Patient experience and satisfaction of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and mandibular midline distraction

A Phenomenological Study on Patients' Experiences With Extraction Retraction Orthodontic Regret

Background Extraction retraction orthodontic (ERO) practices are commonly used to treat every malocclusion. Occasionally, patients express dissatisfaction over the previous ERO treatment. This study investigates the experience of those who have had ERO intervention and expressed regret or dissatisfaction with this treatment. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who have expressed regret over past ERO treatment. Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to derive themes from transcripts. Results Eleven participants were recruited, who gave informed consent and participated in the semi-structured interview process. Six major themes were identified through IPA: "ERO Treatment Course", "Lack of Informed Consent", "Ocean of Grief and Trauma" to describe the overall patient emotional experience, "Multifaceted Health Complaints", "Finding Solutions and Coping Strategies", and "Wishing There Was a Better Way". Participants felt like they were not able to give informed consent for ERO due to a number of different reasons such as being too young, not being given accurate information on the risks, or being influenced parentally, culturally, or by the provider. Participants regret ERO due to a number of multifaceted health complaints, including but not limited to sleep breathing disorders, craniofacial pain patterns, neuropsychobehavioural symptoms, and negative aesthetic outcomes that they believe result from ERO. Conclusion Patient regret following extraction retraction orthodontics is due to a lack of informed consent and negative health and aesthetic effects. To prevent this regret, future research and practice direction should focus on improving the informed consent process, promoting optimal dentofacial development and non-extraction-retraction therapies.

Hybrid mandibular Bologna midline distractor in combination with surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion for transverse facial expansion: clinical and cephalometric results

Transverse maxillomandibular hypoplasia can be treated with surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) in association with mandibular symphyseal distraction (MSD). This paper introduces a hybrid mandibular Bologna midline distractor (BMD); the effectiveness of the distractor in combination with SARME for the treatment of transverse skeletal deficiency was evaluated. This two-centre study included 10 patients with a transverse arch width deficit>7 mm and dental crowding, in both the maxilla and mandible, treated with SARME and MSD. The study design was partly retrospective (seven patients) and partly prospective (three patients). Frontal and lateral cephalometric analyses, as well as measurements on dental models, were performed at three different times: before treatment, after the distraction, and 6 months after postoperative orthodontic treatment. The cephalometric analyses and measurements on dental impressions confirmed a balanced and stable skeletal and dental mandibular expansion. An average symphyseal expansion of 7.8 mm was obtained, resolving dental crowding without dental extractions. In conclusion, mandibular expansion performed with the BMD in combination with SARME appears to be a viable surgical approach to transverse maxillomandibular hypoplasia. This technique allows the surgeon to obtain a balanced skeletal and dental expansion, with a low level of relapse.

Three-dimensional dento-skeletal effects of mandibular midline distraction and surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: A retrospective study

It was the aim of the study to provide a three-dimensional evaluation of dento-skeletal effects following bone-borne vs tooth-borne mandibular midline distraction (MMD) and tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). A retrospective observational study was conducted. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) records were taken pre-operatively (T1), immediately post-distraction (T2) and 1 year post-operatively (T3). All included 30 patients had undergone MMD (20 bone-borne MMD; 10 tooth-borne MMD). A total of 20 bone-borne MMD and 8 tooth-borne MMD patients had simultaneously undergone tooth-borne SARME. At T1 vs T3, canine (p = 0.007; 26.0 ± 2.09 vs 29.2 ± 2.02) and first premolar (p = 0.005; 33.8 ± 2.70 vs 37.0 ± 2.43) showed significant expansion on the tip level for tooth-borne MMD. This was no significant on the apex level, indicating tipping. Bone-borne MMD showed a parallel distraction gap, whereas tooth-borne MMD showed a V-shape. There was a significant (p = 0.017; 138 ± 17.8 vs 141 ± 18.2) inter-condylar axes increase for bone-borne MMD. In conclusion, bone-borne vs tooth-borne MMD and tooth-borne SARME showed stable dento-skeletal effects at 1 year post-operatively. Bone-borne and tooth-borne MMD seemed not to be superior to each other. The choice of distractor type therefore depends more on anatomical and comfort factors.

Three-dimensional dentoskeletal changes following minimally invasive surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a prospective study

Dentoskeletal changes in minimally invasive surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) were evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This was a prospective study of 30 patients who underwent minimally invasive SARPE performed under local anaesthesia plus sedation by the same surgeon, in an ambulatory setting. Pre- and postoperative CBCT images were obtained for each patient. A statistically significant increase in the linear transverse dimensions of the maxilla occurred systematically. In the canine region, a mean increase of 5.84 mm occurred at the apex level and 7.82 mm at the crown level. These dimensions were 4.83 mm and 7.68 mm, respectively, in the molar region. The cross-sectional area of the maxilla increased by a mean 12.9 mm² at the palate level and 23.3 mm² at the crown level. Dental inclination to the buccal aspect was detected (mean 6.1° at the canines and 8.4° at the first molars). The alveolar process tipped buccally 10° at the molar level. Nasal width increased a mean of 3.0 mm at the canine level. Through a three-dimensional analysis, this study found that minimally invasive SARPE was effective in the correction of transverse maxillary discrepancies> 5 mm in non-growing patients. Although dental inclination to the buccal aspect occurred, significant expansion of the maxilla at the skeletal and dentoalveolar levels was confirmed.

Non-Surgical Transversal Dentoalveolar Compensation with Completely Customized Lingual Appliances versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion in Adults-The Amount of Posterior Crossbite Correction

The aim of this study was to compare the crossbite correction of a group (n = 43; f/m 19/24; mean age 27.6 ± 9.5 years) with surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) versus a non-surgical transversal dentoalveolar compensation (DC) group (n = 38; f/m 25/13; mean age 30.4 ± 12.9 years) with completely customized lingual appliances (CCLA). Arch width was measured on digital models at the canines (C), second premolars (P2), first molars (M1) and second molars (M2). Measurements were obtained before treatment (T0) and at the end of lingual treatment (T1) or after orthodontic alignment prior to a second surgical intervention for three-dimensional bite correction. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the amount of total crossbite correction between the SARPE and DC-CCLA group at C, P2, M1 and M2. Maxillary expansion was greater in the SARPE group and mandibular compression was greater in the DC-CCLA group. Crossbite correction in the DC-CCLA group was mainly a combination of maxillary expansion and mandibular compression. Dentoalveolar compensation with CCLAs as a combination of maxillary expansion and mandibular compression seems to be a clinically effective procedure to correct a transverse maxillo-mandibular discrepancy without the need for surgical assistance.

Minimally invasive surgical and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MISMARPE) in adult patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate maxillary expansion, operative time and pain associated with a new minimally invasive surgical technique to treat maxillary hypoplasia in adult patients. Consecutive patients were included and prospectively analyzed. The technique consists in miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), minimally invasive approach to maxillary osteotomies, latency period and activation period until the desired expansion. The parameters evaluated included operative time, treatment-related pain by the visual analog scale (VAS), and transverse maxillary expansion. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of data distribution. A paired t-test was used to compare the data between T0 (preoperative) and T1 (postoperative - end of activation). The significance level was set at 5%. Eleven patients were included. Mean operative time was 24.11 min (14.4-32 min) and overall postoperative VAS score was 2.81 (0-9). A comparative analysis showed significant increases in maxillary width at the skeletal, alveolar, and dental levels (p < 0.0001 for all), with a mean range of 1.8 (SD 0.3) mm to 4.7 (SD 0.5) mm. The present minimally invasive surgical MARPE (MISMARPE) technique appears to yield good skeletal outcomes with minimal trauma. It might have potential for clinical use, but larger comparative studies are needed to confirm the clinical relevance of the approach.