The relative cost of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early oral cancer

Summary of Japanese clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer - 2022 update edited by the Japan society for head and neck cancer

The aim of the "Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer - 2022 Update" is to review the latest evidence regarding head and neck cancer and to present the current standard approaches for diagnosis and treatment. These evidence-based recommendations were created with the consensus of the Guideline Committee, which is composed of otorhinolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons, together with radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, plastic surgeons, dentists, palliative care physicians, and rehabilitation physicians. These guidelines were created by the Clinical Practice Guideline Committee of the Japan Society for Head and Neck Cancer based on the "Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 Edition," and the revised draft was compiled after evaluation by the Assessment Committee and public comments. The 'Clinical questions and recommendations' section consists of 13 categories, and 59 clinical questions are described in total. Here we describe 6 clinical questions specific to other sets of guidelines with recommendations and comments.

Cost-Effectiveness of [99mTc]Tilmanocept Relative to [99mTc]Sulfur Colloid for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated varying rates of efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in identifying occult nodal disease for early stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) depending on the radionuclide agent utilized. No head-to-head comparison of cost or clinical outcomes of SLNB when utilizing [99mTc]tilmanocept versus [99mTc]sulfur colloid has been performed. The goal of this study was to develop a decision model to compare the cost-effectiveness of [99mTc]tilmanocept versus [99mTc]sulfur colloid in early stage OCSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A decision model of disease and treatment as a function of SLNB was created. Patients with a negative SLNB entered a Markov model of the natural history of OCSCC parameterized with published data to simulate five states of health and iterated over a 30-year time horizon. Treatment costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each health state were included. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was then estimated using $100,000 per additional QALY as the threshold for determining cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

The base case cost-effectiveness analysis suggested [99mTc]tilmanocept was more effective than [99mTc]sulfur colloid by 0.12 QALYs (7.06 versus 6.94 QALYs). [99mTc]Tilmanocept was more costly, with a lifetime cost of $84,961 in comparison with $84,264 for sulfur colloid, however, the overall base case ICER was $5859 per additional QALY, well under the threshold for cost-effectiveness. Multiple one-way sensitivity analyses were performed, and demonstrated the model was robust to alternative parameter values.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed that while [99mTc]tilmanocept is more costly upfront, these costs are worth the additional QALYs gained by the use of [99mTc]tilmanocept.

Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in node-negative oral cancers

BACKGROUND

We aimed to define the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the third option for cervical treatment in oral cancer with negative cervical lymph nodes.

METHODS

The greatest depth of invasion (DOI) and long diameter (LD) of the primary site were used as exposures. SLN metastasis was considered the outcome.

RESULTS

In three trials conducted between 2009 and 2016, 158 patients were eligible and reassigned to this study group. The scatterplot based on the respective values of DOI and LD would eventually be divided into three sections. In cases of sections T1, T2, and T3, the proportions of SLN metastasis positivity were 21.3%, 35.3%, and 51.2%, respectively. In certain cases of T1 with 2 mm < DOI ≤ 5 mm and 8 mm < LD ≤ 20 mm, the proportion of SLN metastasis positivity was 40.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB-navigated or assisted neck dissection can be added as an effective procedure for N0 neck control.

Critical Review of the Current Evidence on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Oral Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With contemporary surgery of the cN0 neck in early oral cancer becoming more selective, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is gaining popularity as a possible alternate option to elective neck dissection (END). This review attempts to critically appraise the current evidence and highlight pertinent arguments for the use of SNB in early oral cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Based on the recent randomized trials, it is imperative to perform an END at the time of primary resection in cN0 oral cancers. The much criticized false negative rate of SNB can be argued to be equal to the regional failure rate after END for pN0 necks, possibly making a case for SNB due to the reduction in number of neck dissections. There still lies ambiguity on the technique, protocols, and benefit of SNB over END. The role of extended histopathological techniques and the implications of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells for treatment intensification remain questionable. Currently, SNB is an intermediary between routine imaging and END that needs to evolve before it can become a practice changing alternative to END itself. More efforts are needed in standardizing the protocols for SNB.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with a clinically N0 neck: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an emerging strategy for managing early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with a clinically N0 (cN0) neck. However, the role of SLNB in this scenario is debatable. Herein, relevant literature was systematically reviewed, and a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential dividends of SLNB compared to elective neck dissection (END) for these patients. The meta-analysis, including six prospective studies, showed comparable results of the two management strategies in terms of regional recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.70), 5-year disease-free survival (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.11), and 5-year overall survival (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.13). Fewer adverse events occurred in the SLNB arm than in the END arm (RR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.70). Overall, SLNB results in as favorable an oncologic prognosis for patients with cN0 oral SCC as END, while significantly lessening side effects and unnecessary surgeries.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus selective neck dissection in patients with early oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cost analysis

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been proved to be as efficient as selective neck dissection (SND) for the treatment of occult metastases in T1-T2cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of our study was to assess and compare the cost of these two surgical procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cost analysis includes consecutive patients treated between 2012 and 2017 in two French hospitals either by SLNB or SND. Hospital cost (hospital stay for initial surgery and re-hospitalizations over a period of 60 days after the initial surgery), the length of hospital stay for the initial surgery and the perioperative management were described and compared between the two techniques. The propensity score regression adjustment method was used to address selection bias.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients underwent SLNB procedure and seventy-seven patients underwent SND. The length of hospital stay for initial surgery was lower in SLNB group: 5.8 days (SD: 3.8) versus 9.2 days (SD: 5) in the SND group. Hospital costs were lower in SLNB group: €7 489 (standard deviation: €3 691) versus €8 886 (standard deviation: €4 381) but this difference was not significant after propensity score regression adjustment. The rate of complication, the delay of full oral feeding and postoperative drainage were lower in SLNB group.

CONCLUSION

SLNB in T1-T2cN0 OSCC is less invasive than SND with fewer complications, a shorter length of hospital stay and favorable perioperative management. This study shows that this technique could be also less expensive than SND.

What is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of oral cancer in 2020?

Approximately 70–80% of patients with cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) ultimately prove to have no cancer in the cervical lymphatics on final pathology after selective neck dissection. As a result, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted during the last decade as a diagnostic staging method to intelligently identify patients who would benefit from formal selective lymphadenectomy or neck irradiation. While not yet universally accepted, SLNB is now incorporated in many national guidelines. SLNB offers a less invasive alternative to elective neck dissection (END), and has some advantages and disadvantages. SLNB can assess the individual drainage pattern and, with step serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry (IHC), can enable the accurate detection of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Staging of the neck is improved relative to END with routine histopathological examination. The improvements in staging are particularly notable for the contralateral neck and the pretreated neck. However, for floor of mouth (FOM) tumors, occult metastases are frequently missed by SLNB due to the proximity of activity from the primary site to the lymphatics (the shine through phenomenon). For FOM cancers, it is advised to perform either elective neck dissection or superselective neck dissection of the preglandular triangle of level I. New tracers and techniques under development may improve the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB for early-stage OSCC, particularly for FOM tumors. Treatment of the neck (either neck dissection or radiotherapy), although limited to levels I–IV, remains mandatory for any positive category of metastasis (macrometastasis, micrometastasis, or ITCs). Recently, the updated EANM practical guidelines for SLN localization in OSCC and the surgical consensus guidelines on SLNB in patients with OSCC were published. In this review, the current evidence and results of SLNB in early OSCC are presented.

Long term-follow-up multicenter feasibility study of ICG fluorescence-navigated sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer

In the current study, the utility of sentinel node (SN) identification using indocyanine green (ICG) was investigated for oral cancers in the clinical N0 stage. The current study was a prospective, multicentre, phase II clinical trial that was conducted in Japan. A total of 18 patients were included. Before surgery, the patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy to map the SNs. During surgery, radioactive isotope (RI) mapping was used to detect the SNs, and ICG was subsequently injected. ICG mapping of the SNs was then performed through the skin. The primary tumour was resected, and a neck flap was elevated for neck dissection, followed by SN biopsy (SNB) using RI or ICG mapping. With the RI method, a total of 63 SNs were detected. Among these SNs, 8 (12.7%) were positive for metastasis, including those with isolated tumour cells (ITCs). The median number of SNs per patient identified by SNB was 4. With the ICG method, a total of 67 SNs were detected. Among these SNs, 7 (10.4%) were positive for metastasis, including those with ITCs. The median number of SNs per patient identified by SNB was 4 (range, 1-6). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of all patients was 83.3%, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of all patients was 76.7%. The neck compression technique is a simple method that can be used to facilitate surgical procedures of ICG fluorescence navigated SNB for head and neck cancer.

Radioguided sentinel node biopsy to avoid unnecessary neck dissection in T1-T2N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: personal experience with same day protocol

PURPOSE

Data from literature show a mean incidence of occult metastases of 33% in early OCSCC. The gold standard for most authors is a selective neck dissection and a routine pathological examination. 60-70% of unnecessary neck dissections with associated morbidity, can be avoided by using SNB. The aim of this study is to present the results of one of the major Italian centres for the SNB procedure, reserving neck dissection only for proven positive lymphatic metastases.

METHODS

From July 2004 to March 2015, 48 patients with transorally resectable cT1-T2N0 oral SCC were submitted to a lymphoscintigraphic examination one-three hours before surgery and a radio-guided SNB (same day protocol). Patients with a negative SNB were checked every 3 months by ultrasound examination. The minimum follow-up was 5 years.

RESULTS

Sentinel nodes were found in all cases, with 71% localized in the ipsilateral neck only in levels I-II. Metastases were found in 15 out of 48 cases (31.2%), on levels I, II and III. Further metastatic nodes were found in 6 cases in the neck dissection specimen. In the cohort of 33 patients with SNB negative at 5 years, no-one had a recurrence on the ipsilateral neck.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the accuracy of SNB in predicting the presence of occult metastases, sparing the need for unnecessary neck dissection in 70% of cases. The same day protocol is designed to detect sentinel nodes, which are almost always on neck level I-II, thereby limiting the number of nodes examined and the extension of the surgical approach.

Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for detecting neck nodal metastasis in early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) as an alternative to elective neck dissection.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases.

METHODS

Two reviewers individually searched the five databases up to November 2019. For studies that met inclusion criteria, data on patient diagnoses were pooled, including true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. Methodological quality was checked with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2) tool.

RESULTS

In total, 98 observational or retrospective studies were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of SLNB was 326.165 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 231.477-459.587; I²  = 0%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.982. Sensitivity was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.804-0.848), and specificity was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.975-0.986). The correlation between sensitivity and the false positive rate was -0.076, which indicates that heterogeneity did not exist. Subgroup analyses were performed with the subgroups reference test type, publication year, and study type. No significant difference was found within the reference test type subgroup. However, differences within the publication year and study type subgroups were significant, where the retrospective study subgroup was significantly more sensitive and specific than the prospective study subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Results of this meta-analysis imply that the high specificity of SLNB supports its role as a diagnostic tool for patients with clinical tumor stage (CT)1-2 clinically negative (N0) OSCC. More studies should be done to further verify the results of this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2a Laryngoscope, 131:E459-E465, 2021.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck oncology]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been initially developed for melanoma and breast cancers. Its application in head and neck cancers is recent, probably due to the complexity of the lymphatic drainage, the proximity between the primary tumor and the lymph nodes and the critical anatomical structures (such as the facial nerve). In onco-dermatology, SLNB is validated in head and neck surgery for melanoma with Breslow thickness up to 1mm or ulceration, Merkel carcinoma and high-risk squamous cell carcinoma. Considering the malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract, the feasibility and oncologic safety of SLNB are now established for T1-T2N0 oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Thus, it could allow patients with negative sentinel nodes to avoid an unnecessary neck dissection, leading to a decrease of morbidity with an quality of life improvement. For some primary locations (e.g., anterior floor of the mouth) with high proximity between tumor and lymph nodes, it is recommended to remove the tumor before the SLNB so as to improve the detection. New techniques of detection are currently being developed with intra-operative procedures and new tracers (such as tilmanocept), leading to a better accuracy of detection and, probably, new indications.

The economic burden of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Australia

OBJECTIVES

The financial burden of treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma in Australia has never been reported, and there is a paucity of international data. Here, we report the direct costs of treatment of surgically resectable oral cancer in a tertiary public hospital in Australia over a 15-year period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pathology department records, records of hospital attendance and hospital finance department records were interrogated to determine the direct costs of inpatient and outpatient treatment. Costs were adjusted using the total health price index so that all costs were equivalent to costings for the 2016/2017 financial year.

RESULTS

A total of 113 cases were identified as suitable for inclusion. Complete inpatient and outpatient hospital attendance and costing data for treatment and subsequent 2-year follow-up was available for 29 cases. The average total cost over the 2-year period was $92 958AUD (median $102 722, range $11 662-$181 512). On average, 92.8% of costs were incurred in the first year post-diagnosis. Inpatient costs, outpatient costs and total costs increased with increasing pathological cancer stage. Both 1- and 2-year post-diagnosis overall cost for patients with Stage 4 oral cavity cancer were more than two times greater than for patients with Stage 1 oral cancer.

CONCLUSION

It is well documented that patients diagnosed at an earlier stage will have better survival outcomes, and it is assumed that the economic burden of their treatment will be less. We have shown that there is a direct correlation between cancer stage and cancer treatment cost. The findings provide clear economic support for oral cancer screening initiatives to detect earlier stage cancers, and the need to investigate novel techniques and technologies to detect oral squamous cell carcinoma early and reduce recurrence and mortality rates.

Elective neck dissection in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Past, present and future

In 1994 a decision analysis, based on the literature and utility ratings for outcome by a panel of experienced head and neck physicians, was presented which showed a threshold probability of occult metastases of 20% to recommend elective treatment of the neck. It was stated that recommendations for the management of the cN0 neck are not immutable and should be reconfigured to determine the optimal management based on different sets of underlying assumptions. Although much has changed and is published in the almost 25 years after its publication, up to date this figure is still mentioned in the context of decisions on treatment of the clinically negative (cN0) neck. Therefore, we critically reviewed the developments in diagnostics and therapy and modeling approaches in the context of decisions on treatment of the cN0 neck. However, the results of studies on treatment of the cN0 neck cannot be translated to other settings due to significant differences in relevant variables such as population, culture, diagnostic work-up, follow-up, costs, institutional preferences and other factors. Moreover, patients may have personal preferences and may weigh oncologic outcomes versus morbidity and quality of life differently. Therefore, instead of trying to establish "the" best strategy for the cN0 neck or "the" optimal cut-off point for elective neck treatment, the approach to optimize the management of the cN0 neck would be to develop and implement models and decision support systems that can serve to optimize choices depending on individual, institutional, population and other relevant variables.

Association of neck dissection with survival for early stage N0 tongue cancer: A SEER population-based study

The management of the node negative neck in patients with tongue cancer remains a complex and controversial issue, especially in those with early stage tumors. Patients with negative cervical lymph nodes generally have a good prognosis. However, in patients without neck dissection, neck recurrences may occur after excision of the primary tumor due to occult cervical metastases. It often results in poor salvage therapy options and short survival. We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 2004 to 2013 to investigate the association of neck dissection with survival among early stage tongue cancer patients with negative lymph node metastasis. A total of 4274 eligible patients were subdivided into 2 groups according to their neck management strategies: neck dissection and observation. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the independent factors of survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed for survival analysis. In the overall cohort, patients who underwent neck dissection had better survival than those who were managed with observation in both tongue cancer specific survival and overall survival. After adjusting for confounding variables, neck dissection strategy remains an independent prognostic factor for better survival. When stratifying the patients according to age, gender, race, marital status, histologic grade, stage and radiotherapy, patients in the neck dissection group had significantly better survival than those in the observation group. Neck dissection may improve survival for early stage tongue cancer patients with negative lymph node metastasis. These results may assist clinicians in selecting the most appropriate neck management strategy for individual patients.

MR lymphography for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with oral cavity cancer: Preliminary clinical study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of MR lymphography with interstitial injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent for identifying sentinel lymph nodes in patients with oral cavity cancer and clinically negative neck.

METHODS

Pretreatment MR lymphography with a differential subsampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO) sequence was performed in 26 patients with resectable oral cavity cancer and clinically negative neck, after peritumoral injection of 1-mL diluted gadobutrol. The accuracy of sentinel lymph node identification by MR lymphography was assessed and compared with the final histopathological results.

RESULTS

The MR lymphography consistently visualized the 44 sentinel lymph nodes in all 26 patients. In all but 1 patient with pathologically positive neck, assumed sentinel lymph nodes revealed metastatic involvement.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment MR lymphography is a safe and feasible imaging technique that can help clinicians identify sentinel lymph nodes with a high risk of occult metastases in patients with oral cavity cancer, enabling focused preoperative biopsy in these high-risk patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Where are we now?

Recent data have confirmed that elective surgical management of the cN0 neck improves survival in patients with early (T1-T2) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and is better than watchful waiting. However, elective neck dissection (END) may not always be necessary. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB), which is a reliable staging test for patients with early disease and a radiologically N0 neck, can detect occult metastases with a sensitivity of 86%-94%. Patients with no sign of metastases on SNB could avoid neck dissection, and individual treatment should reduce both morbidity and cost. Currently, SNB for oral SCC is available at a limited number of centres in the UK, but this is likely to change as national guidelines have recommended that it is incorporated into the standard treatment pathway. It is therefore important to understand the current evidence that supports its use, its limitations and related controversies, and to plan for a validated training programme.

Annexin A8 is a novel molecular marker for detecting lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Cervical lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but its accurate assessment after sentinel node biopsy or neck dissection is often limited to the histopathological examination of only one or two sections. Previous our study showed the usefulness of the reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) targeting keratin 19 (KRT19) mRNA for the genetic detection of lymph node metastasis, but the sensitivity was insufficient. Here, we have attempted to identify novel molecular markers for OSCC cells in lymph nodes. We performed microarray analysis to identify genes overexpressed in 7 metastatic lymph nodes from OSCC patients, compared to 1 normal lymph node and 5 salivary glands from non-cancer patients. We then used real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and RT-LAMP to compare the expression of these genes in newly resected metastatic and normal lymph nodes. Of 4 genes identified by microarray analysis, annexin A8 (ANXA8) and desmoglein 3 mRNA were detected by qRT-PCR in metastatic lymph nodes but not in normal lymph nodes. Furthermore, ANXA8 mRNA expression was detected in all KRT19-negative metastatic lymph nodes. Both KRT19 and ANXA8 mRNA may be useful markers for detecting lymph node metastases in OSCC patients.

Comprehensive cost analysis of sentinel node biopsy in solid head and neck tumors using a time-driven activity-based costing approach

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is predominantly a locoregional disease. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy offers a minimally invasive means of accurately staging the neck. Value in healthcare is determined by both outcomes and the costs associated with achieving them. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) may offer more precise estimates of the true cost. Process maps were developed for nuclear medicine, operating room and pathology care phases. TDABC estimates the costs by combining information about the process with the unit cost of each resource used. Resource utilization is based on observation of care and staff interviews. Unit costs are calculated as a capacity cost rate, measured as a Euros/min (2014), for each resource consumed. Multiplying together the unit costs and resource quantities and summing across all resources used will produce the average cost for each phase of care. Three time equations with six different scenarios were modeled based on the type of camera, the number of SLN and the type of staining used. Total times for different SLN scenarios vary between 284 and 307 min, respectively, with a total cost between 2794 and 3541€. The unit costs vary between 788€/h for the intraoperative evaluation with a gamma-probe and 889€/h for a preoperative imaging with a SPECT/CT. The unit costs for the lymphadenectomy and the pathological examination are, respectively, 560 and 713€/h. A 10 % increase of time per individual activity generates only 1 % change in the total cost. TDABC evaluates the cost of SLN in HNC. The total costs across all phases which varied between 2761 and 3744€ per standard case.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck mucosal cancers - an update on the current evidence

Regional metastases are a prominent feature of mucosal-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and are an important prognostic factor. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is one modality that has potential to add to the accuracy of neck staging, although it is currently not used as widely in the head and neck as it is in other areas such as breast cancer. We review the efficacy of SLNB in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinomas and provide an overview of current practice and include details of technical advances.

Technique for reliable sentinel node biopsy in squamous cell carcinomas of the floor of mouth

BACKGROUND

Applicability of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for tumors of the floor of mouth (FOM) is controversial.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of gamma-probe-guided superselective neck dissection of the preglandular triangle of level I for SNB in FOM squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT.

RESULTS

In total, 22 sentinel lymph nodes were harvested in level I. Eight of 22 (36%) were seen on lymphoscintigraphy and 11 (50%) on SPECT/CT. Eleven sentinel lymph nodes (50%) were only detected intraoperatively. In unilateral tumors, 20% were contralateral, and, in midline tumors, 93% showed bilateral level I sentinel lymph nodes. The false-negative rate was 8.3%, the negative predictive value was 96.4%, and the false-omission rate was 3.6%. The ultimate neck control rate, including salvage treatment, was 100%.

CONCLUSION

SNB in FOM can be reliably performed using the presented surgical technique. Level I exploration, bilaterally in midline tumors, is mandatory irrespective of the visualization of sentinel lymph nodes in other levels. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1367-1372, 2016.

Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT): 3-year results of sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer

PURPOSE

Optimum management of the N0 neck is unresolved in oral cancer. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) can reliably detect microscopic lymph node metastasis. The object of this study was to establish whether the technique was both reliable in staging the N0 neck and a safe oncological procedure in patients with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

An European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-approved prospective, observational study commenced in 2005. Fourteen European centres recruited 415 patients with radiologically staged T1-T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma. SNB was undertaken with an average of 3.2 nodes removed per patient. Patients were excluded if the sentinel node (SN) could not be identified. A positive SN led to a neck dissection within 3 weeks. Analysis was performed at 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

An SN was found in 99.5% of cases. Positive SNs were found in 23% (94 in 415). A false-negative result occurred in 14% (15 in 109) of patients, of whom eight were subsequently rescued by salvage therapy. Recurrence after a positive SNB and subsequent neck dissection occurred in 22 patients, of which 16 (73%) were in the neck and just six patients were rescued. Only minor complications (3%) were reported following SNB. Disease-specific survival was 94%. The sensitivity of SNB was 86% and the negative predictive value 95%.

CONCLUSION

These data show that SNB is a reliable and safe oncological technique for staging the clinically N0 neck in patients with T1 and T2 oral cancer. EORTC Protocol 24021: Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Management of Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Staging of early lymph node metastases with the sentinel lymph node technique and predictive factors in T1/T2 oral cavity cancer: A retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of detecting lymph node metastases and to identify predictive and prognostic clinicopathological factors in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with cT1 to T2N0 OSCC who underwent a diagnostic SLNB between 2007 and 2013 were included.

RESULTS

We identified 253 patients, of whom 27% had a positive sentinel lymph node (SLB). The false-negative rate, sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 5%, 88%, and 95%, respectively. Patients with micrometastases as well as macrometastases had a separately, significantly shorter disease-specific survival than patients with pN0 disease. In a logistic regression model, the maximum tumor thickness, perineural invasion, and differentiation grade were independent predictive factors for the presence of metastases.

CONCLUSION

These data support the use of the SLNB technique as an accurate and safe staging tool in patients with OSCC with a cN0 neck. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1033-E1040, 2016.

Current Trends and Emerging Future of Indocyanine Green Usage in Surgery and Oncology: An Update

BACKGROUND

Indocyanine green (ICG) is a widely available dye of clinical importance that has been used for more than 50 years. Near-infrared (NIR) ICG fluorescence imaging has found a niche in cancer care since 2005, and was reviewed in 2011. There is a need for a comprehensive update and we aim to provide this through a review of the most recent literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases of articles published from 2000 to June 2015 evaluated topics pertinent to NIR fluorescence imaging with ICG in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of cancer. Articles previously referenced in a 2011 review and a 2015 meta-analysis were excluded, while articles that referenced future directions and economics were included in this current review.

RESULTS

Since 2011, the literature has grown exponentially, with significant advances at the molecular level. Significant findings from 89 select articles and 10 reviews, most of which were published between 2011 and 2015, are summarized. Preclinical studies are currently underway investigating tumor-specific fluorescence and targeted therapeutic delivery. The potential for ICG exists at every level of cancer care, from diagnosis to surveillance.

CONCLUSION

The indications, applications, and potential for ICG have grown exponentially in the past decade; an updated review of the literature is overdue and we present the most comprehensive review to date.

The history of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck cancer: From visualization of lymphatic vessels to sentinel nodes

The aim of this report is to describe the history of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck cancer. Sentinel node biopsy is a minimally invasive technique to select patients for treatment of metastatic lymph nodes in the neck. Although this procedure has only recently been accepted for early oral cancer, the first studies on visualization of the cervical lymphatic vessels were reported in the 1960s. In the 1980s mapping of lymphatic drainage from specific head and neck sites was introduced. Sentinel node biopsy was further developed in the 1990s and after validation in this century the procedure is routinely performed in early oral cancer in several head and neck centers. New techniques may improve the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy further, particularly in difficult subsites like the floor of mouth.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: current status and unresolved challenges

Because imaging with ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography is unreliable for preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), elective neck dissection has been typically performed. The targeted sampling of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) identified by lymphoscintigraphy and detected by gamma probe has become an effective alternative for the selection of patients for regional nodal resection. With careful consideration to technique, high SLN detection rates have been reported. Advanced techniques including intraoperative handheld gamma camera imaging and freehand single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are expected to increase surgical confidence in these procedures. This review gives an update on SLN biopsy in patients with OSCC including clinical standards and controversial aspects.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral cancer: supporting evidence and recent novel developments

Occult spread to regional lymphatics occurs in a significant percentage of patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer. While elective neck dissection continues to be the gold standard for assessing for the presence of occult regional disease, the optimal management strategy continues to evolve. Increasingly, sentinel lymph node biopsy is being recognized as a viable alternative to elective neck dissection for staging the neck in early-stage oral cavity cancer. In this article, we examine the evidence supporting sentinel lymph node biopsy for early-stage oral cancer and provide an update on some of the novel developments in this field.