Experiences of patients with haemorrhoidal disease – a qualitative study

Exploring factors impacting patient decisions in hemorrhoid surgery: A questionnaire survey in Taiwan

Background

Minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgeries like Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DGHAL) and Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH) offer benefits over traditional methods. This study investigated public perceptions and attitudes towards these surgeries, exploring awareness, preferences, and influencing factors.

Methods

A detailed questionnaire was disseminated to 2011 participants from various regions of Taiwan in December 2023, gathering data on demographics, understanding of minimally invasive surgery, and attitudes towards hemorrhoid surgery. Chi-square tests were used for analysis (p < 0.05).

Results

Hemorrhoid prevalence was similar across sexes and age groups. About 70 % preferred medical centers or district hospitals for surgery. Postoperative complications were a primary concern, with significant sex differences. Approximately 70 % preferred minimally invasive surgery if costs were below NT$50,000. Medical personnel showed higher awareness of minimally invasive surgery benefits. Most participants relied on personal networks and medical social media for information.

Conclusions

The study revealed generally positive perceptions of minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery, with cost being a significant factor. Knowledge gaps exist, particularly among non-medical personnel. Future initiatives should aim to enhance public awareness of minimally invasive surgery benefits, and policy considerations should address financial aspects of healthcare decisions.

Proctological disorders: psychometrics assessment of personality features and clinical evaluation

Patients with gastrointestinal diseases have been shown to report greater stress, anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive characteristics. The aim of our study is to investigate personality characteristics and general distress of adult patients suffering from common coloproctological conditions. We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients aged 18 years or older, with diagnosis of haemorrhoidal disease (HD group) or anal fissure (AF group). The final sample was composed of 64 participants, who were asked to complete a battery of questionnaires. They were compared with a control group of healthy volunteers. In terms of general distress, HD group scored higher than both the CG and AF groups. The two proctological groups had higher scores in neuroticism/emotional lability compared to the CG group. In the MOCQ-R scale (obsessive-compulsive tendency), HD group had significantly higher scores compared to the CG group in the total score (p < 0.01,) and also scored higher in the doubting/ruminating subscale compared to the AF group. We support the importance of taking a multidisciplinary perspective and incorporating psychometric tools to assess the psychological and personality dimensions of patients into proctological clinical practice. The correct early evaluation and management of these conditions may result in an improvement in patients' quality of life and better response to treatment.

English translation and cross-cultural validation of the patient-reported outcome measurement-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS)

AIM

The aim of this study was to translate the Dutch patient-reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS) to English and perform a cross-cultural validation.

METHOD

The ISPOR good practice guidelines for the cross-cultural validation of PROMs were followed and included two steps: (1) Two forward and two backward translations. The forward translation concerned the translation from the source language (Dutch) to the target language (English), performed by two independent English speakers, one medical doctor and one nonmedical. Subsequently, a discussion about discrepancies in the reconciled version was performed by a stakeholder group. (2) Cognitive interviews were held with patients with haemorrhoidal disease (HD), probing the comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the PROM-HISS.

RESULTS

Discrepancies in the reconciled forward translation concerned the terminology of HD symptoms. Furthermore, special attention was paid to the response options, ranging from "not at all", indicating minor symptoms, to "a lot", implying many symptoms. Consensus among the stakeholder group about the final version of the translated PROM-HISS was reached. Interviews were conducted with 10 native English-speaking HD patients (30% female), with a mean age of 44 years (24-83) and primarily diagnosed with grade II HD (80%). The mean time to complete the PROM-HISS was 1 min 43 s. Patients showed a good understanding of the questions and response options, found all items relevant and did not miss important symptoms or topics.

CONCLUSION

The translated English language PROM-HISS is a valid tool to assess symptoms of HD, its impact on daily activities and patient satisfaction with HD treatment.

Patient reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS): Development, reliability and construct validity

AIM

Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a frequently occurring disorder with a significant negative impact on a patient's quality of life. Here, we describe the development and validation of the Dutch patient reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS).

METHODS

The development of the PROM-HISS followed recommended guidelines. Face and content validity, structural properties, reliability and construct validity were evaluated in a HD population. Reliability was tested by assessing the test-retest reliability, defined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and internal consistency measured with Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and hypotheses testing.

RESULTS

The PROM-HISS consists of three domains: (1) HD symptoms (blood loss; pain; prolapse; soiling; itching), (2) impact of symptoms on daily activities, and (3) satisfaction with treatment. The PROM-HISS showed good face and content validity. The PROM-HISS was completed by 102 patients (65% male), with a mean age of 58 years (23-81 years). The ICCs of the different items in the domain HD symptoms ranged between 0.56 and 0.79 and were interpreted as good. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.80 and considered satisfactory. The CFA provided further evidence for construct validity with a good model fit. A high score on the symptoms of HD correlated with a high impact of HD on daily activities (Pearson's r = 0.632, p < 0.01) and a low degree of satisfaction (Pearson's r = 0.378, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The PROM-HISS is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate symptoms of HD, impact on daily activities and satisfaction with treatment.

Making Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Haemorrhoidal Disease in Clinical Practice: A Perspective

Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) affects millions of people around the world and for most it is a recurring problem. Increasingly, clinicians broaden their focus on the patient's experiences with haemorrhoidal symptoms, including their impact on daily life. The patient's experience can be assessed using a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). A PROM facilitates a deeper understanding of the disease-burden and allows a clinician to obtain information directly from the patients about their experiences with the ailment. Over the last years, PROMs have shown their additional role to traditional outcomes for several diseases and have earned their place in the daily consultation room. In order to improve and personalize the treatment of HD, we endorse the use of validated PROMs in clinical care.

Symptom-based scoring for haemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review

AIM

Haemorrhoidal disease can severely affect a patient's quality of life. Its classification is commonly based on morphology of the degree of prolapse; however, this does not take into account the symptoms and impact on the quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the most appropriate instruments that classify the severity of disease according to symptoms.

METHOD

A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted in December 2019 to identify studies that described the validation of a haemorrhoidal symptom score. The measurement properties of the scoring systems were assessed based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews for patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 5288 articles were identified, with five articles included. Three studies developed a scoring system based on a set of core symptoms for a cohort of patients and validated the score against treatment outcomes. One study developed a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire based on symptoms to evaluate disease burden. One study combined both quality of life and symptom measures and tested measurement properties on two cohorts of patients. Only one study demonstrated satisfactory valid, reliable and responsive measurement criteria.

CONCLUSION

A single study demonstrated sufficient quality in measurement properties to be recommended for clinical use. Further studies in this area should utilize consensus-based standards for designing and reporting validation research to ensure that the appropriate evidence base is acquired if any further patient-reported outcome measures are to be recommended.