Reduced mortality with noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of shock

To Swan or Not to Swan: Indications, Alternatives, and Future Directions

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has revolutionized bedside assessment of preload, afterload, and contractility using measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, calculated systemic vascular resistance, and estimated cardiac output. It is placed percutaneously by a flow-directed balloon-tipped technique through the venous system and the right heart to the pulmonary artery. Interest in the hemodynamic variables obtained from PACs paved the way for the development of numerous less-invasive hemodynamic monitors over the past 3 decades. These devices estimate cardiac output using concepts such as pulse contour and pressure analysis, transpulmonary thermodilution, carbon dioxide rebreathing, impedance plethysmography, Doppler ultrasonography, and echocardiography. Herein, the authors review the conception, technologic advancements, and modern use of PACs, as well as the criticisms regarding the clinical utility, reliability, and safety of PACs. The authors comment on the current understanding of the benefits and limitations of alternative hemodynamic monitors, which is important for providers caring for critically ill patients. The authors also briefly discuss the use of hemodynamic monitoring in goal-directed fluid therapy algorithms in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs.

Using what you get: dynamic physiologic signatures of critical illness

The development and resolution of cardiopulmonary instability take time to become clinically apparent, and the treatments provided take time to have an impact. The characterization of dynamic changes in hemodynamic and metabolic variables is implicit in physiologic signatures. When primary variables are collected with high enough frequency to derive new variables, this data hierarchy can be used to develop physiologic signatures. The creation of physiologic signatures requires no new information; additional knowledge is extracted from data that already exist. It is possible to create physiologic signatures for each stage in the process of clinical decompensation and recovery to improve outcomes.

Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: spanning the range of kidney function

Critically ill patients often have deranged hemodynamics. Physical examination, central venous pressure, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure ("wedge") have been shown to be unreliable at assessing volume status, volume responsiveness, and adequacy of cardiac output in critically ill patients. Thus, invasive and noninvasive cardiac output monitoring is a core feature of evaluating and managing a hemodynamically unstable patient. In this review, we discuss the various techniques and options of cardiac output assessment available to clinicians for hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Issues related to patients with kidney disease, such as timing and location of arterial and central venous catheters and the approach to hemodynamics in patients treated by long-term dialysis also are discussed.

Non-invasive cardiac output and oxygen delivery measurement in an infant with critical anemia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the combination of a non-invasive blood oxygen content (CaO(2)) monitor and a non-invasive cardiac output (CO) monitor to continuously measure oxygen delivery (DO(2); DO(2) = CaO(2) × CO).

METHODS

DO(2) was assessed during blood transfusions in an infant with acute hemolytic anemia following admission (~48 h). CaO(2) was measured by Pulse Co-Oximetry, which also provides estimates of hemoglobin (Hgb) concentration and percent oxygen saturation. CO was measured by Electrical Velocimetry, which also provides an estimate of stroke volume (SV). Lactate levels, an indirect measure of adequate DO(2), were assessed during the initial 8 h following admission.

RESULTS

Incremental blood transfusions during the first 36 h increased Hgb from 2.7 to 9.5 g/dL during which time heart rate (HR) normalized from 156 to 115 beats/min. Lactate levels decreased from 20 to 0.8 mmol/L in the first 7 h. Non-invasive Hgb and CaO(2) measurements were well correlated with invasive Hgb and CaO(2) measures (r (2) = 0.88; P = 0.019; r (2) = 0.86; P = 0.0074, respectively). CO decreased from 2.47 ± 0.06 to 1.28 ± 0.02 L/min and SV decreased from 15.9 ± 0.4 to 11.1 ± 0.2 mL/beat. Mean arterial blood pressure was stable throughout the admission with systemic vascular resistance increasing from 407.6 ± 15.2 to 887.7 ± 30.1 dynes-s/cm(5). DO(2) was estimated to increase from 120.2 ± 18.9 to 182.4 ± 5.6 mL O(2)/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive continuous CO and CaO(2) monitors are shown in this single case to provide continuous DO(2) measurement. The ability to assess DO(2) may improve hemodynamic monitoring during goal directed therapies.