Real life evidence that impaired awareness of hypoglycemia persists for years in patients with type 1 diabetes

Validating and Establishing a Diagnostic Threshold for the Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire Impaired Awareness Subscale

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the discriminant and convergent validities of the Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire Impaired Awareness (HypoA-Q IA) subscale and establish a diagnostic threshold for the classification of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

Twenty-one adults with T1D (male, 48%; median age, 36 years; and T1D duration, 21 years) completed the HypoA-Q IA subscale, Clarke, and hypoglycemia severity (HYPO) scores, continuous glucose monitoring, and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp testing. Those with IAH defined by a Clarke score of ≥4 (n = 10) and who experienced severely problematic hypoglycemia and/or marked glycemic lability started automated insulin delivery as part of an 18-month intervention study with the 6-monthly paired assessment of the HypoA-Q IA subscale, Clarke score, HYPO score and continuous glucose monitoring, and hypoglycemic clamp testing at baseline and 6 and 18 months.

RESULTS

The HypoA-Q IA subscale discriminated between those with and without IAH defined by the Clarke score (W = 110.5; P <.001). During intervention, the HypoA-Q IA subscale demonstrated convergent validity via significant relationships with the Clarke (r = 0.72; P <.001) and HYPO (r = 0.60; P <.001) scores; hypoglycemia exposure below 70 (r = 0.53; P <.01), 60 (r = 0.50; P <.01), and 54 (r = 0.48; P <.01) mg/dL; and autonomic symptom (r = -0.53; P <.05), epinephrine (r = -0.68; P <.001), and pancreatic polypeptide (r = -0.52; P <.05) responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the HypoA-Q IA subscale was an excellent predictor of an abnormal symptom response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (area under the curve, 0.86) with a score of 12, which was the optimal threshold for IAH classification (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 80%).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the validity of the HypoA-Q IA subscale and propose a HypoA-Q IA diagnostic threshold to identify IAH in both clinical and research settings.

Automated Insulin Delivery for Hypoglycemia Avoidance and Glucose Counterregulation in Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes with Hypoglycemia Unawareness

Objective: Automated insulin delivery (AID) may benefit individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes where frequent exposure to hypoglycemia impairs counterregulatory responses. This study assessed the effect of 18 months AID on hypoglycemia avoidance and glucose counterregulatory responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in long-standing type 1 diabetes complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Methods: Ten participants mean ± standard deviation age 49 ± 16 and diabetes duration 34 ± 16 years were initiated on AID. Continuous glucose monitoring was paired with actigraphy to assess awake- and sleep-associated hypoglycemia exposure every 3 months. Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp experiments were performed at baseline, 6, and 18 months postintervention. Hypoglycemia exposure was reduced by 3 months, especially during sleep, with effects sustained through 18 months (P ≤ 0.001) together with reduced glucose variability (P < 0.01). Results: Hypoglycemia awareness and severity scores improved (P < 0.01) with severe hypoglycemia events reduced from median (interquartile range) 3 (3-10) at baseline to 0 (0-1) events/person·year postintervention (P = 0.005). During the hypoglycemic clamp experiments, no change was seen in the endogenous glucose production (EGP) response, however, peripheral glucose utilization during hypoglycemia was reduced following intervention [pre: 4.6 ± 0.4, 6 months: 3.8 ± 0.5, 18 months: 3.4 ± 0.3 mg/(kg·min), P < 0.05]. There were increases over time in pancreatic polypeptide (Pre:62 ± 29, 6 months:127 ± 44, 18 months:176 ± 58 pmol/L, P < 0.01), epinephrine (Pre: 199 ± 53, 6 months: 332 ± 91, 18 months: 386 ± 95 pg/mL, P = 0.001), and autonomic symptom (Pre: 6 ± 2, 6 months: 6 ± 2, 18 months: 10 ± 2, P < 0.05) responses. Conclusions: AID led to a sustained reduction of hypoglycemia exposure. EGP in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia remained defective, however, partial recovery of glucose counterregulation was evidenced by a reduction in peripheral glucose utilization likely mediated by increased epinephrine secretion and, together with improved autonomic symptoms, may contribute to the observed clinical reduction in hypoglycemia.

Fall in prevalence of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) has been reported to affect up to a third of people with type 1 diabetes. Whether the increased use of sensor technology has changed its prevalence remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the current prevalence of IAH and its change over time in a cohort of individuals with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

IAH was assessed using the modified Clarke questionnaire in adults with type 1 diabetes. Participants were recruited from the diabetes outpatient clinic from February 2020 through April 2021. The scores were compared to similar data collected during previous assessments in 2006, 2010 and 2016 respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 488 individuals (51.2% male) with a mean (±SD) age of 51.3 ± 15.9 years, median [Q1-Q3] diabetes duration of 30 [16-40] years and mean HbA1c of 60 ± 12 mmol/mol (7.7 ± 1.1%) were included. Sensors were used by 85% of the study population. IAH was present among 78 (16.0%) participants, whereas 86 (17.6%) participants had a history of severe hypoglycaemia. By comparison, the prevalence of IAH equalled 32.5% in 2006, 32.3% in 2010 and 30.1% in 2016 (p for trend <0.001), while the proportion of individuals reporting severe hypoglycaemia equalled 21.2%, 46.7% and 49.8% respectively (p for trend 0.010). Comparing sequential assessments over time, the proportion of individuals with persistent IAH decreased from 74.0% and 63.6% between 2006 and 2016 to 32.5% in 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with type 1 diabetes and high use of sensor technology, the current prevalence of IAH was 16%, about 50% lower as compared to previous years.

Awareness of hypoglycemia and spectral analysis of heart rate variability in type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To investigate the relationship of unawareness of hypoglycemia with spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) and clinical variables in type 1 diabetes (T1D) individuals.

METHODS

Participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (type 1 diabetes) were prospectively assessed for hypoglycemia awareness using the Pedersen-Bjergaard method and were classified as normal hypoglycemia awareness, impaired hypoglycemia awareness and hypoglycemia unawareness. Indices of HRV in frequency domain were evaluated and Ewing tests were used for the diagnosis of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN).

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants with T1D (mean age 26 years, average diabetes duration 13 years, and mean HbA1c 8.4%) were included in this study. The prevalence of hypoglycemia unawareness was 28%. No significant difference was observed on the prevalence of CAN among groups of different hypoglycemia awareness (p = 0.740). On regression analyses, abnormal results of HRV in frequency domain were not associated with unawareness of hypoglycemia. On univariable regression analysis, age, diabetes duration and estimated creatinine clearance were associated with unawareness of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

CAN as assessed by Ewing tests and spectral analysis of HRV is not associated with unawareness of hypoglycemia. There is association of age, diabetes duration and renal deficit with unawareness of hypoglycemia.