1
|
Rognoni C, Pohlmeier R, Tarricone R. Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus Systemic Heparin in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy: Examining the Role of Evidence in Health Technology Assessment. Adv Ther 2025:10.1007/s12325-025-03186-8. [PMID: 40238058 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03186-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is an established treatment supporting kidney function in patients with severe acute kidney disease. Systemic heparin and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) are the main anticoagulation strategies to prevent dialysis filter loss due to clotting, a complication of all KRT, including CKRT. The present study aims to comprehensively compare two anticoagulation strategies by collecting available clinical and economic evidence for an adult population under CKRT through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. METHODS Randomized controlled trials, prospective/retrospective observational studies and economic analyses, involving systemic heparin or RCA, were searched through PubMed and Web of Science databases. Extracted data focused on clinical parameters, adverse events and cost items. Meta-analyses were conducted on data points with numeric outcomes to compare the two anticoagulation techniques. An evaluation of the quality of the evidence was also conducted using the GRADE system. RESULTS Seventy-two studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Statistically significant differences between heparin and RCA were observed in ionized calcium levels (mmol/l; heparin 1.19, RCA 1.13), bleeding events (heparin 12.6%, RCA 2.4%), filter lifespan (hours; heparin 16.43, RCA 36.69), clotting issues (heparin 50.7%, RCA 21.3%), filter failure rate (heparin 67.7%, RCA 13.5%), hypocalcemia (heparin 0.1%, RCA 4.4%) and alkalosis (heparin 0.4%, RCA 6.6%) rates. Limitations include heterogeneity across studies, particularly for RCA, and potential biases, although the overall methodological quality ranged from moderate to low. CONCLUSIONS Based on the evidence presented, despite higher rates of hypocalcemia and alkalosis, RCA demonstrates advantages over heparin, including a reduction in bleeding events, prevention of filter clotting and improvement in filter lifespan. Additionally, the cost outcome demonstrated comparable statistics depending on the RCA protocol considered, which supports the potential cost-effectiveness of RCA. RCA provides clear clinical and potential organizational benefits and comparable cost statistics with a reasonable level of confidence in the evidence for the economic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Rognoni
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Rosanna Tarricone
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136, Milan, Italy
- Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assefi M, Leurent A, Blanchard F, Quemeneur C, Deransy R, Monsel A, Constantin JM. Impact of increasing post-filter ionized calcium target on filter lifespan in renal replacement therapy with regional citrate anticoagulation: A before-and-after study. J Crit Care 2023; 78:154364. [PMID: 37379797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is the recommended method for anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, the optimal post-filter ionized calcium (iCa) target level remains unclear. This study aims to assess the effect of increasing the post-filter iCa target level from 0.25-0.35 mmol/L to 0.30-0.40 mmol/L on filter lifespan until clotting during RCA-CRRT. METHODS This before-and-after single-center study included patients who underwent RCA-CRRT sessions without systemic anticoagulation during two periods. The first period included patients with a post-filter iCa target between 0.25 and 0.35 mmol/L, while the second period included those with a target between 0.30 and 0.40 mmol/L. The primary outcome was filter lifespan until clotting. RESULTS A total of 1037 CRRT sessions were analyzed, with 610 sessions in the first period and 427 sessions in the second period. After adjusting for confounding factors, there was no significant difference in filter lifespan until clotting between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.020 [0.703; 1.481]; p = 0.92). CONCLUSION Increasing the post-filter iCa target level from 0.25-0.35 mmol/L to 0.30-0.40 mmol/L during RCA-CRRT does not reduce filter lifespan until clotting and may decrease unnecessary citrate exposure. However, the optimal post-filter iCa target should be individualized according to the patient's clinical and biological status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Assefi
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
| | - Alix Leurent
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Florian Blanchard
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Cyril Quemeneur
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Romain Deransy
- Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Antoine Monsel
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne University-INSERM UMRS_959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), 75013 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Michel Constantin
- Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thanapongsatorn P, Sinjira T, Kaewdoungtien P, Kusirisin P, Kulvichit W, Sirivongrangson P, Peerapornratana S, Lumlertgul N, Srisawat N. Standard versus no post-filter ionized calcium monitoring in regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (NPC trial). Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:1469-1479. [PMID: 37664560 PMCID: PMC10468745 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend monitoring of post-filter ionized calcium (pfCa) when using regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy (RCA-CRRT) to determine citrate efficiency for the prevention of filter clotting. However, the reliability of pfCa raises the question of whether routine monitoring is required. Reducing the frequency of pfCa monitoring could potentially reduce costs and workload. Our objective was to test the efficacy and safety of no pfCa monitoring among critically ill patients receiving RCA-CRRT. Methods This study was a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between January 2021 and October 2021 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand. Critically ill patients who were treated with RCA-CRRT were randomized to receive either standard pfCa monitoring (aiming pfCa level of 0.25-0.35 mmol/L), or no pfCa monitoring, in which a constant rate of citrate infusion was maintained at pre-determined citrate concentrations of 4 mmol/L with blinding of pfCa levels to treating clinicians. The primary outcome was the filter lifespan. Non-inferiority would be demonstrated if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in filter lifespan between the groups was less than 20 h. Results Fifty patients were randomized to the standard pfCa monitoring group (n = 25) or no pfCa monitoring group (n = 25). The mean filter lifespan was 54 ± 20 h in the standard pfCa monitoring group and 47 ± 23 h in the no pfCa monitoring group (absolute difference 7.1 h; 95% CI -5.3, 19.5, P = .25). When restricting the analysis to circuits reaching the maximum duration of circuit lifespan at 72 h and clotted filters, the filter lifespan was 61 ± 17 h in the standard pfCa group vs 60 ± 19 h in the no pfCa monitoring group (absolute difference 0.9 h; 95% CI -11.5, 13.4, P = .88). Compared with the no pfCa monitoring group, the standard pfCa monitoring group had a significantly higher mean citrate concentrations (4.43 ± 0.32 vs 4 mmol/L, P < .001) and a higher rate of severe hypocalcemia (44% vs 20%, P = .13). No statistical differences were found in filter clotting, citrate accumulation, citrate overload and mortality between the two groups. Conclusions Among critically ill patients receiving RCA-CRRT, no pfCa monitoring by maintaining the citrate concentrations of 4 mmol/L is feasible. Larger randomized controlled trials should be conducted to ensure the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of this strategy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04792424 (registered 11 March 2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peerapat Thanapongsatorn
- Department of Medicine, Central Chest Institute of Thailand, Nonthaburi, Thailand
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tanyapim Sinjira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Piyanut Kaewdoungtien
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prit Kusirisin
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Win Kulvichit
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Sadudee Peerapornratana
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Critical Care Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nuttha Lumlertgul
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Critical Care Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nattachai Srisawat
- Excellence Center for Critical Care Nephrology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Critical Care Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Academy of Science, Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu SY, Xu SY, Yin L, Yang T, Jin K, Zhang QB, Sun F, Tan DY, Xin TY, Chen YG, Zhao XD, Yu XZ, Xu J. Management of regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: guideline recommendations from Chinese emergency medical doctor consensus. Mil Med Res 2023; 10:23. [PMID: 37248514 DOI: 10.1186/s40779-023-00457-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely used for treating critically-ill patients in the emergency department in China. Anticoagulant therapy is needed to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circulation during CRRT. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been shown to potentially be safer and more effective and is now recommended as the preferred anticoagulant method for CRRT. However, there is still a lack of unified standards for RCA management in the world, and there are many problems in using this method in clinical practice. The Emergency Medical Doctor Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA) organized a panel of domestic emergency medicine experts and international experts of CRRT to discuss RCA-related issues, including the advantages and disadvantages of RCA in CRRT anticoagulation, the principle of RCA, parameter settings for RCA, monitoring of RCA (mainly metabolic acid-base disorders), and special issues during RCA. Based on the latest available research evidence as well as the paneled experts' clinical experience, considering the generalizability, suitability, and potential resource utilization, while also balancing clinical advantages and disadvantages, a total of 16 guideline recommendations were formed from the experts' consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Yuan Liu
- Emergency Department, The Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, China
| | - Sheng-Yong Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Emergency Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lu Yin
- Emergency Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, China
| | - Ting Yang
- Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650000, China
| | - Kui Jin
- Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, China
| | - Qiu-Bin Zhang
- Emergency Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou, 570100, China
| | - Feng Sun
- Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Ding-Yu Tan
- Emergency Department, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Tian-Yu Xin
- Emergency Department, The Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, China
| | - Yu-Guo Chen
- Emergency Department and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 100005, China.
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jinan, 100005, China.
- Key Laboratory of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 100005, China.
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhao
- Emergency Department, The Fourth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, China.
| | - Xue-Zhong Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Emergency Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Jun Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Emergency Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sansom B, Udy A, Sriram S, Presneill J, Bellomo R. Circuit haemodynamics during non-citrate and regional citrate continuous renal replacement, and impact of blood flow on filter life. Int J Artif Organs 2022; 45:988-996. [PMID: 36036083 DOI: 10.1177/03913988221118585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), blood flow (Qb) might affect vascular access dysfunction (AD) and, thereby, circuit life. METHODS Circuit life and circuit haemodynamics were studied in three intensive care units (ICUs) by analysing hemofilter device data (Prismaflex®, Baxter, Chicago, IL). The three sites shared similar RCA protocols but differed in Qb (120-130 vs 150-200 mL/h). Non-RCA circuits were compared with RCA circuits in which the impact of Qb was also assessed. RESULTS About 3,981,906 min of circuit pressures were analysed in 2568 circuits in 567 patients. High-Qb RCA was associated with more extreme pressures, and greater AD (IRR 3.7 (1.93-7.08) as well as reduced filter life 21.1 (10.2-42.6) vs 27.0 (14.8-41.6) h). AD in high-Qb RCA circuits was associated with a 49% reduction in filter life, versus 24% reduction in low-Qb RCA, associated with a rise in the rate of increase in transfilter pressure. CONCLUSIONS High-Qb RCA-CRRT was associated with greater access dysfunction, earlier filter loss and increased haemodynamic impacts of access dysfunction, suggesting low-Qb RCA-CRRT may improve circuit mechanics, function and longevity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Sansom
- Department of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Udy
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shyamala Sriram
- Department of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Presneill
- Department of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rinaldo Bellomo
- Department of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Intensive Care, The Austin, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|