Adverse effect of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies directed at HLA-DP/-DQ on engraftment in cord blood transplantation

Engraftment outcome of patients with anti-HLA antibodies in HLA-mismatched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, particularly donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA), negatively impact engraftment in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Past studies have proposed various interventions to reduce DSA, but these were primarily from single centers and not from large-scale registry data. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data to examine the effects of anti-HLA antibodies on engraftment. Evaluable patients were classified into an anti-HLA antibody-negative group (n = 3657), an anti-HLA antibody-positive group (without high DSA) (n = 137), and a high-DSA (MFI > 5000) group (n = 8). Patient characteristics differed significantly between the anti-HLA antibody-negative and anti-HLA antibody-positive groups, and the number of patients with DSA was lower than expected. Statistical analyses revealed that the anti-HLA antibody-positive group had better neutrophil engraftment than the anti-HLA antibody-negative group (94.0% vs 84.2%, p < 0.001) but worse platelet engraftment (60.3% vs 64.9%, p = 0.047). In the high DSA group, two patients received a DSA-depleting intervention. Only one patient with an MFI of 5832 (without intervention) developed primary graft failure, while the remaining seven achieved engraftment. In this study, the effect of anti-HLA antibodies remained inconclusive, and the possibility of neutrophil engraftment with high-DSA levels was confirmed.

[Update for cord blood unit selection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (workshop SFGM-TC)]

Changing practices and the limited use of cord blood units as a source of cells for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSC) led us to reconsider the recommendations established in 2011 and 2012, and to propose an update incorporating recent bibliographic data. If HLA compatibility was until now established at low resolution for HLA-A and B loci, and at high resolution for HLA-DRB1, the recent papers are converging towards an increase in the level of resolution, making way for a compatibility now defined in high resolution for all the considered loci, and the inclusion of the HLA-C locus, in order to establish a level of HLA compatibility on 8 alleles (HLA-A, B, C and DRB1). The CD34+ dose is a determining factor in hematopoietic reconstitution but it is not correlated with the total nucleated cells content. This is why we recommend taking these two data into account when choosing a cord blood unit. The recommendations established by our group are presented as a flow chart taking into account the characteristics of the underlying pathology (malignant or non-malignant), the cell dose and the HLA compatibility criteria, as well as criteria linked to the banks in which units are stored.

ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

Desensitization Strategies for Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA-Mismatched Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know

In human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation settings, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) can independently lead to graft failure, including both primary graft rejection and primary poor graft function. Although several strategies, such as plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and bortezomib, have been used for DSA desensitization, the effectiveness of desensitization and transplantation outcomes in some patients remain unsatisfactory. In this review, we summarized recent research on the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies and the underlying mechanism of DSAs in the pathogenesis of graft failure. We mainly focused on desensitization strategies for DSAs, especially novel methods that are being investigated in the preclinical stage and those with promising outcomes after preliminary clinical application.

Lymphocyte Crossmatch Testing or Donor HLA-DP and -DQ Allele Typing Effectiveness in Single Cord Blood Transplantation for Patients With Anti-HLA Antibodies Other Than Against HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1

Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies other than those against HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1 are a risk factor for engraftment delay and failure, especially in cord blood transplantation (CBT). The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of the presence of anti-HLA antibodies on CBT and to evaluate the utility of lymphocyte crossmatch testing or additional HLA-DP and -DQ typing of CB units in improving transplant outcomes. We retrospectively assessed the engraftment rates and transplant outcomes of 772 patients who underwent their first CBT at our hospital between 2012 and 2021. Donors were routinely typed for HLA-A, -B, -C, and-DRB1 alleles, and the anti-HLA antibodies of recipients were screened before donor selection in all cases. Among patients who had antibodies against other than HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1 (n = 58), lymphocyte crossmatch testing (n = 32) or additional HLA-DP/-DQ alleles typing of CB (n = 15) was performed to avoid the use of units with corresponding alleles. The median patient age was 57 years (16 to 77). Overall, 75.7% had a high-risk disease status at transplantation, 83.5% received myeloablative conditioning regimens, and >80% were heavily transfused. Two hundred twenty-nine of the 772 recipients (29.6%) were positive for anti-HLA antibodies. There were no statistical differences in the number of infused CD34-positive cells between the anti-HLA antibody-positive and the anti-HLA antibody-negative patients. Of the 229 patients with anti-HLA antibodies, 168 (73.3%) had antibodies against HLA-A, -B, -C, and-DRB1 (Group A), whereas 58 (25.3%) had antibodies against HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, or -DRB3/4/5 with or without antibodies against HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 (Group B). No patients in both Groups A and B exhibited donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies against HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1. The neutrophil engraftment rate was lower in patients with anti-HLA antibodies than in those without antibodies (89.9% versus 94.1%), whereas nonrelapse mortality (NRM) before engraftment was higher in antibody-positive patients (9.6% versus 4.9%). In patients who received 2 or more HLA allele-mismatched CB in the host-versus-graft (HVG) direction (n = 685), the neutrophil engraftment rate was lower in the anti-HLA antibody-positive recipients than in the antibody-negative recipients with significant differences (88.8% versus 93.8%) (P = .049). Similarly, transplant outcomes were worse in the antibody-positive patients with respect to 2-year overall survival (OS) (43.1% versus 52.3%) and NRM (44.0% versus 30.7%) than in the antibody-negative patients. In contrast, the results of Group B were comparable to those of the antibody-negative patients, while those of Group A were statistically worse than the antibody-negative patients in terms of all engraftment rate (88.6%), OS (34.2%), and NRM (49.0%). The presence of anti-HLA antibodies negatively impacts engraftment, NRM, and OS in CBT. However, HLA-DP/-DQ allele typing of CB units or lymphocyte crossmatch testing could be a useful strategy to overcome poor engraftment rates and transplant outcomes, especially in patients with anti-HLA antibodies against HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, or -DRB3/4/5.

HLA-DPB1 genotype variants predict DP molecule cell surface expression and DP donor specific antibody binding capacity

The contribution of alloresponses to mismatched HLA-DP in solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has been well documented. Exploring the regulatory mechanisms of DPB1 alleles has become an important question to be answered. In this study, our initial investigation focused on examining the correlation between the rs9277534G/A SNP and DPB1 mRNA expression. The result showed that there was a significant increase in DPB1 mRNA expression in B lymphoblastoid cell lines (BLCLs) with the rs9277534GG genotype compared to rs9277534AA genotype. In addition, B cells with the rs9277534GG exhibited significantly higher DP protein expression than those carrying the rs9277534AA genotype in primary B cells. Furthermore, we observed a significant upregulation of DP expression in B cells following treatment with Interleukin 13 (IL-13) compared to untreated B cells carrying rs9277534GG-linked DPB1 alleles. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of DPB1 in BLCL demonstrated significant differences in both the cytoplasmic (p=0.0003) and nuclear (p=0.0001) localization of DP mRNA expression comparing DPB1*04:01 (rs9277534AA) and DPB1*05:01 (rs9277534GG) homozygous cells. The study of the correlation between differential DPB1 expression and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) showed that lnc-HLA-DPB1-13:1 is strongly associated with DP expression (r=0.85), suggesting the potential involvement of lncRNA in regulating DP expression. The correlation of DP donor specific antibody (DSA) with B cell flow crossmatch (B-FCXM) results showed a better linear correlation of DP DSA against GG and AG donor cells (R2 = 0.4243, p=0.0025 and R2 = 0.6172, p=0.0003, respectively), compared to DSA against AA donor cells (R2 = 0.0649, p=0.4244). This explained why strong DP DSA with a low expression DP leads to negative B-FCXM. In conclusion, this study provides evidence supporting the involvement of lncRNA in modulating HLA-DP expression, shedding lights on the intricate regulatory mechanisms of DP, particularly under inflammatory conditions in transplantation.

Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies against HLA-DP

The presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) against anti-HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 in HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with graft failure. DSAs against HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of greater than > 1,000 was shown to increase the risk of graft failure in single-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Nevertheless, the impact of DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ on transplantation outcomes is not fully understood. In this report, we present a case of UCBT in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome who was positive for DSAs against HLA-DP with MFI of 1,263 before UCBT but successfully achieved neutrophil engraftment. If HLA-DP or -DQ is mismatched in UCBT, evaluating DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ is crucial to avoid graft failure. However, the criteria for DSAs against HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 may not be directly applicable to those against HLA-DP or -DQ.

Selection of Cord Blood Unit by CD34+ Cell and GM-CFU Numbers and Allele-Level HLA Matching in Single Cord Blood Transplantation

In Japan, only single-unit cord blood transplantations (CBTs) are typically performed, and their number has increased over the last 23 years, with ongoing improvement in results. In most cases, CBTs with multiple HLA mismatches are used, owing to a low HLA barrier, and lower engraftment rate is a problem that must be overcome. Here, as part of an effort to improve guidelines for the selection and processing of CB units for transplantation, we sought to assess the present status of CBT in Japan and to elucidate factors contributing to the favorable outcomes, focusing in particular on selection by cell components of CB unit and HLA allele matching. We conducted a nationwide study analyzing 13,443 patients who underwent first CBT between in Japan between December 1997 and December 2019 using multivariate regression analysis. Both patient- and transplantation-related variables, such as age and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index, as well as selected CB unit characteristics, were included in the analysis. The interaction analysis elucidated that CB unit selection favoring higher counts of CD34+ cells and granulocyte macrophage colony-forming units (GM-CFU)/kg, but not of total nucleated cells, contributed to improved engraftment after transplantation. Moreover, a higher CD34+ cell dose was associated with improved overall survival (OS). Distinctive HLA allele matching was observed. A 0 or 1 HLA allele mismatch between patient and donor had favorable engraftment and carried significantly lower risks of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD but had a significantly higher leukemia relapse rate, compared with a 3-HLA allele mismatch. HLA-DRB1 mismatches were associated with reduced risk of leukemia relapse. Notably, the number of HLA allele mismatches had no incremental effect on engraftment, acute and chronic GVHD, or relapse incidence. As a result, 5-year overall survival did not differ significantly among patients receiving CB units with 0 to 7 HLA allele mismatches. The main points of CB unit selection are as follows. First, selection according to a higher number of CD34+ cells/kg and then of CFU-GM/kg is recommended to obtain favorable engraftment. A unit with .5 × 105 CD34+ cells/kg is minimally acceptable. For units with a CD34+ cell dose of .5 to 1.0 × 105 cells/kg, applying the parameter of ≥20 to 50 × 103 GM-CFU/kg (66.5% of transplanted CB units in this cohort) is associated with a neutrophil engraftment rate of approximately 90%. A unit with ≥1.0 × 105 CD34+ cells/kg can achieve a ≥90% mean neutrophil engraftment rate. Subsequently, HLA allele matching of HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 at the 2-field level should be searched for units with 0 or 1 HLA allele mismatch in the host-versus-graft direction for favorable engraftment. Units with 2 to 6 HLA allele mismatches are acceptable in patients age ≥15 years and units with 2 to 4 HLA allele mismatches are acceptable in patients age ≤14 years. Units with HLA-DRB1 and/or -B allele mismatch(es) might not be preferable owing to an increased GVHD risk. Our analysis demonstrates that single-unit CBT with the selection of adequate CD34+/kg and GM-CFU/kg and HLA allele matching showed favorable outcomes in both pediatric and adult patients.