Clinical characteristics in cholinergic urticaria with palpebral angioedema: Report of 15 cases

Cholinergic Urticaria: Subtype Classification and Clinical Approach

Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) is a subtype of chronic inducible urticaria with a chief complaint of itching and/or stinging, painful papular wheals that develop simultaneously with sweating. This review specifically focuses on several subtypes of CholU and specifically investigates the relationship between CholU and anhidrosis. We review recent publications and update the evidence around CholU, including the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic approaches, physiopathology, subtype classification, and therapeutic approaches. Multiple mechanisms contribute in a complex manner to the development of CholU, including histamine, sweat allergy, cholinergic-related substances, poral occlusion, and hypohidrosis/anhidrosis. A new schematic of the currently known pathological conditions has been created. Specific methods for diagnosing CholU, a provocation test, and evaluation methods for disease severity/activity and disease burden of CholU are summarized. The characteristics of the diseases that should be differentiated from CholU and examination methods are also summarized. The primary finding of this review is that CholU should be categorized based on the etiology and clinical characteristics of each subtype to properly manage and treat the disease. This categorization leads to improvement of therapeutic resistance status of this disease. In particular, a sweating abnormality should be given more attention when examining patients with CholU. Because CholU is not a homogeneous disease, its subtype classification is important for selection of the most suitable therapeutic method. Further elucidation of the pathophysiology of each subtype is expected.

Cross-sectional study of cholinergic urticaria subtypes and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) is classified into several subtypes: (1) conventional sweat allergy-type CholU (conventional SAT-CholU), (2) CholU with palpebral angioedema (CholU-PA), 3) CholU with acquired anhidrosis and/or hypohidrosis (CholU-Anhd); 1) and 2) include SAT based on pathogenesis. There have been no studies on differences in the prevalence of bronchial asthma among the subtypes. We analyzed bronchial responsiveness using the methacholine dose indicator D_min, respiratory symptoms, and exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Median log10 D_min (interquartile range) of patients with conventional SAT-CholU (n = 11), CholU-PA (n = 11), and CholU-Anhd (n = 11) was 0.381 (- 0.829, 1.079), 0.717 (0.249, 0.787), and 1.318 (0.121, 1.699), respectively (p = 0.516). Respiratory symptoms were less frequently observed in CholU-Anhd than in conventional SAT-CholU or CholU-PA. FeNO of patients with conventional SAT-CholU, CholU-PA, and CholU-Anhd was 23 (18.5, 65.0), 39 (32.0, 59.5), and 25 (19.0, 33.0) ppb, respectively (p = 0.237). Nine% of conventional SAT-CholU patients and more than half of CholU-PA patients required treatment for asthma. Log D_min tended to be lower in patients with SAT-CholU than in those with CholU-Anhd. CholU-PA might be associated with asthma.

Evidence for histamine release in chronic inducible urticaria – A systematic review

Background

Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) constitutes a group of nine different CIndUs in which pruritic wheals and/or angioedema occur after exposure to specific and definite triggers. Histamine released from activated and degranulating skin mast cells is held to play a key role in the pathogenesis of CIndU, but evidence to support this has, as of yet, not been reviewed systematically or in detail. We aim to characterize the role and relevance of histamine in CIndU.

Methods

We systematically searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) for studies that reported increased serum or skin histamine concentration (direct evidence) or in vitro or ex vivo histamine release (indirect evidence) following trigger exposure.

Results

An initial total of 3,882 articles was narrowed down to 107 relevant studies of which 52 were in cold urticaria, 19 in cholinergic urticaria, 14 in heat urticaria, 10 in contact urticaria, 7 each in solar urticaria and vibratory angioedema, 4 each in symptomatic dermographism and aquagenic urticaria, and 3 in delayed pressure urticaria. The results of our review support that histamine has a key pathogenic role in the pathogenesis of all CIndUs, but it is not the sole mediator as evidenced by the often poor relationship between the level of histamine and severity of symptoms and the variable clinical efficacy of H1-antihistamines.

Conclusions

Histamine released from skin mast cells is a key driver of the development of signs and symptoms and a promising therapeutic target in CIndU.

Direct and indirect action modes of acetylcholine in cholinergic urticaria

Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) manifests small, itchy and/or painful wheals occurring upon perspiration and mechanically involving acetylcholine (Ach). Although a considerable number of studies have been conducted, the pathomechanisms underlying perspiration-associated release of histamine remain to be elucidated. We have proposed that CholU can be categorized into two major subtypes: Ach-indirectly induced, sweat allergic type and Ach-directly induced, depressed sweating type. In the former type, Ach evokes perspiration, and some sweat antigen(s) leaking from the sweat ducts to the dermis may stimulate mast cells to release histamine. In this scenario, the ducts might be damaged or obstructed for sweat leakage, and patients frequently exhibit positive autologous sweat skin test, representing "sweat allergy (hypersensitivity)". On the other hand, the latter Ach-mast cell directly interacting type, typically seen as "CholU with anhidrosis and/or hypohidrosis (CUAH)", eccrine sweat gland epithelial cells lack cholinergic receptor M3 expression. The expression of cholinergic receptors is completely absent in the anhidrotic areas and only slightly expressed in the hypohidrotic areas. In the hypohidrotic area, where pinpoint wheal occurs, it is hypothesized that released Ach cannot be completely trapped by cholinergic receptors of eccrine glands and overflows to the adjacent mast cells, leading to wheal formation. Thus, sweat allergy is not a requirement in this depressed sweating type. Although some additional complications, such as angioedema, anaphylaxis, and cold urticaria, have been documented, these two types represent the modes of action of Ach in this enigmatic urticaria.

Regular sweating activities for the treatment of cholinergic urticaria with or without acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis

Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) decreases affected individuals' quality of life because they must avoid stimuli including exercise and hot bathing. Although case reports have indicated that regular sweating activities are effective for CholU with hypohidrosis, little evidence is available. This retrospective medical record review examined CholU patients who received any form of treatment at our hospital. Twenty-seven cases (78% men; median age 22 years, range 12-70 years) were analyzed. Fourteen (52%) patients had acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis (AIGA). Among the 12 patients receiving sweating therapy (4 with, 8 without AIGA), improvement of symptoms was confirmed in 11 (92%; sweating therapy alone: n = 5, with H1 blocker: n = 5, with steroid pulse: n = 1) including 8 (67%) showing complete response (CR). In this sweating-therapy group, CR was achieved by six of the eight (75%) patients without AIGA and two of the four (50%) patients with AIGA. Among the 15 patients without sweating therapy, symptom improvement was observed in 9 (60%; steroid pulse: n = 7, H1 blocker: n = 2) including 1 (7%) achieving CR. Sweating therapy was safely undertaken except in one case in which the patient showed angioedema and anaphylaxis. Regular sweating activities could be a potential therapeutic option for CholU patients.

Clinical utility of the basophil activation test in the diagnosis of sweat allergy

BACKGROUND

Many patients with atopic dermatitis and cholinergic urticaria display an immediate-type allergy to autologous sweat. Although the histamine release test (HRT) using semi-purified sweat antigen (QR) was available for the detection of immediate sweat allergy, the existence of HRT low responders could not be disregarded. Furthermore, it has not been established whether the results of the HRT are consistent with the autologous sweat skin test (ASwST). We aimed to compare the HRT and basophil activation test (BAT) for the diagnosis of immediate sweat allergy.

METHODS

The HRT and BAT were performed on 47 subjects (35 ASwST positive, 12 negative) whose symptoms had worsened on sweating. For the BAT, blood was incubated with QR or crude sweat and CD203c upregulation was assessed. A commercial HRT was performed and histamine release induced by QR was quantified.

RESULTS

When excluding non-responders for anti-IgE antibody, the BAT using QR and the HRT had a sensitivity of 100% and 44% and specificity of 75% and 100%, respectively. The BAT and HRT had a positive predictive value of 91.3% and 100% and negative predictive value of 100% and 30%, respectively. The BAT detected 0% non-responders, whereas the HRT identified 22.5%. When using crude sweat for the BAT, the false-positives observed when using QR were not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The BAT using QR displayed a higher sensitivity and negative predictive value and a lower number of non-responders compared with the HRT. Furthermore, the BAT using crude sweat can also be an alternative tool for the ASwST.

Case of cholinergic urticaria accompanied by anaphylaxis

Cholinergic urticaria occasionally occurs in combination with anaphylactic symptoms. However, this has not been widely reported. Herein, we report the case of a 14-year-old Japanese male who was diagnosed with cholinergic urticaria accompanied by anaphylaxis. The patient, who was suffering from atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma, had developed wheals after exercising or bathing, which would have increased his core body temperature, since summer 2014. He experienced two episodes of severe systemic symptoms and wheal development when he took a bath after eating in December 2014 and the following January. His symptoms included wheezing, numbness of the lips, respiratory distress, blindness and fainting. Laboratory tests revealed the following results: serum IgE level, 7060 IU/mL; titers of specific immunoglobulin E antibodies against Malassezia and MGL_1304, 31.70 UA/mL and 112.5 ng/mL, respectively. A histamine release test against human sweat revealed a class 4 response. Skin prick and intradermal tests against autologous sweat produced immediate-type positive reactions. According to these findings, we diagnosed him with the sweat-hypersensitivity type of cholinergic urticaria accompanied by anaphylaxis. He was successfully treated with lafutidine, a histamine H₂ receptor antagonist, in combination with fexofenadine. It is important for dermatologists to be aware that cholinergic urticaria can progress to anaphylaxis.

Cholinergic urticaria: epidemiology, physiopathology, new categorization, and management

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the epidemiology, physiopathology, categorization, and management of cholinergic urticaria. We specifically focused on several subtypes of cholinergic urticaria and investigated the relationship between cholinergic urticaria and idiopathic anhidrosis.

METHODS

Using an integrative approach, we reviewed publications addressing the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic approach, physiopathology, subtype classification, and therapeutic approach to cholinergic urticaria.

RESULTS

Multiple mechanisms were found to contribute to the development of cholinergic urticaria. This disorder should be classified based on the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of each subtype. Such a classification system would lead to better management of this resistant condition. In particular, sweating function should be given more attention when examining patients with cholinergic urticaria.

CONCLUSIONS

Because cholinergic urticaria is not a homogeneous disease, its subtype classification is essential for selection of the most suitable therapeutic method.