Impact of bilateral cataract surgery on vision-related activity limitations

Perception of Canadian ophthalmologists on immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery: insights and implications

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perception of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) among Canadian ophthalmologists.

DESIGN

An anonymous survey was sent to all active members of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society.

METHODS

Basic demographic information, cataract surgery practice patterns, and perceived advantages, disadvantages, and concerns regarding ISBCS were collected from respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 352 ophthalmologists answered the survey. Among these, 94 respondents (27%) practice ISBCS routinely, 123 (35%) practice ISBCS in exceptional cases, and 131 (37%) do not practice ISBCS. ISBCS practitioners were significantly younger than nonpractitioners (p < 0.001) and had a shorter duration of practice (p < 0.001). The prevalence of ISBCS practitioners also varied significantly by province (p < 0.001): most practitioners who routinely practice ISBCS were from Quebec (n = 44; 48%), where financial disincentives are lowest in the country. The main work setting of ISBCS practitioners was academic centres (n = 39; 42%) as opposed to private or community settings (p < 0.001). The main reason for performing ISBCS was more efficient operating theatre use (n = 142; 65%). The main concerns regarding ISBCS were the risk of bilateral complications (n = 193; 57%) and the lack of refractive outcomes for second-eye surgery (n = 184; 52%). The COVID-19 pandemic positively influenced the view of 152 respondents (43%), but this was mostly among practitioners who already performed ISBCS routinely (n = 77; 84%).

CONCLUSIONS

ISBCS practitioners are more likely younger ophthalmologists working in academic centres. Quebec has the highest prevalence of ISBCS practitioners. ISBCS practitioners were positively influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic to offer ISBCS more often compared with non-ISBCS practitioners.

Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

To investigate the psychometric performance and responsiveness of Catquest-9SF, a patient-reported questionnaire developed to evaluate visual function as related to daily tasks, in patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

This is a pooled analysis on prospective data collected for previous projects. Subjects were recruited from three tertiary care centers in Peel region, Hamilton, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Catquest-9SF was administered pre-operative and post-operatively to patients with cataract. Psychometric properties, including category threshold order, infit/outfit, precision, unidimensionality, targeting, and differential item functioning were tested using Rasch analysis with Winsteps software (v.4.4.4) for Catquest-9SF. Responsiveness of questionnaire scores to cataract surgery was assessed.

RESULTS

934 patients (mean age = 71.6, 492[52.7%] female) completed the pre- and post-operative Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.01, person reliability = 0.80), and confirmed unidimensionality. The infit range was 0.75-1.29 and the outfit range was 0.74-1.51, with one item ('satisfaction with vision') misfitting (outfit value = 1.51). There was mistargeting of -1.07 in pre-operative scores and mistargeting of -2.43 in both pre- and post-operative scores, meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. There was no adverse differential item functioning. There was a mean 1.47 logit improvement in Catquest-9SF scores after cataract surgery (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Catquest-9SF is a psychometrically robust questionnaire for assessment of visual function in patients with cataract in Ontario, Canada. It is also responsive to clinical improvement after cataract surgery.

Perception of visual outcomes in patients after delayed compared with immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient-reported visual outcomes of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) compared with delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS).

SETTING

Tertiary university teaching hospital of Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

METHODS

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was administered on the day of surgery for ISBCS patients and on the day of first-eye surgery for DSBCS patients who underwent cataract surgery between August and September 2021. The questionnaire was administered again 1 month postoperatively for ISBCS patients and 1 month postoperatively after each surgery for DSBCS patients.

RESULTS

186 patients (ISBCS: n = 152 vs DSBCS: n = 34) were included. At 1 month postoperatively, the Catquest-9SF score of ISBCS patients was significantly lower than that of DSBCS patients after first-eye surgery ( P < .001). Furthermore, the ISBCS group achieved significantly better scores on multiple tasks of the Catquest-9SF, such as reading text in the newspaper ( P < .001) or reading text on television ( P < .001). In multiple linear regression analysis, the type of surgery was the factor most associated with a lower Catquest-9SF score (β = -0.391, P < .001). 1 month after the second-eye surgery, DSBCS patients had achieved similar Catquest-9SF scores compared with ISBCS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with DSBCS patients, ISBCS patients had significantly greater perceived visual function and fewer vision-related limitations in their daily activities at 1 month postoperatively. This difference lost significance 1 month after the second-eye surgery of DSBCS patients. This patient-reported outcome study did not find evidence of perceived bilateral visual impairment in the early postoperative period after ISBCS.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis

PURPOSE

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire is a tool measuring visual disability and vision-related limitation in patients' daily activities. The primary objective of this study was the validation of Catquest-9SF in a Greek-speaking cataract population.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated into Greek and translated back into English. A pre-final Greek version was formed and tested by 10 Greek-English bilingual participants and by the translation team, and the final version was produced. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery completed the questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Rasch analysis was performed for the assessment of the Catquest-9SF psychometric properties, including response category ordering, item fit statistics, principal components analysis, precision, differential item functioning and targeting for preoperative and postoperative data collectively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 (55 men, 45 women, mean age = 71.94±6.63) cataract patients completed the Greek version of Catquest-9SF questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Rasch analysis showed a significant improvement in the median person Rasch score from -1.49 preoperatively to -4.71 logits postoperatively, while the effect size was 1.3. Unidimensionality was confirmed since infit and outfit mean square values varied between 0.66 and 1.37. Rasch analysis showed good precision and separation ability (Person Separation Index of 3.28, and Person Reliability of 0.92). Four response categories were found for all items. The item-person means difference was -1.83 logits. The difference between preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF logit score was positively correlated with preoperative Catquest-9SF logit score (coeff. = 0.798, p<0.0001) and negatively correlated with postoperative spherical equivalent (coeff. = -0.825, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The Greek version of Catquest-9SF proved to be reliable, valid, unidimensional and responsive to changes after cataract surgery presenting good psychometric properties for cataract patients. Some postoperative mistargeting was found indicating that the tasks were easily performed by respondents after cataract surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05323526 -retrospectively registered.

Self-assessed visual function outcome in cataract surgery: minimum important difference of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to study the minimum important difference (MID) of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in cataract surgery.

METHODS

A nationwide multi-center prospective randomized study was conducted using the Swedish National Cataract Register and the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Randomized patients (n = 400) who had completed the Catquest-9SF before surgery and three months after surgery were sent an anchor question on self-assessed change in visual function after cataract surgery 14 days after the postoperative Catquest-9SF. Rasch analysis was performed on the preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF questionnaires, and the patients were dichotomized with regard to their preoperative Rasch score. The MID range of the two groups was calculated based on the anchor question, and the anchor question based MID was then estimated in a scatter plot. The MID was also estimated based on distribution by calculating Cohen's effect size.

RESULTS

The analyses included 231 patients who had completed the Catquest-9SF on both occasions as well as the questionnaire with the anchor question. The group with better preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 0.5 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.07. The group with worse preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 1.80 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.46.

CONCLUSION

This article contributes detailed knowledge of the MID of Catquest-9SF, enabling even more accurate high-quality evaluation of the outcome and benefit of cataract surgery worldwide.

Immediate sequential bilateral surgery versus delayed sequential bilateral surgery for cataracts

BACKGROUND

Age-related cataract affects both eyes in most cases. Most people undergo cataract surgery in both eyes on separate days, referred to as delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). An alternative procedure involves operating on both eyes on the same day, but as two separate procedures, known as immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS). Potential advantages of ISBCS include fewer hospital visits for the patient, faster visual recovery, and lower healthcare costs. Nevertheless, concerns exist about possible bilateral, postoperative, sight-threatening adverse effects with ISBCS. Therefore, there is a clear need for evaluating evidence regarding the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of ISBCS versus DSBCS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of ISBCS compared to DSBCS in people with bilateral age-related cataracts and to summarise current evidence for the incremental resource use, utilities, costs, and cost-effectiveness associated with the use of ISBCS compared to DSBCS in people with bilateral age-related cataracts (primary objectives). The secondary objective was to assess visual and patient-reported outcomes of ISBCS compared to DSBCS in people with bilateral age-related cataracts.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 5); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; the WHO ICTRP; and DARE and NHS EED on the CRD Database on 11 May 2021. There were no language restrictions. We limited the searches to a date range of 2007 onwards.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess complications, refractive outcomes, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with ISBCS compared to DSBCS. We included non-randomised (NRSs), prospective, and retrospective cohort studies comparing ISBCS and DSBCS for safety assessment, because of the rare incidence of important adverse events. To assess cost-effectiveness of ISBCS compared to DSBCS, we included both full and partial economic evaluations, and both trial-based and model-based economic evaluations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures and assessed risk of bias for NRSs using the ROBINS-I tool. For cost-evaluations, we used the CHEC-list, the CHEERS-checklist, and the NICE-checklist to investigate risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence with the GRADE tool. We reported results for economic evaluations narratively.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 studies in the review; two RCTs, seven NRSs, and six economic evaluations (one study was both an NRS and economic evaluation). The studies reported on 276,260 participants (7384 for ISBCS and 268,876 for DSBCS) and were conducted in Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Iran, (South) Korea, Spain (Canary Islands), Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Overall, we considered the included RCTs to be at 'high to some concerns' risk of bias for complications, 'some concerns' risk of bias for refractive outcomes and visual acuity, and 'high' risk of bias for PROMs. The overall risk of bias for NRSs was graded 'serious' regarding complications and 'serious to critical' regarding refractive outcomes.  With regard to endophthalmitis, we found that relative effects were estimated imprecisely and with low certainty, so that relative estimates were not reliable. Nonetheless, we found a very low risk of endophthalmitis in both ISBCS (1/14,076 participants) and DSBCS (55/556,246 participants) groups. Based on descriptive evidence and partially weak statistical evidence we found no evidence of an increased risk of endophthalmitis with ISBCS. Regarding refractive outcomes, we found moderate-certainty (RCTs) and low-certainty (NRSs) evidence there was no difference in the percentage of eyes that did not achieve refraction within 1.0 dioptre of target one to three months after surgery (RCTs: risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.26; NRSs: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.75). Similarly, postoperative complications did not differ between groups (RCTs: RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.40; NRSs: 1.04, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.29), although the certainty of this evidence was very low for both RCTs and NRSs. Furthermore, we found low-certainty (RCTs) to very low-certainty (NRSs) evidence that total costs per participant were lower for ISBCS compared to DSBCS, although results of individual studies could not be pooled. Only one study reported on cost-effectiveness. This study found that ISBCS is cost-effective compared to DSBCS, but did not measure quality-adjusted life years using preferred methods and calculated costs erroneously. Finally, regarding secondary outcomes, we found limited evidence on BCDVA (data of two RCTs could not be pooled, although both studies individually found no difference between groups (very low-certainty evidence)). Regarding PROMs, we found moderate-certainty evidence (RCTs only) that there was no difference between groups one to three months after surgery (standardised mean difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.03).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports there are probably no clinically important differences in outcomes between ISBCS and DSBCS, but with lower costs for ISBCS. However, the amount of evidence is limited, and the certainty of the evidence was graded moderate to very low. In addition, there is a need for well-designed cost-effectiveness studies.

Cataract standard set for outcome measures: An Italian tertiary referral centre experience

PURPOSE

Implementation of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements (ICHOM) standard for cataract surgery into clinical practice at an Italian tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, descriptive study consisting of the registry and analysis of cataract surgeries performed during a 6-month enrolment period at the University Eye Clinic of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. Outcomes were recorded and analysed according to the ICHOM Cataract Standard Set version 2.0.1. Records included clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs) - visual outcome and complications - and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) - self-assessed vision with the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Correlations between PROMs and CROMs were evaluated. A multiple linear regression was used for predicting the change in PROMs with surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 218 eyes (of 218 patients) were analysed. Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was ⩾0.3 in 89.0% (194/218) of eyes. There was a statistically significant improvement of the post-operative Catquest-9SF global average score. (p < 0.001). The change in the Catquest-9SF score significantly correlated with the change in Item 2 score (related to intermediate vision) (r = 0.634, p < 0.001). A predictive model of the change in the Catquest-9SF score was found (p < 0.001, R2: 0.527) based on preoperative Catquest-9SF total score, presence or not of macular degeneration, presence or not of intraoperative complications, age >75 years old, and preoperative CDVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery improves the functional vision, with some factors limiting the outcomes such as comorbidities. Self-perceived improvement in intermediate vision significantly influenced the improvement in self-assessed vision.

Global multi-site, prospective analysis of cataract surgery outcomes following ICHOM standards: the European CAT-Community

PURPOSE

To evaluate in a large sample of patients from 10 different European centers the results of cataract surgery, characterizing the relationship between patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs).

METHODS

Prospective non-interventional multicenter observational descriptive study analyzing the clinical outcomes of a total of 3799 cases undergoing cataract surgery (mean age: 72.7 years). In all cases, the cataract surgery standard developed by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements (ICHOM) was used to register the clinical data. Three-month postoperative visual acuity and refraction data were considered CROMs, whereas Rasch-calibrated item 2 (RCCQ2) and total Catquest-9SF score (CQ) were considered PROMs.

RESULTS

Postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.3 logMAR or better in 88.7% (2505/2823) of eyes. Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative RCCQ2 and CQ scores were -3.09 and -2.39, respectively. Visual function improvement with surgery was reported by 91.5% (2163/2364) of patients. Statistically significant, although weak, correlations of postoperative CDVA with postoperative refraction, PROMs, and complications were found (0.133 ≤ r ≤0.289, p < 0.001). A predictive model (R²: 0.254) of postoperative CDVA considering 10 variables was obtained, including preoperative CDVA, different ocular comorbidities, age, gender and intraoperative complications. Likewise, another predictive model (R²: 0.148) of postoperative CQ considering a total of 14 variables was obtained, including additionally preoperative CQ, target refraction and previous surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery provides an improved functional vision in most of patients although this improvement can be limited by ocular comorbidities and complications. The relationship between PROMs and CROMs is multifactorial and complex.

Validity of the French version of Catquest-9SF and use of an electronic notepad for entering patient-reported outcome measures

Background

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire is a patient reported outcome measure that quantifies the visual benefits from cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the Catquest-9SF questionnaire for France, to assess its psychometric properties via Rasch analysis, and to assess its validity when completed using an electronic notepad.

Methods

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was translated following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Catquest-9SF and clinical data were collected from patients before and after routine cataract surgery. All questionnaire data were collected via an electronic notepad. Rasch analysis was performed to assess psychometric properties, and sensitivity to change was analysed for patients with complete paired pre- and post-operative questionnaires.

Results

A complete filled-in preoperative questionnaire was obtained for 848 patients. Rasch analysis showed good precision (person separation: 2.32, person reliability: 0.84), ordered category probability curves, no item misfit, and unidimensionality. The respondents were slightly more able than the level of item difficulty (targeting: −1.12 logits). Sensitivity was analysed on 211 paired questionnaires, and the postoperative questionnaires showed a clear ceiling effect. The effect size was 2.6. The use of an electronic notepad for completing the questionnaire worked out very well after some adjustments.

Conclusions

The French version of Catquest-9SF has good psychometric properties and is suitable for use in French-speaking patients. The use of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in an electronic format showed good validity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-021-00233-7.

Clinical Outcomes With a New Continuous Range of Vision Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures in a sample of eyes undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of a new model of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

This non-randomized prospective case series enrolled 206 eyes of 103 patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of the TECNIS Synergy IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision). High and low contrast visual acuity, refractive, defocus curve, and patient-reported visual performance (Catquest-9SF questionnaire) outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 96.1% (99 of 103) and 91.3% (94 of 103) of patients achieved binocular postoperative uncorrected distance (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) of 0.00 logMAR (20/20), respectively. Mean postoperative mesopic UNVA for both eyes was 0.14 ± 0.03 logMAR. Likewise, mean binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.00 ± 0.03 and 0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR. An almost flat mean defocus curve was obtained, with visual acuities between 0.00 and 0.10 logMAR for most defocus levels in both eyes. A reduction of contrast led to a limited but statistically significant change in UNVA in both eyes (P < .001). The Rasch calibrated scoring of item 2 and the Rasch calibrated mean score of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire increased significantly with surgery (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This new presbyopia-correcting IOL provides a continuous range of functional focus, with a limited deterioration under mesopic conditions, which is perceived as a satisfactory outcome by the patient if proper patient selection is performed. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(4):256-262.].

Low-Grade Versus Medium-Grade Nuclear Sclerotic Cataract Density Produces Identical Surgical and Visual Outcomes: A Prospective Single-Surgeon Study

Purpose To determine whether the incidence of major complications and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity are comparable for surgery on low-grade versus medium-grade nuclear sclerotic cataracts. Design This was a prospective, consecutive, single-surgeon, no-exclusion study of 1025 cataract cases with one-month follow-up. Methods Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the nuclear sclerosis grade at presentation, as classified using the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III. Cohort A, representing low-grade nuclear sclerotic cataracts (grades 1-2), consisted of 739 eyes, while Cohort B, representing medium-grade nuclear sclerotic cataracts (grades 3-6), consisted of 286 eyes. Results There was no significant difference in major intraoperative or postoperative complications (p>0.999) between Cohorts A and B. The mean logMar preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in Cohort A was 0.245 as compared with 0.346 in Cohort B (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between cohorts for postoperative CDVA at one day (-0.168 versus -0.118; p=0.070), one week (-0.180 versus -0.147; p=0.405), or one month (-0.185 versus -0.161; p=0.569). Conclusions There was no significant difference in the incidence of operative complications or postoperative CDVA between the cohorts. These findings suggest that, in experienced hands, surgery for medium-grade nuclear sclerotic cataracts is equally effective and safe as compared with that for low-grade nuclear sclerotic cataracts.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population

Background

Visual acuity alone has limitations in assessing a patient’s appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. Several tools, including the Catquest-9SF questionnaire and the electronic cataract appropriateness and priority system (eCAPS) have been developed to evaluate patients–reported visual function as related to day-to-day tasks. The aim of this study was to validate Catquest-9SF and eCAPS in a Canadian population and propose a shorter version of each, in an attempt to extend their applicability in clinical practice.

Methods

The English translation of the Swedish Catquest-9SF and eCAPS were self-administered separately in pre-operative patients in tertiary care in Peel region, Ontario. Rasch analysis was used to validate both scales and assess their psychometric properties, such as category threshold order, item fit, unidimensionality, precision, targeting, and differential item functioning.

Results

A total of 313 cataract patients (mean age = 69.1, 56.5% female) completed the Catquest-9SF and eCAPS. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.09, person reliability = 0.81), unidimensionality and no misfits (infit range 0.75–1.35, outfit range 0.83–1.36). There mean for patients was equal to -1.43 (lower than the mean for items which is set automatically at zero), meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. eCAPS had 3 items that misfit the Rasch model and were excluded (infit range 0.82–1.30, outfit range 0.75–1.36). Precision was inadequate (person separation index = 0.19, person reliability = 0.04). 78.8% of subjects scored≤9 (answered that they had no issues for most questions).

Conclusions

Catquest-9SF demonstrated good psychometric properties and is suitable for assessing visual function of care-seeking patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada. There was some mistargeting, suggesting that the tasks were relatively easy to perform, which is consistent with previous research. On the contrary, eCAPS is not sensitive in differentiating patients who had impaired visual functioning.

Evaluation of eye movements and visual performance in patients with cataract

Eye movement is an essential component of visual perception. Eye movement disorders have been observed in many eye disease, and are thought to affect various visual performance in daily life. However, eye movement behaviors of the elderly with cataract are poorly understood, and the impact of cataract surgery on eye movements has not been investigated. In this study, we observed the eye movement behaviors in thirty patients with bilateral age-related cataract while performing three performance-based tasks (visual search, face recognition and reading). Eye movements were automatically recorded by an eye tracker during task performance. We found an overall improved visual performance postoperatively, presented as elevated percentage of correctly identified objects and faces, reduced search time and increased reading speed. Eye movement parameters were found significantly altered after cataract surgery. Fixation count, total fixation duration and total visit duration were markedly increased in the visual search task and face recognition task. The proportion of regressive saccades was obviously decreased in the reading task. These eye movement parameters were found to be correlated with the measures of visual performance. Our findings suggested a potential association between the eye movement disturbance and impaired visual performance, and provided a new insight on the potential usefulness of eye movement as an objective and valid tool to understand visual impairments caused by cataract, as well as evaluate practical outcomes of cataract surgery.

Incidence and characteristics of cataract surgery in South Korea from 2011 to 2015: A nationwide population-based study

IMPORTANCE

Detailed incidence data for cataract surgery in the general population are limited, yet important for determining the surgical needs of the community and formulation of healthcare policies.

BACKGROUND

To report incidence rates of cataract surgery in South Korea.

DESIGN

Nationwide, retrospective population-based study.

PARTICIPANTS

This study involved the entire population of South Korea (n = 47 990 761); 2 236 107 eyes of 1 591 176 patients confirmed as having cataract surgery from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015 were included.

METHODS

Data for all patients who underwent primary cataract surgery in South Korea were retrieved using Korean Electronic Data Interchange and Korean Standard Classification of Diseases-7 codes. Annual incidence rates were calculated and adjusted to the national population data for the corresponding year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The average incidence of cataract surgery during the 5-year study period was estimated using population data from the 2010 Korean census.

RESULTS

The incidence of cataract surgery increased from 8.54/1000 person-years in 2011 to 9.67/1000 person-years in 2015. The probability of second-eye surgery within 12 months after the first-eye surgery increased from 42.98% in 2011 to 48.01% in 2015. In total, 85.72% of surgeries were performed in non-rural areas: 43.18% in individuals with a higher household income and 76.65% in primary healthcare centres. The rate of vitrectomy for posterior capsular rupture was 0.72%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The incidence of cataract surgery in South Korea is increasing over time. Our findings are expected to aid in the formulation of future healthcare policies concerning cataract surgery in South Korea.

Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: A systematic review

Cataract is a common cause of reversible blindness. Visual acuity alone is not enough to assess appropriateness for surgery, prioritization, and outcomes. Catquest-9SF questionnaire evaluates patients' self-assessed visual function as related to daily tasks. We summarize and assess the validity of Catquest-9SF as a patient-reported outcome questionnaire to determine its suitability for clinical use. Thirteen studies with sample sizes ranging 102-10,886 (total n = 15,289) undertaken from 2009 to 2018 were included. Catquest-9SF showed unidimensionality, ordered response thresholds, and acceptable precision in all studies. Nine studies had significant mistargeting (range 0.66 to -2.04); the tasks being easy relative to the respondent ability in most studies. Two studies had misfitting items. We conclude Catquest-9SF is a valid and reliable tool to measure visual function in patients with cataract in various populations. Because results can be population specific, it is recommended that Catquest-9SF be validated in a new population before it is incorporated in routine practice.

Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF - the Danish Catquest-7SF

PURPOSE

The primary goal was to validate a Danish translated version of the Catquest-9SF by Rasch analysis. The secondary goal was to investigate whether preoperative Catquest-9SF scores, best-corrected visual acuity, comorbidity, gender, age or corneal astigmatism could predict improvements in subjective outcome.

METHODS

In a prospective trial, 250 patients eligible for cataract surgery were included. Patients filled out the translated Catquest-9SF questionnaire before surgery and again 3 months after surgery. Both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were included in the Rasch analysis. A multiple reverse stepwise regression model was used to investigate the correlation between preoperative measurements and subjective improvement.

RESULTS

The preliminary Rasch analysis showed misfit of items 4 and 6. These items were removed, and the remaining seven items demonstrated a measurement precision of 2.78, a person reliability coefficient of 0.89, ordered response categories, infit of 0.69-1.22, outfit of 0.73-1.14, observed raw variance explained by measures of 70.4% and an eigenvalue of 1.7. Item 7 showed a mild DIF for gender (0.54 logits), and person mean Rasch score targeting was -1.69 logits. Preoperative Catquest score was the only parameter with a significant correlation to a gain in subjective outcome (p < 0.001). A preoperative Catquest-9SF score of 0.5 carried a 95% likelihood of an increase in subjective outcome.

CONCLUSION

The Danish version of the Catquest-9SF fit the Rasch model. Only preoperative Catquest-9SF score was correlated to subjective improvement, and a cut-off value of 0.5 predicted an improvement in subjective outcome with 95% probability.

The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings

Background

The purpose of this study was to validate the Chinese Catquest-9SF questionnaire in community screenings and explore the correlation between Catquest-9SF scores and Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III cataract grading.

Methods

This was a prospective questionnaire validation study. The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was translated into Chinese and was completed by 104 Chinese cataract patients who were diagnosed in community screening. Rasch analysis was used to assess its psychometric properties, and Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to determine the correlation between Catquest-9SF scores and LOCS III cataract grading.

Results

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire demonstrated ordered response categories and unidimensionality (item fit statistics range: 0.70–1.35); the PSI and PR of the category probability curves were 2.00 and 0.80, respectively. There was a fair but statistically significant correlation between Catquest-9SF (Q6, Q7, and Q8) and LOCS III scores and a moderate correlation between Q4 in Catquest-9SF and subcapsular components for the better eye (r = − 0.546, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The Chinese version of Catquest-9SF is a valid and reliable questionnaire in community screenings. Thus, this questionnaire may be expected to be an auxiliary tool for preliminary cataract screening use.

Effect of phenylephrine/ketorolac on iris fixation ring use and surgical times in patients at risk of intraoperative miosis

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of intracameral phenylephrine/ketorolac (1%/0.3%) during cataract surgery on the use of iris fixation ring and surgical time in patients with poor pupil dilation (≤5.0 mm) or intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS).

Setting

Private practice outpatient surgical center.

Design

This retrospective analysis was conducted from January 1, 2014 to October 7, 2015.

Materials and methods

The use of iris fixation rings was evaluated in a retrospective analysis of 46 patients who underwent cataract surgery from January 1, 2014, to October 7, 2015, and who were identified before surgery to be at risk for intraoperative miosis. The qualifying factors were presurgical examination of pupil dilation ≤5.0 mm after being administered topical tropicamide 1% and phenylephrine 2.5% or history of IFIS during surgery in the fellow eye. All patients received a 2-day preoperative course of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and day-of-surgery preoperative dilation using topical cyclopentolate 1%, tropicamide 1%, and phenylephrine 10%. Phenylephrine/ketorolac 1%/0.3% (Omidria^®) or epinephrine 1:1,000 with sulfites was added to the ophthalmic irrigation solution and delivered intracamerally at the start of the procedure and throughout surgery. The use of iris fixation rings and surgical time for each patient were captured for each group.

Results

Eighteen (50%) of the patients in the epinephrine group and no patients in the phenylephrine/ketorolac group required iris fixation ring insertion to maintain pupil dilation or to control IFIS (p=0.0034). Mean surgical time was significantly shorter in the group of patients who received phenylephrine/ketorolac (p=0.0068).

Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort analysis of patients with poorly dilated pupils and/or IFIS, the use of intracameral phenylephrine/ketorolac in patients at risk for intraoperative miosis resulted in significantly less iris fixation ring use and significantly shorter surgical time when compared with intracameral epinephrine use.

Validation, test-retest reliability and norm scores for the Dutch Catquest-9SF

PURPOSE

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire is a unidimensional, reliable, valid and short patient-reported outcome measure for quantifying benefits in visual functioning from cataract surgery. Our aim was to develop a formal Dutch translation, calculate norm scores, assess its validity and test-retest reliability and provide an easy way for use in clinical practice.

METHODS

Translation of the questionnaire was performed according to guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Catquest-9SF was obtained in 657 patients pre- and postcataract surgery. We applied Rasch and classical analyses to determine the questionnaire performance with characteristics such as unidimensionality, reliability, separation and differential item functioning. Test-retest reliability was assessed in another group of 145 patients. A cut-off value to discriminate between people with and without cataract, norm scores and a reliable change index (RCI) were calculated using data from a sample of 916 'healthy' persons from the normal population.

RESULTS

The Dutch Catquest-9SF was unidimensional, and both person and item reliability were high; 0.87 and 0.99, respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94, test-retest reliability was 0.85 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93. Catquest-9SF showed to be responsive to the effect of cataract surgery (effect size = 1.27; p < 0.001). The cut-off value was -1.90, and RCI was 2.27. A quick-access table with norm scores and percentiles was established to facilitate clinical interpretation.

CONCLUSION

This investigation provides validity and reliability of the Dutch Catquest-9SF as well as norm scores and a new tool to facilitate the clinical interpretation of patient scores. This makes Catquest-9SF suitable for routine use in clinical practice.

Assessment of Cataract Surgery Outcome Using the Modified Catquest Short-Form Instrument in China

Purpose

To assess cataract surgery outcome using the Rasch scaled Chinese version of the Catquest short-form.

Methods

The Chinese translated and culturally adapted version of the Catquest-9SF was interviewer-administered to patients, pre and post cataract surgery. Rasch analysis was performed on the baseline data to revise the Catquest. For the surgical outcome assessment, we stacked pre- and post-surgical Catquest data to demonstrate improvement in visual function scores and responsiveness of the instrument to cataract surgery.

Results

A total of 247 cataract patients (median age, 70 yrs; male 51.0%) completed the Catquest 9SF at baseline.The Catquest-9SF possessed adequate measurement precision of 2.15. No disordering of response categories were observed and all the items perfectly fit to the Rasch model except item 7 (outfit >1.5). A slight reduction in precision was observed after removing misfitting item 7 (Catquest-8SF-CN), but the precision value was well above the acceptable value of 2.00. Notably, the instrument was well targeted (mean person location 0.30), demonstrated no evidence of multidimensionality and DIF. At 12 months post-surgery, 74 (30%) patients came for follow-up and completed the Catquest. There was a significant improvement in the Catquest scores post cataract surgery with a considerably large effect size.

Conclusion

The Catquest-8SF-CN demonstrated promising Rasch based psychometric properties and was highly responsive to cataract surgery.

The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application

BACKGROUND

To validate the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in Italian, assess the change in visual disability with cataract surgery and determine the correlation between pre-operative Catquest-9SF scores and Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III cataract grading.

METHODS

Prospective, questionnaire validation study. The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was forward and back translated and completed by 209 Italian patients before and three months following cataract surgery. Rasch analysis was used to assess its psychometric properties.

RESULTS

The Italian Catquest-9SF demonstrated ordered response categories, unidimensionality (item fit statistics range: 0.73-1.34), adequate person separation (2.04), and no differential item functioning. Mistargeting was evident with a mean difference in item difficulty and person ability of 2.04 logits but improved with inclusion of pre-operative data only. There was a statistically significant (Friedman tests, p < 0.001) median improvement in visual disability of 1.92, 3.57, 1.44 and 2.94 logits in patients undergoing first eye surgery with and without ocular comorbidity, and second eye surgery with and without ocular comorbidity respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the improvements among the four groups (Kruskal-Wallis H test, X (2) (3) = 5.445, p = 0.142). There was no correlation between Catquest-9SF scores and nuclear opalescence (r s = 0.049, p = 0.478), nuclear colour (r s = 0.008, p = 0.909), cortical (r s = 0.066, p = 0.341), and posterior subcapsular components (r s = 0.048, p = 0.494).

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian Catquest-9SF demonstrated good psychometric properties and is suitable for use in Italian speaking patients. There were similar improvements in visual disability in patients undergoing first or second eye surgery, with or without ocular comorbidity. There was no correlation between pre-operative Catquest-9SF scores and LOCS III cataract grading.

Indication for cataract surgery. Do we have evidence of who will benefit from surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The need for cataract surgery is expected to rise dramatically in the future due to the increasing proportion of elderly citizens and increasing demands for optimum visual function. The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based recommendation for the indication of cataract surgery based on which group of patients are most likely to benefit from surgery. A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases. Studies evaluating the outcome after cataract surgery according to preoperative visual acuity and visual complaints were included in a meta-analysis. We identified eight observational studies comparing outcome after cataract surgery in patients with poor (<20/40) and fair (>20/40) preoperative visual acuity. We could not find any studies that compared outcome after cataract surgery in patients with few or many preoperative visual complaints. A meta-analysis showed that the outcome of cataract surgery, evaluated as objective and subjective visual improvement, was independent on preoperative visual acuity. There is a lack of scientific evidence to guide the clinician in deciding which patients are most likely to benefit from surgery. To overcome this shortage of evidence, many systems have been developed internationally to prioritize patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery, but the Swedish NIKE (Nationell Indikationsmodell för Katarakt Ekstraktion) is the only system where an association to the preoperative scoring of a patient has been related to outcome of cataract surgery. We advise that clinicians are inspired by the NIKE system when they decide which patients to operate to ensure that surgery is only offered to patients who are expected to benefit from cataract surgery.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Age on Retinal Detachment after Cataract Surgery in France: A National Population Study

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence, risk factors, and impact of age on retinal detachment (RD) after cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients older than 40 years of age who underwent a primary cataract surgery in France between January 2009 and December 2012.

METHODS

A Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used to analyze risk factors of RD after cataract surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk factors of RD after cataract surgery.

RESULTS

Over 4 years, 2680167 eyes in 1787021 patients (59.4% women; mean age, 73.9±9.5 years) underwent cataract surgery. A total of 11 424 patients experienced RD after cataract surgery, with an estimated risk of 0.99% at 4 years after surgery. The odds ratio associated with increased risk of RD was 3.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.79-3.95) for cataract surgery itself. The multiadjusted hazard ratio (HR) associated with increased risk of RD was 5.22 (95% CI, 5.05-5.39) for patients 40 to 54 years of age, 3.69 (95% CI, 3.60-3.79) for those 55 to 64 years of age, and 1.98 (95% CI, 1.93-2.03) for those 65 to 74 years of age as compared with those 75 years of age or older. Retinal detachment was associated with high myopia (HR, 6.12; 95% CI, 5.84-6.41), vitrectomy for perioperative capsular rupture (HR, 4.36; 95% CI, 4.07-4.68), history of eye trauma (HR, 3.98; 95% CI, 3.69-4.30), extracapsular extraction (HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.94-3.30), male gender (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.35-2.44), and history of diabetes (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.15-1.21). In myopic patients, the multiadjusted HR associated with increased risk of RD was 25.02 (95% CI, 24.76-25.18) for patients 40 to 54 years of age, 20.37 (95% CI, 20.21-20.53) for those 55 to 64 years of age, and 17.05 (95% CI, 16.85-17.25) for those 65 to 74 years of age as compared with nonmyopic patients 75 years of age or older.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a hierarchy of risk factors for RD onset: high myopia, young age, capsular rupture, history of eye trauma, extracapsular extraction technique, male gender, and diabetes. Young age was an additional risk factor in myopic patients.

The efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily in achieving zero-to-trace anterior chamber cell severity following cataract surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% dosed once daily in achieving zero-to-trace (0–5 cells) anterior chamber cells, following cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

Methods

The study designed employed two Phase III, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trials of 440 subjects, randomized to either bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% (n=222) or placebo (n=218). Subjects self-dosed once daily, beginning 1 day before undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation (day –1) and again on the day of surgery (day 0) and for 14 days postoperatively. Follow-up was on days 1, 3, 8, and 15. The outcome measures included the percentage of subjects with zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells at each visit, as determined by the percentage of subjects with ≤5 anterior chamber cells, overall anterior chamber cell grades, and summed ocular inflammation score (SOIS) (combined anterior chamber cell and flare scores).

Results

The proportion of subjects with zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells was significantly higher in the bromfenac 0.07% group compared with the placebo group as early as day 3 (P=0.0007), continued at day 8 (P<0.0001), and through day 15 (P<0.0001). At day 15, 80.2% of subjects in the bromfenac 0.07% group achieved zero-to-trace anterior chamber cells compared with 47.2% of subjects who did so in the placebo group. The overall anterior chamber cell scores were significantly lower in the bromfenac 0.07% group compared with the placebo group at days 3, 8, and 15 (P<0.0001 at each visit). The SOIS were also significantly lower in the bromfenac group compared with the placebo group at days 3, 8, and 15 (P<0.0001 at each visit).

Conclusion

Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%, dosed once daily was clinically effective in achieving zero-to-trace anterior chamber cell severity after cataract surgery and was superior to placebo in all anterior chamber cell severity and inflammation outcome measures.