In-situ atrazine biodegradation dynamics in wheat (Triticum) crops under variable hydrologic regime

Integration of Metabolomics and Transcriptomics for Investigating the Tolerance of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) to Atrazine Stress

Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) is a monotypic species widely planted in China. However, residual atrazine, a commonly used maize herbicide, in soil, is a major abiotic stress to millet. Here, we investigated atrazine tolerance in millet based on the field experiments, then obtained an atrazine-resistant variety (Gongai2, GA2) and an atrazine-sensitive variety (Longgu31, LG31). To examine the effects of atrazine on genes and metabolites in millet plants, we compared the transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles between GA2 and LG31 seedling leaves. The results showed that 2,208 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; 501 upregulated, 1,707 downregulated) and 192 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs; 82 upregulated, 110 downregulate) were identified in atrazine-treated GA2, while in atrazine-treated LG31, 1,773 DEGs (761 upregulated, 1,012 downregulated) and 215 DEMs (95 upregulated, 120 downregulated) were identified. The bioinformatics analysis of DEGs and DEMs showed that many biosynthetic metabolism pathways were significantly enriched in GA2 and LG31, such as glutathione metabolism (oxiglutatione, γ-glutamylcysteine; GSTU6, GSTU1, GSTF1), amino acid biosynthesis (L-cysteine, N-acetyl-L-glutamic acid; ArgB, GS, hisC, POX1), and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis [trans-5-o-(4-coumaroyl)shikimate; HST, C3'H]. Meanwhile, the co-expression analysis indicated that GA2 plants had enhanced atrazine tolerance owing to improved glutathione metabolism and proline biosynthesis, and the enrichment of scopoletin may help LG31 plants resist atrazine stress. Herein, we screened an atrazine-resistant millet variety and generated valuable information that may deepen our understanding of the complex molecular mechanism underlying the response to atrazine stress in millet.

Emerging Strategies for the Bioremediation of the Phenylurea Herbicide Diuron

Diuron (DUR) is a phenylurea herbicide widely used for the effective control of most annual and perennial weeds in farming areas. The extensive use of DUR has led to its widespread presence in soil, sediment, and aquatic environments, which poses a threat to non-target crops, animals, humans, and ecosystems. Therefore, the removal of DUR from contaminated environments has been a hot topic for researchers in recent decades. Bioremediation seldom leaves harmful intermediate metabolites and is emerging as the most effective and eco-friendly strategy for removing DUR from the environment. Microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes, can use DUR as their sole source of carbon. Some of them have been isolated, including organisms from the bacterial genera Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Vagococcus, Burkholderia, Micrococcus, Stenotrophomonas, and Pseudomonas and fungal genera Aspergillus, Pycnoporus, Pluteus, Trametes, Neurospora, Cunninghamella, and Mortierella. A number of studies have investigated the toxicity and fate of DUR, its degradation pathways and metabolites, and DUR-degrading hydrolases and related genes. However, few reviews have focused on the microbial degradation and biochemical mechanisms of DUR. The common microbial degradation pathway for DUR is via transformation to 3,4-dichloroaniline, which is then metabolized through two different metabolic pathways: dehalogenation and hydroxylation, the products of which are further degraded via cooperative metabolism. Microbial degradation hydrolases, including PuhA, PuhB, LibA, HylA, Phh, Mhh, and LahB, provide new knowledge about the underlying pathways governing DUR metabolism. The present review summarizes the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding (1) the environmental occurrence and toxicity of DUR, (2) newly isolated and identified DUR-degrading microbes and their enzymes/genes, and (3) the bioremediation of DUR in soil and water environments. This review further updates the recent knowledge on bioremediation strategies with a focus on the metabolic pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in the bioremediation of DUR.

Phytoremediation potential of three terrestrial plant species for removal of atrazine, azoxystrobin, and imidacloprid

Pesticides can move off-target resulting in contamination of sensitive water bodies and causing adverse effects on inhabiting species. Through best management practices, such as the implementation of vegetative buffer strips, off-target movement of pesticides can be decreased, and compound degradation can be increased via phytoremediation. In this study, blueflag iris (Iris versicolor), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) were planted in soil treated with one of three commonly used pesticides. At 28, 56 and 112 days after treatment (DAT), plants were destructively harvested and analyzed for pesticide residue in soil and above-ground and below-ground vegetation using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Relative to the amount of pesticide found in planted pots compared to non-planted pots, I. versicolor was found to reduce greater atrazine in soil compared to non-planted pots at 112 DAT by 58.7%. I. versicolor was also the most capable of reducing azoxystrobin, by 86.9% compared to non-planted pots, from the soil at 112 DAT. At the same sampling time, I. versicolor and P. virgatum reduced greater imidacloprid from soil by 62.5% and 64.3% compared to non-planted pots, respectively. This information supports the recommendation for establishment of diverse plant species for optimization of phytoremediation capacities. Novelty statement While research has found that plants can absorb and remediate synthetic chemicals, this practice is only sustainable if used with native plants that require low maintenance and are tolerant to the applied substances. Various previous studies observe plants that are fast-growing, tolerant to environmental conditions, require low-maintenance, and are hardy. However, these plant species are not always suitable for any location and are often considered invasive and/or weed-like. The present research initiates a list of plant species which can be used within the southeastern United States and similar areas to phytoremediate commonly used pesticides atrazine, azoxystrobin, and imidacloprid and prevent off-target movement.

Enhancing the removal of atrazine from soils by electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation using ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)

Atrazine (ATR) continues being one of the most frequently detected pesticides in natural waters and soils. In this work, an electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation pot test (EKPR) was performed for the remediation of an atrazine-spiked soil; a low electric voltage gradient (1 V cm^-1) with two different electric field operation times (6 and 24 h per day) was used in combination with ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). EKPR increased up to 27% and 7% the overall ATR removal from soil as compared to natural attenuation and phytoremediation treatments, respectively. ATR soil concentration vs time curves were fitted to a pseudofirst-order kinetic equation, obtaining ATR half-life values of 8.2, 7.1 and 5.4 days for the treatments corresponding, respectively, to 0, 6 and 24 h day^-1 of electric current application. It clearly showed that the ATR removal from soils was enhanced by the electric field. ATR plant accumulation was significantly improved with respect to phytoremediation when the electric current was continuously applied throughout the experiment (24 h day^-1); most of the ATR residues were accumulated in the shoot biomass of the ryegrass plants.

Glyphosate dispersion, degradation, and aquifer contamination in vineyards and wheat fields in the Po Valley, Italy

Biodegradation of glyphosate (GLP) and its metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) was numerically assessed for a vineyard and a wheat field in the Po Valley, Italy. Calculation of the Hazard Quotient suggested that GLP and AMPA can pose a risk of aquifer contamination in the top 1.5 m depth within 50 years of GLP use. Numerical results relative to soil GLP and AMPA concentrations, and GLP age, half life, and turnover time show that GLP was equivalently removed through hydrolysis and oxidation, but the latter produced AMPA. Biodegradation processes in the root zone removed more than 90% of applied GLP and more than 23% of the produced AMPA between two consecutive applications. Doubling organic carbon availability enhanced GLP and AMPA biodegradation, especially GLP hydrolysis to sarcosine. This work highlights that GLP and AMPA removal is controlled by soil water dynamics that depend on ecohydrological boundary conditions, and by carbon sources availability to biodegraders.