Cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms lead to biases in self-evaluated masticatory performance among community-dwelling older Japanese adults: the Tsurugaya Project

Factors related to subjective evaluation of difficulty in chewing among community-dwelling older adults

AIM

Awareness of difficulty chewing may limit the diversity of food intake in older adults. However, few studies have clarified which factors are related to subjective difficulty in chewing. The aim was to identify factors related to subjective difficulty in chewing in 70- and 80-year-old Japanese older adults.

METHODS

A total of 1680 participants (792 men, 888 women) were surveyed. Difficulty in chewing was assessed with questionnaires regarding food intake, such as rice, apples, beef, and hard rice crackers. The participants were classified into two groups, the "with difficulty" group (participants who answered "cannot eat," "can eat with difficulty," and "can eat if small") and the "without difficulty" group (participants who answered "can eat without problems"), according to their answers to questionnaires for each food. A logistic regression analysis with subjective difficulty in chewing as the dependent variable was performed for each food.

RESULTS

Subjective difficulty in chewing was associated with age, occlusal force, and depression for rice; age, number of remaining teeth, occlusal force, and depression for apples; number of remaining teeth, occlusal force, and depression for beef; and number of remaining teeth and occlusal force for hard rice crackers.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, number of remaining teeth, and occlusal force, as well as depression, might be related to subjective evaluation of difficulty chewing in community-dwelling Japanese older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 327-333.

Chewing and Swallowing Abilities of Persons Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Instruments

Background and Objectives

It is critical to use validated instruments to diagnose and manage chewing and swallowing problems of persons living with dementia. The study aimed to synthesize the characteristics and psychometric quality of instruments that assess the chewing and swallowing abilities of persons living with dementia.

Research Design and Methods

The systematic review was used to conduct this study. We searched 5 electric databases for records published from January 1, 1980, to July 8, 2022. Records were eligible if they included any instrument to assess chewing ability or swallowing ability in the dementia population. Eight characteristics of eligible instruments were extracted from the records: (1) development process, (2) operationalized concept/construct, (3) sample and setting, (4) administration method, (5) items, (6) scoring format/interpretation, (7) reliability, and (8) validity. The psychometric assessment for self-report and observational tool was used to evaluate 12 psychometric properties of eligible instruments.

Results

In total, 11,074 records were reviewed. Thirty-five eligible instruments, including observational tools, self-report questionnaires, and physiological instruments, were identified from 60 records. All 8 instruments assessing chewing ability were evaluated as having low psychometric quality, and only 3 out of 27 instruments assessing swallowing ability were evaluated as having moderate psychometric quality. Fifteen instruments were tested for only 1 type of psychometric property, limiting the overall evaluation of psychometric evidence.

Discussion and Implications

The study findings inform the use and adaptation of appropriate instruments for practice and research. All existing instruments warrant further validation in larger samples to expand use in diverse care settings. This review described and evaluated current instruments measuring chewing and swallowing abilities and potential use in research and clinical practice to plan for and evaluate the effectiveness of mealtime and oral care practice and reduce health-related negative outcomes of persons living with dementia.

Assessment of subjective and objective masticatory function among elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment

BACKGROUND

Masticatory function is known to be related to cognitive ability; therefore, factors for improving masticatory function should be identified.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify factors influencing masticatory function associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in elderly individuals.

METHODS

A total of 123 elderly participants [mean age: 76.5 ± 6.5 years; 82 females (66.7%), 41 males (33.3%)] were included. Cognitive function was evaluated by the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (KMMSE). Questionnaires for subjective evaluation were administered, and dynamic objective masticatory function evaluations, including chewing tests and bite force measurements, were performed. Intergroup differences were evaluated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square test, and correlations between cognitive ability and masticatory function were evaluated by multilinear logistic regression.

RESULTS

The number of teeth, number of posterior teeth, bite force, masticatory ability index (MAI) and posterior support status showed significant differences between the normal (KMMSE > 23) and MCI (KMMSE ≤ 23) groups. However, only the MAI, representing dynamic masticatory performance, was significantly associated with MCI regardless of age, sex and removable prostheses. The number of teeth and posterior teeth, bite force, subjective masticatory ability and posterior occlusal support showed no significant association with MCI.

DISCUSSION

These results suggested the importance of chewing function for preventing the progression of cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that only the MAI was significantly associated with MCI, it is more important to improve chewing efficiency by harmonizing therapeutic prosthetics with the surrounding masticatory system than simply increasing the number of teeth to prevent or delay cognitive impairment in elderly individuals.

Associations Between Abdominal Obesity, Chewing Difficulty and Cognitive Impairment in Dementia-Free Chinese Elderly

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the independent and synergistic associations between abdominal obesity, chewing difficulty and cognitive impairment in a community-dwelling older adults sample in China.

METHODS

Cognitive function was measured by the 5 min- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (5 min-MoCA) and abdominal obesity was measured by A Body Shape Index (ABSI) in 572 participants recruited from local communities. Chewing difficulty was assessed via a self-report questionnaire. Linear regression and general logistic regression were performed to investigate the association of chewing difficulty and abdominal obesity with cognition.

RESULTS

Chewing difficulty score [β (95% CI) = -.30 (-.49, -.11)] and ABSI [β (95%CI) = -.30 (-.55, -.05)] were independently associated with worse performance on the 5 min-MoCA. Whilst ABSI was not associated with cognitive impairment, the co-existence of chewing difficulty and abdominal obesity [OR (95% CI) = 2.22 (1.18, 4.17)] was found associated with the presence of cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSION

Chewing difficulty and abdominal obesity were independently associated with cognition. Abdominal obesity and chewing may have an additive effect on cognitive function.

[The oral function of community-dwelling older adults complaining of an oral function deterioration: An examination using the oral function-related items of the Questionnaire for Latter-stage Elderly People]

AIM

The oral function-related items of the newly developed "Questionnaire for Latter-stage Elderly People" are based on two items of the Kihon checklist assessing the masticatory and swallowing functions. In this study, we estimated the questionnaire's application rate and investigated the oral function of the respondents.

METHODS

Included were 699 older adults (274 men/425 women, average age, 73.4±6.6 years old). Those who responded positively to the related items were considered to have decreased swallowing and masticatory functions. The specific oral function was assessed based on the number of present and functional teeth; oral hygiene; oral moisture; occlusal force; oral diadochokinesis /pa/, /ta/, /ka/; tongue pressure; mixing ability; shearing ability; and Eating Assessment Tool (EAT)-10 (reference, score ≥3).

RESULTS

The rates of decreased masticatory and swallowing functions were 21.5% and 26.6%, respectively, while 7.4% of participants had both. Those with a decreased masticatory function showed fewer present teeth; a lower occlusal force, oral diadochokinesis /pa/, mixing ability, shearing ability, and higher EAT-10 scores.Those with a decreased swallowing function only had higher EAT-10 scores. In the early- and latter-stage elderly, the decreased masticatory function rates were 15.6% and 29.4%, respectively, the decreased swallowing function rates were 27.8% and 25.0%, respectively, and the rates of both decreased masticatory and swallowing functions were 6.0% and 9.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The older adults who responded positively to the related questionnaire items, especially for items related to masticatory function, had a decreased oral function in multiple respects. The items related to the oral function in the Questionnaire for Latter-stage Elderly People are considered useful for identifying older adults with a decreased oral function.

Oral health-related quality of life is associated with the prevalence and development of depressive symptoms in older Japanese individuals: The Ohasama Study

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study investigated the cross-sectional association between impaired oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and the prevalence of depressive symptoms, and the longitudinal association between impaired OHRQoL and development of depressive symptoms among older adults.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown a relationship between poor oral health and depression among older adults; however, findings are inconsistent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were 669 community-dwelling older Japanese individuals aged≥55 years (mean: 67.8 ± 7.2 years). Data of 296 participants were used for longitudinal analyses. OHRQoL was evaluated using the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances scale. Impaired OHRQoL was defined as the presence of at least one impact on the scale. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Japanese version of the Zung self-rating depression scale with a cut-off score of 40.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional logistic regression model demonstrated that impaired OHRQoL was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 5.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-8.95) independent of age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, cerebrovascular/cardiovascular disease, smoking, drinking alcohol, education, cognitive function, objective oral health (dentition status) and oral health behaviour (dental visit within 1 year). Similarly, impaired OHRQoL predicted the development of depressive symptoms within 4 years in a fully adjusted longitudinal model (OR, 6.00; 95% CI, 1.38-26.09).

CONCLUSION

Impaired OHRQoL was identified as a potential comorbidity of depressive symptoms and a predictor for depressive disorder later in life. OHRQoL may be a useful clinical outcome for elder patients with regard to their mental and oral health.