Evaluation of the virtues and pitfalls in an HIV screening algorithm based on two fourth generation assays - A step towards an improved national algorithm

High sensitivity of HIV antibody screening tests may lead to longer time to diagnosis: a Case Report

Background

The fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology assay, which simultaneously detects the HIV-1 p24 antigen and HIV-1 antibodies, is available either in a combined format or as dual tests that differentiate between the p24 antigen and antibodies. Divergent detection methodologies require distinct confirmatory testing algorithms, which significantly impact the time to HIV infection.

Case presentation

In this report, we present three cases where the HIV-1 p24 antigen tested reactive, while the HIV-1 antibody remained non-reactive in a dual testing scenario-despite both the combined test and the colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA) for HIV-1 antibodies yielding reactive results. Upon further analysis of subsequent laboratory procedures, we observed that due to the application of various complementary tests, the assay with high antibody sensitivity such as the GICA paradoxically resulted in a prolonged time to diagnosis, extending the diagnostic window for patients from 5 days to 11 days.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore the importance of prioritizing HIV-1 RNA testing in cases of discordant results between combined antigen/antibody testing, dual testing, and stand-alone antibody testing, particularly for patients who have not received pre-exposure or post-exposure prophylaxis.

Using signal-to-cutoff ratios of HIV screening assay to predict HIV infection

BACKGROUND

The sensitivity of HIV screening assays often leads to a high rate of false-positive results, requiring retests and confirmatory tests. This study aimed to analyze the capability of signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratios of HIV screening assay to predict HIV infection.

METHODS

A retrospective study on the HIV screening-positive population was performed at Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, the correlation between HIV screening assay S/CO ratios and HIV infection was assessed, and plotted Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to establish the optimal cutoff value for predicting HIV infection.

RESULTS

Out of 396,679 patients, 836 were confirmed to be HIV-infected, with an HIV prevalence of 0.21%. The median S/CO ratios in HIV infection were significantly higher than that in non-HIV infection (296.9 vs. 2.41, P < 0.001). The rate of confirmed HIV infection was increased with higher S/CO ratios in the screening assay. The ROC curve based on the HIV screening assay S/CO ratio achieved a sensitivity of 93.78% and a specificity of 93.12% with an optimal cutoff value of 14.09. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9612. Further analysis of the ROC curve indicated that the S/CO ratio thresholds yielding positive predictive values of 99%, 99.5%, and 100% for HIV infection were 26.25, 285.7, and 354.5, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using HIV screening assay S/CO ratio to predict HIV infection can largely reduce necessitating retests and confirmatory tests. Incorporating the S/CO ratio into HIV testing algorithms can have significant implications for medical and public health practices.

HIV serology false positivity among expatriates from Africa: a screening dilemma

HIV prevalence in Oman is low (<5 %); however, 45 % of the population are expatriates, including a portion originating from countries with high HIV prevalence (>5 %). HIV screening is performed at regional public health laboratories as part of a medical fitness programme for residency applicants. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of indeterminate serology results from 11 females of African origin, aged 21–43 years. Serology testing for HIV was conducted according to the national Oman algorithm: fourth-generation immunoassays (Bio-Rad GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA, Siemens Enzygnost HIV Integral 4, Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo, Roche Elecsys HIV Combi PT, bioMérieux VIDAS HIV DUO QUICK), confirmatory assays (Geenius HIV 1/2 Confirmatory, INNO-LIA HIV I/II Score) and PCR testing. Confirmatory testing to resolve indeterminate results was conducted with available samples for five patients using a combination of immunoassays, confirmatory assays, PCR/PERT and pro-viral DNA levels, at three external laboratories; Roche Diagnostics (Germany), Swiss National Laboratory (Switzerland) and Barts Health NHS Trust (UK). Nineteen serum, 15 plasma and two whole-blood samples were analysed. Nine of ten patients analysed on Bio-Rad and Siemens immunoassays were highly reactive; seven were highly reactive on the Abbott assay. Eight of nine patients tested with the Roche assay were negative. Three of four patients tested on the bioMérieux assay were negative. Five patients underwent confirmatory testing at external laboratories; all were negative by HIV-RNA or pro-viral DNA testing. In conclusion, HIV-RNA and pro-viral DNA testing is recommended for HIV screening of individuals from high-prevalence regions coming to low-prevalence regions.

HIV-1/2 screening in blood centers: implementing a two-step serological screening assay approach to reduce donor deferral

BACKGROUND

Screening blood donations for human immunodeficiency virus 1/2 (HIV-1/2) infection in blood centers is often done with a highly sensitive 3rd-generation immunoassay which may cause false-positive results. Donations found repeatedly reactive (RR) are discarded regardless of negative HIV-1/2 nucleic acid testing (NAT) and confirmatory assays results. These donors are notified and deferred if RR in a subsequent donation. We evaluated the introduction of a secondary 4th-generation serological assay to the overall algorithm performance.

METHODS

All donations collected between January 2016 and May 2018 (574,338) were screened using 3rd-generation immunoassay (PRISM HIV O Plus) and NAT (Procleix Ultrio/Ultrio Elite). Serology RR donations were tested with 4th-generation Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo and Vidas HIV Duo Ultra and a confirmatory assay (Geenius HIV-1/2).

RESULTS

The two 4th-generation assays found that 86% (179/209 on Architect) and 94% (182/193 on Vidas) of the 3rd-generation immunoassay RR were negative for HIV-1/2, which were also negative by confirmatory assay. Only 14% (30/209 on Architect) and 6% (11/193 on Vidas) that were 3rd-generation HIV-1/2 RR required confirmation, of which eight donors were confirmed as HIV positive. The probability of missing an HIV-1 infected donor by this algorithm is one in a million RR cases.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a two-step serological screening algorithm in blood centers whereby 4th-generation assay will be performed for all 3rd-generation RR blood donors will reduce the number of donations requiring confirmation, save time and money, and most importantly, reduce the number of discarded blood donations and allow re-entry processes.

BioRad BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay: Incidence of false positivity in a low-prevalence population and its effects on the current HIV testing algorithm

BACKGROUND

The BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay, unlike other HIV 1/2 antigen/antibody immunoassays, is capable of differentiating positive HIV-1 antibodies (Groups M and O) from HIV-2 antibodies and/or HIV-1 p24 antigen in a single test.

OBJECTIVE

The Alaska State Virology Laboratory (ASVL) adopted the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay early 2017 and can report on its performance in terms of false positivity in a low-prevalence population and its effects on the current HIV testing algorithm recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

STUDY DESIGN

Specimens received between March 2017 and August 2018 were screened using the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay. Specimens screening positive for HIV antibodies or antigen were further confirmed using the Geenius™ HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay and/or HIV RNA testing.

RESULTS

Of the 12,338 sera screened by the BioPlex assay for HIV, 35 specimens were positive. Only 22 of the specimens were confirmed by supplemental testing and were considered to be truly positive (PPV, 62.9%). RNA was not detected in these cases suggesting initial false positivity on the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay. True positive results had index values (IDX) of >180 whereas false positive IDX's were between 1 and 4, with the exception of one specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that specimens demonstrating positivity with low IDX values <4 on the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay proceed directly to RNA testing, essentially bypassing supplemental antibody confirmation tests, to reduce turnaround time and cost of HIV confirmation.