Discrimination of ST deviation caused by acute coronary occlusion from normal variants and other abnormal conditions, using computed electrocardiographic imaging based on 12-lead ECG

Criteria for ECG detection of acute myocardial ischemia: Sensitivity versus specificity

BACKGROUND

Criteria for electrocardiographic detection of acute myocardial ischemia recommended by the Consensus Document of ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF consist of two parts: The ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria based on ST elevation (ST↑) in 10 pairs of contiguous leads and the other on ST depression (ST↓) in the same 10 contiguous pairs. Our aim was to assess sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of these criteria-and to seek their possible improvements-in three databases of 12‑lead ECGs.

METHODS

We used (1) STAFF III data of controlled ischemic episodes recorded from 99 patients (pts) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving either left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, right coronary artery (RCA), or left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery. (2) Data from the University of Glasgow for 58 pts with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 58 pts without AMI, as confirmed by MRI. (3) Data from Lund University retrieved from a centralized ECG management system for 100 pts with various pathological ST changes-other than acute coronary occlusion-including ventricular pre-excitation, acute pericarditis, early repolarization syndrome, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left bundle branch block. ST measurements at J-point in ECGs of all 315 pts were obtained automatically on the averaged beat with manual review and the recommended criteria as well as their proposed modifications, were applied. Performance measures included SE, SP, positive predictive value (PPV), and benefit-to-harm ratio (BHR), defined as the ratio of true-positive vs. false-positive detections.

RESULTS

We found that the SE of widely-used STEMI criteria can be indeed improved by the additional ST↓ criteria, but at the cost of markedly decreased SP. In contrast, using ST↑ in only 3 additional contiguous pairs of leads (STEMI13) can boost SE without any loss of SP. In the STAFF III database, SE/SP/PPV were 56/98/97% for the STEMI, 79/79/79% for the STEMI with added ST↓ and 67/97/96% for the STEMI13. In the Glasgow database, corresponding SE/SP/PPV were 43/98/96%, 84/90/89%, and 55/98/97%. For the Lund database, SP was 56% for the STEMI, 24% for the STEMI with ST↓, and 56% for the STEMI13.

CONCLUSION

Current recommended criteria for detecting acute myocardial ischemia, involving ST↓, boost SE of widely-used STEMI criteria, at the cost of SP. To keep the SP high, we propose either the adjustment of threshold for the added ST↓ criteria or a selective use of ST↓ only in contiguous leads V2 and V3 plus ST↑ in lead pairs (aVL, -III) and (III, -aVL).

Chest-lead ST-J amplitudes using arm electrodes as reference instead of the Wilson central terminal in smartphone ECG applications: Influence on ST-elevation myocardial infarction criteria fulfillment

Background

“Smartphone 12‐lead ECG” for the assessment of acute myocardial ischemia has recently been introduced. In the smartphone 12‐lead ECG either the right or the left arm can be used as reference for the chest electrodes instead of the Wilson central terminal. These leads are labeled “CR leads” or “CL leads.” We aimed to compare chest‐lead ST‐J amplitudes, using either CR or CL leads, to those present in the conventional 12‐lead ECG, and to determine sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of STEMI for CR and CL leads.

Methods

Five hundred patients (74 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 66 patients with nonischemic ST deviation and 360 controls) were included. Smartphone 12‐lead ECG chest‐lead ST‐J amplitudes were calculated for both CR and CL leads.

Results

ST‐J amplitudes were 9.1 ± 29 μV larger for CR leads and 7.7 ± 42 μV larger for CL leads than for conventional chest leads (V leads). Sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 95% for CR leads and 81% and 97% for CL leads when fulfillment of STEMI criteria in V leads was used as reference. In ischemic patients who met STEMI criteria in V leads, but not in limb leads, STEMI criteria were met with CR or CL leads in 91%.

Conclusion

By the use of CR or CL leads, smartphone 12‐lead ECG results in slightly lower sensitivity in STEMI detection. Therefore, the adjustment of STEMI criteria may be needed before application in clinical practice.

Diagnostic Accuracy Of The Electrocardiographic Decision Support – Myocardial Ischaemia (EDS-MI) Algorithm In Detection Of Acute Coronary Occlusion

Electrocardiographic Decision Support – Myocardial Ischaemia (EDS-MI) is a graphical decision support for detection and localization of acute transmural ischaemia. A recent study indicated that EDS-MI performs well for detection of acute transmural ischaemia. However, its performance has not been tested in patients with non-ischaemic ST-deviation. We aimed to optimize the diagnostic accuracy of EDS-MI in patients with verified acute coronary occlusion as well as patients with non-ischaemic ST deviation and compare its performance with STEMI criteria. We studied 135 patients with non-ischaemic ST deviation (perimyocarditis, left ventricular hypertrophy, takotsubo cardiomyopathy and early repolarization) and 117 patients with acute coronary occlusion. In 63 ischaemic patients, the extent and location of the ischaemic area (myocardium at risk) was assessed by both cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and EDS-MI. Sensitivity and specificity of ST elevation myocardial infarction criteria were 85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77, 90) and 44% (95% CI 36, 53) respectively. Using EDS-MI, sensitivity and specificity increased to 92% (95% CI 85, 95) and 81% (95% CI 74, 87) respectively (p=0.035 and p<0.001). Agreement was strong (83%) between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and EDS-MI in localization of ischaemia. Mean myocardium at risk was 32% (± 10) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and 33% (± 11) by EDS-MI when the estimated infarcted area according to Selvester QRS scoring was included in myocardium at risk estimation. In conclusion, EDS-MI increases diagnostic accuracy and may serve as an automatic decision support in the early management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The added clinical benefit in a non-selected clinical chest pain population needs to be assessed.

Validation of the vessel-specific leads (VSLs) for detection of acute ischemia on a dataset with non-ischemic ST-segment deviation

BACKGROUND

Existing criteria recommended by ACC/ESC for identifying patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from the 12-lead ECG perform with high specificity (SP) but low sensitivity (SE). In our previous studies, we found that the SE of acute ischemia detection can be markedly improved without any loss of SP by calculating, from the 12-lead ECG, ST deviation in 3 "optimal" vessel-specific leads (VSLs). To further validate the method, we evaluated the SP performance using a dataset with non-ischemic ST-segment changes.

METHODS

12-lead ECGs of 100 patients (75 males/25 females, age range 12-83years, average age 52years) were retrieved from a centralized ECG management system at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. These ECGs were chosen to represent five subgroups with various causes of pathological ST deviation, other than acute coronary occlusion: a) ventricular preexcitation (n=12), b) acute pericarditis (n=26), c) early repolarization syndrome (ERS) (n=14), d) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with "strain" (n=26), and e) left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=22). ECGs with inadequate signal quality, heart rate exceeding 120bpm and/or atrial flutter were not selected for this study population. Both STEMI criteria and VSLs criteria with and without a new augmented LVH-specific derived lead were tested. SP, calculated for each subgroup and combined, was used as the performance measure for comparison.

RESULTS

SP test results for the STEMI criteria vs. the VSLs method without the augmented LVH lead were 100% vs. 92%, 4% vs. 88%, 29% vs. 100%, 100% vs. 77%, and 64% vs. 68% for the five subgroups with preexcitation, pericarditis, ERS, LVH, and LBBB, respectively. For the whole group, SP was 57% for the STEMI criteria and 83% for the VSLs criteria; this improvement was statistically significant (p<0.001). With the augmented LVH lead, SP for the VSLs improved from 77% to 96% for the LVH subgroup and SP for the other subgroups remained unchanged. For the whole study group, SP improved from 83% to 88%.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, we conclude that the VSLs criteria are not only more sensitive in detecting acute ischemia but also more specific in recognizing patients with non-ischemic ST deviation than the existing STEMI criteria. This finding needs to be further corroborated on a larger patient population with AMI prevalence typical of the population presenting to the emergency room.