Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Reconstruction of unfixable comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures with autologous bone graft: A systematic review

Background

Posterior wall acetabular fractures, often caused by high-energy trauma, are complex injuries that pose significant surgical challenges, especially when comminuted. Traditional fixation techniques have shown variable outcomes, with severe comminution sometimes rendering fragment fixation impossible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of autologous bone grafting for reconstructing severely comminuted unfixable posterior wall acetabular fractures.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search for clinical studies was carried out across four databases: Embase, PubMed, Medline, and Scopus. The included studies were evaluated using the Coleman Methodology Score. The present study protocol was registered in PROSPERO.

Results

The study involved 71 patients, with an average age of 37.12 years. Autologous iliac crest grafts were predominantly used, with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in all cases. Clinical outcomes, assessed by Merle d'Aubigne and Harris Hip Scores, showed 78.9 % of patients reporting excellent to good results. Radiological outcomes indicated 66 % with excellent results per Matta's score. The overall success rate ranged from 57 % to 100 %, with a 5 % conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Complications were reported in 7 % of cases, including nonunion and avascular necrosis.

Conclusion

Autologous bone grafts for comminuted, non-fixable posterior wall acetabular fractures may be considered as a potential salvage option in young patients, potentially delaying the need for THA.

A pipkin type IV injury treated with acetabular reconstruction and primary total hip replacement surgery: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Acetabular fractures are uncommon and serious injuries to the hip joint occurring in 3 out of 100,000 individuals annually, commonly affects young people. In young individuals usually occurs from high-energy trauma and usually accompanied with associated injuries.

CASE PRESENTATION

54 years old male involved in a motor traffic crash as a driver who had head-to-head collision with a tractor and sustained right hip injury and loss of consciousness for an unknown period of time. On admission pelvis X-ray and CT scan were done, he was diagnosed with 1. mild traumatic brain injury, 2. posterior hip dislocation with comminuted posterior wall acetabular fracture, and 3. femoral head fracture pipkin IV. E-fast was negative, chest X-ray revealed cardiomegaly, echocardiogram and electrocardiogram were unremarkable. He was kept on right distal femur skeletal traction temporarily, definitively acetabular reconstruction and total hip replacement were done.

DISCUSSION

Posterior wall acetabular fracture with posterior column fracture if treated with ORIF results into failed fixation in 31.8 %, osteoarthritis in 63.6 %. 46 % of patients above 50 yrs treated with ORIF will end up requiring a late total hip replacement. Early treatment with total hip replacement results into better outcome compared to total hip done secondary to posttraumatic arthritis and failed fixation.

CONCLUSION

Primary total hip replacement is a best treatment modality in patients with severely comminuted posterior wall acetabular fracture due to the fact that open reduction and internal fixation is associated with more complications and inferior outcome compared to early total hip replacement.

Characterizing acetabular defects and need of major reconstruction during total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion- a retrospective study

Purpose

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of acetabular defects in patients with protrusion and to assess the need for major reconstruction.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 125 THAs performed at a single tertiary center from 2010 to 2020 by a single surgeon in patients with acetabular protrusion. Demographics, operative details and radiographic details were recorded. THAs in which a structural graft, cage or augment were used for acetabular reconstruction were considered to have undergone a major reconstructive procedure and a classification system was proposed to identify patients requiring major reconstruction.

Results

10 (8 %) THAs required a major reconstruction in our cohort (2- augment, 8- structural allograft. There was significant difference in acetabular defects based on the etiology. Major reconstruction was more common when the diagnosis was sequalae of tuberculosis or post-traumatic arthritis. Simple cavitatory defects seldom required a major reconstruction while combined defects and medial wall deficiency increased the risk of requiring a major reconstruction.

Conclusion

The severity of defects varied considerably with majority of patients having cavitatory type of defect which can be successfully managed without the need of any major reconstructive measures. A simple classification based on the type of defect and medial wall competency appeared to be useful in identifying patients who may need a major reconstructive procedure during THA.

Temporal Patterns and Treatment Associations in Complications Following Hip Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: Hip arthroplasty is commonly performed to enhance mobility and quality of life in patients with severe joint degeneration. However, post-surgery complications such as infections, dislocations, and mechanical failures remain prevalent and vary over time. This study examines the relationship between time intervals post-surgery and the occurrence of complications and explores the associations between specific treatment modalities and complications. It also investigates temporal patterns of infectious and mechanical complications to inform more effective post-surgery care. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on hip arthroplasty patients to analyze the occurrence and distribution of complications across medium-term (1-5 years) and long-term (≥6 years) intervals. Treatment modalities, including joint debridement, lavage, antibiotics, and mechanical interventions, were analyzed for their association with complications. Chi-Square tests were used, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A significant association was found between time intervals and complications (χ2 = 58.149, df = 19, p < 0.001). Infections were more prevalent in the medium-term, while mechanical complications such as dislocation, implant loosening, and periprosthetic fractures were more common in the long-term. Antibiotics were strongly linked to infectious complications (χ2 = 279.000, p < 0.001), and mechanical treatments were associated with fractures and dislocations. Conclusions: The study confirms that the timing of complications post-surgery plays a critical role in their occurrence. Specific complications become more prevalent at different intervals, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies. Antibiotics for infections and mechanical interventions for fractures and dislocations should be adjusted based on timing. These findings highlight the importance of time-specific post-surgery care and suggest areas for further research on long-term strategies and risk factors.

Traumaplasty: When and How to Perform Acute Arthroplasty for Fractures Around the Hip in the Elderly Patient

Acute fractures around the hip are prevalent injuries associated with potentially devastating outcomes. The growing utilization of arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly is likely a result of improvements in reoperation rates and postoperative function. Compared to hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty is associated with a slight functional benefit that is unlikely noticeable for many patients, as well as minimal differences in complications and patient reported outcome measures. However, the evidence supporting cement use in femoral stem fixation is robust. Multiple high power randomized controlled trial-based studies indicate cement fixation brings more predictable outcomes and fewer reoperations. In the setting of acute acetabular fracture, total hip arthroplasty is a favorable approach for elderly patients and fracture patterns associated with increased risk of revision after open reduction and internal fixation. Variations in patient characteristics and fracture patterns demand careful consideration whenever selecting the optimal treatment. In fracture patient populations, comanagement is an important consideration when seeking to reduce complications and promote cost-effective quality care.

Evaluation of total hip arthroplasty for management of acetabular fracture complications: A prospective cohort study

Objectives:

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been recommended as an effective tool for restoring joint function. This study aimed to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of THA management of acetabular fracture late complications such as arthritis by both Harris-Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, anticipate, and prevent the most common complications such as infection and dislocation.

Methods:

This prospective case series included 30 patients with THA to manage acetabular fracture complications such as arthritis. The study started in November 2021 and ended in September 2023. Inclusion criteria were patients with acetabular fractures with secondary arthritis (pre-existing osteoarthritis were excluded) aged 25– 70 and who had at least 1 year from fracture to arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria were patients with a history of previous infection.

Results:

Heterotopic ossification (HO) improved statistically significantly after using ketorolac at an 18-month follow-up compared to preoperatively. Using both the HHS and WOMAC scores, a statistically significant difference was found between pre-operative and post-operative functional outcomes for estimating HO development using radiographs.

Conclusion:

THA was safe and effective in managing late acetabular fracture complications. Ketorolac use showed promising results in prophylaxis against HO.

Mid-term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after Acetabular Fracture

Purpose

The prognosis of total hip replacement (THR) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus THR following non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures is unclear. Few studies have been conducted in this regard. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to perform an assessment and compare the functional outcomes for study subjects in the ORIF and non-ORIF groups during the follow-up period compared to baseline.

Materials and Methods

This longitudinal comparative study, which included 40 patients who underwent THR for either posttraumatic arthritis after fixation of an acetabular fracture or arthritis following conservative management of a fracture, was conducted for 60 months. Twenty-four patients had undergone ORIF, and 16 patients had undergone nonoperative/conservative management for acetabular fractures. Following THR, the patients were followed up for monitoring of functional outcomes for the Harris hip score (HHS) and comparison between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups was performed.

Results

The HHS showed significant improvement in both ORIF and non-ORIF groups. At the end of the mean follow-up period, no significant variation in scores was observed between the groups, i.e., ORIF group (91.61±6.64) compared to non-ORIF group (85.74±11.56). A significantly higher number of re-interventions were required for medial wall fractures and combined fractures compared to posterior fractures (P<0.05).

Conclusion

THR resulted in improved functional outcome during follow-up in both the groups; however, the ORIF group was observed to have better functional outcome. Re-intervention was not required for any of the posterior fractures at the end of the mean follow-up period.

The outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the main treatment plan for patients with first-line treatment failure of acetabulum fracture. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of the type of initial treatment and timing of surgery on the outcomes of conversion THA.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL Cochrane were searched for articles published before October 14, 2022. Comparative studies investigating the outcome of THA following treatment failure of acetabular fracture were included. These articles were categorized into three groups, and the outcomes of treatment plans in each group were compared: (A) primary THA vs. conversion THA, (B) THA following conservative treatment vs. THA following ORIF, and (C) acute THA vs. delayed THA following prior treatment failure. Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3) software was utilized to perform the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four comparative studies met the inclusion criteria (reported the data of 13,373 patients). Concerning group (A), the following complications were significantly higher in conversion THA: Infection (OR [95% CI] 3.19 [2.12, 4.79]; p value < 0.00001), dislocation (OR [95% CI] 4.58 [1.56, 13.45]; p value = 0.006), heterotopic ossification (OR [95% CI] 5.68 [3.46, 9.32]; p value < 0.00001), and Revision (OR [95% CI] 2.57 [1.65, 4.01]; p value < 0.00001). Postoperative HHS (SMD [95% CI] - 0.66 [- 1.24, - 0.08]; p value = 0.03) was significantly lower and operation time (SMD [95% CI] 0.88 [0.61, 1.15]; p value < 0.00001), blood loss (SMD [95% CI] 0.83 [0.56, 1.11]; p value < 0.00001), and bone graft need (OR [95% CI] 27.84 [11.80, 65.65]; p value < 0.00001) were significantly higher in conversion THA. Regarding group (B), bone graft need (OR [95% CI] 0.48 [0.27, 0.86]; p value = 0.01) was considerably higher in patients with prior acetabular fracture conservative treatment, while other outcomes were comparable. Respecting group (C), there were no significant differences in analyzed outcomes. However, systematically reviewing existing literature suggested a higher incidence rate of DVT following acute THA.

CONCLUSION

There were significantly higher postoperative complications and lower functional outcomes in conversion THA compared to primary THA. While complications and functional outcomes were comparable between ORIF and the conservative groups, the bone graft need was significantly higher in the conservative group. There were no significant differences between aTHA and dTHA. These results can assist surgeons in designing treatment plans based on each patient's clinical situation. Prospero registration code: CRD42022385508.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III/IV.

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Neglected Acetabular Fracture with Pipkin Type 4 Femoral Head Fracture. A Case Report

Introduction

Pipkin type 4 fracture is defined as hip dislocation with femoral head fracture and concomitant acetabular rim fracture. These fractures are rare. Neglected fractures develop adaptive changes in the acetabulum, femoral head, and soft tissues around the hip joint, leading to hip arthritis. Total hip arthroplasty is preferred in such cases. After an extensive literature review, we did not find any guidelines for managing neglected Pipkin type 4 fractures.

Case Report

A 47-year-old male presented with pain in his left hip and an inability to bear weight on his left lower limb. He had a road traffic accident 1 year ago. On clinical examination, there was a shortening of 3 cm and reduced hip range of motion on 3D computed tomography posterosuperior defect of the acetabular wall along with Pipkin type 4 femoral head fracture was detected. Total hip arthroplasty with acetabular reconstruction using a femoral head autograft was done. At 1 year of follow-up, the patient was pain-free and could walk without any assistance with a normal gait.

Conclusion

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with an autologous structural femoral head graft is a suitable method of treatment for neglected Pipkin type 4 fractures. It preserves bone stock and does not add any financial burden.

The Association between Acetabulum Fractures and Subsequent Coxarthrosis in a Cohort of 77 Patients-A Retrospective Analysis of Predictors for Secondary Hip Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

the aim of this study was to document the occurrence of THA after acetabulum surgery and examine the factors that predict its occurrence.

METHODS

This study included 77 consecutive patients who were admitted for acetabulum fracture surgery between 2012 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were acetabular fractures and indications for operative management. The exclusion criteria were acetabular fractures treated non-operatively, fractures requiring primary THA, and periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Data concerning demographics, date of injury, date of surgery, surgical approach, stabilization, and further reconstructive surgery were collected retrospectively. The number of patients who underwent THA and their risk factors were recorded. The minimum follow-up for each patient was 2 years of observation. A total of 77 patients with a mean age of 53 years were included.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 2 years, THA was performed in 16 (20.8%) patients due to post-traumatic arthritis. An analysis of the surgical approaches showed that the Kocher-Langenbeck approach increased the risk of THA nearly 12 times compared with the ilioinguinal approach (p = 0.016). Furthermore, the duration of the waiting period for surgery significantly impacted the occurrence of THA, with each additional day leading to an 89% increase in the risk of prosthesis usage (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that acetabular fractures may lead to post-traumatic hip osteoarthritis. The surgical approach and the waiting time for surgery are potential factors that may predict secondary hip osteoarthritis and the need for subsequent THA. However, further investigations should be performed to establish predictors for secondary hip osteoarthritis, and especially to determine the impact of the surgical approach.

Risk of Revision and Complications after Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Treatment of Acetabular Fracture

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of acute acetabular fractures may be indicated where there is high risk for failure of open reduction and internal fixation. This study aimed to determine risks of revision and rates of major complications of THA for acute acetabular fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed (all-claims data files of a large national database) by querying International Classification of Disease, tenth revision procedure codes for THA within 14 days of acetabular fracture. We identified all-cause revision and surgical complications including dislocations, mechanical failures (loosenings or broken prostheses), infections, as well as medical complications. Demographic data collected included age, sex, obesity and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Multivariate analyses evaluated the association of revision and major surgical complications after adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. We identified 956 THAs for the treatment of acute acetabular fracture from 2015 to 2020. Of all acute acetabular fractures treated with THA, 241 were concomitant with ORIF, and 715 were THA alone.

RESULTS

All-cause revision risk was 18.2%, overall major surgical complication rate 26.9%, and medical complication rate was 13.2%. Women were associated with increased risk of revision (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.8; Confidence Interval (CI) 1.3-2.6, P=0.001), dislocation (aOR 2.0; CI 1.5-3.1, P<0.001), mechanical complication (aOR 2.1; CI 1.4-3.2, P<0.001), and infection (aOR 1.6; CI 1.0-2.5, P=0.044).

CONCLUSION

We noted risk of all-cause revision of 18.2%, overall major surgical complication rate of 26.9%, and overall major medical complication rate of 13.2% for THA as the treatment of acute acetabular fracture. We caution against broad expansion of THA for treatment of acute acetabular fractures. Furthermore, increased risks of revision and complications in women warrant additional investigation into patient and fracture characteristics that may contribute to this finding.

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cemented Dual Mobility Cup into a Fully Porous Multihole Cup with Variable Angle Locking Screws for Acetabular Fractures in the Frail Elderly

Purpose

The purpose was to examine the clinical and radiological outcomes after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures with total hip arthroplasty with a dual mobility cup cemented into a porous multihole cup in the population of frail elderly patients.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of 16 patients who underwent surgery (mean age, 76.7 years) with a mean follow-up period of 36.9 months was conducted. Following surgery, patients underwent postoperative follow-up at six weeks, three, six, and 12 months and clinical and radiological examinations were performed.

Results

Classification of fractures was based on the Letournel classification. Following surgery, all patients were allowed weight-bearing as tolerated immediately postoperative. Fourteen patients showed maintenance of preoperative mobility status at one year. The mean Harris hip score was 64.8 (range, 34.7-82.8) and 80.0 (range, 60.8-93.8) at three months and one year, respectively. The mortality rate was 12.5% at one year (2/16). Complications included heterotopic ossification (2/16), deep venous thrombosis (1/16), heamatoma (1/16), and femoral revision due to a Vancouver B2 fracture (1/16). No case of deep infection, dislocation, or implant loosening was reported.

Conclusion

Total hip arthroplasty using a dual mobility cup cemented into a porous multihole cup with locking screws resulted in a stable construct with a capacity for immediate weight-bearing as tolerated with rapid relief of pain. The findings of this study suggest that this procedure can be regarded as a safe method that has shown promising clinical and radiological outcomes for treatment of patients with medical frailty.

Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis secondary to acetabular fracture: An evidence based on 1,284 patients from 1970 to 2018

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) can be a crippling sequela of acetabular fracture (AF), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often necessary to alleviate the clinical progression of symptoms. The purpose of this study was to summarize the existing clinical evidence concerning the surgical management of AF with THA through meta-analyses.

METHODS

Databases were searched for articles published between 1995 and January 2022 that contained the keywords "acetabular," "fracture," "arthroplasty," and "osteoarthritis." Our study was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42022314997.

RESULTS

We screened 3,125 studies and included data from 31 studies with 1,284 patients. The median patient age at the time of THA was 52 years and ranged from 19 to 94 years. The pooled overall survival rate was 88% [86%-90%, 95% confidence interval (CI)] and could reach 83% at ≥15-year follow-up. For the Harris Hip Score, we pooled 22 studies with an overall mean difference of 43.25 (40.40-46.10, 95% CI; P < 0.001), indicating a large clinical effect. The pooled complications (incidence rates) across studies were: heterotopic ossification (22.53%), implant dislocation (4.66%), implant infection (3.44%), and iatrogenic nerve injury (1.07%).

CONCLUSION

THA in patients with PTOA following AF leads to significant improvement in symptoms and function at ≥15-year follow-up. Survival rates of implants free from re-operation or revision after THA decreased with follow-up time and could still reach 83% at ≥15-year follow-up. THA might be an effective therapeutic method for patients with PTOA due to AF.

WHICH PROBLEMATICS IN THA AFTER ACETABULAR FRACTURES: EXPERIENCE OF 38 CASES

BACKGROUND

Within a timeframe of 8 years (2008-2016), 38 patients have undergone total hip replacement surgery for coxarthrosis or aseptic necrosis secondary to acetabulum fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 27 males and 11 females between 42 and 70 years of age, all of whom came from other institutions. The follow-up period ranged between a minimum of 4.6 and a maximum of 9.7 years.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, all patients were evaluated using the Merle D'Aubigne and Pastel model. Optimal results were found in all the cases. Three patients benefited from surgical revisitation with implant exchange following infection and one/two state reimplatation at seven, fourtheen et twenty-seven months respectively. Two patients benefited from cotyle revision due to chronic instability of the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

The scope of the study was to present all the possible surgical difficulties that can come up with prosthetic implants. More particularly, hip implants after acetabulum fractures qualifies as a "difficult primary implant".

Primary stability of multi-hole cups compared to plate osteosynthesis in osteoporotic anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures—A biomechanical comparison

Introduction

Acetabular fractures pose high demands on the surgeon and in the case of osteosynthetic treatment, anatomical reconstruction has the highest priority to achieve a good outcome. However, especially in older patients with poor bone quality, even anatomical reconstruction is no guarantee for a good clinical outcome and may nevertheless end in early osteoarthritis. Primary arthroplasty therefore has an increasing importance in the treatment of these patients. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare fracture gap displacement and failure load as an assessment measure of the primary stability of conventional plate osteosynthesis with the treatment using a sole multi-hole cup for acetabular fractures.

Methods

Six hemi-pelvises each with anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) fracture were treated with either plate osteosynthesis or a multi-hole cup. The tests were carried out in a standardised test set-up with cyclic loading in various stages between 150 N and 2500 N. The fracture gap displacement was recorded with optical 3D measuring and the failure load was determined after the cyclic measurement.

Results

With increasing force, the fracture gap displacement increased in both procedures. In each group there was one treatment which failed at the cyclic loading test and a bone fragment was broken out. The primary stability in arthroplasty was comparable to that of the standard osteosynthesis.

Conclusions

The results found seem promising that the primary arthroplasty with a sole multi-hole cup and corresponding screw fixation achieves an initial stability comparable to osteosynthesis for typical ACPHT fractures. However, further clinical studies are needed to prove that the cups heal solidly into the bone.

A New Classification System for Acetabular Bone Defect Evaluation in Posttraumatic Acetabular Nonunion and Malunion

INTRODUCTION

There is no distinct classification system to evaluate the bone defect in previously managed acetabular fractures. We propose a new classification system for bone defect evaluation in a previously managed acetabular fracture that will be helpful for total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The preoperative pelvis radiographs of 99 THA patients with previous acetabular fractures with at least 2 years of follow-up were evaluated by 10 experienced surgeons (Paprosky and new classification systems). As per the new classification system, the five types of bone defects are circumferential, posterior wall, posterior column, both column defect, and anterior column. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated, and a consensus management plan based on the recommendation of the observers was formulated.

RESULTS

There was fair interobserver reliability for Paprosky classification (alpha coefficient 0.39) and substantial interobserver reliability for the new classification (alpha co-efficient 0.71). There was a substantial intraobserver agreement for the new classification (kappa value 0.80) and moderate intraobserver agreement for Paprosky classification (kappa value 0.55). Sixty-nine patients who were treated as per the management plan of the observers reported significant improvement in modified Harris hip score (improved from 25 to 85.88, p < 0.001). 89.7% of patients reported good to excellent outcomes. Overall best health as per EQ-5D VAS was obtained in THA following anterior column fracture (EQ-5D VAS 97.5), and relatively poor health was obtained after THA of posterior column nonunion (EQ-FD VAS 80).

CONCLUSIONS

 The new classification system for bone defect evaluation in previously treated acetabular fractures is valid and reliable. The proposed surgical plan for the management of bone defects in THA provided good to excellent outcomes.

Predicting the Poor Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after the Anatomical Reduction and Internal Fixation of Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

Anatomical reduction is the fundamental principle of hip function restoration after posterior acetabular wall fractures (PWFs). Some patients exhibit poor outcomes despite anatomical reduction, and the prognostic factors leading to poor outcomes remain elusive. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with PWFs who had undergone anatomical reduction and internal fixation and to identify the predictors that impair clinical and radiologic outcomes. The clinical records of 60 patients with elementary PWFs who had undergone anatomical reduction and internal fixation between January 2005 and July 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The Harris hip score (HHS) and modified Merle d’Aubigné clinical hip scores (MMAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcome. Preoperative and final follow-up radiographs were cross checked to identify poor radiographic outcomes that included the presence of advanced osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis, as well as the need for conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular dome comminution was assessed from computerized tomography, and the outcomes were further evaluated according to the involvement of fragment comminution. The fracture comminution and age were negatively correlated with functional outcomes (correlation coefficients were −0.41 and −0.39 in HHS and MMAS, respectively) and were significantly related to the severity of osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis as well as the need for total hip arthroplasty. Regarding the radiographic factors, significantly worse post-operative HHS and MMAS were found in the fracture comminution group. In the subanalysis of the status of fracture comminution, patients with fragment comminution involving the acetabular dome had significantly lower functional scores than those with other fracture patterns. In conclusion, age, fracture comminution, and dome comminution were the prognostic indicators of advanced osteoarthritis and poor functional scores after the anatomical reduction and internal fixation of PWFs. We emphasized the relevance of acetabular dome comminution as an important contributing factor to clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Fragility Fractures of the Acetabulum: Current Concepts for Improving Patients' Outcomes

The incidence of fragility fractures of the acetabulum (FFA) is constantly increasing. Generally, these fractures are related to a fall on the greater trochanter involving the anterior column. The management of FFA is extremely difficult considering both patients' comorbidities and poor bone quality. Both non-operative and several operative treatment protocols are available, and the choice among them is still ambiguous. The proposed surgical techniques for FFA [namely open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), percutaneous fixation and total hip arthroplasty (THA)] are associated with a high complication rate. The treatment with the higher early mortality is the ORIF + THA, while the one with the lowest is the non-operative. However, at longer follow-up, this difference dreadfully change is becoming the opposite. Frequently ORIF, percutaneous fixation, and non-operative treatment need a subsequent re-operation through a THA. This latter could be extremely difficult, because of poor bone quality, acetabular mal union/non-union, bone gaps and hardware retention. However, the outcomes of each of the proposed treatment are mostly poor and controverted; therefore, a comprehensive patient evaluation and an accurate fracture description are required to appropriately manage acetabular fracture in the elderly.

Biomechanical comparison of acetabular fracture fixation with stand-alone THA or in combination with plating

PURPOSE

A common surgical treatment in anterior column acetabular fractures with preexisting osteoarthritis is THA, which is commonly combined with plate osteosynthesis. Implantation of a solitary revision cup cranially fixed to the os ilium is less common. The purpose of this study was to compare the stabilization of anterior column acetabular fractures fixed with a cranial socket revision cup with flange and iliac peg or with a suprapectineal plate osteosynthesis combined with an additional revision cup.

METHODS

In 20 human hemipelves, an anterior column fracture was stabilized by either a cranial socket revision cup with integrated flange (CF = Cup with Flange) or by a suprapectineal plate combined with a revision cup (CP = Cup and Plate). Each specimen was loaded under a stepwise increasing dynamic load protocol. Initial construct stiffness, interfragmentary movements along the fracture line, as well as femoral head movement in relation to the acetabulum were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups showed comparable initial construct stiffness (CP: 3180 ± 1162 N/mm and CF: 3754 ± 668 N/mm; p = 0.158). At an applied load of 1400 N, interfragmentary movements at the acetabular (p = 0.139) and the supraacetabular region (p = 0.051) revealed comparable displacement for both groups and remained below 1 mm. Femoral head movement in relation to the acetabulum also remained below 1 mm for both test groups (p = 0.260).

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical point of view, both surgical approaches showed comparable fracture reduction in terms of initial construct stiffness and interfragmentary movement. The potential benefit of the less-invasive cranial socket revision cup has to be further investigated in clinical studies.

Is non-operative management of acetabular fracture a viable option for older patients? A systematic review of the literature for indication, treatments, complications and outcome

There is no consensus about the best treatment for acetabular fracture in older patients. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature looking for indication, perioperative information and outcome of nonoperative management for acetabular fractures in elderly.A systematic review of literature was performed on different research database by using various combination of the keywords "acetabular fracture", "elderly patients", "60 years", "nonoperative", "nonsurgical" and "conservative treatment".Six articles met our inclusion criteria, 315 patients aged 60 or more treated nonoperatively for acetabular fracture were included in the analysis. The average age was 78.1 years, the average follow-up length was 48.7 months. The main criteria for indication of nonoperative management for acetabular fractures were, old age (75 years or more), two or more important medical comorbidities, and minimally or undisplaced fracture. The most frequent fracture pattern was anterior column in 25.3% of cases. Fall from standard height was the most frequent causative mechanism in 80% of patients. A conversion total hip arthroplasty was performed after 8.3% of cases. A 1-year mortality of 18% was reported, an overall mortality of 33.1% at last follow-up was reported.The management of acetabular fractur in elderly is a challenging problem and there is no consensus about the best treatment. Currently, multiple treatment options have been suggested, depending on fracture pattern and patients' general conditions. Although operatively treatment allow for an early recovery, there is not an high level of evidence about the superiority in terms or complications and mortality rate compared to nonoperative treatment.