Effect of primary correction of nasal septal deformity in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the craniofacial morphology

Septoplasty During Primary Cleft Lip Reconstruction: A Historical Perspective and Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Traditional surgical approaches excluded septoplasty at primary cleft lip reconstruction due to concerns about restricted nasal and midfacial growth. Modern opinion in the treatment of cleft lip has increasingly employed primary septoplasty; this scoping review and historical perspective aims to chronicle the evolution of septoplasty in patients born with cleft lip and palate and discuss current evidence.

METHODS

The historical perspective explicitly contrasts American and European perceptions of septoplasty in cleft lip deformity and the competing anatomical theories of the role of the septum on midfacial and nasal growth. For the scoping review, articles were extracted from Embase, PubMed, and Medline, as well as manual searches of reference lists. Results were compiled, grouped, and appraised by date, outcomes, and historical significance. Inclusion criteria consisted of children who underwent primary septoplasty for any indication and were followed up on outcomes of facial growth and nasal function. Literature reviews, opinion articles, case reports, guidelines, or studies not available in English or online were excluded.

RESULTS

Evolving anatomical theories relating to midfacial growth in the mid-late 20th century underpinned a progressive ideological shift on the safety and efficacy of septoplasty in children. This is supported by our scoping review, which included 23 articles mutually selected for inclusion by 2 blinded assessors. Several competing methods have been employed to measure endpoints on facial growth and nasal function, but generally indicate primary septoplasty is successful in improving nasal function and preserving midfacial growth.

CONCLUSION

Perceptions towards septoplasty on facial growth in the pediatric population have transformed significantly and suggest a growing acceptance of primary septoplasty techniques in patients born with a cleft lip.

"Primary Correction of the Cleft Nasal Septum: A Systematic Review"

Patients affected by cleft lip and palate have a characteristic nasal deformity; however, the treatment timeline varies amongst providers. There has been a shift from a more conservative approach to earlier intervention in order to allow for more normal development of the nose. Form, function, and future development all must be considered. For this reason, this investigation was undertaken to present the current literature available on the effects to all aspects of primary septoplasty in the cleft nasal deformity.

An initial list of 222 papers was identified, and it was determined that 16 papers fit the inclusion criteria. Studies were included in which the initial age of operation for the majority of patients was between 3 and 12 months and in which patients underwent septal repositioning at the time of cleft lip repair. These papers were all reviewed by a single author initially, and the results recorded. All results were then verified by a second author for accuracy and completeness.

Symmetry was found to be improved by primary septoplasty. Growth was not found to be impaired in any study; data was insufficient to indicate that growth was improved. Obstruction was improved as determined both by imaging, endoscopy, and patient survey. Finally, reoperation rates occurred at an acceptable rate not exceeding that of primary rhinoplasty without septoplasty.

Primary septoplasty leads to better aesthetic symmetry and function of the cleft nose without impairing growth. This change is maintained into adulthood often without the need for revisionary surgery.

Orofacial Cleft and Mandibular Prognathism-Human Genetics and Animal Models

Many complex molecular interactions are involved in the process of craniofacial development. Consequently, the network is sensitive to genetic mutations that may result in congenital malformations of varying severity. The most common birth anomalies within the head and neck are orofacial clefts (OFCs) and prognathism. Orofacial clefts are disorders with a range of phenotypes such as the cleft of the lip with or without cleft palate and isolated form of cleft palate with unilateral and bilateral variations. They may occur as an isolated abnormality (nonsyndromic-NSCLP) or coexist with syndromic disorders. Another cause of malformations, prognathism or skeletal class III malocclusion, is characterized by the disproportionate overgrowth of the mandible with or without the hypoplasia of maxilla. Both syndromes may be caused by the presence of environmental factors, but the majority of them are hereditary. Several mutations are linked to those phenotypes. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the genetics of those phenotypes and describe genotype-phenotype correlations. We then present the animal models used to study these defects.

Photogrammetric Outcomes of Primary Nasal Correction in Unilateral Cleft Lip Patients: Early Childhood Results From a Single Surgeon's Experience

BACKGROUND

Concerns of nonlasting results and potential nasal growth damage precluded cleft nasal correction at the time of initial cleft lip repair. Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip who underwent primary cleft nasal correction from 2010 to 2017 by the same surgeon was performed. The cleft-to-noncleft nostril height, width, one-fourth medial part of nostril height, nasal sill height, and nostril area ratios, as well as inner nostril height-to-width ratios were determined from standard basilar view photographs taken in different time points (T1, <3 months; T2, 3-12 months; T3, 12-36 months; and T4, >36 months after surgery). A 5-point visual analog scale (1 = worst, 5 = best) was used to assess each patient's nose appearance.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were identified (66.7% male, 51.3% with a complete cleft lip). Average visual analog scale scores T1-T4 were 3.88 ± 0.85, 3.72 ± 0.93, 3.54 ± 0.99, and 3.40 ± 0.71, respectively. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.61 to 0.94. A significant decrease [mean difference (SD)] was found for cleft-to-noncleft nostril width ratio [0.15 (0.18)] from T1 to T2, and an increase for one-fourth medial height ratio [-0.09 (0.07)] and for inner nostril height-to-width ratio in the noncleft side [-0.23 (0.25)] from T1 to T3. Thirteen patients required secondary surgical revision.

CONCLUSION

Based on photogrammetry, primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip achieved acceptable and stable outcomes during early childhood.

Validity of the combined use of two esthetic rating systems, the infant index and 5-point aesthetic index, for pre- and postsurgical evaluation of cleft lip repair

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to investigate the usefulness of combining two different ordinal scaling indices, infant index (I-I) and 5-point aesthetic index (5-PAI), for the assessment and prediction of esthetic outcome of primary lip repair for patients with unilateral cleft lip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The nasolabial appearance of the patients was evaluated before primary lip repair and at 5 years of age using cropped facial photographs with frontal and oblique views. The I-I and 5-PAI employ expanded reference photographs and objective esthetic variables for judgment.

RESULTS

The inter- and intrarater Kappa values of both I-I and 5-PAI demonstrated good to very good agreement (range: 0.74-0.84 for I-I and 0.62-0.77 for 5-PAI). Furthermore, both the declination of the columella and the deformity of the alar cartilage in I-I showed a correlation with nasal rating score of 5-PAI and were identified as predictable independent parameters (declination of the columella: Rs = 0.37, P = 0.04; deformity of the alar cartilage: Rs = 0.35, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of I-I and 5-PAI with expanded reference photographs and objective variables could be useful for obtaining greater accuracy of the esthetic assessment and predicting postsurgical nasolabial esthetics at infancy.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Primary Deformity and Longitudinal Changes following Primary Correction of the Nasal Foundation

BACKGROUND

Objective assessment of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity and the longitudinal changes with treatment is critical for optimizing cleft care.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing cleft lip repair and foundation-based rhinoplasty were included (n = 102). Three-dimensional images preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age were assessed and compared to age-matched controls. Images were normalized to standard horizontal, craniocaudal, and anteroposterior axes.

RESULTS

Cleft subalare was similar in position relative to controls but was 1.6 mm retrodisplaced. Subnasale was deviated 4.6 mm lateral to midline and had the greatest displacement of any landmark. Noncleft subalare was displaced 2.3 mm laterally. Regression analysis with deviation of subnasale from the midline as a dependent variable revealed progressive lateral displacement of noncleft subalare, narrowing of noncleft nostril, and intercanthal widening. Surgery corrected nasal base displacements along all axes, resulting in landmark positions similar to controls. Symmetry of nasal base correction persisted at 5-year follow-up, with no recurrent cleft alar base retrusion, regardless of initial cleft type.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity may be "driven" by displacement of the anterior nasal spine and caudal septum. The cleft alar base is normal in position but retruded, whereas the noncleft alar base is displaced laterally. Changes with surgery involve anterior movement of the cleft alar base but also include medial movement of the noncleft alar base and columella. Symmetry of correction, including alar base retrusion, was stable over time and did not rely on alveolar bone grafting.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Foundation-Based Approach to Primary Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip results in disruption of the nasal foundation and collapse of tip structures. Most approaches to primary rhinoplasty focus on correction of lower lateral cartilages; however, recurrent deformity is common, and secondary revision is frequently required. The authors describe an alternate approach that focuses on the foundation to "upright the nose," without any nasal tip dissection. This study assessed changes with surgery and with growth. Secondary goals were to compare methods of sidewall reconstruction and septoplasty and to identify predictors of relapse.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing repair (n = 102) were assessed. Images were captured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age (when available) using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Standard anthropometric and contemporary shape-based analysis (volume ratio, dorsal deviation, and alar-cheek definition) was performed to assess longitudinal changes. Images of age-matched normal control subjects were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Significant changes in anthropometric and morphometric measurements occurred following surgery. Postoperative form was similar to controls immediately after surgery and at 5 years. Nasal corrections were satisfactory, and only two patients have elected to undergo revision. When subjects were grouped according to cleft type, we found the same trends. When comparing different methods of nasal sidewall reconstruction or septoplasty, we found no differences. Alveolar cleft width was a significant predictor of worse preoperative and postoperative form.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant nasal correction can be achieved by means of reconstruction of nasal foundation, without nasal tip dissection. Preservation of tissue planes may allow for easier secondary revision, if necessary.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Effectiveness of endoscopic septoplasty in different types of nasal septal deformities: our experience with NOSE evaluation

Septal deviations are the most frequent cause of nasal obstruction, and represent a common complaint in rhinologic practice. Since the first description of Lanza et al. in 1991, the use of the endoscope for the correction of septal deformities is increasingly more frequent. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectivenes of the endoscopic septoplasty for the correction of each of the 7 types of septal deformities according to the Mladina’s classification. A retrospective chart review was performed in 59 consecutive patients presenting to our Department for Endoscopic Septoplasty from February 2012 to August 2014. For each deviation, descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation, significant increase/decrease) was used to asses the corrective capacity and time-dependent effects at follow-up. This study shows that the corrective power of endoscopic septoplasty is different according to the type of deviation.

To our knowledge this is the first study that evaluates the corrective capacity of this technique for each deviation by analysing pre- and postoperative objective outcomes as well as subjective outcomes gathered from the validated NOSE questionnaire. Even if endoscopic septoplasty may now be considered a reliable alternative to the classic technique, it is essential to identify the right deformity preoperatively in order to provide the correct therapeutic choice.

Nasal Obstruction in Children With Cleft Lip and Palate: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study Utilizing the NOSE Scale

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the epidemiology and risk factors for nasal obstruction among subjects with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) utilizing the well-validated Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) survey.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Cleft Lip and Palate Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

PATIENTS, SUBJECTS

One thousand twenty-eight surveys obtained from 456 subjects (mean age: 10.10 (4.48) years) with CL/P evaluated between January 2015 and August 2017 with at least 1 completed NOSE survey.

INTERVENTIONS

Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation surveys completed at each annual visit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Composite NOSE and individual symptom scores.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent of subjects had nasal obstruction at some point during the study period, with 49% reporting nasal obstruction at latest follow-up. subjects aged 14 years and older reported the most severe symptoms ( P = .002). Subjects with cleft lip and alveolus (CL+A) and unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) reported more severe nasal blockage than other phenotypes ( P = .021). subjects with a history of either posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF) or sphincter pharyngoplasty (SP) had significantly higher NOSE scores than subjects with no history of speech surgery ( P = .006). There was no significant difference ( P > .050) in NOSE scores with regard to history of primary tip rhinoplasty, nasal stent use, or nasoalveolar molding.

CONCLUSIONS

There are more severe nasal obstructive symptoms among subjects older than 14 years of age, with CL+A or unilateral CLP, and with a history of PPF or SP. Future studies utilizing the NOSE are needed to evaluate and address this prevalent morbidity in the CLP population.

The Microsurgical Approach in Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty-An Anthropometric Analysis

PURPOSE

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons use different approaches to repair the nasal deformity of patients with a cleft lip deformity, differing in technique and timing. The aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze a new surgical technique to treat the cleft nasal deformity at 4 to 6 weeks of life using a microscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven newborn patients with a cleft lip deformity were treated by primary repair of the nasal deformity using a microscope at 4 to 6 weeks of life. The procedure includes a columellar incision, alar cartilage plication sutures according to Daniel (Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1491, 1999), and trans-columellar sutures. All patients were photographed at specific time points up to 1 year after surgery. Established angles and distances were analyzed and compared with normal values of age-matched children by Farkas (Anthropometry of the Head and Face [ed 2]. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1994).

RESULTS

All parameters improved through surgery and showed stable values at follow-up assessments. Almost ideal values concerning symmetry, as indicated by columellar deviation and nostril comparison, were obtained. Measurements of nasal morphology were similar to established norm values.

CONCLUSION

The authors recommend the early treatment of cleft nasal deformity using microscopic surgery because it shows stable and symmetrical results at least up to 1 year after surgery. Clinical observations up to adolescence suggest no growth disturbance or deterioration of nasal shape.

Personal technique for definite repair of complete unilateral cleft lip: modified Millard technique

Background

Millard’s rotation-advancement repair, which is used by many surgeons, can make a natural philtral column, but most surgeons use a modification of the rotation-advancement flap. The purpose of this article is to introduce a modification utilized by the authors and to provide detailed surgical procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients’ medical records and presented surgical technique and outcomes. The main features of the authors’ strategy are emphasizing horizontal length of the lip, orbicularis oris muscle duplication for improving the definition of the philtral column, overcorrection of domal portion than the non-cleft side in order to compensate for the recurrence during growth. Two judges rated two times the appearance of the patients’ nose and lip using Asher-McDade aesthetic index. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were determined using Cohen’s kappa statistics.

Results

All patients recovered eventually after surgery; however, two patients have a minor complications (wound infection in one patient, wound disruption due to trauma in the other patient). The improvement of the aesthetic results can be achieved with this modified Millard technique. Total mean scores of the Asher-McDade index was 2.08, fair to good appearance. The intraobserver reliabilities were substantial to almost perfect agreement and the interobserver reliabilities were moderate to almost perfect agreement.

Conclusion

We modified Millard method for repair of complete unilateral cleft lip. The surgical outcomes were favorable in long-term follow-up. We hope our technique will serve as a guide for those new to the procedure.

[Septoplasty during primary unilateral cleft lip repair]

Primary repair of cleft lip and palate has become a nasal and lip repair. In the aim to improve our nasal results on symmetry we perform an extensive septoplasty to put the nose in a good shape and a median axis. This septoplasty without resection of cartilage does not cause growth disorders to the nose and it promotes maxillary growth by improving early nasal breathing. It can prevent secondary rhinoplasty, source of new scars (externally, fork). But rhinoplasty will increase the incidence of scar contraction, thus shaping with a nasal conformer is essential.

Morphological analysis of the lip and nose following cleft lip repair with simultaneous partial primary rhinoplasty: A prospective study over 4 years

INTRODUCTION

Facial clefts involve complex abnormalities. The therapy is elaborate, and a critical evaluation of therapeutic outcome is required. Our study analyzed the lip and nose deformities associated with unilateral clefts in a prospective longitudinal study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 33 patients with a cleft lip or cleft lip and alveolus (UCL) and 46 with a cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were treated using a similar concept. Standardized photographs were taken preoperatively (age 0.4-0.52 years) and again aged 4.04-4.59 years. Anthropometric analyses were performed and compared with age-matched normal values.

RESULTS

Nostril width (UCL = 1.01, UCLP = 1.03) and nostril floor width (UCL = 1.02, UCLP = 1.04) were almost symmetric. Nasal tip angles were normalized by surgery. Upper labial height improved, but remained slightly reduced (-4% to -6%). Upper vermillion length was increased (15-17%), and vermillion width was reduced (-12% to -13%) postoperatively. A significantly flatter nostril axis inclination persisted, especially on the affected side (UCL: 37.5°; UCLP: 38.5°), when compared with normal values (53.8°).

CONCLUSION

Most cleft irregularities were almost eliminated by therapy; however, the outcome is still not satisfactory for some parameters. The rehabilitation of patients with clefts remains a considerable surgical challenge. Facial anthropometric assessment must play an important role in order to detect and overcome therapeutic shortcomings.

Are gender differences in external noses caused by differences in nasal septal growth?

BACKGROUND

The nasal septum plays an important role in nasal growth, but there have been few reports on the relationship between the septum and nasal growth. The authors investigated the relationship between septa and external noses using computed tomography during the growth period.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-eight patients under the age of 21 were enrolled in this study between 2008 and 2012. The authors evaluated a total of 9 measurement items (five for nasal bones and septa, and four for external noses).

RESULTS

In the final age group, most measurement items were significantly larger in males than in females. However, there was no remarkable difference between male and female growth processes. Nasal bridge length and nasal height were significantly correlated with the nasal bone or septum in almost all age groups. The relative proportion of the cartilaginous septum decreased significantly with age, and was negatively correlated with the perpendicular plate in all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal septa and external noses were both larger in males than in females at the beginning of the study period, although not significantly. The differences became significant throughout the study due to differential increases between the sexes during the monitored growth spurts.

Unilateral cleft lip/nose repair using an equal bows /straight line advancement technique - A preliminary report and postoperative symmetry-based anthropometry

In the evolution of cleft lip repair there has been continuous attempt to minimize local trauma, improve lip and nasal appearance and, especially, prevent conspicuous scars. The surgical technique presented meets these criteria, resulting in an appropriate scar course in children with a specific philtral ridge shape. Postoperative digital anthropometry was performed in 18 patients who underwent unilateral cleft lip repair using the equal bows/straight line advancement technique and in matched healthy control individuals. Symmetry values were assessed for lip length, philtral ridge length, vermilion height, width of the alar base, nasocanthal length, circumference of the nostrils, nostril width and height in both cleft and control groups. Evaluation revealed no significant differences in the symmetry values between cleft patients and control group (lip length: p = 0.71, philtral ridge length: p = 0.52, vermilion height: p = 0.23, alar base width: p = 0.69, nasocanthal length: p = 0.25, nostril circumference: p = 0.17, nostril width: p = 0.34, nostril height: p = 0.33). Principles of cleft lip repair can be achieved using the described technique which provides adequate lip length and natural nasal appearance in patients with a parallel-shaped philtral ridge.