Double anterior (anterolateral and anteromedial) thigh flap for oral perforated defect reconstruction

Anteromedial thigh septocutaneous perforator flap as a first choice for head and neck reconstruction: A clinical algorithm based on perforator-pedicle relationship

BACKGROUND

Anterolateral thigh perforator flaps (ALTPFs) have long been considered workhorse flaps for head and neck reconstructions. However, in some instances, anteromedial thigh septocutaneous perforator flaps (AMTPFs) are easier to harvest than ALTPFs. This study aimed to determine when and how the AMTPF should be considered the first choice as a reconstructive tool.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Head & Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, from January 2014 to December 2018. Both the perforator-pedicle relationships and postoperative functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were included in this study, among whom 49 underwent AMTPF reconstructions. The AMTPF perforators in this study were mostly septocutaneous (n = 38, 77.5%). Notably, the AMTPF perforators mainly originated from the medial branch of the descending branches of the lateral circumflex femoral arteries (n = 44, 89.8%), while for the other 5 patients, the perforators were found to originate from the superficial femoral arteries. Additionally, the average pedicle length of the AMTPFs was 8.7 cm (range: 6.0 to 13.0 cm), which was comparable to that of the ALTPFs (8.9 cm) (p = 0.442). The postoperative complication rate and functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups. The algorithm and harvesting approaches are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of AMTPF should not be downplayed. After careful preoperative evaluation, we believe that AMTPF should not be considered a second choice in patients with sizable septocutaneous perforators.

Complications and Outcomes of Chimeric Free Flaps: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Ablations of locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer commonly result in large composite orofacial defects. Chimeric flaps represent a unique surgical option for these defects, as they provide diverse tissue types from a single donor site. The purpose of the study was to consolidate the literature on chimeric flaps with regard to postoperative complication rates to help inform surgical decision making.

DATA SOURCES

The librarian created search strategies with a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary in Ovid Medline (1946), Embase (1947), Scopus (1823), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrails.gov (1997).

REVIEW METHODS

Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors familiar with the subject material, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were uniformly applied for article selection. Articles were considered eligible if they included patients who received a single chimeric flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects and if they provided data on complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 521 chimeric flaps were included in the study. The major complication rate was 22.6%, while the minor complication rate was 14.0%. There were 7 flap deaths noted in the series. Median operative time and harvest time were 15.0 and 2.5 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chimeric flaps represent a viable option for reconstruction of complex head and neck defects and have complication rates similar to those of double free flaps and single free flaps with locoregional flap while only modestly increasing total operative time.

Therapeutic effects of anterolateral thigh flap transfer in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects after ablative surgery of neoplasms

BACKGROUND

To investigate the therapeutic effects of anterolateral thigh flap transfer in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects after ablative surgery of neoplasms and to discuss perioperative psychological care.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients who received oral and maxillofacial surgery for tumor resection in Nanfang Hospital from October 2014 to August 2016 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 40 patients in each group. Patients in control group received forearm flap transfer, while patients in observation group were treated with anterolateral thigh flap transfer.

RESULTS

The survival rate of flap, food intake ability, quality of life and incidence of complication were compared between groups. There was no significant difference in survival rate of the flaps between two groups (P>0.05). No significant difference in food intake was found between groups at 3 months after operation (P>0.05). The UW-QOL scores of the two groups at 1 year after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05), and no significant differences in UW-QOL scores were found between two groups at 1 year after operation (P>0.05). Incidence of temporary dysfunction, hyperplastic scar, permanent dysfunction, pigmentation and pruritus was significantly lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of necrosis between two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that anterolateral thigh flap transfer has similar therapeutic effects to those of forearm flap transfer in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects after ablative surgery of neoplasms and improving food intake and quality of life. But Anterolateral thigh flap transfer can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, so this treatment should be popularized.

Maxillary reconstruction using rectus femoris muscle flap and sagittal mandibular ramus/coronoid process graft pedicled with temporalis muscle

BACKGROUND

Maxillary reconstruction using various pedicled and free-tissue transfer techniques with bone graft or without bone graft has some drawbacks. In this study, we demonstrate maxillary reconstruction using femoris rectus muscle flap and sagittal mandibular ramus/coronoid process graft pedicled with temporalis muscle through the modified lateral lip-submandibular approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine patients suffering from maxillary defects secondary to maxillary cancer ablation, who underwent maxillary reconstruction using rectus femoris muscle flap and sagittal mandibular ramus/coronoid process graft pedicled with temporalis muscle, were enrolled into this study between November 2015 and August 2017.

RESULTS

All patients who underwent the maxillary reconstruction using femoris rectus muscle flap and sagittal mandibular ramus/coronoid process graft pedicled with temporalis muscle presented satisfactory postoperative function, with adequate mouth opening, optimal esthetic outcome and no restrictions on the diet. Every rectus femoris muscle flaps mucosalized well within five weeks. No donor site functional impairment or complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique is a feasible and acceptable technique for the maxillary reconstructions. It is safe, quick and simple to harvest. It also presents an optimal esthetic and satisfactory functional outcome with the advantage of low morbidity of the donor site. Combined with the three-dimension reconstruction, this technique can improve the postoperative outcomes.

Double free-flap for a bimalleolar defect of lower leg and ankle

Double free-flaps are necessary when tissue cover cannot be sufficed with a single flap. The other factors to be considered when using two free flaps for resurfacing of distal limb defects are the availability of more than one recipient vessel, the risk of distal limb ischaemia and the donor site morbidity of double flap harvest. If these factors are adequately addressed, double free-flaps can be safely executed for resurfacing distal limb defects with minimal morbidity. We report the simultaneous harvest and transfer of the anterolateral and anteromedial thigh flaps inset and vascularised as double free-flaps to resurface a large bimalleolar defect in a 14-year-old boy with no additional morbidity as compared to that of a single free tissue transfer.