Comparison between patient specific implants and conventional mini-plates in Le Fort I osteotomy with regard to infections: No differences in up to 3-year follow-up

Skeletal stability after mandible bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - comparison of patient-specific implant and mini-plate fixation: A retrospective study

The aim of the study was to compare the stability of the virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design accompanied by patient-specific implants (PSIs) and conventional mini-plates in mandible advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). This retrospective study evaluates the clinical and cephalometric records of 53 patients (12 male, 41 female) treated with BSSO in Helsinki University Hospital. Subjects were divided into two groups: VSP-PSI (21 patients: 4 male and 17 female; mean age 38 years, range 25-53 years); and conventional wafer-based repositioning with mini-plate fixation (32 patients: 8 male and 24 female; mean age 39 years, range 21-56 years). The effect of the amount and direction of the advancement on the stability was also analysed individually. The standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs in three time points were analysed to compare the groups. After surgery (T2), there were no differences between groups in cephalometric variables. During follow-up (T2-T3), the cephalometric variables in both Groups A and B were stable, so there was no difference in stability between the VSP-PSI and the conventional mini-plate groups. During follow-up, the mandibles rotated clockwise or counterclockwise, relapsed towards their original direction, and the changes were statistically significant (jaw relationship; p = 0.018, soft tissue profile; p = 0.025); when the advancement of mandible was >6 mm, the increase in gonial angle compared to mandibles advanced ≤6 mm was statistically significant (p = 0.03). VSP-PSI and conventional mini-plate fixation can be considered equally stable. Large advancements with counterclockwise rotation regardless of fixation method are more susceptible to relapse. VSP-PSI alone cannot solve the relapse-related concerns in mandible osteotomy.

3D Printing Applications for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction: A Sweeping Review

The field of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery is rich in pathological diversity and broad in the ages that it treats. Moreover, the CMF skeleton is a complex confluence of sensory organs and hard and soft tissue with load-bearing demands that can change within millimeters. Computer-aided design (CAD) and additive manufacturing (AM) create extraordinary opportunities to repair the infinite array of craniomaxillofacial defects that exist because of the aforementioned circumstances. 3D printed scaffolds have the potential to serve as a comparable if not superior alternative to the "gold standard" autologous graft. In vitro and in vivo studies continue to investigate the optimal 3D printed scaffold design and composition to foster bone regeneration that is suited to the unique biological and mechanical environment of each CMF defect. Furthermore, 3D printed fixation devices serve as a patient-specific alternative to those that are available off-the-shelf with an opportunity to reduce operative time and optimize fit. Similar benefits have been found to apply to 3D printed anatomical models and surgical guides for preoperative or intraoperative use. Creation and implementation of these devices requires extensive preclinical and clinical research, novel manufacturing capabilities, and strict regulatory oversight. Researchers, manufacturers, CMF surgeons, and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are working in tandem to further the development of such technology within their respective domains, all with a mutual goal to deliver safe, effective, cost-efficient, and patient-specific CMF care. This manuscript reviews FDA regulatory status, 3D printing techniques, biomaterials, and sterilization procedures suitable for 3D printed devices of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. It also seeks to discuss recent clinical applications, economic feasibility, and future directions of this novel technology. By reviewing the current state of 3D printing in CMF surgery, we hope to gain a better understanding of its impact and in turn identify opportunities to further the development of patient-specific surgical care.

Early experience of wafer-free Le Fort I osteotomy with patient-specific implants in cleft lip and palate patients

PURPOSE

The use of virtual surgical planning and patient-specific saw and drill guides combined with customized osteosynthesis is becoming a gold standard in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study is to report preliminary results of the use of virtual surgical planning and the wafer-free PSI technique in cleft patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient-specific saw and drill guides combined with milled patient-specific 3D titanium alloy implants were used in reposition and fixation in Le Fort I osteotomy of 12 cleft patients. Surgical information was retrieved from hospital records. Pre- and post-operative lateral cephalograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 10 of 12 cases, the implants fitted as planned to predesigned drill holes and bone contours with high precision. In one patient, the mobilization of the maxilla was too demanding for virtually planned advancement, and the implants could not be used. In another patient, PSI fitting was impaired due to an insufficient mobilization of maxilla and tension on PSI fixation with screws. After the surgery, the mean advancement of the anterior maxilla (point A) of all patients was 5.8 mm horizontally (range 2.7-10.1) and -3.1 mm vertically (range -9.2 to 3.4). Skeletal relationships of the maxilla and mandible could be corrected successfully in all patients except for the one whose PSI could not be used.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual surgical planning combined with PSI is a possible useful clinical adjunct for the correction of maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Large maxillary advancements and scarring may be cause problems for desired advancement and for the use of implants.

Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Planning using Three-dimensional Virtual Techniques compared with Conventional Two-dimensional Techniques: a Systematic Review

Objectives

The objective was to assess the accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning using three-dimensional virtual planning compared with conventional two-dimensional planning.

Material and Methods

MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search combined with hand-search of relevant journals was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English through August 2^nd, 2022. Primary outcomes included postsurgical accuracy of hard and soft tissue. Secondary outcomes included treatment planning time, intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, financial expenses, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Quality and risk-of-bias assessment were evaluated by Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE system.

Results

Seven RCTs characterised by low, high, and unclear risk of bias fulfilled inclusion criteria. Included studies disclosed conflicting results regarding accuracy of hard and soft tissue as well as treatment planning time. The intraoperative time was shortened, and financial expenses were increased with three-dimensional virtual surgical planning (TVSP), while no planning-related complications were revealed. Comparable improvement in PROMs were reported with TVSP and two-dimensional planning.

Conclusions

Future orthognathic surgical planning will indisputable be performed by three-dimensional virtual planning. The financial expenses, treatment planning time, and intraoperative time will therefore probably decrease due to further development of three-dimensional virtual planning techniques. The hard and soft tissue accuracy between planned position and achieved surgical outcome seems to be improved by three-dimensional virtual planning compared with two-dimensional planning, although results are inconsistent. Further development of three-dimensional virtual planning involving cutting guides and patient-specific osteosynthesis plates are therefore needed to improve the accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning.

Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties

This study investigated two of the most commonly used CAD–CAM materials for patient-specific reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The aim of this study was to access the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli on titanium and PEEK medical implant materials. Two titanium specimens (titanium grade 2 tooled with a Planmeca CAD–CAM milling device and titanium grade 5 tooled with a computer-aided design direct metal laser sintering device (CAD-DMLS)) and one PEEK specimen tooled with a Planmeca CAD–CAM milling device were studied. Bacterial adhesion on implants was evaluated in two groups (saliva-treated group and non-saliva-treated group) to imitate intraoral and extraoral surgical routes for implant placement. The PEEK medical implant material showed higher bacterial adhesion by S. aureus, S. mutans, and E. coli than titanium grade 2 and titanium grade 5, whereas E. faecalis showed higher adhesion to titanium as compared to PEEK. Saliva contamination of implants also effected bacterial attachment. Salivary coating enhanced biofilm formation by S. aureus, S. mutans, and E. faecalis. In conclusion, our findings imply that regardless of the implant material type or tooling techniques used, salivary coating plays a vital role in bacterial adhesion. In addition, the majority of the bacterial strains showed higher adhesion to PEEK than titanium.

Peri- and postoperative complications in Le Fort I osteotomies

This retrospective study was performed to report the peri- and postoperative complications encountered by patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy, as well as predictor variables affecting the risk of complications. Patients who underwent only Le Fort I osteotomy were included in the study. Information on peri- and postoperative complications were collected from the patient data records. The effects of certain predictor variables on complication rates were also studied. Twenty-four per cent of the patients suffered from complications, six (6.1%) of whom were reoperated. Most of the complications were minor and transient. Compared with one-piece osteotomy, segmental osteotomy was a significant risk factor predisposing patients to postoperative complications (p = 0.04619). Additionally, the use of patient-specific implants seemed to increase the risk of both perioperative and postoperative complications (p = 0.0248). Currently, the conventional plate fixation method is the primary method in Le Fort I osteotomies. Careful patient selection, surgical planning, and selection of surgical technique seem to be the most important factors in reducing the complication risk. Special attention should be paid with segmental osteotomy surgery.

Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction in Congenital Craniofacial Deformities

ABSTRACT

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction with alloplastic prosthesis is a commonly performed procedure, which can be used as a treatment for improving pathologic conditions affecting the TMJ. Depending of the severity of the condition, the patient's ability to eat can be impaired, which in turn can affect their quality of life. Several syndromes can affect the patient's facial features, and some of those also affect TMJ's. Use of alloplastic prosthesis in TMJ's affecting syndromes, by means of correcting TMJ conditions and mandibular deformities, is still rather uncommon. Purpose of our study is to review the use TMJ total prosthesis as a treatment modality for correcting TMJ conditions and the reconstruction of mandibular deformities in congenital syndromes affecting the facial features. This study consists of a retrospective cohort of patients treated with TMJ reconstruction with alloplastic prosthesis at the Helsinki University Hospital during the past decade. All subjects with congenital syndrome who underwent TMJ reconstruction were included the study. The cohort consisted of seven patients and ten joints treated. Temporomandibular joints affecting syndromes were Goldenhar syndrome, hemifacial macrosomia, Nager syndrome, and Treacher-Collins syndrome. The majority of the patients have had several previous operative treatments on the facial skeleton during their childhood, which in turn probably affected and compromised the TMJ surgery outcome. Mouth opening was sufficiently achieved as average maximal opening was 34 mm (range 24-42 mm) postoperatively. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction with alloplastic prosthesis can offer new tools and approaches for treatment of facial deformities in syndromes with craniofacial abnormalities. Impaired jaw functions and asymmetry can be addressed with the use of alloplastic prostheses, achieving sufficient mouth opening and restoring the symmetry of the lower facial skeleton.

Biofunctional Glycol-Modified Polyethylene Terephthalate and Thermoplastic Polyurethane Implants by Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing for Medical 3D Maxillofacial Defect Reconstruction

This work addresses the topic of extrusion-based additive manufacturing (filament-based material extrusion) of patient-specific biofunctional maxillofacial implants. The technical approach was chosen to overcome the shortcomings of medically established fabrication processes such as a limited availability of materials or long manufacturing times. The goal of the work was a successful fabrication of basic implants for defect reconstruction. The underlying vision is the implants' clinic-internal and operation-accompanying application. Following a literature search, a material selection was conducted. Digitally prepared three-dimensional (3D) models dealing with two representative mandible bone defects were printed based on the material selection. An ex-vivo model of the implant environment evaluated dimensional and fitting traits of the implants. Glycol-modified PET (PETG) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) were finally selected. These plastics had high cell acceptance, good mechanical properties, and optimal printability. The subsequent fabrication process yielded two different implant strategies: the standard implant made of PETG with a build-up rate of approximately 10 g/h, and the biofunctional performance implant with a TPU shell and a PETG core with a build-up rate of approximately 4 g/h. The standard implant is meant to be intraoperatively applied, as the print time is below three hours even for larger skull defects. Standard implants proved to be well fitting, mechanically stable and cleanly printed. In addition, the hybrid implant showed particularly cell-friendly behavior due to the chemical constitution of the TPU shell and great impact stability because of the crack-absorbing TPU/PETG combination. This biofunctional constellation could be used in specific reconstructive patient cases and is suitable for pre-operative manufacturing based on radiological image scans of the defect. In summary, filament-based material extrusion has been identified as a suitable manufacturing method for personalized implants in the maxillofacial area. A further clinical and mechanical study is recommended.

CAD/CAM Engineered Patient-Specific Impants as a Reposition Device in Le Fort I and Modified Subcondylar Osteotomies: Case Report of Facial Deformity Correction in Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a medical condition where elevated growth hormone or insulin-like growth factor I levels cause several changes in the craniofacial soft and hard features. We report the correction of facial deformity and posterior open bite with Le Fort I and modified subcondylar osteotomies in a patient affected by acromegaly. Computer-aided design and manufacturing generated saw and drill guides were used to perform osteotomies and segment removal. The placement of the patient-specific implants (PSIs) was guided by predesigned drill holes ensuring the required and planned movement of the jaws and position of the PSIs. After segment removal, the PSIs fitted the predesigned drill holes with high precision and were secured without problems. The planned amount of mandibular and maxillary movement was achieved. The occlusion and osteotomies remained stable for the follow-up of 22 months. The use of PSIs combined with guided surgery can be beneficial for selected cases with asymmetry or posterior open bite enabling new approaches and yielding good functional and aesthetic outcome. The modification of conventional ramus osteotomy combined with utilization of ramus segment removal and the use of PSI for reposition is an interesting and promising technique for rare conditions with ramus height asymmetry.

No differences in infections between patient-specific implants and conventional mini-plates in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - Up to 3-year follow-up

The use of individually designed osteotomies, combined with individually manufactured osteosynthesis material, is rapidly becoming a standard for more challenging maxillofacial surgery. The benefits of patient-specific implants (PSI) in orthognathic surgery are clear in complex cases. PSIs can enhance precision and ease up the surgical protocol. We previously reported on the benefits of PSIs as reposition and fixation systems during Le Fort I osteotomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate a cohort of 28 patients, treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and PSIs for fixation, with regard to healing for up to 3 years. A retrospective cohort of 48 patients with conventional mini-plate repositioned mandibles was also collected for statistical analysis. No statistically significant differences were found with regard to infection, soft tissue problems, or reoperations between these two groups.