Long-Term Outcomes of Rotationplasty patients in the treatment of lower extremity sarcomas with cost analysis

Progress in muscle strength of the reconstructed knee and quality of life of the patient after knee rotationplasty: A case report

Knee rotationplasty (KRP) is a function-preserving surgery that serves as an alternative to above-knee amputation in patients diagnosed with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors around the knee joint. However, the short-term progress of the reconstructed knee in terms of muscle strength is unclear after KRP. This case report describes the progress of a 37-year-old man diagnosed with synovial sarcoma in the distal femur, 1 year after undergoing KRP. Changes in muscle strength of the reconstructed knee and physical function are reported. Physical therapy was started on postoperative day 1 after the KRP, and mobilization proceeded step-by-step with sitting, wheelchair transfer, and crutch walking. Active and passive range-of-motion exercises of the reconstructed knee were started on postoperative day 5. The isometric reconstructed knee extension strength, 10-m walk test, timed up and go test, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated. One month postoperatively, muscle strength had increased, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, isometric knee extension strength and physical function had improved. Furthermore, activities of daily living and QOL gradually improved over the course of the 12 months. Our case shows the previously unknown course of reconstructed knee muscle strength in the early post-KRP period, with corresponding improvements in physical function, activities of daily living, and QOL.

Rotationplasty outcomes assessed by gait analysis following resection of lower extremity bone neoplasms

Aims

The standard of surgical treatment for lower limb neoplasms had been characterized by highly interventional techniques, leading to severe kinetic impairment of the patients and incidences of phantom pain. Rotationplasty had arisen as a potent limb salvage treatment option for young cancer patients with lower limb bone tumours, but its impact on the gait through comparative studies still remains unclear several years after the introduction of the procedure. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of rotationplasty on gait parameters measured by gait analysis compared to healthy individuals.

Methods

The MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched without time restriction until 10 January 2022 for eligible studies. Gait parameters measured by gait analysis were the outcomes of interest.

Results

Three studies were eligible for analyses. Compared to healthy individuals, rotationplasty significantly decreased gait velocity (-1.45 cm/sec; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.98 to -0.93; p < 0.001), stride length (-1.20 cm; 95% CI -2.31 to -0.09; p < 0.001), cadence (-0.83 stride/min; 95% (CI -1.29 to -0.36; p < 0.001), and non-significantly increased cycle time (0.54 sec; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.51; p = 0.184).

Conclusion

Rotationplasty is a valid option for the management of lower limb bone tumours in young cancer patients. Larger studies, with high patient accrual, refined surgical techniques, and well planned rehabilitation strategies, are required to further improve the reported outcomes of this procedure.

Rotationplasty Salvage Procedure as an Effective Alternative to Femoral Amputation in an Adult With a History of Osteosarcoma: A Case Report and Review

Rotationplasty or Borggreve-Van Ness surgery is lower limb salvage surgery, indicated mainly in the management of femoral bone sarcoma and congenital femur malformations in children. It can also be an interesting surgery option for managing chronic osteoarticular infections, or in cases of non union when curative therapy is no longer an option, as an alternative to femoral amputation. The principle of this surgery is to remove the affected knee and to apply a rotation of 180° to the distal part of the lower limb in order to give the ankle the function of a neo-knee. With the help of an adapted prosthesis, the aim is to allow patients to resume their social and professional activities by keeping most of their lower limb, thus avoiding the known complications of amputation (ghost limb pain, proprioceptive deficit, psychological disorders). Nevertheless, this surgery is complex and exceptional, with vascular, infectious, and psychological risks - the chimeric aspect of the lower limb may cause significant ill-being for the patient. This article reports the case of a 38-year-old patient consulting for management of a complex septic distal femoral non-union following osteosarcoma considered as being in remission. The patient underwent rotationplasty surgery on his left lower limb, with very good functional results and no surgical revision to date. In light of this particular case, we propose a didactic overview of the literature data concerning this surgery, especially in adulthood.

Frequency and reason for reoperation following non-invasive expandable endoprostheses: A systematic review

•

Implant failure is the most common reason for revision of growing prostheses.

•

Maximum prosthesis growth with a residual LLD is the most common mode of failure.

•

Functional outcomes are good, but 1/ 5 patients have a persistent LLD over 2 cm.

Background

Non-invasive expandable endoprostheses (NIEPR) utilize an external electromagnetic field to drive an innate mechanical gearbox. This lengthens the extremity following oncological resections in children with a predicted limb length discrepancy (LLD), facilitating limb-salvage. This review was conducted to assess NIEPR implant survival rates and identify modes of implant failure unique to these prostheses.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all manuscripts evaluating implant survival of NIEPRs implanted into skeletally immature patients following resection of extremity sarcomas. Minimum follow-up of 12 months or implant failure was required for inclusion. Failures were classified using the latest ISOLS classification and exact implant-specific failure modality was also identified.

Results

19 studies met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 10.0 years (7.7 – 11.4 years). The most common locations for NIEPR implantation were the distal femur (343, 76.7%) and proximal tibia (53, 119%). Mean follow-up was 65.3 months (19.4 – 163 months). The overall implant revision rate was 46.2% (0 – 100%); implant specific revisions included maximal prosthesis lengthening with persistent LLD (10.4%), failed extension mechanism (6.1%), implant fracture (7.7%), hinge fracture (1.4%) and bushing wear (0.9%). Persistent clinically significant (>20 mm) LLD at final follow-up was present in 19.2% (0 – 50%) of patients. The mean MSTS score was 85.1% (66.7–96.3%) at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Implant-related failures are the most common reason for NIEPR revision. Implant reliability appears to be improved with current designs. A sub-classification to the current classification system based on implant-specific failures for NIEPRs is proposed.