Le Fort 1 osteotomy and calvarial bone grafting for severely resorbed maxillae

Pre-implant and implant management of oligodontia patients: A 10-year retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

the aim of this study was to report and assess the management and implant rehabilitation of oligodontia patients since its recognition in 2012 by french authorities in the nomenclature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study in the Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology Department of the Lille University Hospital between January 2012 and May 2022. Patients had to present an oligodontia recognized under the ALD31 in adulthood, and to have benefited from a pre-implant/implant surgical treatment in the unit.

RESULTS

a total of 106 patients were included in the study. The mean number of agenesis was 12 per patient. The most missing teeth are the ones at the end of the series. After a pre-implant surgery phase including orthognathic surgery and/or bone grafting, 97 patients benefited from implant placements. The mean age for this phase was 19.38. A total of 688 implants were placed. The median number of implants placed was 6 per patient and 5 patients presented implant failures after or during the osseointegration phase (16 implants lost). The implant success rate was 97.6%. 78 patients benefited from rehabilitations by fixed implant-supported prostheses and 3 by implant-supported mandibular removable prostheses.

DISCUSSION

The described care pathway seems to us adapted to the patients followed in our department, with good functional and esthetic results. It would be necessary to evaluate on a national scale to adapt the management process.

Surgical bone augmentation procedures for oral rehabilitation of patients with oligodontia: A review with a systematic approach

Oligodontia is a developmental dental anomaly defined by the absence of 6 or more permanent teeth, excluding the third molars. We performed a review with a systematic approach and proposed a guideline for the choice of the bone augmentation surgery. The different bone augmentation technique terms were searched in the PubMed and Science Direct database. Clinical studies were eligible if they reported on pre-implant surgery in patients with oligodontia. The database search yielded 400 studies after duplicates removed. Thirty studies were finally included, involving 410 patients. Sixty-three sinus lifts were performed in 37 patients with no failure. Thirteen out of 33 patients with iliac bone transplantation and two out of 24 with parietal bone transplantation had resorption, one out of 4 patients who received allogeneic bone block had complete failure. Seventy-eight patients underwent guided bone regeneration, none had bone loss. No failure was found with the alveolar distraction osteogenesis technique. Four out of thirteen patients developed permanent hypoesthesia after inferior alveolar nerve transposition. The cumulative implant survival rate was 94.4% after bone augmentation procedures. Extensive edentulous areas should be grafted with parietal bone, as iliac grafts present a greater risk of resorption. Smaller edentulous areas should be treated by endobuccal harvesting or guided bone regeneration. Osteogenesis distraction and nerve transposition are effective surgeries for medium-to-large mandibular edentulous spaces. The implant survival rate is not significantly different between implants placed in grafted and nongrafted bone, the appropriate choice of bone augmentation technique can reduce the risk of peri‑implant bone resorption.

Autogenous bone grafting with conventional implants vs zygomatic implants for atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study of the oral health-related quality of life

INTRODUCTION

Autogenous bone grafting (ABG)-combined or not with Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO)-and zygomatic implants (ZI) are two reliable techniques for the fixed rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. ZI allow a reduced treatment duration with no need to graft, immediate loading and in principle less morbidity. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare these two protocols on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). We also discussed implant and prosthetic survival rates, and biological complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients who benefited from ZI or ABG with conventional implants (CI) for a fixed maxillary rehabilitation, from November 2011 to April 2019, were included: 21 patients in the ABG group and 22 in the ZI group. OHRQoL was evaluated postoperatively by OHIP-14 questionnaire.

RESULTS

OHIP-14 median scores were respectively 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-13.0) and 6.0 (IQR 3.0-10.0) without significant difference (p = 0.97). Implant/prosthetic survival rates were 97.9%/100% and 97.1%/95.5%. Biological complications rates were 33.3% and 36.4% without significant difference (p = 0.83).

DISCUSSION

The type of surgery or prosthesis does not seem to affect final OHRQoL, implant and prosthetic survival rates or biological complications rates.

Management of sinus graft infection-a systematic review

Sinus graft infections are rare but serious complications, as they are associated with significant morbidity and sinus graft loss. The aim of this study was to systematically review the management of sinus graft infection in order to define which protocols should be implemented. The terms searched in each database were "sinus graft infection management", "maxillary sinus lift infection", "maxillary sinus graft infection", "maxillary sinus elevation infection", and "maxillary sinus augmentation infection". The management of the sinus graft infection was assessed. The outcomes evaluated were maxillary sinus health and dental implantation results. The initial search yielded 1190 results. Eighteen articles were included, reporting a total of 3319 patients and 217 sinus graft infections. Drainage was performed with an intraoral approach in 13 studies, an endoscopic approach in two studies, and a combined approach in three studies. In every study, a disease-free sinus was finally obtained in all patients, but the outcomes of the graft and the dental implant were more varied. It is not possible to define the best treatment protocol for sinus graft infections based on the published data, since the level of evidence is poor. Management is very heterogeneous. This review highlights the necessity of surgical treatment associated with antibiotic therapy.

Implant repositioning with segmental osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to assess a pioneering technique for atrophic premaxilla restoration. The objective is to reposition an implant reconstruction zone into a position both anatomically and physiologically suitable for occlusal function. Indeed, unlike the other few articles published on the correctional osteotomy of the implant in an inadequate situation, we have planned here an initially «unsuitable» insertion in order to benefit of the available bone mass.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

3 patients aged 14-20 years old (1 woman and 2 men) were operated on at the maxillo-facial department of Lille 2 University Hospital for partial implant-prosthetic rehabilitation on atrophic maxillary and/or mandibular sector. 13 implants were seated (85% in the maxilla) in the native bone then moved subsequently by segmental osteotomy.

RESULTS

The patients were assessed both clinically and radiologically according to the functional and aesthetic criteria of implant-prosthetic restoration. Functionally, a biomechanically favourable implant/number of teeth ratio (80%) was achieved, with consistent occlusal relationships (centric positioning of the midline point and absence of crossbite) in 100% of cases. Aesthetically, the screw access hole is systematically non-apparent (100%) but has a prosthetically substituted reduced gingivo-alveolar architecture.

DISCUSSION

These observations suggest that implant repositioning with segmental osteotomy allows for atrophic premaxilla restoration in implanted bone volume whatever the initial angulation. Peri-implant aesthetic difficulties are not specific to the technique suggested here but are quite common to all premaxilla reconstruction techniques. Lastly, this group of three patients is not enough to be conclusive, and a larger group would be necessary to validate this type of management.

Zygomatic implant penetration to the central portion of orbit: a case report

Background

Zygomatic implants have been proposed in literature for atrophic maxillary fixed oral rehabilitations. The aim of the present research was to evaluate, by a clinical and tomography assessment, a surgical complication of a zygomatic implant penetration to the orbit.

Case presentation

A 56 year-old female patient was visited for pain and swelling in the left orbit after a zygomatic implant protocol. The orbit invasion of the zygomatic implant screw was confirmed by the CBCT scan. The patient was treated for surgical implant removal and the peri- and post-operative symptoms were assessed. No neurological complications were reported at the follow-up. The ocular motility and the visual acuity were well maintained. No purulent secretion or inflammatory evidence were reported in the post-operative healing phases.

Conclusion

The penetration of the orbit during a zygomatic implant positioning is a surgical complication that could compromise the sight and movements of the eye. In the present case report, a zygomatic implant removal resulted in an uneventful healing phase with recovery of the eye functions.

Staged autogenous calvarial bone grafting and dental implants placement in the management of oligodontia: a retrospective study of 20 patients over a 12-year period

Oligodontia demands multidisciplinary management due to its repercussions on dentofacial growth. To place implants to realize implant-borne fixed denture, preimplant surgery may be necessary if bone volumes are insufficient. Our aim was to assess bone increase following autogenic bone grafting and to discuss prosthetic options. Twenty patients followed for oligodontia, who underwent bone grafting, were treated from 2008 to 2019. Transversal and vertical bone levels were measured pre- and postoperatively to assess alveolar ridge augmentation. Mean horizontal grafting increase was 4.60 mm [standard deviation (SD) 0.79 mm], mean sinus lift increase was 9.95 mm (SD 2.35 mm). Mean implants placed per patient was 9, mean implants placed on grafted site was 5 per patient. Overall implant survival rate was 100%. All patients benefited from prosthetic procedures when it was planned to perform implant-borne fixed dentures. Within the framework of a complete treatment plan (involving paediatric dentistry, dentofacial orthopaedics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and prosthodontics), autologous bone grafting combined or not with orthognathic surgery is fully adapted to patients with oligodontia. It allows reconstruction of favourable bone volumes for placement of implants to realize implant-borne fixed dentures, with high implant survival rates and great improvements to quality of life.

Rehabilitation of an Extremely Edentulous Atrophic Maxilla with a Pseudoskeletal Class III Relationship

The skeletal class III relationship presents complex dentoalveolar problems, requiring multidisciplinary treatment. In edentulous people, severe atrophy of the jawbone simulates the clinical appearance of a skeletal class III relationship (pseudoskeletal class III), which presents major problems for rehabilitation. This article describes the rehabilitation of a 67-year-old patient with a pseudoskeletal class III relationship. The mandible was restored with two implant-supported bar-retained overdentures using clips for retention. The extremely atrophic maxilla was restored with a combination of sinus augmentation, implant placement, and classic prosthodontic treatment using an electroformed mesostructured overdenture with swivel lock attachments on an implant-supported bar. By performing minimal augmentative and implant surgeries and using the possibilities and advantages of classic prosthetic dentistry, the clinical situation described here could be managed and the atrophic maxilla could be rehabilitated.