The impact of an adrenal incidentaloma algorithm on the evaluation of adrenal nodules

Transformations in a hypersaline lake: Examining the linkages between water level changes and Aeolian dust generation

The decline of hypersaline lakes, such as Maharloo Lake, presents significant ecological challenges. That highlights the need to comprehensively analyze the changing dynamics driven by human activities and climate change. Satellite imagery analysis from 1987 to 2022 reveals that the surface area of Maharloo Lake has decreased from 270 to 252 square kilometers due to land use changes. Moreover, the water level of the lake has declined by 30% during the wet season (May) and 90.2% during the dry season (October). The primary factors contributing to this decline include changes in temperature, potential evapotranspiration, excessive groundwater extraction, and the diversion of surface water for agriculture and urban development. These changes have transformed Maharloo Lake from a permanent to a seasonal lake, leading to an increase in the overall extent of barren, saline lands. The lake sediments are predominantly composed of fine-grained, destructive deposits with chemical salts, with over 90% being silt and clay. The average maximum wind speed and threshold erosion velocity indicate a reduced role of wind in eroding the lake's surface sediments, and the low levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) particles around the lake suggest the sediments are resistant to wind erosion and have not been a significant source of dust storms thus far. Understanding the nature of the sediments and their sensitivity to wind erosion, as well as the influence of the erosive wind factor in the occurrence of dust storms, is crucial. One cannot uniformly consider all lakes or dried lake beds as sources of dust storms based solely on changes in water levels.

Risk of malignancy in adrenal tumors in patients with a history of cancer

Purpose

Adrenal gland is a common site of metastasis and on the other hand, metastases are the most frequent malignant adrenal tumors. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of malignancy in suspicious adrenal mass in patients with a history of cancer.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with adrenal tumors treated previously for different types of cancers. Between 2004 and 2021 a hundred and six such patients were identified. Mean age of patients was 62.6 years (30-78), and mean time from oncologic treatment was 55.8 months (0-274). The most common primary cancer was kidney (RCC): 29 (27.4%), colon/rectum (CRC): 20 (18.9%) and lung (NSCLC): 20 (18.9%).

Results

Of 106 patients, 12 had hormonally active (HA) (11,3%) and 94 (88,7%) non active (HNA) tumors In group of patients with HA tumours 4 had hypercortisolaemia and 8 had elevation of urinary metanephrines. In the first group of HA patients pathology confirmed preoperative diagnosis of adrenocortical cancer and no metastasis was found. In all patients from the second group pheochromocytomas were confirmed. Primary (PM) and secondary (SM) malignancies were found in 50 patients (47.2%). In hormone inactive group only SM - 46/94 (48.9%) were diagnosed. The odds that adrenal lesion was a metastasis were higher if primary cancer was RCC (OR 4.29) and NSCLC (OR 12.3). Metastases were also more likely with high native tumor density, and bigger size in CT. The cut-off values for tumor size and native density calculated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 37mm and 24, respectively.

Conclusion

Risk of malignancy of adrenal mass in a patient with a history of cancer is high (47,2%), regardless of hormonal status. 47,2% risk of malignancy. In preoperative assessment type of primary cancer, adrenal tumour size and native density on CT should be taken into consideration as predictive factors of malignancy. Native density exceeding 24 HU was the strongest risk factor of adrenal malignancy (RR 3.23), followed by history of lung or renal cancer (RR 2.82) and maximum tumor diameter over 37 mm (RR 2.14).

Adrenal Incidentaloma Controversial Size Recommendations

The size of adrenal incidentalomas has important implications for diagnosis and management. Recommendations from endocrine societies do not all correlate with regard to adrenal incidentaloma size. Therefore, the aim was to compare adrenal incidentaloma size recommendations between different endocrine societies and the reasoning for these recommendations. Eight different international guidelines were reviewed and compared. The smaller the size of the incidentaloma, the lower the risk for malignancy. The majority of guidelines consider 4 cm as the cut-off, but there are discrepancies. Size indications for laparoscopic adrenalectomy have a wide range from less than 4 cm up to 12 cm. The followup period of adrenal incidentalomas, as well as what is considered significant growth over that period, varies between the recommendations. Therefore, the clinician should be aware of the differences when managing a patient with adrenal incidentaloma. There are discrepancies in size considerations with regard to significance, treatment options, optimal follow-up period, and further management.

Management of incidental adrenal nodules: a survey of abdominal radiologists conducted by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on Adrenal Neoplasms

Adrenal incidentalomas are common findings discovered at abdominal CT and MRI, yet the most appropriate management remains controversial and guidelines vary. The Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Disease-Focused Panel on Adrenal Neoplasms sought to determine the practice patterns of abdominal radiologists regarding the interpretation and management of adrenal incidentalomas. An electronic survey consisting of eleven multiple choice questions about adrenal incidentalomas was developed and distributed to the email list of current and past SAR members. The response rate was 11.8% (423/3581) and most respondents were academic radiologists (80.6%). The 2017 American College of Radiology White Paper was the most used guideline, yet the management of indeterminate adrenal incidentalomas was highly variable with no single management option reaching a majority. Hormonal evaluation and endocrinology consultation was most often rarely or never recommended. The results of the survey indicate wide variability in the interpretation of imaging findings and management recommendations for incidental adrenal nodules among surveyed radiologists. Further standardization of adrenal incidentaloma guidelines and education of radiologists is needed.

Can abdominal CT features predict autonomous cortisol secretion in patients with adrenal nodules?

PURPOSE

To determine if CT features of adrenal nodules and of the remainder of the abdomen can predict autonomous cortisol secretion (ACH) in patients with adrenal nodules, and to identify a nodule size threshold below which ACH is unlikely.

METHODS

Retrospective review of adult patients with adrenal nodules who underwent CT of abdomen and 1-mg Dexamethasone suppression test within 1 year of each other. Patients were considered to have no ACH if serum cortisol was ≤ 1.8 µg/dL after the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test and to have possible or definite autonomous cortisol secretion if serum cortisol was > 1.8 µg/dL. The following CT features were assessed: Adrenal nodule length, nodule width, unenhanced nodule attenuation, contralateral adrenal gland thickness, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue area, skeletal muscle area and density, and unenhanced liver attenuation.

RESULTS

29 patients had no autonomous cortisol secretion and 29 patients had possible or definite autonomous cortisol secretion. Nodule length and width were the only two variables that significantly differed between patients with nonfunctional nodules and those with possibly or definitely functional nodules. Using a threshold nodule length of 1.5 cm, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting possible or definite autonomous cortisol secretion was 93.1% and 37.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Autonomous cortisol secretion in patients with adrenal nodules correlates with increasing nodule size. A nodule length threshold of 1.5 cm provides 93.1% sensitivity for predicting possible or definite ACH based on the 1-mg Dexamethasone suppression test.

Accuracy of focal cystic appearance within adrenal nodules on contrast-enhanced CT to distinguish pheochromocytoma and malignant adrenal tumors from adenomas

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of cystic appearance within adrenal masses on contrast-enhanced CT in distinguishing pheochromocytomas and malignant adrenal tumors from adenomas.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of adult patients with pathologically proven adrenal tumors who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. There were 92 patients (mean age 64.7 years, 52 men) with 22 pheochromocytomas, 34 malignant masses, and 36 adenomas. Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed CT images to determine the presence of cystic appearance within the adrenal masses, defined as focal regions of low attenuation within the tumor that subjectively had fluid density.

RESULTS

Cystic appearance was present in 12/22 (55%, 95% CI 32-76%) pheochromocytomas (mean size 5.3 cm), 15/34 (44%, 95% CI 27-62%) malignant masses (mean size 5.8 cm), and 2/36 (5.6%, 95% CI 0.7-9%) adenomas (mean size 3.2 cm). Sensitivity and specificity of cystic appearance for distinguishing pheochromocytoma or malignant masses from adenomas were 48.2% (95% CI 34.7-62.0%) and 94.4% (95% CI 81.3-99.3%), respectively. Cystic appearance was a significant predictor of tumor type (p = 0.015) even after controlling for tumor size. Reader agreement for cystic appearance was almost perfect with a kappa of 0.85.

CONCLUSION

Cystic appearance in adrenal tumors on contrast-enhanced CT has high specificity and low sensitivity for distinguishing pheochromocytoma and malignant adrenal masses from adenomas.

Strategies to optimize management of incidental radiographic findings in the primary care setting: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) are common. Primary care providers (PCPs) are frequently responsible for incidentaloma evaluations. We evaluated whether PCPs view this paradigm effective, barriers faced, and strategies to optimize care delivery.

METHODS

This is a sequential explanatory study, comprised of surveys followed by focus groups of PCPs. Because lung nodules are another type of common incidental finding, we compared PCP views on management of lung nodules to their views on IAMs.

RESULTS

For IAMs, 22.3% of PCPs "always refer" to specialists, but for lung nodules this was 11.5% (p = 0.026). For lung nodules, the most significant barrier was insufficient time/support to longitudinally follow results (69%), but for IAMs it was uncertainty about which tests to order (68%). Fear of litigation was equal (lung = 22.5%, IAMs = 21.3%). Consistent themes regarding the "ideal" system included specific recommendations in radiology reports; automation of orders for follow-up tests; longitudinal tracking tools; streamlined consultations; and decision guides embedded within the electronic health record.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents are more comfortable with lung nodules than IAMs. Management of "incidentalomas" is within their scope of practice, but the current system can be optimized.

Adherence to guidelines for hormonal evaluation in patients with incidentally detected adrenal nodules: effects of radiology report wording and standardized reporting

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of hormonal evaluation in patients who had CT reports describing adrenal incidentalomas with and without a specific recommendation for hormonal evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of adult outpatients without a history of cancer who had a CT report describing an incidental adrenal nodule. Radiology reports were reviewed to determine whether a standardized macro was used which gave specific recommendations for hormonal evaluation and endocrinology consultation. If no macro was used it was determined whether the report had a recommendation for hormonal evaluation and endocrinology consultation.

RESULTS

A standardized macro recommending hormonal evaluation and endocrinology referral was used in 45/129 (34.8%) reports that described an incidental adrenal nodule. A recommendation for hormonal evaluation was made in 5/84 (6.0%) reports without a macro. Hormonal evaluation was performed in 24/50 (48.0%) patients whose reports recommended it and in 11/79 (13.9%) patients whose reports did not (p < 0.0001). A recommendation for endocrinology referral was made in 2/84 (2.4%) reports without a macro. Patients were seen by endocrinology in 12/47 (25.5%) patients whose reports recommended an endocrinology referral evaluation and 5/82 (6.1%) patients whose reports did not (p < 0.0001). Hormonal evaluation was performed in 17/17 (100%) patients who were seen by endocrinology and 18/112 (16.1%) patients who were not (p < 0.0001). Eleven patients (8.5%) had an evaluation suggesting hyperfunctioning nodules (4 cortisol producing, 6 aldosterone producing, and 1 pheochromocytoma).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing standardized macros that make specific recommendations for hormonal evaluation in patients with adrenal incidentalomas leads to improved adherence to clinical guidelines.

WFUMB position paper on the management incidental findings: adrenal incidentaloma

Focal lesions of the adrenal glands are incidentally detected in approximately 5% of cases by modern imaging techniques. Fewer than 5% of these adrenal incidentalomas are malignant and approximately 10% have endocrine activity. Reliable differentiation of malignant versus benign and hormonally active versus nonfunctional adrenal incidentalomas significantly influences therapeutic management and the outcome of affected individuals. Therefore, each adrenal incidentaloma should undergo a standardized diagnostic work-up to exclude malignancy and endocrine activity. This position statement of the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) summarizes the available evidence on the management of adrenal incidentaloma and describes efficient management strategies with particular reference to the role of ultrasound techniques.

Diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with adrenal incidentaloma

BACKGROUND

The management of adrenal incidentaloma is still a challenge with respect to determining its functionality (hormone secretion) and malignancy. In this light, we performed 18F-FDG PET/CT scan to assess the SUVmax values in different adrenal masses including Cushing syndrome, pheochromocytoma, primary hyperaldosteronism and non-functional adrenal adenomas.

METHODS

Total 109 (73 F, 36 M) patients with adrenal mass (incidentaloma), mean age of 53.3 ± 10.2 years (range, 24-70) were screened by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Data of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of the patients were assessed by the same specialist. Adrenal masses were identified according to the calculated standardized uptake values (SUVs). Clinical examination, 24-h urine cortisol, catecholamine metabolites, 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, aldosterone/renin ratio and serum electrolytes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Based on the clinical and hormonal evaluations, there were 100 patients with non-functional adrenal mass, four with cortisol-secreting, four with pheochromocytomas and one with aldosterone-secreting adenoma. Mean adrenal mass diameter of 109 patients was 2.1 ± 4.3 (range, 1-6.5 cm). The 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of the patients revealed that lower SUVmax values were found in non-functional adrenal masses (SUVmax 3.2) when compared to the functional adrenal masses including four with cortisol-secreting adenoma (SUVmax 10.1); four with pheochromcytoma (SUVmax 8.7) and one with aldosterone-secreting adenomas (SUVmax 3.30). Cortisol-secreting (Cushing syndrome) adrenal masses showed the highest SUVmax value (10.1), and a cut-off SUVmax of 4.135 was found with an 84.6% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity cortisol-secreting adrenal adenoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the similar studies, non-functional adrenal adenomas typically do not show increased FDG uptake and a certain form of functional adenoma could present various FDG uptake in FDG PET/CT. Especially functional adrenal adenomas (cortisol secreting was the highest) showed increased FDG uptake in comparison to the non-functional adrenal masses. Therefore, setting a specific SUVmax value in the differentiation of malignant adrenal lesion from the benign one is risky and further studies, including a high number of functional adrenal mass are needed.