Patterns of treatment and correction of hyponatremia in intensive care unit patients

Impacts of perioperative hyponatremia relevant to outcomes and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

A recent study reported the effect of preoperative hyponatremia on postoperative outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, the influence of postoperative hyponatremia on postoperative outcomes has not been completely investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 75 octogenarians who underwent pulmonary surgery for non-small cell lung cancer between 2009 and 2018. We divided them into hyponatremic and non-hyponatremic groups, depending on preoperative and immediate postoperative serum sodium levels, and investigated their clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes. Disease-specific survival and cumulative incidence of relapse rates between the two groups were calculated and compared using the stratified Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Preoperative hyponatremia was associated with 66.7% of postoperative respiratory and 88.9% of non-cardiovascular complications. The long-term prognosis of the postoperative hyponatremic group was significantly worse than that of their counterpart. The 3-year disease-specific survival and 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse rate were 55.9% and 46.2%, respectively, and the median observation period after surgery was 37.4 (interquartile range, 23.7-51.0) months for the entire cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that hyponatremia was associated with worse disease-specific survival and cumulative incidence of relapse. Multivariable analysis identified hyponatremia as a factor that predicted unfavorable disease-specific survival and cumulative incidence of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate postoperative hyponatremia is an independent predictor of non-small cell lung cancer outcomes among octogenarians. Preoperative hyponatremia was associated with a high frequency of postoperative respiratory and non-cardiovascular complications. Surgical indications in older patients with hyponatremia should be carefully considered with follow-up.

Association Between an Increase in Serum Sodium and In-Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

OBJECTIVES:

In critically ill patients, dysnatremia is common, and in these patients, in-hospital mortality is higher. It remains unknown whether changes of serum sodium after ICU admission affect mortality, especially whether normalization of mild hyponatremia improves survival.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Ten Dutch ICUs between January 2011 and April 2017.

Patients:

Adult patients were included if at least one serum sodium measurement within 24 hours of ICU admission and at least one serum sodium measurement 24–48 hours after ICU admission were available.

INTERVENTIONS:

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

A logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV–predicted mortality was used to assess the difference between mean of sodium measurements 24–48 hours after ICU admission and first serum sodium measurement at ICU admission (Δ48 hr-[Na]) and in-hospital mortality. In total, 36,660 patients were included for analysis. An increase in serum sodium was independently associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with normonatremia (Δ48 hr-[Na] 5–10 mmol/L odds ratio: 1.61 [1.44–1.79], Δ48 hr-[Na] > 10 mmol/L odds ratio: 4.10 [3.20–5.24]) and hypernatremia (Δ48 hr-[Na] 5–10 mmol/L odds ratio: 1.47 [1.02–2.14], Δ48 hr-[Na] > 10 mmol/L odds ratio: 8.46 [3.31–21.64]). In patients admitted with mild hyponatremia and Δ48 hr-[Na] greater than 5 mmol/L, no significant difference in hospital mortality was found (odds ratio, 1.11 [0.99–1.25]).

CONCLUSIONS:

An increase in serum sodium in the first 48 hours of ICU admission was associated with higher in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with normonatremia and in patients admitted with hypernatremia.

Evaluation of Serum Sodium Correction Rates for Management of Hyponatremia in Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

Appropriate correction of hyponatremia can reduce complications such as osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rates of serum sodium correction in hyponatremic hospitalized patients and identify factors associated with higher rates of overcorrection.

METHODS

This is an institutional review board-approved single-center, retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 years of age with at least 1 serum sodium <130 mEq/L during hospitalization. The primary end point was percentage of patients appropriately corrected for hyponatremia. Appropriate correction was defined as a sodium change ≤12 mEq/L over 24 hours and 18 mEq/L over 48 hours, and overcorrection was defined as an increase in serum sodium exceeding these cutoffs. Secondary end points included incidence of ODS, poor neurological outcome, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay (LOSs), and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 234 patients evaluated, 100 were included. Mean age was 72 ± 16 years, and 47% were male. Overcorrection occurred in 14 patients. There was no incidence of ODS. Rates of poor neurological outcome (P = 0.77), ICU (P = 0.09) and hospital LOS (P = 0.13), and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.20) were similar between appropriately corrected and overcorrected patients. Using a logistic regression analysis, severe hyponatremia (serum sodium < 120 mEq/L; P = 0.0122) and history of alcohol use disorder (P < 0.001) were risk factors found to be associated with overcorrection.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Overcorrection of hyponatremia occurred in 14% of patients in this study. To minimize this risk, further caution should be taken when managing patients presenting with identified risk factors.

Intensive care unit-acquired hyponatremia in critically ill medical patients

Background

Previous research has focused on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired hypernatremia; however, ICU-acquired hyponatremia has frequently been overlooked and has rarely been studied in surgical or mixed ICUs. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of ICU-acquired hyponatremia, the risk factors associated with its development, and its impact on outcomes in critically ill medical patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the prospective registry of all critically ill patients admitted to the medical ICU from January 2015 to December 2018. Baseline characteristics and management variables were compared between ICU-acquired hyponatremia and normonatremia patients.

Results

Of 1342 patients with initial normonatremia, ICU-acquired hyponatremia developed in 217 (16.2%) patients and ICU-acquired hypernatremia developed in 117 (8.7%) patients. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (8.0 vs 7.0, P = 0.009) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 scores (55.0 vs 51.0, P = 0.005) were higher in ICU-acquired hyponatremia patients compared with normonatremia patients. Baseline sodium (137.0 mmol/L vs 139.0 mmol/L, P < 0.001), potassium (4.2 mmol/L vs 4.0 mmol/L, P = 0.001), and creatinine (0.98 mg/dL vs 0.88 mg/dL, P = 0.034) levels were different between the two groups. Net volume balance over first 3 days was higher in ICU-acquired hyponatremia patients (19.4 mL/kg vs 11.5 mL/kg, P = 0.004) and was associated with the development of ICU-acquired hyponatremia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 1.002–1.007; P = 0.001). ICU mortality was similar in both groups (15.2% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.751), but renal replacement therapy was more commonly required in ICU-acquired hyponatremia patients (13.4% vs 7.4%, P = 0.007).

Conclusions

ICU-acquired hyponatremia is not uncommon in critically ill medical patients. Increased volume balance is associated with its development. ICU-acquired hyponatremia is related to increased use of renal replacement therapy but not to mortality.

[Hyponatremia-workflow for intensive care physicians]

Hyponatremia (sodium <135 mmol/l) is the most common electrolyte disorder. Despite identical serum concentrations, clinical symptomatology can vary greatly from mild to life-threatening. Accordingly, individual patients require immediate active treatment, while the majority of (mostly oligosymptomatic) patients should first undergo differentiated diagnosis. The most important element is the assessment of the clinical situation of the patient and never isolated laboratory chemical constellations: "Treat the patient, not the numbers".

Practical document on the management of hyponatremia in critically ill patients

Hyponatremia is the most prevalent electrolyte disorder in Intensive Care Units. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. The majority of the published studies are observational, retrospective and do not include critical patients; hence it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, the lack of clinical evidence has led to important dissimilarities in the recommendations coming from different scientific societies. Finally, etiopathogenic mechanisms leading to hyponatremia in the critical care patient are complex and often combined, and an intensive analysis is clearly needed. A study was therefore made to review all clinical aspects about hyponatremia management in the critical care setting. The aim was to develop a Spanish nationwide algorithm to standardize hyponatremia diagnosis and treatment in the critical care patient.

Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults

BACKGROUND:

Both balanced crystalloids and saline are used for intravenous fluid administration among critically ill adults. Which results in better clinical outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS:

In a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial in five intensive care units at an academic center, we assigned 15,802 adults to receive saline (0.9% sodium chloride) or balanced crystalloids (lactated Ringer’s solution or Plasma-Lyte A®), according to the randomization of the unit to which they were admitted. The primary outcome was Major Adverse Kidney Events within 30 days (MAKE30), i.e., the composite of death, new renal replacement therapy, or persistent creatinine elevation ≥ 200% of baseline – all censored at the first of hospital discharge or 30 days.

RESULTS:

In the balanced crystalloid group, 1,139 patients (14.3%) experienced MAKE30, compared to 1,211 patients (15.4%) in the saline group (marginal odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.99; conditional odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–0.99; P=0.04). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 10.3% in the balanced crystalloid group and 11.1% in the saline group (P=0.06). The incidence of new renal replacement therapy was 2.5% and 2.9% respectively (P=0.08), and the incidence of persistent creatinine elevation was 6.4% and 6.6% respectively (P=0.60).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among critically ill adults, the use of balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid administration appeared to reduce the composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, new renal replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction compared with the use of saline. (SMART-MED and SMART-SURG ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02444988 and NCT02547779.)