on continuing regulatory, healthcare system, and payer support. This analysis presents a framework of the strengths and challenges of clinically integrated trials and is based on a multidisciplinary expert "Think Tank" panel discussion that included representatives from patient populations, academia, non-profit funding agencies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony E Peters
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - W Schuyler Jones
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Carolyn T Bramante
- Departmentd of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Christoph P Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Lindsay Kehoe
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Kirk U Knowlton
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Trevan Locke
- Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Manesh R Patel
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Frank W Rockhold
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | - Norman Stockbridge
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Anne Trontell
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC
| | - Lesley H Curtis
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Adrian F Hernandez
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson JL, Knight S, Dong L, May HT, Le VT, Bair TL, Knowlton KU. Coronary Calcium Is Elevated in Patients with Myocardial Infarction without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2569. [PMID: 38731098 PMCID: PMC11084599 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Recent reports have highlighted myocardial infarction (MI) patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMRF), noting them to be surprisingly common and to have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to address the challenge of identifying at-risk patients without SMRF and providing preventive therapy. Methods: Patients presenting between 2001 and 2021 to Intermountain Health catheterization laboratories with a diagnosis of MI were included if they also had a coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan by computed tomography within 2 years. SMRF were defined as a clinical diagnosis or treatment of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, or smoking. The co-primary endpoints in SMRF-less patients were: (1) proportion of patients with an elevated (>50%ile) CAC score, and (2) an indication for statin therapy (i.e., CAC ≥ 100 AU or ≥75%ile). The 60-day and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events were determined. A comparison set included MI patients with SMRF. Results: We identified 429 MI patients with a concurrent CAC scan, of which 60 had no SMRF. SMRF status did not distinguish most risk factors or interventions. No-SMRF patients had a high CAC prevalence and percentile (82% ≥ 50%ile; median, 80%ile), and 77% met criteria for preventive therapy. As expected, patients with SMRF had high CAC scores and percentiles. Outcomes were more favorable for No-SMRF status and for lower CAC scores. Conclusions: Patients without SMRF presenting with an MI have a high prevalence and percentile of CAC. Wider application of CAC scans, including in those without SMRF, is promising as a method to identify an additional at-risk population for MI and to provide primary preventive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L. Anderson
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Stacey Knight
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Li Dong
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
| | - Heidi T. May
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
| | - Viet T. Le
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
- Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT 84606, USA
| | - Tami L. Bair
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
| | - Kirk U. Knowlton
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA; (S.K.); (L.D.); (H.T.M.); (V.T.L.); (T.L.B.); (K.U.K.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ichikawa K, Wang R, McClelland RL, Manubolu VS, Susarla S, Lee D, Pourafkari L, Fazlalizadeh H, Bitar JA, Robin R, Kinninger A, Roy S, Post WS, Budoff M. Thoracic versus coronary calcification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events prediction. Heart 2024:heartjnl-2023-323838. [PMID: 38627022 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
This study compared the prognostic value of quantified thoracic artery calcium (TAC) including aortic arch on chest CT and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score on ECG-gated cardiac CT. METHODS A total of 2412 participants who underwent both chest CT and ECG-gated cardiac CT at the same period were included in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Exam 5. All participants were monitored for incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. TAC is defined as calcification in the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta on chest CT. The quantification of TAC was measured using the Agatston method. Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the prognostic value of TAC and CAC scores. RESULTS Participants were 69±9 years of age and 47% were male. The Spearman correlation between TAC and CAC scores was 0.46 (p<0.001). During the median follow-up period of 8.8 years, 234 participants (9.7%) experienced ASCVD events. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, TAC score was independently associated with increased risk of ASCVD events (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58) as well as CAC score (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.17). However, the area under the time-dependent ROC curve for CAC score was greater than that for TAC score in all participants (0.698 and 0.641, p=0.031). This was particularly pronounced in participants with borderline/intermediate and high 10-year ASCVD risk scores. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated a significant association between TAC and CAC scores but a superior prognostic value of CAC score for ASCVD events. These findings suggest TAC on chest CT provides supplementary data to estimate ASCVD risk but does not replace CAC on ECG-gated cardiac CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robyn L McClelland
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Duo Lee
- The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rick Robin
- The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California, USA
| | | | - Sion Roy
- The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Wendy S Post
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pedro-Botet J, Climent E, Benaiges D, Llauradó G. [When to treat hypercholesterolaemia]. Med Clin (Barc) 2024; 162:238-243. [PMID: 37925276 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pedro-Botet
- Unidad de Lípidos y Riesgo Vascular, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | - Elisenda Climent
- Unidad de Lípidos y Riesgo Vascular, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - David Benaiges
- Unidad de Lípidos y Riesgo Vascular, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Departamento MELIS, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España
| | - Gemma Llauradó
- Unidad de Lípidos y Riesgo Vascular, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Departamento MELIS, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blankstein R, Chandrashekhar Y. Is the Concept of Primary and Secondary Prevention Outdated?: Imaging Provides an Answer. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16:1247-1249. [PMID: 37673486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
|
6
|
The Role of Imaging in Preventive Cardiology in Women. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:29-40. [PMID: 36576679 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01828-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The prevalence of CVD in women is increasing and is due to the increased prevalence of CV risk factors. Traditional CV risk assessment tools for prevention have failed to accurately determine CVD risk in women. CAC has shown to more precisely determine CV risk and is a better predictor of CV outcomes. Coronary CTA provides an opportunity to determine the presence of CAD and initiate prevention in women presenting with angina. Identifying women with INOCA due to CMD with use of cPET or cMRI with MBFR is vital in managing these patients. This review article outlines the role of imaging in preventive cardiology for women and will include the latest evidence supporting the use of these imaging tests for this purpose. RECENT FINDINGS CV mortality is higher in women who have more extensive CAC burden. Women have a greater prevalence of INOCA which is associated with higher MACE. INOCA is due to CMD in most cases which is associated with traditional CVD risk factors. Over half of these women are untreated or undertreated. Recent study showed that stratified medical therapy, tailored to the specific INOCA endotype, is feasible and improves angina in women. Coronary CTA is useful in the setting of women presenting with acute chest pain to identify CAD and initiate preventive therapy. CAC confers greater relative risk for CV mortality in women versus (vs.) men. cMRI or cPET is useful to assess MBFR to diagnose CMD and is another useful imaging tool in women for CV prevention.
Collapse
|
7
|
Grundy SM, Wang J, Vega GL. Statin therapy for primary prevention in men: What is the role for coronary artery calcium? J Clin Lipidol 2023; 17:12-18. [PMID: 36593174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Current cholesterol guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) base statin treatment decisions on multiple risk factor algorithms (e.g., Pooled Cohort Equations [PCEs]). By available PCEs, most older middle-aged men are statin eligible. But several studies cast doubt on predictive accuracy of available PCEs for ASCVD risk assessment. Recent studies suggest that accuracy can be improved by measurement of coronary artery calcium (CAC). This method has the advantage of identifying men at low risk in whom statin therapy can be delayed for several years, provided they are monitored periodically for progression of CAC. Thus, there are two approaches to statin therapy in men ≥ 55 years: first all men could be treated routinely, or second, treatment can be based on the extent of coronary calcium. The latter could allow a sizable fraction of men to avoid treatment for several years or indefinitely. Whether with initial CAC scan or with periodic rescanning, a CAC score ≥ 100 Agatston units is high enough to warrant statin therapy. In otherwise high-risk men (e.g., diabetes, severe hypercholesterolemia, 10-year risk by PCE ≥ 20%), a statin is generally indicated without the need for CAC; but in special cases, CAC measurement may aid in treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Grundy
- Departments of Internal Medicine; Center for Human Nutrition of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas; The Veterans Administration Medical Center at North Texas Healthcare System at Dallas, Texas.
| | | | - Gloria L Vega
- Clinical Nutrition; Center for Human Nutrition of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas; The Veterans Administration Medical Center at North Texas Healthcare System at Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ban X, Li Z, Duan Y, Xu K, Xiong J, Tu Y. Advanced Imaging Modalities Provide New Insights into Coronary Artery Calcification. Eur J Radiol 2022; 157:110601. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
9
|
Eradicating Atherosclerosis: Should We Start Statins at Younger Ages and at Lower LDL-Cs. Curr Cardiol Rep 2022; 24:1397-1406. [PMID: 36006590 PMCID: PMC10021628 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01760-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Given the increasing burden of cardiovascular disease, we review the literature for earlier initiation of statin therapy at younger ages and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, with the goal of preventing the development of atherosclerosis prior to clinical events. RECENT FINDINGS There is a rising prevalence of dyslipidemia among younger adults. Although guidelines offer recommendations for adults over 40, there is little guidance for the management of younger adults with moderately elevated LDL-C levels. Earlier and more aggressive statin use may slow progression, or even halt atherosclerosis, and may likewise be beneficial and cost-effective on a population level. Further research is needed to define the exact age and LDL-C level at which to start statin therapy. Until then, more detailed risk stratification with lab testing and imaging should be used to identify younger adults at the highest risk.
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hlatky
- Stanford University, School of Medicine, Encina Commons, Room 200, 615 Crothers Way, Stanford, CA 94305-6006, USA
| | - Philip Greenland
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kole A, Joshi PH. Coronary Artery Calcium-Based Approach to Lipid Management. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12170-022-00704-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Anderson JL, Knowlton KU. Cardiovascular Events and Gout Flares. JAMA 2022; 328:425-426. [PMID: 35916865 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.9165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
13
|
Greenland P, Polonsky TS. 40 Years of Research on Coronary Artery Calcium and Still No Convincing Clinical Trials? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 15:856-858. [PMID: 35512956 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Greenland
- Departments of Preventive Medicine and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Tamar S Polonsky
- Department of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|