Functional results of swallowing and aspiration after oral cancer treatment and microvascular free flap reconstruction: A retrospective observational assessment

Assessment of chewing and swallowing in post mandibular resection patients with no bony reconstruction - A cross sectional study

Introduction

The intricate process of chewing and swallowing is compromised following mandibular resection. An evaluation of chewing and swallowing is crucial to comprehend the quality of life following surgery in cases when bone repair was not performed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate chewing and swallowing in mandibulectomy patients without bony reconstruction.

Material and method

This study involved ten patients, including four with H defects, three with L defects, and three with LC defects, after a one-year postop period. Using Robbin's penetration aspiration scale, video fluoroscopy was used to evaluate swallowing. Using a functional oral intake scale, chewing was assessed. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Robbin's penetration aspiration scale score of 1 was noted in all 10 patients. According to FOIS, 50 % of patients with H defect scored 4, and 66.7 % of those with L defect scored 6. The results were not significant when the scores were correlated with the type of defect.

Conclusion

Mandibular surgical defects which were not reconstructed with bone were shown to affect the quality of life in our study. Chewing efficiency was poorest in patients with H defect. Swallowing efficiency was not affected adversely in this group of patients.

Articulatory-kinematic changes in speech following surgical treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Treatment for oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (O&OSCC) often leads to problems with speech articulation. Articulatory-kinematic data may be especially informative in designing new therapeutic approaches for individuals treated for these tumours.

AIMS

To provide a systematic review of the literature assessing the articulatory-kinematic consequences of oral and oropharyngeal cancer treatment.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo) were used to identify studies that used kinematic methods to characterize the speech of individuals treated for O&OSCC. Risk of bias was assessed using the critical appraisal checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were synthesized using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis guidelines.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

In total, 29 studies with a total of 197 individuals treated for O&OSCC were included. In most studies the risk of bias was moderate to high and certainty of evidence was very low to low. Results showed both global changes (i.e., reduced movement and increased asymmetry of the tongue) as well as more local changes (i.e., reduced palatal contact and more centralized productions of consonants) following treatment for O&OSCC. Generally, reported changes were related to tumour size and location. Smaller tumours resulted in better or more typical articulatory-kinematic speech outcomes. Articulatory movements were most reduced in the affected region of the tongue as compared with neighbouring parts. Study findings were limited to small sample sizes with generally minimal descriptions of patient characteristics. No study assessed the influence of primary radiation treatment or adjuvant radiation therapy on kinematic speech outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

Based on the literature to date, surgical treatment for O&OSCC seems to reduce articulatory-kinematics of speech, and post-treatment outcomes may be partially explained by tumour size and location. The absence of studies assessing the effect of primary or adjuvant radiation therapy on articulatory-kinematics limits our knowledge of how these interventions influence post-treatment kinematic speech outcomes. Future studies should provide detailed patient descriptions and develop standardized speech assessment tools in order to further our knowledge regarding articulatory-kinematic speech changes following treatment, and to move towards the development of active rehabilitation strategies for those with O&OSCC.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject Treatment for O&OSCC can result in problems with speech articulation. Speech outcomes for O&OSCC are highly variable. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge We systematically reviewed and synthesized the literature on articulatory-kinematic changes following O&OSCC treatment and identified 29 related studies. Treatment for O&OSCC resulted in global (i.e., more asymmetrical or reduced movement patterns) and local (i.e., reduced palatal contact) articulatory-kinematic changes. In general, smaller tumours resulted in better or more typical articulatory-kinematic speech outcomes as compared with larger tumours. Articulatory movements were most reduced in the affected region of the tongue as compared with neighbouring parts. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Understanding articulatory-kinematic impacts of surgical intervention for O&OSCC can guide (the development of) tailored speech rehabilitation.

Effects of personalized oral exercises on swallowing function among patients with oral cancer after free flap transplantation: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Dysphagia is a common complication in patients with oral cancer who have undergone free flap transplantation. The aim of this cluster randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of personalized oral exercises on swallowing function in this group of patients. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 34) or control (n = 34) group. Intervention group patients received personalized oral exercises starting on day 6 after surgery. Swallowing function was evaluated on days 6 and 15, and at 1 month postoperative using the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability-Oral Cancer tool (MASA-OC). On day 15 and at 1 month after surgery, the total MASA-OC score (P = 0.003, P < 0.001) and the mouth opening (P = 0.001, P < 0.001) and lip seal (both P < 0.001) item scores showed a significantly greater improvement in the intervention group than in the control group. Moreover, the changes in salivation (P < 0.001) and tongue movement (P = 0.025) scores at 1 month after surgery were significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups in the change in tongue strength scores on day 15 or at 1 month postoperative (P = 0.476, P = 0.223). Personalized oral exercises can improve swallowing function in patients with oral cancer after free flap transplantation.

Clinical Experience with Autofluorescence Guided Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgery

In our study, the effect of the use of autofluorescence (Visually Enhanced Lesion Scope-VELscope) on increasing the success rate of surgical treatment in oral squamous carcinoma (OSCC) was investigated. Our hypothesis was tested on a group of 122 patients suffering from OSCC, randomized into a study and a control group enrolled in our study after meeting the inclusion criteria. The preoperative checkup via VELscope, accompanied by the marking of the range of a loss of fluorescence in the study group, was performed before the surgery. We developed a unique mucosal tattoo marking technique for this purpose. The histopathological results after surgical treatment, i.e., the margin status, were then compared. In the study group, we achieved pathological free margin (pFM) in 55 patients, pathological close margin (pCM) in 6 cases, and we encountered no cases of pathological positive margin (pPM) in the mucosal layer. In comparison, the control group results revealed pPM in 7 cases, pCM in 14 cases, and pFM in 40 of all cases in the mucosal layer. This study demonstrated that preoperative autofluorescence assessment of the mucosal surroundings of OSCC increased the ability to achieve pFM resection 4.8 times in terms of lateral margins.

Effects of personalized swallowing rehabilitation in patients with oral cancer after free flap transplantation: A cluster randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Dysphagia is a common and serious complication in patients with oral cancer after free flap transplantation (OC-FFT), which seriously affects their quality of life. Studies have found swallowing rehabilitation can improve the swallowing ability of these patients, but the studies have design deficiencies. This study's purpose was to test the effectiveness of personalized swallowing rehabilitation for this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cluster randomized, non-blind, controlled clinical trial. Participants were 68 OC-FFT patients randomly assigned to intervention (n = 34) or control (n = 34) groups. The control group received routine nursing and health education, while the intervention group received personalized swallowing rehabilitation twice a day for 10 days, based on the results of the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability-Oral Cancer (MASA-OC). On the 6th and 15th days and 1 month after the operation, MASA-OC scores and percentage weight loss were measured, and the removal time to nasogastric tube was also recorded. The quality of life was evaluated 1 month after the operation.

RESULTS

On day 15 and 1 month after the operation, MASA-OC scores were higher and the percentage weight loss was lower in the intervention group than the control group (P < 0.05). The removal time of the nasogastric tube was shorter (P < 0.05), and the quality of life at 1 month was better in the intervention group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Personalized swallowing rehabilitation can improve patients' swallowing after OC-FFT, promote the early removal of the nasogastric tube, and improve nutritional status and quality of life.

Quality of Life and Aesthetic Satisfaction in Patients Who Underwent the “Commando Operation” with Pectoralis Major Myocutaneus Flap Reconstruction—A Case Series Study

The “commando operation” is an extensive surgical procedure used to treat patients with oral squamous carcinoma and metastasis in the cervical lymph nodes. While the procedure can be curative, it is also very mutilating, which consequently has a major impact on the patient’s quality of life. Several studies showed that the procedure is associated with loss of certain functions, such as impairments in speech, chewing, swallowing, and loss of taste and appetite. Furthermore, some of these impairments and their degree depend on the reconstruction method. However, the data regarding the functional impairments and aesthetic results in patients who underwent the “commando operation” along with the pectoralis major myocutaneus flap reconstruction are still inconclusive. This study included 34 patients that underwent partial glossectomy, ipsilateral modified radical neck dissection, pectoralis major myocutaneus flap reconstruction, and adjuvant radiotherapy. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate aesthetical results and functional impairments as well as to grade the level of satisfaction with the functional and aesthetic outcomes both by the patients and by the operator. Most of the patients stated that their speech (N = 33; 97%) and salivation (N = 32; 94.2%) severely changed after the operation and that they cannot chew (N = 33; 97%) and swallow (N = 33; 97%) the same as before the operation. Moreover, almost half of the patients (N = 16; 47%) reported that they have severe sleep impairments. However, only few of the included patients stated that they sought professional help regarding the speech (N = 4; 11.7%), eating (N = 5; 14.7%), and sleeping (N = 4; 11.7%) disturbances. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between the operator and the patients in the subjective assessment of the aesthetic results (p = 0.047), as operators gave significantly better grades. Our results imply that this procedure and reconstructive method possibly cause impairments that have an impact on the patients’ wellbeing. Moreover, our outcomes also suggest that patients should be educated and rehabilitated after the “commando operation” since most of them were reluctant to seek professional help regarding their impairments. Lastly, sleep deficiency, which was observed after the procedure, should be further explored.

Examination of Suprahyoid Muscle Resection and Other Factors Affecting Swallowing Function in Patients With Advanced Oral Cancer After Surgical Resection and Reconstruction

Dysphagia is one of the most common adverse effects associated with oral cancer therapy and could greatly impair postoperative quality of life. The objective of this study was to analyze postoperative swallowing outcomes and factors influencing postoperative swallowing function in patients with advanced oral cancer who underwent primary reconstruction after surgical resection to identify patients at risk of experiencing severe dysphagia after immediate reconstruction of surgical defects, and to determine an ideal approach to provide appropriate perioperative interventions. The swallowing status was evaluated at 4 week postoperatively using the Functional Oral Intake Scale. We also analyzed the effects of patient, tumor, surgical, and other factors on postoperative swallowing function. The study included 67 patients. At 4 weeks postoperatively, 11 patients showed reduced swallowing function, whereas 56 patients showed good swallowing function. The number of resected suprahyoid muscles (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.32; P=0.035) was an independent factor influencing postoperative swallowing function. Thus, among patients who underwent radical resection of oral cancer with primary reconstruction, those with extensive resection of the suprahyoid muscles were at higher risk of developing postoperative dysphagia. These findings are expected to facilitate increased vigilance for dysphagia, better counseling, and appropriate rehabilitation interventions.