Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using fixed suspensory device versus adjustable suspensory device for femoral side graft fixation: What are the outcomes?

Both Adjustable and Fixed Loop Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation Have Similar Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

This study aims to compare the outcomes of fixed-loop device (FLD) vs adjustable-loop device (ALD) graft fixation with up to 2-year follow-up in patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a predominantly Asian setting.

Methods

Prospectively collected outcome measures as well as clinical records of patients who underwent primary ACLR using either FLD or ALD fixation of hamstring tendon autograft performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. The surgeon in this study used a fixed-loop device from 2018 to 2019 and then changed to adjustable loop from 2019 to 2020. Suspensory fixation was performed on the femoral side, and aperture (interference screw) fixation was performed on the tibial side. Outcome measures included knee range of motion, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity scale. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at regular intervals of 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

A total of 105 patients were identified. Forty-six were excluded due to incomplete follow-up data, so 59 patients with full 2-year follow-up were included in the final study group. Both groups (FLD vs ALD) were similar in demographics except for age (P = .042). Out of 105, there were 59 patients remaining in the study group with 2-year follow-up data. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups at all respective testing intervals.

Conclusions

FLDs and ALDs for suspensory fixation of hamstring tendon autograft in ACLR had similar clinical outcomes with a minimum of 2-year follow up. There is no evidence of graft loosening from loop lengthening.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

ACL Reconstruction and Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Utilizing Common Suspensory Femoral Fixation

Persistent rotatory instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been well studied and recognized as the cause of unsatisfactory clinical results. Various anterolateral techniques have been described as an adjunct to the ACL reconstruction to improve clinical outcomes. Modified deep Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis has been tested both biomechanically and clinically and proved an efficient solution in controlling tibia internal rotation, when performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. We describe a simple, versatile, effective, and reproducible technique of lateral extra-articular tenodesis, using common suspensory femoral fixation, with no additional cost and surgical risk.

Adjustable-loop implants are non-inferior to fixed-loop implants for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Button implants with an adjustable-loop device (ALD) are often used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Clinical research comparing ALDs with fixed-loop devices (FLD) has mainly been conducted in small patient populations with short follow-up times. To determine whether ALDs are safe to use in ACLR, a non-inferiority study with a large sample population and a long follow-up period would be beneficial. This study compared ALDs with FLDs to determine non-inferior revision surgery rates, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes (PROM) in ACLRs.

METHODS

This non-inferiority register-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR). A total of 12,723 patients > 15 years of age with primary ACLR using hamstring tendon autografts and either an FLD or ALD for femoral fixation were included: 9719 patients were in the FLD group, and 3014 patients were in the ALD group. The primary outcome was revision ACLR with a non-inferiority margin for ALDs at 4% at the 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes were anterior and rotatory knee stability and PROMs based on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The crude cumulative revision rates in ALD implants at 2 and 5 years were 2.1% (95% CI 1.62-2.68) and 5.0% (95% CI 4.22-5.96), respectively. In the FLD group, the rates were 2.2% (95% CI 1.89-2.48) at 2 years and 4.7% (95% CI 4.31-5.20) at 5 years. The 1-year side-to-side differences were 0.97 mm (95% CI 0.90-1.03) in the ALD group and 1.45 mm (95% CI 1.41-1.49) in the FLD group. In the FLD group, 13% had a positive pivot shift, and in the ALD group, 6% had a positive pivot shift. There were no differences in KOOS.

CONCLUSION

ALDs were non-inferior to FLDs regarding revision rates, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes. Based on this conclusion, ALDs are safe to use for femoral fixation in ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A prospective randomized study of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with adjustable- versus fixed-loop device for femoral side fixation

Purpose

Suspensory devices are extensively used in the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. They include fixed- and adjustable-loop devices. There are only a few studies comparing the efficacy of these two devices in the available literature. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between the adjustable-loop device (group I) and fixed-loop device (group II).

Materials and methods

This was a prospective randomized study. Both groups were equivalent in demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables. Twenty-three patients underwent femoral side graft fixation with adjustable-loop and 20 with fixed-loop devices. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Assessment of clinical outcome was done with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and knee stability tests (Lachman test and pivot shift test). Patient evaluation was performed preoperatively and finally postoperatively 2 years after surgery.

Results

Postoperative IKDC scores of group I and II were 91.9 ± 3.6 and 91.5 ± 3.6, respectively, and Lysholm scores were 91.0 ± 3.6 and 91.4 ± 3.5, respectively, after 2 years; however, the difference in the outcomes was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Twenty patients (87%) in group I and 17 patients (85%) in group II had a negative Lachman test (p = 0.8). Twenty-two patients (95.7%) in group I and 19 patients (95%) in group II had a negative pivot shift test (p = 0.9).

Conclusion

ACL reconstruction with fixed- and adjustable-loop suspensory devices for graft fixation gives equivalent and satisfactory clinical results.

Level of evidence

1.

Graft Selection in Contemporary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

In the last decade, there have been significant advances in our understanding of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Recent prospective cohort studies have identified risk factors for ACL reconstruction graft failure such as younger patient age, increased activity level, nonanatomic tunnel placement, and the use of allograft. Among these, the most easily modifiable risk factor is graft choice. Given that the surgeon's recommendation has been shown to be one of the most important factors behind patients' graft choice, it is critical that the operating surgeon have a thorough understanding of all the ACL graft options available to choose the graft that would be most suitable for the patient's personalized reconstruction (i.e., patient's anatomy, sport, level of competition, age, risk factors for failure, and graft used in previous ACL surgery). The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date understanding of the current ACL graft reconstruction options. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of the different ACL reconstruction graft options available will be discussed.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Study Between Adjustable and Fixed Length Suspension Devices

BACKGROUND

Adjustable-length cortical suspension devices provide technical advantages over fixed-length devices for femoral graft fixation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction but have shown increased lengthening during cyclic loading in biomechanical studies. The purpose of this study was to prospectively measure graft elongation in vivo along with patient reported outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty-seven skeletally mature patients diagnosed with anterior cruciate insufficiency who underwent ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring graft were included in this study. Thirteen patients received an ACL reconstruction using a fixed loop device (FL) and twenty-four patients were treated with an adjustable-length device (AL) based on surgeon preference. Bilateral knee laxity was measured with a KT1000 Arthrometer before surgery and immediately after surgery with the patient under anesthesia, and at the 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month clinical follow-up appointments. All measurements were made by the same operator with maximum force testing. Differences between the affected knee and the contralateral knee were measured. Patient reported outcomes were collected at 6 and 24 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

No difference was found between the FL and AL groups in either knee laxity or patient reported outcomes. Average side-to-side difference at 6 months was 1.8 ± 2.6 mm for the FL group and 1.7 ± 2.4 mm for the AL group (p=.874). One patient in the FL group (7.7%) and two in the AL group (9.5%) had a side to side difference in laxity greater 5 mm. Patient reported outcomes did not differ between groups and no patients underwent revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The adjustable-length cortical suspension device (AL) did not demonstrate increased laxity as compared to fixed-length devices. There was no difference in patient reported outcomes between the groups.Level of Evidence: IV.

Editorial Commentary: Call for a Better Femoral Fixation Device in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Adjustable-Loop Fixation Appears Better in Theory Than in Reality

Femoral tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a major complication that results in more complex revision surgery. One prevailing theory of the source of this widening is the "bungee cord effect" resulting from suture fixation within the femoral tunnel. Adjustable-loop fixation devices were proposed to theoretically correct this by reducing the amount of suture within the femoral tunnel. Review of the current literature reveals mixed outcomes with most data pointing to no difference between the adjustable and fixed devices, especially with regard to tunnel widening. Adjustable-loop devices are not currently meeting the theoretical expectations, and the quest for improved femoral fixation continues.

The Combined Effect of Body Mass Index and Tibial Slope Angles on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Male Knees: A Case-Control Study

Introduction:

Tibial slope angles (TSAs) have been identified as potential risk factors of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in the literature. A higher body mass index (BMI) might increase the risk of ACL tear because of greater axial compressive force. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship of these factors and the combined effect of BMI and TSA in determination of risk potential for ACL injury.

Methods:

The preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images of 81 ACL-injured male knees and of 68 male individuals with no ACL injuries were evaluated by 2 radiologists to measure the TSA. The Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to indicate the significant difference in height, weight, and BMI values. The independent samples t-test was used to determine the differences between ACL-injured and non-injured groups regarding TSA values. Odds ratios were calculated by logistic regression tests, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves revealed the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values to compare the relationships of these parameters with ACL injury.

Results:

Body mass index, lateral tibial slope (LTS), and medial tibial slope (MTS) were predictive of ACL risk injury. Body mass index alone had the greatest effect among these parameters, and there were no statistically significant differences in coronal tibial slope values between the ACL-ruptured and control groups. The greatest AUC was observed for the combination of BMI, MTS, and LTS.

Conclusions:

Body mass index, LTS, and MTS angles were associated with ACL injury risk and BMI + MTS + LTS together revealed the greatest effect on ACL injury.