The influence of capsule geometry and cement formulation on the apparent viscosity of dental cements

Three Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Their Influence on the Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Single Crowns: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation

Background: In everyday dentistry, monolithic single crowns can be cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate how the marginal adaptation of full monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) single crowns is influenced by three different self-adhesive resin cements. Methods: Forty-five typodont teeth fully prepared for full monolithic crowns were divided into three groups (fifteen each) for the use of three different self-adhesive resin cements. A fourth control group (Temp-bond) was created by taking five teeth from each group before cementation with self-adhesive resin cements. All forty-five abutments were scanned using a Primescan intra-oral scanner (IOS), followed by computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) full crowns using a four-axis machine. Initially, the crowns of the control group were fixed to the abutments using Temp-bond, and the marginal gap was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After removing the control group crowns from the abutments, fifteen crowns in each group were cemented using a different self-adhesive resin cement and observed under SEM for evaluation of the marginal gap. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed, indicating no normal distribution (p < 0.05), followed by Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). Results: The total mean marginal gap of the temp-bond control group was significantly lower compared to all three groups of self-adhesive resin cement (p < 0.0005). The total mean marginal gap of the G-cem ONE group was significantly lower compared to the TheraCem group (p < 0.026) and RelyX U200 group (p < 0.008). The total mean marginal gap of the TheraCem group was significantly higher than the G-cem ONE group (p < 0.026) but showed no significant difference with the RelyX U200 group (p > 0.110). Conclusions: All four groups showed a clinically acceptable marginal gap (<120 microns). Although all three groups of self-adhesive resin cement showed a significant increase in the marginal gap compared to the temp-bond control group, they were within the limits of clinical acceptability. Regarding the marginal gap, in everyday dentistry, it is acceptable to use all three self-adhesive resin cements, although the G-cem ONE group exhibited the lowest marginal gap for ZLS single crowns.

Investigation of water sorption and aluminum releases from high viscosity and resin modified glass ionomer

Background

High viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) have recently been clinically preferred thanks to their numerous advantages. However, initial moisture contamination has a negative effect on the mechanical and physical properties of these cements. The aim of this study was in vitro of HVGICs and RMGICs, with and without surface protection, on water sorption, solubility and release of aluminum.

Material and Methods

In this study, as HVGICs; Equia Forte, IonoStar Plus, Riva Self Cure; as RMCIS, Ionolux and Riva Light Cure; and as control, Z250 universal composite was used. Equia coat, Voco varnish and Riva coat were chosen as surface protective. Water sorption and solubility levels of the samples were measured according to ISO 4049:2009. Al levels released from samples were determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS) for 7, 14 and 21 days. Statistical evaluation of the results was made using one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test (p<0.05).

Results

RMGICs from restorative materials showed more water absorption than HVGICs, but no differences in solubility. Among the materials tested, the water absorption values of the HVGIC and RMGIC materials without surface protection were higher than those with the surface protection (p<0.001).

Conclusions

It was determined that the Al release of HVGIC and RMGIC groups with the surface protection were lower in all time periods than the groups without surface protection (p<0.001). The application of surface protection effectively reduced water sorption and Al release from HVGICs and RMGICs.

Key words:Highly viscous glass ionomer cement, resin coating, aluminum release, water sorption, solubility.

An auxiliary factor for increasing the retention of short abutments

Background

Retention is an essential factor in the sustainability of the prosthesis, especially for short abutment. Despite, the availability of several auxiliary applications, achieving a clinically good retention for cast crowns in prepared short teeth remains a major challenge for the practicing dentist.

Objectives

This study tests a new method for applying frustum-shaped grooves on short prepared abutments and compares them with traditional setting grooves.

Methods

Forty-eight copper machine-milled short dies with 3.5 mm length and 12^o conversion with a chamfer finish line of 0.7 mm were prepared to mimic short prepared molars and distributed into 4 groups. A control group with two opposing setting grooves and two groups with dual opposing frustums, one of which was prepared to receive two integrated metal protrusions inside the casting that fit the frustums. Frustums were prepared with Komet bur No. 807 with dimensions 0.9 mm at the base and 0.7 mm at the occlusal surface. A direct wax-up was carried out on all dies and all castings were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. A pull-off test was applied until separation. Data were analysed to compare the correlation of the four groups using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test (p ≤ 0.05).

Results

The mean retentive values in Newton were as follows: the control group, 457.80; the setting grooves group, 461.07; the frustum group, 597.59; and the frustum group with the two metal protrusions, 919.80. The retention was increased by 65% in frustum group and doubled in frustum group with the metal protrusions.

Conclusions

The results showed a statistical significance in retention in the frustum groups with and without metal protrusion over the retention of the control and the setting grooves groups.