Echocardiographic approach to cardiac tamponade in critically ill patients

Heart in Focus: Advancing Pericardial Effusion Diagnosis With Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Pericardial effusion refers to the accumulation of fluid within the pericardial sac, the double-layered membrane surrounding the heart. It can be caused by various medical conditions and may lead to serious complications if not diagnosed and managed promptly. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a valuable tool in the clinical evaluation of pericardial effusions, offering real-time visualization and aiding in the assessment of its size, characteristics, and potential hemodynamic impact. This comprehensive revision explores the utility of POCUS in diagnosing and managing pericardial effusions. POCUS has gained prominence as a bedside diagnostic tool due to its immediacy, accuracy, and non-invasive nature. This study investigates how POCUS can address critical gaps in current diagnostic approaches, such as delays in diagnosis using traditional imaging modalities and challenges in resource-limited settings, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and clinical decision-making. A search was conducted on PubMed in August of 2023, using the keywords "POCUS" and "pericardial" as MeSH terms and reference mining. A total of 19 articles were included in this review. Characterization and quantification of pericardial effusion (PEF) using POCUS can provide clinicians with critical clues regarding the underlying etiology. This information, combined with other hemodynamic parameters, should guide subsequent management decisions. POCUS enables the identification of key sonographic findings, such as diastolic collapse of the right chambers, abnormal septal movement, and an engorged inferior vena cava (IVC), which together raise a high clinical suspicion of cardiac tamponade. Beyond its utility in identifying tamponade, POCUS plays a significant role in detecting subtle yet life-threatening conditions, such as aortic dissection, which may manifest as pericardial effusion due to hemopericardium. While POCUS is not definitive for diagnosing aortic dissection, indirect findings such as a pericardial effusion with hemodynamic compromise, coupled with high clinical suspicion, should prompt further imaging like CT angiography for confirmation. We propose an algorithmic approach: if cardiac tamponade is confirmed on POCUS, emergent pericardiocentesis is warranted. If ruled out, further investigations should be directed toward identifying the underlying cause of the PEF, including potentially ruling out aortic dissection to avoid missing a subtle but critical condition. POCUS has revolutionized the clinical evaluation of pericardial effusions, providing clinicians with a rapid and accurate bedside tool for diagnosis and management. Its ability to assess effusion size, identify cardiac tamponade, and guide pericardiocentesis procedures has proven invaluable in improving patient outcomes. Integrating POCUS into routine clinical practice enhances diagnostic accuracy and timely intervention, ensuring better care for patients with pericardial effusions. However, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. POCUS is highly operator-dependent, with diagnostic accuracy varying based on the clinician's experience and training. Additionally, the availability of ultrasound equipment and adequately trained personnel can be a barrier, particularly in resource-limited settings. Addressing these challenges is crucial to maximizing the utility of POCUS in clinical practice.

The physiology of cardiac tamponade and implications for patient management

Exceeding the limit of pericardial stretch, intrapericardial collections exert compression on the right heart and decrease preload. Compensatory mechanisms ensue to maintain hemodynamics in the face of a depressed stroke volume but are outstripped as disease progresses. When constrained within a pressurized pericardial space, the right and left ventricles exhibit differential filling mediated by changes in intrathoracic pressure. Invasive hemodynamics and echocardiographic findings inform on the physiologic effects. In this review, we describe tamponade physiology and implications for supportive care and effusion drainage.

Intra-pericardial thrombin injection in iatrogenic cardiac tamponade: a case report

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, percutaneous procedures are expanding in use, and this comes with complications associated with the procedure itself. Cardiac tamponade is rare but may be life threatening since it can involve hemodynamic instability. It is known that after pleural effusion during a percutaneous procedure, pericardiocentesis should be used as drainage of the cavity. However, that does not achieve hemostasis in some cases, and in those patients who are hemodynamically unstable, a sealing agent to promote hemostasis might be useful, like thrombin.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case report of 89-year-old patient with history of melanoma undergoing treatment with pembrolizumab, who attended the emergency department referring chest pain (intensity 5/10) and palpitations that have lasted hours. He had TnTUs 554/566 ng/L and an echocardiogram that showed dilated right chambers, hypertrophy and global hypokinesia of the left ventricle, increased filling pressures of the left ventricle and pulmonary hypertension. Myocarditis associated with pembrolizumab was suspected, so high dose steroids were initiated and endomyocardial biopsy was conducted, resulting in iatrogenic cardiac tamponade. To determine the etiology of the suspected myocarditis, an endomyocardial biopsy was performed. Unfortunately, an intraprocedural complication arose: pleural effusion resulting in iatrogenic cardiac tamponade, leading to hemodynamic instability. It required immediate pericardial drainage via subxiphoid puncture, obtaining a 550 mL hematic debit. Clinical manifestations raised suspicion of tamponade, prompting a bedside echocardiogram for a definitive diagnosis. Despite these efforts, the patient remained hemodynamically unstable, and due to the elevated surgical risk, intrapericardial thrombin was employed to achieve successful hemostasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac tamponade is a life-threatening condition that can sometimes be induced iatrogenically, resulting from percutaneous interventions. Despite limited evidence regarding this therapeutic strategy, in patients experiencing iatrogenic cardiac tamponade with hemodynamic instability and high surgical risk, the administration of intra-pericardial thrombin could be contemplated.

Point-of-Care Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Pericardium

Acute pericardial conditions, such as tamponade, are often rapidly progressive and can become life-threatening without timely diagnosis and intervention. In this review, we aim to describe bedside ultrasonographic evaluation of the pericardium and diagnostic criteria for tamponade, identify confounders in the diagnosis of pericardial tamponade, and delineate procedural details of ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis.

Point-of-care ultrasound use in emergencies: what every anaesthetist should know

Point-of-care ultrasound has been embraced by anaesthetists as an invaluable tool for rapid diagnosis of haemodynamic instability, to ensure procedural safety and monitor response to treatments. Increasingly available, affordable and portable, with emerging evidence of improved patient outcomes, point-of-care ultrasound has become a valuable tool in the emergency setting. This state-of-the-art review describes the feasibility of point-of-care ultrasound practice, training and maintenance of competence. It also describes the many uses of point-of-care ultrasound for the anaesthetist and describes the most salient point-of-care ultrasound views for anaesthetic emergencies including: undifferentiated shock; hypoxemia; and trauma. Procedural safety is also discussed in addition to relevant important governance aspects. Cardiac function should be assessed using the parasternal long axis, parasternal short basal/mid-papillary/apical, apical four chamber and subcostal four chamber views, and should include a visual estimation of global left ventricular ejection fraction. Other cardiovascular conditions that can be identified using point-of-care ultrasound include: pericardial effusion; cardiac tamponade; and pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary emergency conditions that can be diagnosed using point-of-care ultrasound include pneumothorax; pleural effusion; and interstitial syndrome. The extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination may of value in patients who are hypotensive in order to identify intra-abdominal haemorrhage, pneumothoraces and haemothoraces.

When is tamponade not an echocardiographic diagnosis… Or is it ever?

Although cardiac tamponade remains a clinical diagnosis, echocardiography is an essential tool to detect fluid in the pericardial space. Interpretation of echocardiographic findings and assessment of physiologic and hemodynamic consequences of a pericardial effusion require a thorough understanding of pathophysiologic processes. Certain echocardiographic signs point toward the presence of cardiac tamponade: a dilated inferior vena cava (IVC), collapse of the cardiac chambers, an inspiratory bulge of the interventricular septum into the left ventricle (LV) (the "septal bounce"), and characteristic respiratory variations of Doppler flow velocity recordings. However, in certain circumstances (e.g., mechanical ventilation, post-surgical patients, and pulmonary hypertension), these echocardiographic signs can be missing, despite the presence of clinical tamponade. Failure to recognize a potentially life-threatening clinical condition due to the absence of corresponding echocardiographic findings can delay both diagnosis and life-saving treatment. Thus, in the context of critical care, echocardiography should only be used to confirm the presence of pericardial fluid or localized hematoma, and the diagnosis of tamponade should rely on clinical criteria.

Adapting the role of handheld echocardiography during the COVID-19 pandemic: A practical guide

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered our approach to inpatient echocardiography delivery. There is now a greater focus to address key clinical questions likely to make an immediate impact in management, particularly during the period of widespread infection. Handheld echocardiography (HHE) can be used as a first-line assessment tool, limiting scanning time and exposure to high viral load. This article describes a potential role for HHE during a pandemic. We propose a protocol with a reporting template for a focused core dataset necessary in delivering an acute echocardiography service in the setting of a highly contagious disease, minimising risk to the operator. We cover the scenarios typically encountered in the acute cardiology setting and how an expert trained echocardiography team can identify such pathologies using a limited imaging format and include cardiac presentations encountered in those patients acutely unwell with COVID-19.

Isolated Left Atrial Cardiac Tamponade Caused by Pleural Effusion

A localized left atrial tamponade caused by left side pleural effusion is a rare finding that leads to hemodynamic instability. Here, we describe left atrial systolic and diastolic collapse resulting from left pleural effusion. An increase in intrapleural pressure by a pleural effusion can compress the pericardial space and lead to impaired cardiac filling and tamponade physiology. Here, we present a case of a 79-year old African American female who presented with shortness of breath and dry cough for a duration of one week. Chest radiograph and CT scan of the chest showed left pleural effusion. The echocardiogram revealed left atrial systolic and diastolic collapse due to pleural effusion, which triggered cardiac tamponade physiology. With the guidance of a bedside thoracic ultrasound, she underwent a diagnostic and therapeutic thoracentesis which resolved her symptoms. Repeat echocardiogram revealed resolution of the cardiac tamponade with no further indication of left atrial diastolic collapse. In conclusion, pleural effusions can cause tamponade physiology and can be resolved by thoracentesis. Early recognition by a bedside point-of-care ultrasound may help provide prompt relief of tamponade.

Acute life-threatening cardiac tamponade in a mechanically ventilated patient with COVID-19 pneumonia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has recently evolved as a pandemic disease. Although the respiratory system is predominantly affected, cardiovascular complications have been frequently identified, including acute myocarditis, myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, arrhythmias and venous thromboembolic events. Pericardial disease has been rarely reported. We present a case of acute life-threatening cardiac tamponade caused by a small pericardial effusion in a mechanically ventilated patient with severe COVID-19 associated pneumonia. The patient presented acute circulatory collapse with hemodynamic features of cardiogenic or obstructive shock. Bedside echocardiography permitted prompt diagnosis and life-saving pericardiocentesis. Further investigation revealed no other apparent cause of pericardial effusion except for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cardiac tamponade may complicate COVID-19 and should be included in the differential diagnosis of acute hemodynamic deterioration in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Perioperative Management of the Cardiac Transplant Recipient

Management of the cardiac transplant recipient includes careful titration of inotropes and vasopressors. Recipient pulmonary hypertension and ventilatory status must be optimized to prevent allograft right ventricular failure. Vasoplegia, coagulopathy, arrhythmias, and renal dysfunction also require careful management to achieve an optimal outcome. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) can be an ominous problem after cardiac transplantation. Although mild degrees of PGD may be managed medically, mechanical circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or temporary ventricular assist devices may be required. Retransplantation may be necessary in some cases.

Exertional dyspnea after myocardial infarction: thinking beyond the diagnosis of heart failure

INTRODUCTION

We herein present an unusual case of a pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricular myocardium, which is a rare and fatal complication of myocardial infarction.

CASE REPORT

A 64-year-old man with a history of bipolar disorder and arterial hypertension was hospitalized for delayed presentation ST-elevation myocardial infarction. He was admitted to our hospital 24 hours after symptom onset. Diagnostic coronary angiography revealed 95% stenosis at the distal third of the right coronary artery, and he underwent a primary percutaneous coronary intervention to the culprit lesion. Despite administration of a diuretic and optimization of other pharmaceutical treatment, his heart failure deteriorated. Electrocardiography showed a sinus rhythm with Q-wave formation in the inferior wall leads (II, III, aVF), T-wave inversion in the same leads, and borderline QT prolongation (QTc of 490 ms). No ST elevation suggestive of left ventricular aneurysm formation was noticed. Forty days later, cardiac ultrasound revealed a dyskinetic cavity (pseudoaneurysm) in continuity with the posterior-inferior wall of the myocardium, resulting in severe mitral valve regurgitation. Unfortunately, the patient died while awaiting surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although most patients with left ventricular pseudoaneurysm have a relatively benign outcome, those with symptoms of heart failure must be urgently diagnosed and treated.

Pericardial Disease Associated with Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pericardial effusion is commonly associated with malignancy. The goals of treatment should include optimizing symptom relief, minimizing repeat interventions, and restoring as much functional status as possible.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pericardiocentesis should be the first intervention but has high recurrence rates (30-60%). For patients with recurrence, repeat pericardiocentesis is indicated in those with limited expected lifespans. Extended pericardial drainage decreases recurrence to 10-20%. The addition of sclerosing agents decreases recurrence slightly but creates significant pain and can lead to pericardial constriction and therefore has fallen out of favor. Most patients with symptomatic pericardial disease have a short median survival time due to their underlying disease. In patients with a longer life expectancy, surgical drainage offers the lowest recurrence rate. Surgical approach is based on effusion location and clinical condition. Subxiphoid and thoracoscopic approaches lead to similar outcomes. Thoracotomy should be avoided as it increases morbidity without improving outcomes.

Tamponade: Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Diagnosis

Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency that can be readily reversed with timely recognition and appropriate intervention. The clinical diagnosis of cardiac tamponade requires synthesis of a constellation of otherwise nonspecific features based on an understanding of the underlying pathophysiological characteristics. Although echocardiographic examination is a central component of diagnosis, alone it is insufficient to establish the physiological diagnosis of hemodynamically significant cardiac tamponade. The hemodynamic diagnosis of cardiac tamponade requires clinical evidence of low cardiac output and stroke volume in the setting of elevated cardiac filling pressures, with evidence of increased sympathetic tone (eg, tachycardia, peripheral vasoconstriction), and exclusion of other causes of shock as the primary problem (particularly cardiogenic shock). The hemodynamic features of tamponade are revealed by considering the effects of pericardial constraint. Pulsus paradoxus and loss of the normal "y" descent of a jugular venous pressure waveform may be appreciated on clinical examination. When a pulmonary artery catheter is placed, equalization of diastolic pressures across all chambers is observed. Echocardiographic examination confirms the size, location, and other characteristics of the causal pericardial collection. Several echocardiographic features support the hemodynamic diagnosis of tamponade, including early diastolic collapse of the right ventricle, late diastolic collapse of the right atrium, respiratory variation in mitral valve inflow (akin to pulsus paradoxus), and decreased early filling (E wave) of mitral valve inflow (related to loss of the y descent). Echocardiographic examination then supports decisions about the early treatment and drainage of the tamponading effusion.