Speech outcomes following Sommerlad primary palatoplasty: Results of the Ghent University Hospital

Sommerlad-Furlow modified palatoplasty: A retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to introduce the surgical process of Sommerlad-Furlow modified (S-F) palatoplasty and compare its surgical and functional outcomes with conventional Sommerlad (S) palatoplasty. Patients with non-syndromic cleft palate who had undergone either S-F palatoplasty or S palatoplasty were retrospectively reviewed. Data on the outcomes of velopharyngeal function and postsurgical palatal fistula incidence were collected for all patients. Data for preselected factors, including gender, age at palatoplasty, and cleft type, were also collected. Chi-square tests were conducted. 1254 patients were included. The postsurgical velopharyngeal competence (VPC) rate after S-F palatoplasty was significantly higher than after S palatoplasty (total, 70.5% vs 57.9%, p < 0.0001; age ≤ 1, 87.0% vs 69.2%, p < 0.0001; 1 < age ≤ 2, 78.3% vs 69.3%, p = 0.0479). With regard to different types of cleft palate, the postsurgical VPC rates after S-F palatoplasty were all significantly higher than for S palatoplasty in all patients younger than 2 years of age (complete cleft palate, 78.7% vs 62.4%, p = 0.0016; hard and soft palate cleft, 84.4% vs 74.8%, p = 0.0172; submucosal cleft and soft palate cleft, 96.6% vs 68.4%, p = 0.0114). The postoperative fistula rate after S-F palatoplasty was 4.3%. This modified palatoplasty technique provided adequate cleft palate closure, with satisfactory speech outcomes and low fistula rates, while older age at palatoplasty may affect the postsurgical outcomes. Within the limitations of the study it seems that the Sommerlad-Furlow modified technique is an option for cleft palate repair.

Evolution of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgical Training in the UK: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Although the United Kingdom (UK) cleft surgeons follow a similar training pathway, and cleft centers adhere to similar protocols regarding the timing of palate surgery and surgical technique, speech outcomes still vary between centers.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the training experiences of consultant cleft lip and palate (CL/P) surgeons, performing a Sommerlad radical intravelar veloplasty (IVVP) and their approach to teaching others.

DESIGN

An exploratory, qualitative approach was adopted to understand the views of UK cleft surgeons performing a Sommerlad radical IVVP and discuss what was important during training and upon qualifying as a consultant.

METHOD

A semi-structured interview schedule was designed, interviews were conducted in-person or via videoconferencing, depending on preference and availability, with interested surgeons. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked for accuracy. Analysis involved inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen cleft consultants from the UK participated (3F:11M). Seven of the consultants were trained in plastic surgery and four in maxillofacial surgery. Seven themes were identified from the thematic analysis. Three themes, namely Learning to perform palate repair, Teaching others to perform palate repair, and Ongoing learning as a consultant are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleft palate repair is clearly a technically challenging procedure to learn and teach with the potential to cause harm if performed incorrectly. Positive changes have been made to improve exposure to palate surgery, encourage practice away from the patient, and increase supervised practical experience. The role of colleagues in providing mentorship and support appears invaluable. We provide some simple recommendations that may improve the training experience and ensure parity for all trainees.

Speech assessment following microsurgical soft palate repair

The aim of this study was to analyze speech intelligibility of children, who had undergone microsurgical soft palate repair according to Sommerlad. Cleft palate patients were treated by closure of the soft palate according to Sommerlad at about 6 months of age. At the age of 11, their speech was evaluated through automatic speech recognition. Word recognition rate (WR) was used as the outcome parameter of automatic speech recognition. To validate automatic speech results, an institute for speech therapy evaluated the speech samples for perceptual intelligibility. The results of this study group were compared to an age-matched control group. A total of 61 children were evaluated in this study, 29 in the study group and 32 in the control group. Study group patients had a lower word recognition rate (mean 43.03, SD 12.31) compared to the control group (mean 49.98, SD 12.54, p = 0.033). The magnitude of the difference was considered small (95% CI of the difference 0.6-13.3). The study group patients received significantly lower scores in the perceptual evaluation (mean 1.82, SD 0.58) compared to the control group mean (mean 1.51, SD 0.48, p = 0.028). Again, the magnitude of the difference was small (95% CI of the difference 0.03-0.57). Within the limitations of the study it seems that microsurgical soft palate repair according to Sommerlad at the age of 6 months might be a relevant alternative to other well established surgical techniques.

Compensatory Articulation Errors in Patients With Velopharyngeal Dysfunction and Palatal Anomalies

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and types of compensatory articulations (CAs) in nonsyndromic patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) and various palatal anomalies and to determine the relationship between the frequency of CAs, type of palatal anomaly, and phonological errors.

METHOD

A total of 783 nonsyndromic, Hebrew-speaking patients with VPD and various palatal anomalies (cleft lip and palate [CLP], cleft palate [CP], submucous CP [SMCP], occult submucous CP [OSMCP], or non-CP) were studied retrospectively. Perceptual VPD tests, including articulation and phonological assessment, were conducted. CAs were described as below the level of the defect in the vocal tract (abnormal backing of oral targets to post-uvular place) or in front of it within the oral cavity (palatalization) and at the velopharyngeal port.

RESULTS

Among 783 patients, 213 (27.2%) had CAs. Most CAs (18.4%) occurred below the level of the defect, followed by CAs at the velopharyngeal port (12.0%) or in front of it (4.9%). No differences were found in the frequency of CAs between patients with CP (47.8%) or CLP (52.6%) and between those with non-CP (13.6%) or OSMCP (14.7%). SMCP patients had lower frequency of CAs (29.8%) than CP (p = .003) and CLP (p =  .002) patients but higher frequency than OSMCP (p = .002) and non-CP (p =  .002) patients did. Among the 783 patients, 247 (31.5%) had phonological errors. A higher frequency of phonological errors was found in patients with CAs (55.4%) compared to those without (22.6%) and in all palatal anomaly groups except CLP (31.4% vs. 23.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

CAs in nonsyndromic patients with VPD remained relatively high in all age groups, up to adulthood. CAs are influenced by inadequate velar length following palatal repair, as well as by oral structural abnormalities, whereas poor muscle function due to OSMCP and/or abnormal size and/or shape of nasopharynx has less influence. Errors produced in front of the velopharyngeal port are influenced by the structural anomaly of CLP. This information may contribute to general phonetic and phonological theories and genetic investigations about CP anomalies.

Cleft Palate Repair: A History of Techniques and Variations

Orofacial clefting is a common reconstructive surgical condition that often involves the palate. Cleft palate repair has evolved over three centuries from merely achieving anatomical closure to prioritizing speech development and avoiding midface hypoplasia. Despite centuries of advancements, there is still substantial controversy and variable consensus on technique, timing, and sequence of cleft palate repair procedures. Furthermore, evaluating the success of various techniques is hindered by a lack of universal outcome metrics and difficulty maintaining long-term follow-up. This article presents the current controversies of cleft palate repair and details how the history of cleft palate repair has influenced current techniques commonly used worldwide. Our review highlights the need for a global consortium on cleft care to gather expert opinions on current practices and outcomes and to standardize technique classifications. An understanding of global protocols is crucial in an attempt to standardize technique and timing to achieve anatomical closure with optimal velopharyngeal competence, while also minimizing the occurrence of maxillary hypoplasia and palatal fistulae.

Intelligibility in 3-Year-Olds With Cleft Lip and/or Palate Using the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Findings from the Cleft Collective Cohort Study

Objective:

To provide comparison data on the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) for a sample of 3-year-old English-speaking children born with any cleft type.

Design:

Questionnaire data from the Cleft Collective Cohort Study were used. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out to determine difference according to children’s cleft type and syndromic status.

Participants:

A total of 412 children born with cleft lip and/or palate whose mothers had completed the ICS when their child was 3 years old.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Mothers’ rating of their children’s intelligibility using the ICS.

Results:

The average ICS score for the total sample was 3.75 ( sometimes-usually intelligible; standard deviation [SD] = 0.76, 95% CIs = 3.68-3.83) of a possible score of 5 ( always intelligible). Children’s speech was reported to be most intelligible to their mothers (mean = 4.33, SD = 0.61, 95% CIs = 4.27-4.39) and least intelligible to strangers (mean = 3.36, SD = 1.00, 95% CIs = 3.26-3.45). There was strong evidence ( P < .001) for a difference in intelligibility between children with cleft lip only (n = 104, mean = 4.13, SD = 0.62, 95% CIs = 4.01-4.25) and children with any form of cleft palate (n = 308, mean = 3.63, SD = 0.76, 95% CIs = 3.52-3.71). Children born with cleft palate with or without cleft lip and an identified syndrome were rated as less intelligible (n = 63, mean = 3.28, SD = 0.85, 95% CIs = 3.06-3.49) compared to children who did not have a syndrome (n = 245, mean = 3.72, SD = 0.71, 95% CIs = 3.63-3.81).

Conclusions:

These results provide preliminary comparative data for clinical services using the outcome measures recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement.

Surgical Variation Between Consultant Surgeons Performing a Sommerlad Radical Intravelar Veloplasty

BACKGROUND

Although cleft surgeons in the United Kingdom follow a similar training pathway, and cleft centers adhere to similar protocols regarding timing of palate surgery and surgical technique, speech outcomes still vary significantly between centers.

OBJECTIVE

To explore if differences in technique exist between individual surgeons, performing a Sommerlad radical intravelar veloplasty (IVVP).

DESIGN

An exploratory, qualitative approach was adopted to understand the views of UK cleft surgeons performing a Sommerlad radical IVVP for primary cleft palate repair and to discuss what was important in the adoption, adaptation, and evolution of this technique within their own practice.

METHOD

A semistructured interview schedule was designed. Interviews were conducted in person or via videoconferencing, with interested surgeons. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked for accuracy. Analysis involved inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen cleft consultants from the United Kingdom participated (3 females and 11 males). Seven of the consultants were trained in plastic surgery and 4 in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Eight themes were identified from the thematic analysis. One theme-Surgical Variation-is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide insight into areas of variation seen within one surgical technique of cleft palate repair. These variations may have arisen to accommodate heterogeneity in the patient population or may have evolved in relation to different experiences of training or influences of colleagues. Further work is needed to explore the reasons for these differences in technique and to identify if any of these subtle differences contributed to variability in outcomes.

Association between speech and dental occlusion changes in children with cleft lip and palate and time of primary plastic surgeries

ABSTRACT Purpose: to describe the changes in speech and dental occlusion in children with cleft lip and palate and verify their association with each other and with the time of primary plastic surgeries. Methods: a cross-sectional study with collected data on the subjects’ identification, age at the time of primary surgeries, and clinical assessment of speech and dental occlusion. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and t-test were used to verify the associations between the variables at the 5% significance level (p < 0.05). Results: the sample comprised 11 children aged 6 to 10 years, most of whom were males, self-reported white, with trans-incisive foramen cleft, predominantly on the left side. The mean age at lip repair surgery was 6 months, and 13 months at palatoplasty. Among the main dental occlusion changes, posterior and anterior crossbite stood out. All the subjects presented changed speech, with a prevalence of cases with dentoalveolar and palatine deformities, followed by passive and active changes. Subjects with anterior crossbite tended to have undergone primary lip repair surgery at a mean of four months earlier than the subjects without anterior crossbite. Conclusions: the associations between speech and dental occlusion changes, and between these and the time of primary plastic surgeries were not statistically significant. Even though it is known that early lip repair surgery is ideal to favor oral functions and aesthetics, the results revealed a tendency towards anterior crossbite, in these subjects.

Optimizing speech outcomes for cleft palate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cleft lip with or without palate is one of the most common pediatric birth anomalies. Patients with cleft palate often have speech difficulties from underlying anatomical defects that can persist after surgery. This significantly impacts child development. There is a lack of evidence exploring, which surgical techniques optimize speech outcomes. The purpose of this update is to report on recent literature investigating how to optimize speech outcomes for cleft palate.

RECENT FINDINGS

The two-flap palatoplasty with intravelar veloplasty (IVVP) and Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty has the strongest evidence for optimizing speech. One-stage palatal repair is favored at 10-14 months of age, while delays are associated with significant speech deficits. For postoperative speech deficits, there is no significant difference between the pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty, and posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation. Surgical management should be guided by closure pattern and velopharyngeal gap but few studies stratify by these characteristics.

SUMMARY

According to recent evidence, the two-flap palatoplasty with IVVP and Furlow palatoplasty result in the best speech. The pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty, and posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation are all viable techniques to correct residual velopharyngeal insufficiency. Future research should focus on incorporating standardized measures and more robust study designs.

Speech outcome after intravelar veloplasty

OBJECTIVE

Cleft lip and palate is the main craniofacial malformation in France. Many surgical techniques had been described to restore cleft palate. In this study, we evaluate phonation in a homogeneous series of patient with isolated unilateral non-syndromic cleft lip and palate before (and after) alveolar cleft closure, operated according to our surgical protocol.

METHODS

We included retrospectively 71 patients with isolated non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), operated in our department from 2009 to 2013. All patients underwent the same surgical protocol: modified Millard cheilorhinoplasty (from 5 to 9-month-old); direct hard palatal closure (from 12 to 20-month-old); alveolar cleft closure with cancellous iliac bone graft (from 4 to 6-year-old). The phonation and clinical statute were evaluated before and after alveolar cleft closure. Fistula rate and speech evaluation were recorded.

RESULTS

The rate of oronasal fistula was 12.7%. About phonation, 76% and 86% of patients were competent or borderline competent respectively before and after gingivoperiostoplasty.

CONCLUSION

This surgical protocol provided speech results in patients with isolated unilateral non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. The gingivoperiostoplasty improved the speech intelligibility.

Benchmarking Speech, Velopharyngeal Function Outcomes and Surgical Characteristics Following the Sommerlad Protocol and Palate Repair Technique

Objective:

To report speech and velopharyngeal function (VPF) outcomes, and surgical characteristics, at age 5 following early complete palate closure using the Sommerlad protocol.

Design:

A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional consecutive series.

Setting:

A regional twin site center; a district general hospital and tertiary children’s hospital.

Participants:

Between 1993 and 2006, 877 participants underwent surgery; 712 (81%) were eligible for inclusion; 391 (55%) were included, 321 (45%) excluded. Thirteen percent had bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), 40% unilateral CLP, and 47% isolated cleft palate.

Intervention:

Lip and vomerine flap repair at 3 months of age (BCLP, UCLP) with soft palate closure using radical muscle dissection and retropositioning at a mean age of 6.6 months, range 4 to 23 months, as described and undertaken by Sommerlad.

Outcome Measures:

Velopharyngeal Composite (VPC) CAPS-A and articulation summary scores derived from analysis using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented.

Results:

A VPC-SUM CAPS-A score of “0” was found in 97% reflecting adequate VPF; 73% had no cleft articulation difficulties. The BCLP group had the poorest articulation. Secondary speech surgery rate was 2.6% and 10.7% had fistula repair. Levator muscle quality and degree of retropositioning was associated with speech outcomes related to VPF. 2.6% had current features of VPI.

Conclusions:

Complete palate closure by around 6 months of age by the surgeon who described the technique led to excellent perceived VPF and very good speech outcomes at age 5, with less speech therapy and secondary speech surgery than commonly reported. These findings serve as a benchmark for the Sommerlad protocol and technique.