Comparison of prednisolone acetate 1.0% and difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% after cataract surgery: Incidence of postoperative steroid-induced ocular hypertension

Review on the Use of Difluprednate in Inflammatory Eye Disorders: The Topical Steroid That Goes the Distance

Difluprednate (DFP) (difluoroprednisolone butyrate acetate, or DFBA) ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Durezol®) was the first potent corticosteroid to be approved for both postoperative pain and inflammation in 2008. In June 2012, it was approved for the treatment of endogenous anterior uveitis. It is a synthetic difluorinated prednisolone derivative that was originally developed in Japan as a dermatologic ointment. The glucocorticoid binding affinity of its active metabolite was demonstrated to be 56 times stronger than prednisolone. Experimental models showed that it reached the anterior and posterior segments of the eye quickly, via both transcorneal and noncorneal (conjunctiva and sclera) absorption routes. Its clinical applications have been expanded to treat patients with uveitic macular edema and anterior scleritis. Case reports and case series also describe its use in some forms of posterior uveitis and in non-uveitic entities. Elevated intraocular pressure and acceleration of cataract formation are the main concerns with DFP as with all corticosteroids. Because IOP elevation is particularly pronounced in the pediatric age group, IOP is to be closely monitored at every visit in children. High incidence of cataract formation and progression was also documented in children, thus necessitating vigilant follow-up of children on chronic treatment. This review aims to give a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of difluprednate's pharmacological properties, clinical applications, safety profiles, and alternative delivery methods.

Postoperative Management of Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy with Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction

Aim

To review the efficacy and safety of two common postoperative regimens following Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy with phacoemulsification cataract extraction (KDB-CE).

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective review of eyes undergoing KDB-CE from May 2016 to 2018 by a single surgeon. Almost 12-month follow-up data were assessed for two common postop regimens-treatment with (1) topical prednisolone acetate 1% with pilocarpine 1% (pred-pilo) or (2) difluprednate 0.05% postoperatively. Postoperative results were compared to each respective baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) levels.

Results

There were 53 eyes in the difluprednate group and 25 eyes in the pred-pilo group. In the difluprednate group, the IOP decreased at postoperative day 1 (POD1) [16 ± 5 baseline vs 15 ± 5 POD1, mean ± standard deviation (SD) in mm Hg, and p = 0.321], but increased at postoperative week 1 (POW1) due to a 15% rate of IOP-spikes (19 ± 9, p = 0.099). The number of IOP-lowering drops decreased from baseline (2 ± 1 drops) to 1 ± 1 drops at POD1 (p < 0.0001), and remained at 1 ± 1 drops through postoperative month 12 (POM12) (p < 0.0001). In the pred-pilo group, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean IOP at POW1 (16 ± 4 POW1 vs 18 ± 6 baseline, p = 0.044), which persisted through POM6. The number of IOP-lowering drops was not statistically significantly lower from baseline at POM3 (2 ± 1 at POM3, p = 0.188). Spikes in IOP, corneal edema, and hyphema were the most common complications.

Conclusion

Both postoperative regimens were effective following KDB-CE at reducing IOP at 12 months. The difluprednate group was likely to experience an IOP-spike at POW1 but used fewer IOP-lowering drops 12 months after KDB goniotomy. In the pred-pilo group, the number of IOP-lowering drops was equivalent to baseline levels at POM3. Aside from IOP spikes, there were similar complication rates observed between the two postoperative regimens. Due to demographic differences, it was not possible to compare relative IOP-lowering efficacy between the two postoperative regimens.

Clinical significance

It is efficacious and safe to use either postoperative regimen following KBD-CE. Postoperative trajectories may differ with respect to the postoperative regimen, but further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare various topical steroid medications for postoperative regimens following KDB-CE.

How to cite this article

Birnbaum F, Wakil S, Vu DM, et al. Postoperative Management of Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy with Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(4):169-174.

2021 Survey of Keratoplasty Postoperative Steroid Management

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to investigate US-based ophthalmologists' preferred corneal transplant techniques and postoperative steroid regimen.

METHODS

Ophthalmologists attending the 2021 Cornea and Eye Banking Forum and/or Cornea Subspecialty Day were surveyed in person.

RESULTS

Ninety-two ophthalmologists with a median of 13 years (range of 1-35; mean of 14.5; ±9.05 mean ± SD) of experience as attending clinicians were surveyed. One hundred percent of the surgeons performed penetrating keratoplasty, which was followed by 96.7% for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, 90.2% for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, and 72.8% for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Prednisolone 1% for postoperative care was the preferred choice across all surveyed keratoplasty techniques and postsurgery time intervals. All surgeons reported steroid administration frequency of 4 times a day in the first month and once a day after 12 months postkeratoplasty. To manage ocular hypertension after corneal transplantation, the leading approach was adding a glaucoma medication (44.6%), and beta-adrenergic antagonists were ranked as the most preferred choice by 59 (66.3%) of the respondents. For graft rejection after corneal transplantation, topical steroids (79.8%) were the initial treatment of choice with hourly administration being the most common frequency prescribed (87.4%). Most surgeons either agreed or strongly agreed (78.4%) that a randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of different steroid regimens after corneal transplantation would influence their clinical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Prednisolone remains the predominantly used steroid across different keratoplasties. Steroid regimens are similar for non-high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. To treat graft rejection, surgeons tend to initially add a glaucoma medication than to reduce the potency or frequency of the steroid.

Surgical and Perioperative Considerations for the Treatment of Cataract in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Literature Review

Cataract surgery in the presence of glaucoma poses certain challenges that need to be addressed to offer the maximum benefit without complications. In this paper, we are reviewing the preoperative assessment, surgical options, the planning, and postoperative care. Cataract surgery can help reduce the intraocular pressure alone or combined with MIGS. When performed in patients with glaucoma, it can transiently increase the intraocular pressure and later on decrease the IOP to levels lower than the postoperative. The preoperative IOP and biometric characteristics are the main predictors of the postoperative course of IOP. The combination of cataract surgery with trabeculectomy remains controversial, in terms of best timing of each operation.

Difluprednate 0.05% versus Prednisolone Acetate Post-Phacoemulsification for Inflammation and Pain: An Efficacy and Safety Clinical Trial

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of difluprednate 0.05% (PRO-145) versus prednisolone acetate 1% (Prednefrin^® SF), for management of postoperative inflammation and pain, after cataract surgery.

Methods

This was a Phase III, multicenter, prospective, double-blind, clinical trial. Intent-to-treat population included 178 post-phacoemulsification patients that were assigned to receive either PRO-145, or prednisolone. One day after unilateral eye surgery, patients instilled a drop 4 times a day for 14 days (then tapering the dose downward for 14 days). The primary efficacy endpoints were anterior chamber (AC) cell grade and flare. Other parameters measured included: retinal central thickness (measured via OCT), conjunctival hyperemia, edema, pain and photophobia. Tolerability and safety were assessed through burning, itching, foreign body sensation, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and incidence of adverse events (AE).

Results

A total of 171 subjects were randomized (1:1) and completed the study. Compared to day 1, there was a significant improvement in the AC cell count and flare in both groups by the final visit (80.2% vs 88.4%, p=1.000). Conjunctival hyperemia improved in a similar fashion (81.2% vs 79%, p=0.234) in both PRO-145 and prednisolone groups, without differences between them. This was also observed for edema (82.4% vs 82.5%, p=0.246), pain (15.3% vs 7%, p=0.497) and photophobia (16.4% vs 15.1%, p=0.246), respectively. There was no significant difference between treatments for any tolerability parameter studied. Finally, at the 4-week postoperative visit, there were no significant differences between treatments for VA, IOP and AE results (p-values; 0.095, 0.053 and 0.099, respectively).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that PRO-145 is as effective and safe as prednisolone acetate in treating postoperative inflammation and pain in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03693989.